2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-25 05:34:00 +08:00
linux-next/tools/perf/util/branch.h

89 lines
2.0 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

#ifndef _PERF_BRANCH_H
#define _PERF_BRANCH_H 1
/*
* The linux/stddef.h isn't need here, but is needed for __always_inline used
* in files included from uapi/linux/perf_event.h such as
* /usr/include/linux/swab.h and /usr/include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h,
* detected in at least musl libc, used in Alpine Linux. -acme
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <linux/compiler.h>
#include <linux/stddef.h>
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
perf tools: Add hw_idx in struct branch_stack The low level index of raw branch records for the most recent branch can be recorded in a sample with PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX branch_sample_type. Extend struct branch_stack to support it. However, if the PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX is not applied, only nr and entries[] will be output by kernel. The pointer of entries[] could be wrong, since the output format is different with new struct branch_stack. Add a variable no_hw_idx in struct perf_sample to indicate whether the hw_idx is output. Add get_branch_entry() to return corresponding pointer of entries[0]. To make dummy branch sample consistent as new branch sample, add hw_idx in struct dummy_branch_stack for cs-etm and intel-pt. Apply the new struct branch_stack for synthetic events as well. Extend test case sample-parsing to support new struct branch_stack. Committer notes: Renamed get_branch_entries() to perf_sample__branch_entries() to have proper namespacing and pave the way for this to be moved to libperf, eventually. Add 'static' to that inline as it is in a header. Add 'hw_idx' to 'struct dummy_branch_stack' in cs-etm.c to fix the build on arm64. Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Pavel Gerasimov <pavel.gerasimov@intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Vitaly Slobodskoy <vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200228163011.19358-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-02-29 00:30:00 +08:00
#include "event.h"
struct branch_flags {
perf callchain: Stitch LBR call stack In LBR call stack mode, the depth of reconstructed LBR call stack limits to the number of LBR registers. For example, on skylake, the depth of reconstructed LBR call stack is always <= 32. # To display the perf.data header info, please use # --header/--header-only options. # # # Total Lost Samples: 0 # # Samples: 6K of event 'cycles' # Event count (approx.): 6487119731 # # Children Self Command Shared Object Symbol # ........ ........ ............... .................. # ................................ 99.97% 99.97% tchain_edit tchain_edit [.] f43 | --99.64%--f11 f12 f13 f14 f15 f16 f17 f18 f19 f20 f21 f22 f23 f24 f25 f26 f27 f28 f29 f30 f31 f32 f33 f34 f35 f36 f37 f38 f39 f40 f41 f42 f43 For a call stack which is deeper than LBR limit, HW will overwrite the LBR register with oldest branch. Only partial call stacks can be reconstructed. However, the overwritten LBRs may still be retrieved from previous sample. At that moment, HW hasn't overwritten the LBR registers yet. Perf tools can stitch those overwritten LBRs on current call stacks to get a more complete call stack. To determine if LBRs can be stitched, perf tools need to compare current sample with previous sample. - They should have identical LBR records (Same from, to and flags values, and the same physical index of LBR registers). - The searching starts from the base-of-stack of current sample. Once perf determines to stitch the previous LBRs, the corresponding LBR cursor nodes will be copied to 'lists'. The 'lists' is to track the LBR cursor nodes which are going to be stitched. When the stitching is over, the nodes will not be freed immediately. They will be moved to 'free_lists'. Next stitching may reuse the space. Both 'lists' and 'free_lists' will be freed when all samples are processed. Committer notes: Fix the intel-pt.c initialization of the union with 'struct branch_flags', that breaks the build with its unnamed union on older gcc versions. Uninline thread__free_stitch_list(), as it grew big and started dragging includes to thread.h, so move it to thread.c where what it needs in terms of headers are already there. This fixes the build in several systems such as debian:experimental when cross building to the MIPS32 architecture, i.e. in the other cases what was needed was being included by sheer luck. In file included from builtin-sched.c:11: util/thread.h: In function 'thread__free_stitch_list': util/thread.h:169:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'free' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 169 | free(pos); | ^~~~ util/thread.h:169:3: error: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'free' [-Werror] util/thread.h:19:1: note: include '<stdlib.h>' or provide a declaration of 'free' 18 | #include "callchain.h" +++ |+#include <stdlib.h> 19 | util/thread.h:174:3: error: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'free' [-Werror] 174 | free(pos); | ^~~~ util/thread.h:174:3: note: include '<stdlib.h>' or provide a declaration of 'free' Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Pavel Gerasimov <pavel.gerasimov@intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Vitaly Slobodskoy <vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200319202517.23423-13-kan.liang@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-03-20 04:25:12 +08:00
union {
u64 value;
struct {
u64 mispred:1;
u64 predicted:1;
u64 in_tx:1;
u64 abort:1;
u64 cycles:16;
u64 type:4;
u64 reserved:40;
};
};
};
struct branch_info {
struct addr_map_symbol from;
struct addr_map_symbol to;
struct branch_flags flags;
char *srcline_from;
char *srcline_to;
};
struct branch_entry {
u64 from;
u64 to;
struct branch_flags flags;
};
struct branch_stack {
u64 nr;
perf tools: Add hw_idx in struct branch_stack The low level index of raw branch records for the most recent branch can be recorded in a sample with PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX branch_sample_type. Extend struct branch_stack to support it. However, if the PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX is not applied, only nr and entries[] will be output by kernel. The pointer of entries[] could be wrong, since the output format is different with new struct branch_stack. Add a variable no_hw_idx in struct perf_sample to indicate whether the hw_idx is output. Add get_branch_entry() to return corresponding pointer of entries[0]. To make dummy branch sample consistent as new branch sample, add hw_idx in struct dummy_branch_stack for cs-etm and intel-pt. Apply the new struct branch_stack for synthetic events as well. Extend test case sample-parsing to support new struct branch_stack. Committer notes: Renamed get_branch_entries() to perf_sample__branch_entries() to have proper namespacing and pave the way for this to be moved to libperf, eventually. Add 'static' to that inline as it is in a header. Add 'hw_idx' to 'struct dummy_branch_stack' in cs-etm.c to fix the build on arm64. Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Pavel Gerasimov <pavel.gerasimov@intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Vitaly Slobodskoy <vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200228163011.19358-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-02-29 00:30:00 +08:00
u64 hw_idx;
perf branch: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle and audited _manually_. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200520191613.GA26869@embeddedor Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-05-21 03:16:13 +08:00
struct branch_entry entries[];
};
perf tools: Add hw_idx in struct branch_stack The low level index of raw branch records for the most recent branch can be recorded in a sample with PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX branch_sample_type. Extend struct branch_stack to support it. However, if the PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX is not applied, only nr and entries[] will be output by kernel. The pointer of entries[] could be wrong, since the output format is different with new struct branch_stack. Add a variable no_hw_idx in struct perf_sample to indicate whether the hw_idx is output. Add get_branch_entry() to return corresponding pointer of entries[0]. To make dummy branch sample consistent as new branch sample, add hw_idx in struct dummy_branch_stack for cs-etm and intel-pt. Apply the new struct branch_stack for synthetic events as well. Extend test case sample-parsing to support new struct branch_stack. Committer notes: Renamed get_branch_entries() to perf_sample__branch_entries() to have proper namespacing and pave the way for this to be moved to libperf, eventually. Add 'static' to that inline as it is in a header. Add 'hw_idx' to 'struct dummy_branch_stack' in cs-etm.c to fix the build on arm64. Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Pavel Gerasimov <pavel.gerasimov@intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Vitaly Slobodskoy <vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200228163011.19358-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-02-29 00:30:00 +08:00
/*
* The hw_idx is only available when PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX is applied.
* Otherwise, the output format of a sample with branch stack is
* struct branch_stack {
* u64 nr;
* struct branch_entry entries[0];
* }
* Check whether the hw_idx is available,
* and return the corresponding pointer of entries[0].
*/
static inline struct branch_entry *perf_sample__branch_entries(struct perf_sample *sample)
{
u64 *entry = (u64 *)sample->branch_stack;
entry++;
if (sample->no_hw_idx)
return (struct branch_entry *)entry;
return (struct branch_entry *)(++entry);
}
struct branch_type_stat {
perf report: Tag branch type/flag on "to" and tag cycles on "from" Current --branch-history LBR annotation displays confused data. For example, each cycles report is duplicated on both "from" and "to" entries. For example: perf report --branch-history --no-children --stdio --2.32%--main div.c:39 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M predicted:49.7% cycles:1) main div.c:44 (predicted:49.7% cycles:1) main div.c:42 (RET CROSS_2M cycles:2) compute_flag div.c:28 (cycles:2) compute_flag div.c:27 (RET CROSS_2M cycles:1) rand rand.c:28 (cycles:1) rand rand.c:28 (RET CROSS_2M cycles:1) __random random.c:298 (cycles:1) __random random.c:297 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M cycles:1) __random random.c:295 (cycles:1) __random random.c:295 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M cycles:1) __random random.c:295 (cycles:1) __random random.c:295 (RET CROSS_2M cycles:9) The cycles should be tagged only on the "from". It's for the code block that ends with "from", not for "to". Another issue is the "predicted:49.7%" is duplicated too (tag on both "from" and "to"). This patch tags the branch type/flag on "to" and tag the cycles on "from". For example: --2.32%--main div.c:39 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M predicted:49.7%) main div.c:44 (cycles:1) main div.c:42 (RET CROSS_2M) compute_flag div.c:28 (cycles:2) compute_flag div.c:27 (RET CROSS_2M) rand rand.c:28 (cycles:1) rand rand.c:28 (RET CROSS_2M) __random random.c:298 (cycles:1) __random random.c:297 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M) __random random.c:295 (cycles:1) __random random.c:295 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M) __random random.c:295 (cycles:1) __random random.c:295 (RET CROSS_2M) | --2.23%--__random_r random_r.c:392 (cycles:9) In this example, The "main div.c:39 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M predicted:49.7%)" is "to" of branch and "main div.c:44 (cycles:1)" is "from" of branch. It should be easier for understanding than before. Signed-off-by: Yao Jin <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1500894547-18411-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2017-07-24 19:09:07 +08:00
bool branch_to;
u64 counts[PERF_BR_MAX];
u64 cond_fwd;
u64 cond_bwd;
u64 cross_4k;
u64 cross_2m;
};
void branch_type_count(struct branch_type_stat *st, struct branch_flags *flags,
u64 from, u64 to);
const char *branch_type_name(int type);
void branch_type_stat_display(FILE *fp, struct branch_type_stat *st);
int branch_type_str(struct branch_type_stat *st, char *bf, int bfsize);
#endif /* _PERF_BRANCH_H */