mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-20 19:23:57 +08:00
btrfs: allow dedupe of same inode
clone() supports cloning within an inode so extent-same can do the same now. This patch fixes up the locking in extent-same to know about the single-inode case. In addition to that, we add a check for overlapping ranges, which clone does not allow. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f441460202
commit
0efa9f48c7
@ -2991,27 +2991,61 @@ static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 olen,
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
u64 len = olen;
|
||||
struct cmp_pages cmp;
|
||||
int same_inode = 0;
|
||||
u64 same_lock_start = 0;
|
||||
u64 same_lock_len = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* btrfs_clone() can't handle extents in the same file
|
||||
* yet. Once that works, we can drop this check and replace it
|
||||
* with a check for the same inode, but overlapping extents.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (src == dst)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
same_inode = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (len == 0)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
btrfs_double_inode_lock(src, dst);
|
||||
if (same_inode) {
|
||||
mutex_lock(&src->i_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = extent_same_check_offsets(src, loff, &len, olen);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
ret = extent_same_check_offsets(src, loff, &len, olen);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = extent_same_check_offsets(dst, dst_loff, &len, olen);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Single inode case wants the same checks, except we
|
||||
* don't want our length pushed out past i_size as
|
||||
* comparing that data range makes no sense.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* extent_same_check_offsets() will do this for an
|
||||
* unaligned length at i_size, so catch it here and
|
||||
* reject the request.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This effectively means we require aligned extents
|
||||
* for the single-inode case, whereas the other cases
|
||||
* allow an unaligned length so long as it ends at
|
||||
* i_size.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (len != olen) {
|
||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check for overlapping ranges */
|
||||
if (dst_loff + len > loff && dst_loff < loff + len) {
|
||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
same_lock_start = min_t(u64, loff, dst_loff);
|
||||
same_lock_len = max_t(u64, loff, dst_loff) + len - same_lock_start;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
btrfs_double_inode_lock(src, dst);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = extent_same_check_offsets(src, loff, &len, olen);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = extent_same_check_offsets(dst, dst_loff, &len, olen);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* don't make the dst file partly checksummed */
|
||||
if ((BTRFS_I(src)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM) !=
|
||||
@ -3024,18 +3058,28 @@ static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 olen,
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
btrfs_double_extent_lock(src, loff, dst, dst_loff, len);
|
||||
if (same_inode)
|
||||
lock_extent_range(src, same_lock_start, same_lock_len);
|
||||
else
|
||||
btrfs_double_extent_lock(src, loff, dst, dst_loff, len);
|
||||
|
||||
/* pass original length for comparison so we stay within i_size */
|
||||
ret = btrfs_cmp_data(src, loff, dst, dst_loff, olen, &cmp);
|
||||
if (ret == 0)
|
||||
ret = btrfs_clone(src, dst, loff, olen, len, dst_loff);
|
||||
|
||||
btrfs_double_extent_unlock(src, loff, dst, dst_loff, len);
|
||||
if (same_inode)
|
||||
unlock_extent(&BTRFS_I(src)->io_tree, same_lock_start,
|
||||
same_lock_start + same_lock_len - 1);
|
||||
else
|
||||
btrfs_double_extent_unlock(src, loff, dst, dst_loff, len);
|
||||
|
||||
btrfs_cmp_data_free(&cmp);
|
||||
out_unlock:
|
||||
btrfs_double_inode_unlock(src, dst);
|
||||
if (same_inode)
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&src->i_mutex);
|
||||
else
|
||||
btrfs_double_inode_unlock(src, dst);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user