2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-23 20:53:53 +08:00
linux-next/drivers/net/veth.c

523 lines
12 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* drivers/net/veth.c
*
* Copyright (C) 2007 OpenVZ http://openvz.org, SWsoft Inc
*
* Author: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
* Ethtool interface from: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
*
*/
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-24 16:04:11 +08:00
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/ethtool.h>
#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
#include <linux/u64_stats_sync.h>
#include <net/rtnetlink.h>
#include <net/dst.h>
#include <net/xfrm.h>
#include <linux/veth.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#define DRV_NAME "veth"
#define DRV_VERSION "1.0"
#define MIN_MTU 68 /* Min L3 MTU */
#define MAX_MTU 65535 /* Max L3 MTU (arbitrary) */
struct pcpu_vstats {
u64 packets;
u64 bytes;
struct u64_stats_sync syncp;
};
struct veth_priv {
veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one commit 2681128f0ced8a (veth: extend device features) added a NULL deref in veth_stats_one(), as veth_get_stats64() was not testing if the peer device was setup or not. At init time, we call dev_get_stats() before veth pair is fully setup. [ 178.854758] [<ffffffffa00f5677>] veth_get_stats64+0x47/0x70 [veth] [ 178.861013] [<ffffffff814f0a2d>] dev_get_stats+0x6d/0x130 [ 178.866486] [<ffffffff81504efc>] rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x47c/0x930 [ 178.872299] [<ffffffff81505b93>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x83/0x100 [ 178.877678] [<ffffffff81505cc6>] rtnl_configure_link+0x76/0xa0 [ 178.883580] [<ffffffffa00f52fa>] veth_newlink+0x16a/0x350 [veth] [ 178.889654] [<ffffffff815061cc>] rtnl_newlink+0x4dc/0x5e0 [ 178.895128] [<ffffffff81505e1e>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x12e/0x5e0 [ 178.900769] [<ffffffff8150587d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x11d/0x310 [ 178.906669] [<ffffffff81505760>] ? __rtnl_unlock+0x20/0x20 [ 178.912225] [<ffffffff81521f89>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xd0 [ 178.917779] [<ffffffff81502d55>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x25/0x40 [ 178.923159] [<ffffffff815218d1>] netlink_unicast+0x1b1/0x230 [ 178.928887] [<ffffffff81521c4e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fe/0x3b0 [ 178.934615] [<ffffffff814dbe22>] sock_sendmsg+0xd2/0xf0 So we must check if peer was setup in veth_get_stats64() As pointed out by Ben Hutchings, priv->peer is missing proper synchronization. Adding RCU protection is a safe and well documented way to make sure we don't access about to be freed or already freed data. Reported-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-01-04 23:42:40 +08:00
struct net_device __rcu *peer;
atomic64_t dropped;
};
/*
* ethtool interface
*/
static struct {
const char string[ETH_GSTRING_LEN];
} ethtool_stats_keys[] = {
{ "peer_ifindex" },
};
static int veth_get_settings(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd)
{
cmd->supported = 0;
cmd->advertising = 0;
ethtool_cmd_speed_set(cmd, SPEED_10000);
cmd->duplex = DUPLEX_FULL;
cmd->port = PORT_TP;
cmd->phy_address = 0;
cmd->transceiver = XCVR_INTERNAL;
cmd->autoneg = AUTONEG_DISABLE;
cmd->maxtxpkt = 0;
cmd->maxrxpkt = 0;
return 0;
}
static void veth_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_drvinfo *info)
{
strlcpy(info->driver, DRV_NAME, sizeof(info->driver));
strlcpy(info->version, DRV_VERSION, sizeof(info->version));
}
static void veth_get_strings(struct net_device *dev, u32 stringset, u8 *buf)
{
switch(stringset) {
case ETH_SS_STATS:
memcpy(buf, &ethtool_stats_keys, sizeof(ethtool_stats_keys));
break;
}
}
static int veth_get_sset_count(struct net_device *dev, int sset)
{
switch (sset) {
case ETH_SS_STATS:
return ARRAY_SIZE(ethtool_stats_keys);
default:
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
}
static void veth_get_ethtool_stats(struct net_device *dev,
struct ethtool_stats *stats, u64 *data)
{
veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one commit 2681128f0ced8a (veth: extend device features) added a NULL deref in veth_stats_one(), as veth_get_stats64() was not testing if the peer device was setup or not. At init time, we call dev_get_stats() before veth pair is fully setup. [ 178.854758] [<ffffffffa00f5677>] veth_get_stats64+0x47/0x70 [veth] [ 178.861013] [<ffffffff814f0a2d>] dev_get_stats+0x6d/0x130 [ 178.866486] [<ffffffff81504efc>] rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x47c/0x930 [ 178.872299] [<ffffffff81505b93>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x83/0x100 [ 178.877678] [<ffffffff81505cc6>] rtnl_configure_link+0x76/0xa0 [ 178.883580] [<ffffffffa00f52fa>] veth_newlink+0x16a/0x350 [veth] [ 178.889654] [<ffffffff815061cc>] rtnl_newlink+0x4dc/0x5e0 [ 178.895128] [<ffffffff81505e1e>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x12e/0x5e0 [ 178.900769] [<ffffffff8150587d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x11d/0x310 [ 178.906669] [<ffffffff81505760>] ? __rtnl_unlock+0x20/0x20 [ 178.912225] [<ffffffff81521f89>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xd0 [ 178.917779] [<ffffffff81502d55>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x25/0x40 [ 178.923159] [<ffffffff815218d1>] netlink_unicast+0x1b1/0x230 [ 178.928887] [<ffffffff81521c4e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fe/0x3b0 [ 178.934615] [<ffffffff814dbe22>] sock_sendmsg+0xd2/0xf0 So we must check if peer was setup in veth_get_stats64() As pointed out by Ben Hutchings, priv->peer is missing proper synchronization. Adding RCU protection is a safe and well documented way to make sure we don't access about to be freed or already freed data. Reported-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-01-04 23:42:40 +08:00
struct veth_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
struct net_device *peer = rtnl_dereference(priv->peer);
veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one commit 2681128f0ced8a (veth: extend device features) added a NULL deref in veth_stats_one(), as veth_get_stats64() was not testing if the peer device was setup or not. At init time, we call dev_get_stats() before veth pair is fully setup. [ 178.854758] [<ffffffffa00f5677>] veth_get_stats64+0x47/0x70 [veth] [ 178.861013] [<ffffffff814f0a2d>] dev_get_stats+0x6d/0x130 [ 178.866486] [<ffffffff81504efc>] rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x47c/0x930 [ 178.872299] [<ffffffff81505b93>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x83/0x100 [ 178.877678] [<ffffffff81505cc6>] rtnl_configure_link+0x76/0xa0 [ 178.883580] [<ffffffffa00f52fa>] veth_newlink+0x16a/0x350 [veth] [ 178.889654] [<ffffffff815061cc>] rtnl_newlink+0x4dc/0x5e0 [ 178.895128] [<ffffffff81505e1e>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x12e/0x5e0 [ 178.900769] [<ffffffff8150587d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x11d/0x310 [ 178.906669] [<ffffffff81505760>] ? __rtnl_unlock+0x20/0x20 [ 178.912225] [<ffffffff81521f89>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xd0 [ 178.917779] [<ffffffff81502d55>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x25/0x40 [ 178.923159] [<ffffffff815218d1>] netlink_unicast+0x1b1/0x230 [ 178.928887] [<ffffffff81521c4e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fe/0x3b0 [ 178.934615] [<ffffffff814dbe22>] sock_sendmsg+0xd2/0xf0 So we must check if peer was setup in veth_get_stats64() As pointed out by Ben Hutchings, priv->peer is missing proper synchronization. Adding RCU protection is a safe and well documented way to make sure we don't access about to be freed or already freed data. Reported-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-01-04 23:42:40 +08:00
data[0] = peer ? peer->ifindex : 0;
}
static const struct ethtool_ops veth_ethtool_ops = {
.get_settings = veth_get_settings,
.get_drvinfo = veth_get_drvinfo,
.get_link = ethtool_op_get_link,
.get_strings = veth_get_strings,
.get_sset_count = veth_get_sset_count,
.get_ethtool_stats = veth_get_ethtool_stats,
};
static netdev_tx_t veth_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
{
struct veth_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one commit 2681128f0ced8a (veth: extend device features) added a NULL deref in veth_stats_one(), as veth_get_stats64() was not testing if the peer device was setup or not. At init time, we call dev_get_stats() before veth pair is fully setup. [ 178.854758] [<ffffffffa00f5677>] veth_get_stats64+0x47/0x70 [veth] [ 178.861013] [<ffffffff814f0a2d>] dev_get_stats+0x6d/0x130 [ 178.866486] [<ffffffff81504efc>] rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x47c/0x930 [ 178.872299] [<ffffffff81505b93>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x83/0x100 [ 178.877678] [<ffffffff81505cc6>] rtnl_configure_link+0x76/0xa0 [ 178.883580] [<ffffffffa00f52fa>] veth_newlink+0x16a/0x350 [veth] [ 178.889654] [<ffffffff815061cc>] rtnl_newlink+0x4dc/0x5e0 [ 178.895128] [<ffffffff81505e1e>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x12e/0x5e0 [ 178.900769] [<ffffffff8150587d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x11d/0x310 [ 178.906669] [<ffffffff81505760>] ? __rtnl_unlock+0x20/0x20 [ 178.912225] [<ffffffff81521f89>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xd0 [ 178.917779] [<ffffffff81502d55>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x25/0x40 [ 178.923159] [<ffffffff815218d1>] netlink_unicast+0x1b1/0x230 [ 178.928887] [<ffffffff81521c4e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fe/0x3b0 [ 178.934615] [<ffffffff814dbe22>] sock_sendmsg+0xd2/0xf0 So we must check if peer was setup in veth_get_stats64() As pointed out by Ben Hutchings, priv->peer is missing proper synchronization. Adding RCU protection is a safe and well documented way to make sure we don't access about to be freed or already freed data. Reported-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-01-04 23:42:40 +08:00
struct net_device *rcv;
int length = skb->len;
veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one commit 2681128f0ced8a (veth: extend device features) added a NULL deref in veth_stats_one(), as veth_get_stats64() was not testing if the peer device was setup or not. At init time, we call dev_get_stats() before veth pair is fully setup. [ 178.854758] [<ffffffffa00f5677>] veth_get_stats64+0x47/0x70 [veth] [ 178.861013] [<ffffffff814f0a2d>] dev_get_stats+0x6d/0x130 [ 178.866486] [<ffffffff81504efc>] rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x47c/0x930 [ 178.872299] [<ffffffff81505b93>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x83/0x100 [ 178.877678] [<ffffffff81505cc6>] rtnl_configure_link+0x76/0xa0 [ 178.883580] [<ffffffffa00f52fa>] veth_newlink+0x16a/0x350 [veth] [ 178.889654] [<ffffffff815061cc>] rtnl_newlink+0x4dc/0x5e0 [ 178.895128] [<ffffffff81505e1e>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x12e/0x5e0 [ 178.900769] [<ffffffff8150587d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x11d/0x310 [ 178.906669] [<ffffffff81505760>] ? __rtnl_unlock+0x20/0x20 [ 178.912225] [<ffffffff81521f89>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xd0 [ 178.917779] [<ffffffff81502d55>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x25/0x40 [ 178.923159] [<ffffffff815218d1>] netlink_unicast+0x1b1/0x230 [ 178.928887] [<ffffffff81521c4e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fe/0x3b0 [ 178.934615] [<ffffffff814dbe22>] sock_sendmsg+0xd2/0xf0 So we must check if peer was setup in veth_get_stats64() As pointed out by Ben Hutchings, priv->peer is missing proper synchronization. Adding RCU protection is a safe and well documented way to make sure we don't access about to be freed or already freed data. Reported-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-01-04 23:42:40 +08:00
rcu_read_lock();
rcv = rcu_dereference(priv->peer);
if (unlikely(!rcv)) {
kfree_skb(skb);
goto drop;
}
if (likely(dev_forward_skb(rcv, skb) == NET_RX_SUCCESS)) {
struct pcpu_vstats *stats = this_cpu_ptr(dev->vstats);
u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp);
stats->bytes += length;
stats->packets++;
u64_stats_update_end(&stats->syncp);
} else {
veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one commit 2681128f0ced8a (veth: extend device features) added a NULL deref in veth_stats_one(), as veth_get_stats64() was not testing if the peer device was setup or not. At init time, we call dev_get_stats() before veth pair is fully setup. [ 178.854758] [<ffffffffa00f5677>] veth_get_stats64+0x47/0x70 [veth] [ 178.861013] [<ffffffff814f0a2d>] dev_get_stats+0x6d/0x130 [ 178.866486] [<ffffffff81504efc>] rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x47c/0x930 [ 178.872299] [<ffffffff81505b93>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x83/0x100 [ 178.877678] [<ffffffff81505cc6>] rtnl_configure_link+0x76/0xa0 [ 178.883580] [<ffffffffa00f52fa>] veth_newlink+0x16a/0x350 [veth] [ 178.889654] [<ffffffff815061cc>] rtnl_newlink+0x4dc/0x5e0 [ 178.895128] [<ffffffff81505e1e>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x12e/0x5e0 [ 178.900769] [<ffffffff8150587d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x11d/0x310 [ 178.906669] [<ffffffff81505760>] ? __rtnl_unlock+0x20/0x20 [ 178.912225] [<ffffffff81521f89>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xd0 [ 178.917779] [<ffffffff81502d55>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x25/0x40 [ 178.923159] [<ffffffff815218d1>] netlink_unicast+0x1b1/0x230 [ 178.928887] [<ffffffff81521c4e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fe/0x3b0 [ 178.934615] [<ffffffff814dbe22>] sock_sendmsg+0xd2/0xf0 So we must check if peer was setup in veth_get_stats64() As pointed out by Ben Hutchings, priv->peer is missing proper synchronization. Adding RCU protection is a safe and well documented way to make sure we don't access about to be freed or already freed data. Reported-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-01-04 23:42:40 +08:00
drop:
atomic64_inc(&priv->dropped);
}
veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one commit 2681128f0ced8a (veth: extend device features) added a NULL deref in veth_stats_one(), as veth_get_stats64() was not testing if the peer device was setup or not. At init time, we call dev_get_stats() before veth pair is fully setup. [ 178.854758] [<ffffffffa00f5677>] veth_get_stats64+0x47/0x70 [veth] [ 178.861013] [<ffffffff814f0a2d>] dev_get_stats+0x6d/0x130 [ 178.866486] [<ffffffff81504efc>] rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x47c/0x930 [ 178.872299] [<ffffffff81505b93>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x83/0x100 [ 178.877678] [<ffffffff81505cc6>] rtnl_configure_link+0x76/0xa0 [ 178.883580] [<ffffffffa00f52fa>] veth_newlink+0x16a/0x350 [veth] [ 178.889654] [<ffffffff815061cc>] rtnl_newlink+0x4dc/0x5e0 [ 178.895128] [<ffffffff81505e1e>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x12e/0x5e0 [ 178.900769] [<ffffffff8150587d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x11d/0x310 [ 178.906669] [<ffffffff81505760>] ? __rtnl_unlock+0x20/0x20 [ 178.912225] [<ffffffff81521f89>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xd0 [ 178.917779] [<ffffffff81502d55>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x25/0x40 [ 178.923159] [<ffffffff815218d1>] netlink_unicast+0x1b1/0x230 [ 178.928887] [<ffffffff81521c4e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fe/0x3b0 [ 178.934615] [<ffffffff814dbe22>] sock_sendmsg+0xd2/0xf0 So we must check if peer was setup in veth_get_stats64() As pointed out by Ben Hutchings, priv->peer is missing proper synchronization. Adding RCU protection is a safe and well documented way to make sure we don't access about to be freed or already freed data. Reported-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-01-04 23:42:40 +08:00
rcu_read_unlock();
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
}
/*
* general routines
*/
static u64 veth_stats_one(struct pcpu_vstats *result, struct net_device *dev)
{
struct veth_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
int cpu;
result->packets = 0;
result->bytes = 0;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct pcpu_vstats *stats = per_cpu_ptr(dev->vstats, cpu);
u64 packets, bytes;
unsigned int start;
do {
start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&stats->syncp);
packets = stats->packets;
bytes = stats->bytes;
} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&stats->syncp, start));
result->packets += packets;
result->bytes += bytes;
}
return atomic64_read(&priv->dropped);
}
static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *veth_get_stats64(struct net_device *dev,
struct rtnl_link_stats64 *tot)
{
struct veth_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one commit 2681128f0ced8a (veth: extend device features) added a NULL deref in veth_stats_one(), as veth_get_stats64() was not testing if the peer device was setup or not. At init time, we call dev_get_stats() before veth pair is fully setup. [ 178.854758] [<ffffffffa00f5677>] veth_get_stats64+0x47/0x70 [veth] [ 178.861013] [<ffffffff814f0a2d>] dev_get_stats+0x6d/0x130 [ 178.866486] [<ffffffff81504efc>] rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x47c/0x930 [ 178.872299] [<ffffffff81505b93>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x83/0x100 [ 178.877678] [<ffffffff81505cc6>] rtnl_configure_link+0x76/0xa0 [ 178.883580] [<ffffffffa00f52fa>] veth_newlink+0x16a/0x350 [veth] [ 178.889654] [<ffffffff815061cc>] rtnl_newlink+0x4dc/0x5e0 [ 178.895128] [<ffffffff81505e1e>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x12e/0x5e0 [ 178.900769] [<ffffffff8150587d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x11d/0x310 [ 178.906669] [<ffffffff81505760>] ? __rtnl_unlock+0x20/0x20 [ 178.912225] [<ffffffff81521f89>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xd0 [ 178.917779] [<ffffffff81502d55>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x25/0x40 [ 178.923159] [<ffffffff815218d1>] netlink_unicast+0x1b1/0x230 [ 178.928887] [<ffffffff81521c4e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fe/0x3b0 [ 178.934615] [<ffffffff814dbe22>] sock_sendmsg+0xd2/0xf0 So we must check if peer was setup in veth_get_stats64() As pointed out by Ben Hutchings, priv->peer is missing proper synchronization. Adding RCU protection is a safe and well documented way to make sure we don't access about to be freed or already freed data. Reported-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-01-04 23:42:40 +08:00
struct net_device *peer;
struct pcpu_vstats one;
tot->tx_dropped = veth_stats_one(&one, dev);
tot->tx_bytes = one.bytes;
tot->tx_packets = one.packets;
veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one commit 2681128f0ced8a (veth: extend device features) added a NULL deref in veth_stats_one(), as veth_get_stats64() was not testing if the peer device was setup or not. At init time, we call dev_get_stats() before veth pair is fully setup. [ 178.854758] [<ffffffffa00f5677>] veth_get_stats64+0x47/0x70 [veth] [ 178.861013] [<ffffffff814f0a2d>] dev_get_stats+0x6d/0x130 [ 178.866486] [<ffffffff81504efc>] rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x47c/0x930 [ 178.872299] [<ffffffff81505b93>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x83/0x100 [ 178.877678] [<ffffffff81505cc6>] rtnl_configure_link+0x76/0xa0 [ 178.883580] [<ffffffffa00f52fa>] veth_newlink+0x16a/0x350 [veth] [ 178.889654] [<ffffffff815061cc>] rtnl_newlink+0x4dc/0x5e0 [ 178.895128] [<ffffffff81505e1e>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x12e/0x5e0 [ 178.900769] [<ffffffff8150587d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x11d/0x310 [ 178.906669] [<ffffffff81505760>] ? __rtnl_unlock+0x20/0x20 [ 178.912225] [<ffffffff81521f89>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xd0 [ 178.917779] [<ffffffff81502d55>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x25/0x40 [ 178.923159] [<ffffffff815218d1>] netlink_unicast+0x1b1/0x230 [ 178.928887] [<ffffffff81521c4e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fe/0x3b0 [ 178.934615] [<ffffffff814dbe22>] sock_sendmsg+0xd2/0xf0 So we must check if peer was setup in veth_get_stats64() As pointed out by Ben Hutchings, priv->peer is missing proper synchronization. Adding RCU protection is a safe and well documented way to make sure we don't access about to be freed or already freed data. Reported-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-01-04 23:42:40 +08:00
rcu_read_lock();
peer = rcu_dereference(priv->peer);
if (peer) {
tot->rx_dropped = veth_stats_one(&one, peer);
tot->rx_bytes = one.bytes;
tot->rx_packets = one.packets;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
return tot;
}
/* fake multicast ability */
static void veth_set_multicast_list(struct net_device *dev)
{
}
static int veth_open(struct net_device *dev)
{
veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one commit 2681128f0ced8a (veth: extend device features) added a NULL deref in veth_stats_one(), as veth_get_stats64() was not testing if the peer device was setup or not. At init time, we call dev_get_stats() before veth pair is fully setup. [ 178.854758] [<ffffffffa00f5677>] veth_get_stats64+0x47/0x70 [veth] [ 178.861013] [<ffffffff814f0a2d>] dev_get_stats+0x6d/0x130 [ 178.866486] [<ffffffff81504efc>] rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x47c/0x930 [ 178.872299] [<ffffffff81505b93>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x83/0x100 [ 178.877678] [<ffffffff81505cc6>] rtnl_configure_link+0x76/0xa0 [ 178.883580] [<ffffffffa00f52fa>] veth_newlink+0x16a/0x350 [veth] [ 178.889654] [<ffffffff815061cc>] rtnl_newlink+0x4dc/0x5e0 [ 178.895128] [<ffffffff81505e1e>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x12e/0x5e0 [ 178.900769] [<ffffffff8150587d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x11d/0x310 [ 178.906669] [<ffffffff81505760>] ? __rtnl_unlock+0x20/0x20 [ 178.912225] [<ffffffff81521f89>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xd0 [ 178.917779] [<ffffffff81502d55>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x25/0x40 [ 178.923159] [<ffffffff815218d1>] netlink_unicast+0x1b1/0x230 [ 178.928887] [<ffffffff81521c4e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fe/0x3b0 [ 178.934615] [<ffffffff814dbe22>] sock_sendmsg+0xd2/0xf0 So we must check if peer was setup in veth_get_stats64() As pointed out by Ben Hutchings, priv->peer is missing proper synchronization. Adding RCU protection is a safe and well documented way to make sure we don't access about to be freed or already freed data. Reported-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-01-04 23:42:40 +08:00
struct veth_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
struct net_device *peer = rtnl_dereference(priv->peer);
veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one commit 2681128f0ced8a (veth: extend device features) added a NULL deref in veth_stats_one(), as veth_get_stats64() was not testing if the peer device was setup or not. At init time, we call dev_get_stats() before veth pair is fully setup. [ 178.854758] [<ffffffffa00f5677>] veth_get_stats64+0x47/0x70 [veth] [ 178.861013] [<ffffffff814f0a2d>] dev_get_stats+0x6d/0x130 [ 178.866486] [<ffffffff81504efc>] rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x47c/0x930 [ 178.872299] [<ffffffff81505b93>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x83/0x100 [ 178.877678] [<ffffffff81505cc6>] rtnl_configure_link+0x76/0xa0 [ 178.883580] [<ffffffffa00f52fa>] veth_newlink+0x16a/0x350 [veth] [ 178.889654] [<ffffffff815061cc>] rtnl_newlink+0x4dc/0x5e0 [ 178.895128] [<ffffffff81505e1e>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x12e/0x5e0 [ 178.900769] [<ffffffff8150587d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x11d/0x310 [ 178.906669] [<ffffffff81505760>] ? __rtnl_unlock+0x20/0x20 [ 178.912225] [<ffffffff81521f89>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xd0 [ 178.917779] [<ffffffff81502d55>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x25/0x40 [ 178.923159] [<ffffffff815218d1>] netlink_unicast+0x1b1/0x230 [ 178.928887] [<ffffffff81521c4e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fe/0x3b0 [ 178.934615] [<ffffffff814dbe22>] sock_sendmsg+0xd2/0xf0 So we must check if peer was setup in veth_get_stats64() As pointed out by Ben Hutchings, priv->peer is missing proper synchronization. Adding RCU protection is a safe and well documented way to make sure we don't access about to be freed or already freed data. Reported-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-01-04 23:42:40 +08:00
if (!peer)
return -ENOTCONN;
veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one commit 2681128f0ced8a (veth: extend device features) added a NULL deref in veth_stats_one(), as veth_get_stats64() was not testing if the peer device was setup or not. At init time, we call dev_get_stats() before veth pair is fully setup. [ 178.854758] [<ffffffffa00f5677>] veth_get_stats64+0x47/0x70 [veth] [ 178.861013] [<ffffffff814f0a2d>] dev_get_stats+0x6d/0x130 [ 178.866486] [<ffffffff81504efc>] rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x47c/0x930 [ 178.872299] [<ffffffff81505b93>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x83/0x100 [ 178.877678] [<ffffffff81505cc6>] rtnl_configure_link+0x76/0xa0 [ 178.883580] [<ffffffffa00f52fa>] veth_newlink+0x16a/0x350 [veth] [ 178.889654] [<ffffffff815061cc>] rtnl_newlink+0x4dc/0x5e0 [ 178.895128] [<ffffffff81505e1e>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x12e/0x5e0 [ 178.900769] [<ffffffff8150587d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x11d/0x310 [ 178.906669] [<ffffffff81505760>] ? __rtnl_unlock+0x20/0x20 [ 178.912225] [<ffffffff81521f89>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xd0 [ 178.917779] [<ffffffff81502d55>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x25/0x40 [ 178.923159] [<ffffffff815218d1>] netlink_unicast+0x1b1/0x230 [ 178.928887] [<ffffffff81521c4e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fe/0x3b0 [ 178.934615] [<ffffffff814dbe22>] sock_sendmsg+0xd2/0xf0 So we must check if peer was setup in veth_get_stats64() As pointed out by Ben Hutchings, priv->peer is missing proper synchronization. Adding RCU protection is a safe and well documented way to make sure we don't access about to be freed or already freed data. Reported-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-01-04 23:42:40 +08:00
if (peer->flags & IFF_UP) {
netif_carrier_on(dev);
veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one commit 2681128f0ced8a (veth: extend device features) added a NULL deref in veth_stats_one(), as veth_get_stats64() was not testing if the peer device was setup or not. At init time, we call dev_get_stats() before veth pair is fully setup. [ 178.854758] [<ffffffffa00f5677>] veth_get_stats64+0x47/0x70 [veth] [ 178.861013] [<ffffffff814f0a2d>] dev_get_stats+0x6d/0x130 [ 178.866486] [<ffffffff81504efc>] rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x47c/0x930 [ 178.872299] [<ffffffff81505b93>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x83/0x100 [ 178.877678] [<ffffffff81505cc6>] rtnl_configure_link+0x76/0xa0 [ 178.883580] [<ffffffffa00f52fa>] veth_newlink+0x16a/0x350 [veth] [ 178.889654] [<ffffffff815061cc>] rtnl_newlink+0x4dc/0x5e0 [ 178.895128] [<ffffffff81505e1e>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x12e/0x5e0 [ 178.900769] [<ffffffff8150587d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x11d/0x310 [ 178.906669] [<ffffffff81505760>] ? __rtnl_unlock+0x20/0x20 [ 178.912225] [<ffffffff81521f89>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xd0 [ 178.917779] [<ffffffff81502d55>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x25/0x40 [ 178.923159] [<ffffffff815218d1>] netlink_unicast+0x1b1/0x230 [ 178.928887] [<ffffffff81521c4e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fe/0x3b0 [ 178.934615] [<ffffffff814dbe22>] sock_sendmsg+0xd2/0xf0 So we must check if peer was setup in veth_get_stats64() As pointed out by Ben Hutchings, priv->peer is missing proper synchronization. Adding RCU protection is a safe and well documented way to make sure we don't access about to be freed or already freed data. Reported-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-01-04 23:42:40 +08:00
netif_carrier_on(peer);
}
return 0;
}
static int veth_close(struct net_device *dev)
{
struct veth_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
struct net_device *peer = rtnl_dereference(priv->peer);
netif_carrier_off(dev);
if (peer)
netif_carrier_off(peer);
return 0;
}
static int is_valid_veth_mtu(int new_mtu)
{
return new_mtu >= MIN_MTU && new_mtu <= MAX_MTU;
}
static int veth_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
{
if (!is_valid_veth_mtu(new_mtu))
return -EINVAL;
dev->mtu = new_mtu;
return 0;
}
static int veth_dev_init(struct net_device *dev)
{
dev->vstats = netdev_alloc_pcpu_stats(struct pcpu_vstats);
if (!dev->vstats)
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}
static void veth_dev_free(struct net_device *dev)
{
free_percpu(dev->vstats);
free_netdev(dev);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
static void veth_poll_controller(struct net_device *dev)
{
/* veth only receives frames when its peer sends one
* Since it's a synchronous operation, we are guaranteed
* never to have pending data when we poll for it so
* there is nothing to do here.
*
* We need this though so netpoll recognizes us as an interface that
* supports polling, which enables bridge devices in virt setups to
* still use netconsole
*/
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER */
static int veth_get_iflink(const struct net_device *dev)
{
struct veth_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
struct net_device *peer;
int iflink;
rcu_read_lock();
peer = rcu_dereference(priv->peer);
iflink = peer ? peer->ifindex : 0;
rcu_read_unlock();
return iflink;
}
static const struct net_device_ops veth_netdev_ops = {
.ndo_init = veth_dev_init,
.ndo_open = veth_open,
.ndo_stop = veth_close,
.ndo_start_xmit = veth_xmit,
.ndo_change_mtu = veth_change_mtu,
.ndo_get_stats64 = veth_get_stats64,
.ndo_set_rx_mode = veth_set_multicast_list,
.ndo_set_mac_address = eth_mac_addr,
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
.ndo_poll_controller = veth_poll_controller,
#endif
.ndo_get_iflink = veth_get_iflink,
.ndo_features_check = passthru_features_check,
};
#define VETH_FEATURES (NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_FRAGLIST | NETIF_F_ALL_TSO | \
NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_RXCSUM | NETIF_F_HIGHDMA | \
NETIF_F_GSO_GRE | NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL | \
NETIF_F_GSO_IPIP | NETIF_F_GSO_SIT | NETIF_F_UFO | \
NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX | NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX | \
NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_TX | NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_RX )
static void veth_setup(struct net_device *dev)
{
ether_setup(dev);
dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_TX_SKB_SHARING;
dev->priv_flags |= IFF_LIVE_ADDR_CHANGE;
dev->priv_flags |= IFF_NO_QUEUE;
dev->netdev_ops = &veth_netdev_ops;
dev->ethtool_ops = &veth_ethtool_ops;
dev->features |= NETIF_F_LLTX;
dev->features |= VETH_FEATURES;
dev->vlan_features = dev->features &
~(NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX |
NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_TX |
NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_RX);
dev->destructor = veth_dev_free;
dev->hw_features = VETH_FEATURES;
dev->hw_enc_features = VETH_FEATURES;
}
/*
* netlink interface
*/
static int veth_validate(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
{
if (tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]) {
if (nla_len(tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]) != ETH_ALEN)
return -EINVAL;
if (!is_valid_ether_addr(nla_data(tb[IFLA_ADDRESS])))
return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
}
if (tb[IFLA_MTU]) {
if (!is_valid_veth_mtu(nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_MTU])))
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
static struct rtnl_link_ops veth_link_ops;
static int veth_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
{
int err;
struct net_device *peer;
struct veth_priv *priv;
char ifname[IFNAMSIZ];
struct nlattr *peer_tb[IFLA_MAX + 1], **tbp;
unsigned char name_assign_type;
rtnetlink: support specifying device flags on device creation commit e8469ed959c373c2ff9e6f488aa5a14971aebe1f Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Date: Tue Feb 23 20:41:30 2010 +0100 Support specifying the initial device flags when creating a device though rtnl_link. Devices allocated by rtnl_create_link() are marked as INITIALIZING in order to surpress netlink registration notifications. To complete setup, rtnl_configure_link() must be called, which performs the device flag changes and invokes the deferred notifiers if everything went well. Two examples: # add macvlan to eth0 # $ ip link add link eth0 up allmulticast on type macvlan [LINK]11: macvlan0@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,ALLMULTI,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/ether 26:f8:84:02:f9:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff [ROUTE]ff00::/8 dev macvlan0 table local metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [ROUTE]fe80::/64 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [LINK]11: macvlan0@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,ALLMULTI,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 link/ether 26:f8:84:02:f9:2a [ADDR]11: macvlan0 inet6 fe80::24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever [ROUTE]local fe80::24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a via :: dev lo table local proto none metric 0 mtu 16436 advmss 16376 hoplimit 0 [ROUTE]default via fe80::215:e9ff:fef0:10f8 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 1024 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [NEIGH]fe80::215:e9ff:fef0:10f8 dev macvlan0 lladdr 00:15:e9:f0:10:f8 router STALE [ROUTE]2001:6f8:974::/64 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 256 expires 0sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [PREFIX]prefix 2001:6f8:974::/64 dev macvlan0 onlink autoconf valid 14400 preferred 131084 [ADDR]11: macvlan0 inet6 2001:6f8:974:0:24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a/64 scope global dynamic valid_lft 86399sec preferred_lft 14399sec # add VLAN to eth1, eth1 is down # $ ip link add link eth1 up type vlan id 1000 RTNETLINK answers: Network is down <no events> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2010-02-26 14:34:54 +08:00
struct ifinfomsg *ifmp;
struct net *net;
/*
* create and register peer first
*/
if (data != NULL && data[VETH_INFO_PEER] != NULL) {
struct nlattr *nla_peer;
nla_peer = data[VETH_INFO_PEER];
rtnetlink: support specifying device flags on device creation commit e8469ed959c373c2ff9e6f488aa5a14971aebe1f Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Date: Tue Feb 23 20:41:30 2010 +0100 Support specifying the initial device flags when creating a device though rtnl_link. Devices allocated by rtnl_create_link() are marked as INITIALIZING in order to surpress netlink registration notifications. To complete setup, rtnl_configure_link() must be called, which performs the device flag changes and invokes the deferred notifiers if everything went well. Two examples: # add macvlan to eth0 # $ ip link add link eth0 up allmulticast on type macvlan [LINK]11: macvlan0@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,ALLMULTI,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/ether 26:f8:84:02:f9:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff [ROUTE]ff00::/8 dev macvlan0 table local metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [ROUTE]fe80::/64 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [LINK]11: macvlan0@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,ALLMULTI,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 link/ether 26:f8:84:02:f9:2a [ADDR]11: macvlan0 inet6 fe80::24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever [ROUTE]local fe80::24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a via :: dev lo table local proto none metric 0 mtu 16436 advmss 16376 hoplimit 0 [ROUTE]default via fe80::215:e9ff:fef0:10f8 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 1024 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [NEIGH]fe80::215:e9ff:fef0:10f8 dev macvlan0 lladdr 00:15:e9:f0:10:f8 router STALE [ROUTE]2001:6f8:974::/64 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 256 expires 0sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [PREFIX]prefix 2001:6f8:974::/64 dev macvlan0 onlink autoconf valid 14400 preferred 131084 [ADDR]11: macvlan0 inet6 2001:6f8:974:0:24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a/64 scope global dynamic valid_lft 86399sec preferred_lft 14399sec # add VLAN to eth1, eth1 is down # $ ip link add link eth1 up type vlan id 1000 RTNETLINK answers: Network is down <no events> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2010-02-26 14:34:54 +08:00
ifmp = nla_data(nla_peer);
err = rtnl_nla_parse_ifla(peer_tb,
nla_data(nla_peer) + sizeof(struct ifinfomsg),
nla_len(nla_peer) - sizeof(struct ifinfomsg));
if (err < 0)
return err;
err = veth_validate(peer_tb, NULL);
if (err < 0)
return err;
tbp = peer_tb;
rtnetlink: support specifying device flags on device creation commit e8469ed959c373c2ff9e6f488aa5a14971aebe1f Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Date: Tue Feb 23 20:41:30 2010 +0100 Support specifying the initial device flags when creating a device though rtnl_link. Devices allocated by rtnl_create_link() are marked as INITIALIZING in order to surpress netlink registration notifications. To complete setup, rtnl_configure_link() must be called, which performs the device flag changes and invokes the deferred notifiers if everything went well. Two examples: # add macvlan to eth0 # $ ip link add link eth0 up allmulticast on type macvlan [LINK]11: macvlan0@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,ALLMULTI,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/ether 26:f8:84:02:f9:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff [ROUTE]ff00::/8 dev macvlan0 table local metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [ROUTE]fe80::/64 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [LINK]11: macvlan0@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,ALLMULTI,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 link/ether 26:f8:84:02:f9:2a [ADDR]11: macvlan0 inet6 fe80::24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever [ROUTE]local fe80::24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a via :: dev lo table local proto none metric 0 mtu 16436 advmss 16376 hoplimit 0 [ROUTE]default via fe80::215:e9ff:fef0:10f8 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 1024 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [NEIGH]fe80::215:e9ff:fef0:10f8 dev macvlan0 lladdr 00:15:e9:f0:10:f8 router STALE [ROUTE]2001:6f8:974::/64 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 256 expires 0sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [PREFIX]prefix 2001:6f8:974::/64 dev macvlan0 onlink autoconf valid 14400 preferred 131084 [ADDR]11: macvlan0 inet6 2001:6f8:974:0:24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a/64 scope global dynamic valid_lft 86399sec preferred_lft 14399sec # add VLAN to eth1, eth1 is down # $ ip link add link eth1 up type vlan id 1000 RTNETLINK answers: Network is down <no events> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2010-02-26 14:34:54 +08:00
} else {
ifmp = NULL;
tbp = tb;
rtnetlink: support specifying device flags on device creation commit e8469ed959c373c2ff9e6f488aa5a14971aebe1f Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Date: Tue Feb 23 20:41:30 2010 +0100 Support specifying the initial device flags when creating a device though rtnl_link. Devices allocated by rtnl_create_link() are marked as INITIALIZING in order to surpress netlink registration notifications. To complete setup, rtnl_configure_link() must be called, which performs the device flag changes and invokes the deferred notifiers if everything went well. Two examples: # add macvlan to eth0 # $ ip link add link eth0 up allmulticast on type macvlan [LINK]11: macvlan0@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,ALLMULTI,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/ether 26:f8:84:02:f9:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff [ROUTE]ff00::/8 dev macvlan0 table local metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [ROUTE]fe80::/64 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [LINK]11: macvlan0@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,ALLMULTI,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 link/ether 26:f8:84:02:f9:2a [ADDR]11: macvlan0 inet6 fe80::24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever [ROUTE]local fe80::24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a via :: dev lo table local proto none metric 0 mtu 16436 advmss 16376 hoplimit 0 [ROUTE]default via fe80::215:e9ff:fef0:10f8 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 1024 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [NEIGH]fe80::215:e9ff:fef0:10f8 dev macvlan0 lladdr 00:15:e9:f0:10:f8 router STALE [ROUTE]2001:6f8:974::/64 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 256 expires 0sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [PREFIX]prefix 2001:6f8:974::/64 dev macvlan0 onlink autoconf valid 14400 preferred 131084 [ADDR]11: macvlan0 inet6 2001:6f8:974:0:24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a/64 scope global dynamic valid_lft 86399sec preferred_lft 14399sec # add VLAN to eth1, eth1 is down # $ ip link add link eth1 up type vlan id 1000 RTNETLINK answers: Network is down <no events> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2010-02-26 14:34:54 +08:00
}
if (tbp[IFLA_IFNAME]) {
nla_strlcpy(ifname, tbp[IFLA_IFNAME], IFNAMSIZ);
name_assign_type = NET_NAME_USER;
} else {
snprintf(ifname, IFNAMSIZ, DRV_NAME "%%d");
name_assign_type = NET_NAME_ENUM;
}
net = rtnl_link_get_net(src_net, tbp);
if (IS_ERR(net))
return PTR_ERR(net);
peer = rtnl_create_link(net, ifname, name_assign_type,
&veth_link_ops, tbp);
if (IS_ERR(peer)) {
put_net(net);
return PTR_ERR(peer);
}
if (tbp[IFLA_ADDRESS] == NULL)
eth_hw_addr_random(peer);
if (ifmp && (dev->ifindex != 0))
peer->ifindex = ifmp->ifi_index;
err = register_netdevice(peer);
put_net(net);
net = NULL;
if (err < 0)
goto err_register_peer;
netif_carrier_off(peer);
rtnetlink: support specifying device flags on device creation commit e8469ed959c373c2ff9e6f488aa5a14971aebe1f Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Date: Tue Feb 23 20:41:30 2010 +0100 Support specifying the initial device flags when creating a device though rtnl_link. Devices allocated by rtnl_create_link() are marked as INITIALIZING in order to surpress netlink registration notifications. To complete setup, rtnl_configure_link() must be called, which performs the device flag changes and invokes the deferred notifiers if everything went well. Two examples: # add macvlan to eth0 # $ ip link add link eth0 up allmulticast on type macvlan [LINK]11: macvlan0@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,ALLMULTI,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/ether 26:f8:84:02:f9:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff [ROUTE]ff00::/8 dev macvlan0 table local metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [ROUTE]fe80::/64 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [LINK]11: macvlan0@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,ALLMULTI,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 link/ether 26:f8:84:02:f9:2a [ADDR]11: macvlan0 inet6 fe80::24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever [ROUTE]local fe80::24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a via :: dev lo table local proto none metric 0 mtu 16436 advmss 16376 hoplimit 0 [ROUTE]default via fe80::215:e9ff:fef0:10f8 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 1024 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [NEIGH]fe80::215:e9ff:fef0:10f8 dev macvlan0 lladdr 00:15:e9:f0:10:f8 router STALE [ROUTE]2001:6f8:974::/64 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 256 expires 0sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [PREFIX]prefix 2001:6f8:974::/64 dev macvlan0 onlink autoconf valid 14400 preferred 131084 [ADDR]11: macvlan0 inet6 2001:6f8:974:0:24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a/64 scope global dynamic valid_lft 86399sec preferred_lft 14399sec # add VLAN to eth1, eth1 is down # $ ip link add link eth1 up type vlan id 1000 RTNETLINK answers: Network is down <no events> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2010-02-26 14:34:54 +08:00
err = rtnl_configure_link(peer, ifmp);
if (err < 0)
goto err_configure_peer;
/*
* register dev last
*
* note, that since we've registered new device the dev's name
* should be re-allocated
*/
if (tb[IFLA_ADDRESS] == NULL)
eth_hw_addr_random(dev);
if (tb[IFLA_IFNAME])
nla_strlcpy(dev->name, tb[IFLA_IFNAME], IFNAMSIZ);
else
snprintf(dev->name, IFNAMSIZ, DRV_NAME "%%d");
err = register_netdevice(dev);
if (err < 0)
goto err_register_dev;
netif_carrier_off(dev);
/*
* tie the deviced together
*/
priv = netdev_priv(dev);
veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one commit 2681128f0ced8a (veth: extend device features) added a NULL deref in veth_stats_one(), as veth_get_stats64() was not testing if the peer device was setup or not. At init time, we call dev_get_stats() before veth pair is fully setup. [ 178.854758] [<ffffffffa00f5677>] veth_get_stats64+0x47/0x70 [veth] [ 178.861013] [<ffffffff814f0a2d>] dev_get_stats+0x6d/0x130 [ 178.866486] [<ffffffff81504efc>] rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x47c/0x930 [ 178.872299] [<ffffffff81505b93>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x83/0x100 [ 178.877678] [<ffffffff81505cc6>] rtnl_configure_link+0x76/0xa0 [ 178.883580] [<ffffffffa00f52fa>] veth_newlink+0x16a/0x350 [veth] [ 178.889654] [<ffffffff815061cc>] rtnl_newlink+0x4dc/0x5e0 [ 178.895128] [<ffffffff81505e1e>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x12e/0x5e0 [ 178.900769] [<ffffffff8150587d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x11d/0x310 [ 178.906669] [<ffffffff81505760>] ? __rtnl_unlock+0x20/0x20 [ 178.912225] [<ffffffff81521f89>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xd0 [ 178.917779] [<ffffffff81502d55>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x25/0x40 [ 178.923159] [<ffffffff815218d1>] netlink_unicast+0x1b1/0x230 [ 178.928887] [<ffffffff81521c4e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fe/0x3b0 [ 178.934615] [<ffffffff814dbe22>] sock_sendmsg+0xd2/0xf0 So we must check if peer was setup in veth_get_stats64() As pointed out by Ben Hutchings, priv->peer is missing proper synchronization. Adding RCU protection is a safe and well documented way to make sure we don't access about to be freed or already freed data. Reported-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-01-04 23:42:40 +08:00
rcu_assign_pointer(priv->peer, peer);
priv = netdev_priv(peer);
veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one commit 2681128f0ced8a (veth: extend device features) added a NULL deref in veth_stats_one(), as veth_get_stats64() was not testing if the peer device was setup or not. At init time, we call dev_get_stats() before veth pair is fully setup. [ 178.854758] [<ffffffffa00f5677>] veth_get_stats64+0x47/0x70 [veth] [ 178.861013] [<ffffffff814f0a2d>] dev_get_stats+0x6d/0x130 [ 178.866486] [<ffffffff81504efc>] rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x47c/0x930 [ 178.872299] [<ffffffff81505b93>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x83/0x100 [ 178.877678] [<ffffffff81505cc6>] rtnl_configure_link+0x76/0xa0 [ 178.883580] [<ffffffffa00f52fa>] veth_newlink+0x16a/0x350 [veth] [ 178.889654] [<ffffffff815061cc>] rtnl_newlink+0x4dc/0x5e0 [ 178.895128] [<ffffffff81505e1e>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x12e/0x5e0 [ 178.900769] [<ffffffff8150587d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x11d/0x310 [ 178.906669] [<ffffffff81505760>] ? __rtnl_unlock+0x20/0x20 [ 178.912225] [<ffffffff81521f89>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xd0 [ 178.917779] [<ffffffff81502d55>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x25/0x40 [ 178.923159] [<ffffffff815218d1>] netlink_unicast+0x1b1/0x230 [ 178.928887] [<ffffffff81521c4e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fe/0x3b0 [ 178.934615] [<ffffffff814dbe22>] sock_sendmsg+0xd2/0xf0 So we must check if peer was setup in veth_get_stats64() As pointed out by Ben Hutchings, priv->peer is missing proper synchronization. Adding RCU protection is a safe and well documented way to make sure we don't access about to be freed or already freed data. Reported-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-01-04 23:42:40 +08:00
rcu_assign_pointer(priv->peer, dev);
return 0;
err_register_dev:
/* nothing to do */
rtnetlink: support specifying device flags on device creation commit e8469ed959c373c2ff9e6f488aa5a14971aebe1f Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Date: Tue Feb 23 20:41:30 2010 +0100 Support specifying the initial device flags when creating a device though rtnl_link. Devices allocated by rtnl_create_link() are marked as INITIALIZING in order to surpress netlink registration notifications. To complete setup, rtnl_configure_link() must be called, which performs the device flag changes and invokes the deferred notifiers if everything went well. Two examples: # add macvlan to eth0 # $ ip link add link eth0 up allmulticast on type macvlan [LINK]11: macvlan0@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,ALLMULTI,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/ether 26:f8:84:02:f9:2a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff [ROUTE]ff00::/8 dev macvlan0 table local metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [ROUTE]fe80::/64 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [LINK]11: macvlan0@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,ALLMULTI,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 link/ether 26:f8:84:02:f9:2a [ADDR]11: macvlan0 inet6 fe80::24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever [ROUTE]local fe80::24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a via :: dev lo table local proto none metric 0 mtu 16436 advmss 16376 hoplimit 0 [ROUTE]default via fe80::215:e9ff:fef0:10f8 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 1024 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [NEIGH]fe80::215:e9ff:fef0:10f8 dev macvlan0 lladdr 00:15:e9:f0:10:f8 router STALE [ROUTE]2001:6f8:974::/64 dev macvlan0 proto kernel metric 256 expires 0sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 [PREFIX]prefix 2001:6f8:974::/64 dev macvlan0 onlink autoconf valid 14400 preferred 131084 [ADDR]11: macvlan0 inet6 2001:6f8:974:0:24f8:84ff:fe02:f92a/64 scope global dynamic valid_lft 86399sec preferred_lft 14399sec # add VLAN to eth1, eth1 is down # $ ip link add link eth1 up type vlan id 1000 RTNETLINK answers: Network is down <no events> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2010-02-26 14:34:54 +08:00
err_configure_peer:
unregister_netdevice(peer);
return err;
err_register_peer:
free_netdev(peer);
return err;
}
static void veth_dellink(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
{
struct veth_priv *priv;
struct net_device *peer;
priv = netdev_priv(dev);
veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one commit 2681128f0ced8a (veth: extend device features) added a NULL deref in veth_stats_one(), as veth_get_stats64() was not testing if the peer device was setup or not. At init time, we call dev_get_stats() before veth pair is fully setup. [ 178.854758] [<ffffffffa00f5677>] veth_get_stats64+0x47/0x70 [veth] [ 178.861013] [<ffffffff814f0a2d>] dev_get_stats+0x6d/0x130 [ 178.866486] [<ffffffff81504efc>] rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x47c/0x930 [ 178.872299] [<ffffffff81505b93>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x83/0x100 [ 178.877678] [<ffffffff81505cc6>] rtnl_configure_link+0x76/0xa0 [ 178.883580] [<ffffffffa00f52fa>] veth_newlink+0x16a/0x350 [veth] [ 178.889654] [<ffffffff815061cc>] rtnl_newlink+0x4dc/0x5e0 [ 178.895128] [<ffffffff81505e1e>] ? rtnl_newlink+0x12e/0x5e0 [ 178.900769] [<ffffffff8150587d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x11d/0x310 [ 178.906669] [<ffffffff81505760>] ? __rtnl_unlock+0x20/0x20 [ 178.912225] [<ffffffff81521f89>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa9/0xd0 [ 178.917779] [<ffffffff81502d55>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x25/0x40 [ 178.923159] [<ffffffff815218d1>] netlink_unicast+0x1b1/0x230 [ 178.928887] [<ffffffff81521c4e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2fe/0x3b0 [ 178.934615] [<ffffffff814dbe22>] sock_sendmsg+0xd2/0xf0 So we must check if peer was setup in veth_get_stats64() As pointed out by Ben Hutchings, priv->peer is missing proper synchronization. Adding RCU protection is a safe and well documented way to make sure we don't access about to be freed or already freed data. Reported-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-01-04 23:42:40 +08:00
peer = rtnl_dereference(priv->peer);
/* Note : dellink() is called from default_device_exit_batch(),
* before a rcu_synchronize() point. The devices are guaranteed
* not being freed before one RCU grace period.
*/
RCU_INIT_POINTER(priv->peer, NULL);
unregister_netdevice_queue(dev, head);
if (peer) {
priv = netdev_priv(peer);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(priv->peer, NULL);
unregister_netdevice_queue(peer, head);
}
}
static const struct nla_policy veth_policy[VETH_INFO_MAX + 1] = {
[VETH_INFO_PEER] = { .len = sizeof(struct ifinfomsg) },
};
static struct net *veth_get_link_net(const struct net_device *dev)
{
struct veth_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
struct net_device *peer = rtnl_dereference(priv->peer);
return peer ? dev_net(peer) : dev_net(dev);
}
static struct rtnl_link_ops veth_link_ops = {
.kind = DRV_NAME,
.priv_size = sizeof(struct veth_priv),
.setup = veth_setup,
.validate = veth_validate,
.newlink = veth_newlink,
.dellink = veth_dellink,
.policy = veth_policy,
.maxtype = VETH_INFO_MAX,
.get_link_net = veth_get_link_net,
};
/*
* init/fini
*/
static __init int veth_init(void)
{
return rtnl_link_register(&veth_link_ops);
}
static __exit void veth_exit(void)
{
rtnl_link_unregister(&veth_link_ops);
}
module_init(veth_init);
module_exit(veth_exit);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Virtual Ethernet Tunnel");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
MODULE_ALIAS_RTNL_LINK(DRV_NAME);