mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-19 02:34:01 +08:00
intel-iommu: Clean up intel_iommu_unmap_range()
Use unaligned address for domain->max_addr. That algorithm isn't ideal anyway -- we should probably just look at the last iova in the tree. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d794dc9b30
commit
163cc52ccd
@ -3491,7 +3491,7 @@ static int intel_iommu_map_range(struct iommu_domain *domain,
|
||||
if ((iommu_prot & IOMMU_CACHE) && dmar_domain->iommu_snooping)
|
||||
prot |= DMA_PTE_SNP;
|
||||
|
||||
max_addr = (iova & VTD_PAGE_MASK) + VTD_PAGE_ALIGN(size);
|
||||
max_addr = iova + size;
|
||||
if (dmar_domain->max_addr < max_addr) {
|
||||
int min_agaw;
|
||||
u64 end;
|
||||
@ -3518,16 +3518,12 @@ static void intel_iommu_unmap_range(struct iommu_domain *domain,
|
||||
unsigned long iova, size_t size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = domain->priv;
|
||||
dma_addr_t base;
|
||||
|
||||
/* The address might not be aligned */
|
||||
base = iova & VTD_PAGE_MASK;
|
||||
size = VTD_PAGE_ALIGN(size);
|
||||
dma_pte_clear_range(dmar_domain, base >> VTD_PAGE_SHIFT,
|
||||
(base + size - 1) >> VTD_PAGE_SHIFT);
|
||||
dma_pte_clear_range(dmar_domain, iova >> VTD_PAGE_SHIFT,
|
||||
(iova + size - 1) >> VTD_PAGE_SHIFT);
|
||||
|
||||
if (dmar_domain->max_addr == base + size)
|
||||
dmar_domain->max_addr = base;
|
||||
if (dmar_domain->max_addr == iova + size)
|
||||
dmar_domain->max_addr = iova;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static phys_addr_t intel_iommu_iova_to_phys(struct iommu_domain *domain,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user