mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-27 06:34:11 +08:00
drm/i915: Restore interrupt enabling after a reset
At least on i965g and i965gm, performing a device reset clobbers the IER resulting in loss of interrupts thereafter. So, run the irq_postinstall hook to restore them. v2: Ville pointed out that he already attempted to solve this problem by reinstalling the interrupts in intel_reset_finish() (part of the display handling around reset). However, reinstalling the irq clobbers the i915->irq_mask which we need for handling MI_USER_INTERRUPTS, and does so too late to handle any interrupts generated from resuming the rings. The simple solution to both is to pull the interrupt reenabling from afterwards to around the device reset. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190218153106.16768-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
parent
e4106dae0f
commit
156b16f9b9
@ -995,11 +995,17 @@ void i915_reset(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
|
||||
goto error;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (INTEL_INFO(i915)->gpu_reset_clobbers_display)
|
||||
intel_runtime_pm_disable_interrupts(i915);
|
||||
|
||||
if (do_reset(i915, stalled_mask)) {
|
||||
dev_err(i915->drm.dev, "Failed to reset chip\n");
|
||||
goto taint;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (INTEL_INFO(i915)->gpu_reset_clobbers_display)
|
||||
intel_runtime_pm_enable_interrupts(i915);
|
||||
|
||||
intel_overlay_reset(i915);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -3922,9 +3922,6 @@ void intel_finish_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
|
||||
* The display has been reset as well,
|
||||
* so need a full re-initialization.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
intel_runtime_pm_disable_interrupts(dev_priv);
|
||||
intel_runtime_pm_enable_interrupts(dev_priv);
|
||||
|
||||
intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa(dev_priv);
|
||||
intel_modeset_init_hw(dev);
|
||||
intel_init_clock_gating(dev_priv);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user