mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-11-21 00:58:28 +08:00
cfg80211: fix deadlock
When removing an interface with nl80211, cfg80211 will deadlock in the netdev notifier because we're already holding rdev->mtx and try to acquire it again to verify the scan has been done. This bug was introduced by my patch "cfg80211: check for and abort dangling scan requests". To fix this, move the dangling scan request check into wiphy_unregister(). This will not be able to catch all cases right away, but if the scan problem happens with a manual ifdown or so it will be possible to remedy it by removing the module/device. Additionally, add comments about the deadlock scenario. Reported-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Tested-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de> Tested-by: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
96909e9771
commit
0ff6ce7b36
@ -586,9 +586,14 @@ void wiphy_unregister(struct wiphy *wiphy)
|
||||
* get to lock contention here if userspace issues a command
|
||||
* that identified the hardware by wiphy index.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mutex_lock(&rdev->mtx);
|
||||
/* unlock again before freeing */
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&rdev->mtx);
|
||||
cfg80211_lock_rdev(rdev);
|
||||
|
||||
if (WARN_ON(rdev->scan_req)) {
|
||||
rdev->scan_req->aborted = true;
|
||||
___cfg80211_scan_done(rdev);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cfg80211_unlock_rdev(rdev);
|
||||
|
||||
cfg80211_debugfs_rdev_del(rdev);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -605,7 +610,6 @@ void wiphy_unregister(struct wiphy *wiphy)
|
||||
|
||||
flush_work(&rdev->scan_done_wk);
|
||||
cancel_work_sync(&rdev->conn_work);
|
||||
kfree(rdev->scan_req);
|
||||
flush_work(&rdev->event_work);
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(wiphy_unregister);
|
||||
@ -653,6 +657,11 @@ static int cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call(struct notifier_block * nb,
|
||||
|
||||
switch (state) {
|
||||
case NETDEV_REGISTER:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* NB: cannot take rdev->mtx here because this may be
|
||||
* called within code protected by it when interfaces
|
||||
* are added with nl80211.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mutex_init(&wdev->mtx);
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wdev->event_list);
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&wdev->event_lock);
|
||||
@ -730,13 +739,11 @@ static int cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call(struct notifier_block * nb,
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
|
||||
cfg80211_lock_rdev(rdev);
|
||||
|
||||
if (WARN_ON(rdev->scan_req && rdev->scan_req->dev == dev)) {
|
||||
rdev->scan_req->aborted = true;
|
||||
___cfg80211_scan_done(rdev);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* NB: cannot take rdev->mtx here because this may be
|
||||
* called within code protected by it when interfaces
|
||||
* are removed with nl80211.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mutex_lock(&rdev->devlist_mtx);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* It is possible to get NETDEV_UNREGISTER
|
||||
@ -755,7 +762,6 @@ static int cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call(struct notifier_block * nb,
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&rdev->devlist_mtx);
|
||||
cfg80211_unlock_rdev(rdev);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case NETDEV_PRE_UP:
|
||||
if (!(wdev->wiphy->interface_modes & BIT(wdev->iftype)))
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user