mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2025-01-27 08:05:27 +08:00
x86-64, rwsem: Avoid store forwarding hazard in __downgrade_write
The Intel Architecture Optimization Reference Manual states that a short load that follows a long store to the same object will suffer a store forwading penalty, particularly if the two accesses use different addresses. Trivially, a long load that follows a short store will also suffer a penalty. __downgrade_write() in rwsem incurs both penalties: the increment operation will not be able to reuse a recently-loaded rwsem value, and its result will not be reused by any recently-following rwsem operation. A comment in the code states that this is because 64-bit immediates are special and expensive; but while they are slightly special (only a single instruction allows them), they aren't expensive: a test shows that two loops, one loading a 32-bit immediate and one loading a 64-bit immediate, both take 1.5 cycles per iteration. Fix this by changing __downgrade_write to use the same add instruction on i386 and on x86_64, so that it uses the same operand size as all the other rwsem functions. Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> LKML-Reference: <1266049992-17419-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1838ef1d78
commit
0d1622d7f5
@ -232,34 +232,19 @@ static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
|
||||
# if RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS != -0x100000000
|
||||
# error "This code assumes RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS == -2^32"
|
||||
# endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* 64-bit immediates are special and expensive, and not needed here */
|
||||
asm volatile("# beginning __downgrade_write\n\t"
|
||||
LOCK_PREFIX "incl 4(%1)\n\t"
|
||||
/* transitions 0xZZZZZZZZ00000001 -> 0xYYYYYYYY00000001 */
|
||||
" jns 1f\n\t"
|
||||
" call call_rwsem_downgrade_wake\n"
|
||||
"1:\n\t"
|
||||
"# ending __downgrade_write\n"
|
||||
: "+m" (sem->count)
|
||||
: "a" (sem)
|
||||
: "memory", "cc");
|
||||
#else
|
||||
asm volatile("# beginning __downgrade_write\n\t"
|
||||
LOCK_PREFIX _ASM_ADD "%2,(%1)\n\t"
|
||||
/* transitions 0xZZZZ0001 -> 0xYYYY0001 */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* transitions 0xZZZZ0001 -> 0xYYYY0001 (i386)
|
||||
* 0xZZZZZZZZ00000001 -> 0xYYYYYYYY00000001 (x86_64)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
" jns 1f\n\t"
|
||||
" call call_rwsem_downgrade_wake\n"
|
||||
"1:\n\t"
|
||||
"# ending __downgrade_write\n"
|
||||
: "+m" (sem->count)
|
||||
: "a" (sem), "i" (-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
|
||||
: "a" (sem), "er" (-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
|
||||
: "memory", "cc");
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user