mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-11-24 18:44:07 +08:00
net/tls: fix no wakeup on partial reads
When tls_sw_recvmsg() partially copies a record it pops that record from ctx->recv_pkt and places it on rx_list. Next iteration of tls_sw_recvmsg() reads from rx_list via process_rx_list() before it enters the decryption loop. If there is no more records to be read tls_wait_data() will put the process on the wait queue and got to sleep. This is incorrect, because some data was already copied in process_rx_list(). In case of RPC connections process may never get woken up, because peer also simply blocks in read(). I think this may also fix a similar issue when BPF is at play, because after __tcp_bpf_recvmsg() returns some data we subtract it from len and use continue to restart the loop, but len could have just reached 0, so again we'd sleep unnecessarily. That's added by: commitd3b18ad31f
("tls: add bpf support to sk_msg handling") Fixes:692d7b5d1f
("tls: Fix recvmsg() to be able to peek across multiple records") Reported-by: David Beckett <david.beckett@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Dirk van der Merwe <dirk.vandermerwe@netronome.com> Tested-by: David Beckett <david.beckett@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7718a855cd
commit
04b25a5411
@ -1719,7 +1719,7 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
|
||||
len = len - copied;
|
||||
timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
|
||||
|
||||
do {
|
||||
while (len && (decrypted + copied < target || ctx->recv_pkt)) {
|
||||
bool retain_skb = false;
|
||||
bool zc = false;
|
||||
int to_decrypt;
|
||||
@ -1850,11 +1850,7 @@ pick_next_record:
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If we have a new message from strparser, continue now. */
|
||||
if (decrypted + copied >= target && !ctx->recv_pkt)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
} while (len);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
recv_end:
|
||||
if (num_async) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user