2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-25 05:34:00 +08:00
linux-next/include/linux/cpufreq.h

937 lines
28 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* linux/include/linux/cpufreq.h
*
* Copyright (C) 2001 Russell King
* (C) 2002 - 2003 Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*/
#ifndef _LINUX_CPUFREQ_H
#define _LINUX_CPUFREQ_H
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/completion.h>
#include <linux/kobject.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>
cpufreq: Make sure frequency transitions are serialized Whenever we change the frequency of a CPU, we call the PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers. They must be serialized, i.e. PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers should strictly alternate, thereby preventing two different sets of PRECHANGE or POSTCHANGE notifiers from interleaving arbitrarily. The following examples illustrate why this is important: Scenario 1: ----------- A thread reading the value of cpuinfo_cur_freq, will call __cpufreq_cpu_get()->cpufreq_out_of_sync()->cpufreq_notify_transition() The ondemand governor can decide to change the frequency of the CPU at the same time and hence it can end up sending the notifications via ->target(). If the notifiers are not serialized, the following sequence can occur: - PRECHANGE Notification for freq A (from cpuinfo_cur_freq) - PRECHANGE Notification for freq B (from target()) - Freq changed by target() to B - POSTCHANGE Notification for freq B - POSTCHANGE Notification for freq A We can see from the above that the last POSTCHANGE Notification happens for freq A but the hardware is set to run at freq B. Where would we break then?: adjust_jiffies() in cpufreq.c & cpufreq_callback() in arch/arm/kernel/smp.c (which also adjusts the jiffies). All the loops_per_jiffy calculations will get messed up. Scenario 2: ----------- The governor calls __cpufreq_driver_target() to change the frequency. At the same time, if we change scaling_{min|max}_freq from sysfs, it will end up calling the governor's CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS notification, which will also call __cpufreq_driver_target(). And hence we end up issuing concurrent calls to ->target(). Typically, platforms have the following logic in their ->target() routines: (Eg: cpufreq-cpu0, omap, exynos, etc) A. If new freq is more than old: Increase voltage B. Change freq C. If new freq is less than old: decrease voltage Now, if the two concurrent calls to ->target() are X and Y, where X is trying to increase the freq and Y is trying to decrease it, we get the following race condition: X.A: voltage gets increased for larger freq Y.A: nothing happens Y.B: freq gets decreased Y.C: voltage gets decreased X.B: freq gets increased X.C: nothing happens Thus we can end up setting a freq which is not supported by the voltage we have set. That will probably make the clock to the CPU unstable and the system might not work properly anymore. This patch introduces a set of synchronization primitives to serialize frequency transitions, which are to be used as shown below: cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(); //Perform the frequency change cpufreq_freq_transition_end(); The _begin() call sends the PRECHANGE notification whereas the _end() call sends the POSTCHANGE notification. Also, all the necessary synchronization is handled within these calls. In particular, even drivers which set the ASYNC_NOTIFICATION flag can also use these APIs for performing frequency transitions (ie., you can call _begin() from one task, and call the corresponding _end() from a different task). The actual synchronization underneath is not that complicated: The key challenge is to allow drivers to begin the transition from one thread and end it in a completely different thread (this is to enable drivers that do asynchronous POSTCHANGE notification from bottom-halves, to also use the same interface). To achieve this, a 'transition_ongoing' flag, a 'transition_lock' spinlock and a wait-queue are added per-policy. The flag and the wait-queue are used in conjunction to create an "uninterrupted flow" from _begin() to _end(). The spinlock is used to ensure that only one such "flow" is in flight at any given time. Put together, this provides us all the necessary synchronization. Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-03-24 16:05:44 +08:00
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/sysfs.h>
/*********************************************************************
* CPUFREQ INTERFACE *
*********************************************************************/
/*
* Frequency values here are CPU kHz
*
* Maximum transition latency is in nanoseconds - if it's unknown,
* CPUFREQ_ETERNAL shall be used.
*/
#define CPUFREQ_ETERNAL (-1)
#define CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN 16
/* Print length for names. Extra 1 space for accommodating '\n' in prints */
#define CPUFREQ_NAME_PLEN (CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN + 1)
struct cpufreq_governor;
enum cpufreq_table_sorting {
CPUFREQ_TABLE_UNSORTED,
CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_ASCENDING,
CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_DESCENDING
};
struct cpufreq_freqs {
unsigned int cpu; /* cpu nr */
unsigned int old;
unsigned int new;
u8 flags; /* flags of cpufreq_driver, see below. */
};
struct cpufreq_cpuinfo {
unsigned int max_freq;
unsigned int min_freq;
/* in 10^(-9) s = nanoseconds */
unsigned int transition_latency;
};
struct cpufreq_user_policy {
unsigned int min; /* in kHz */
unsigned int max; /* in kHz */
};
struct cpufreq_policy {
/* CPUs sharing clock, require sw coordination */
cpumask_var_t cpus; /* Online CPUs only */
cpumask_var_t related_cpus; /* Online + Offline CPUs */
cpufreq: Avoid attempts to create duplicate symbolic links After commit 87549141d516 (cpufreq: Stop migrating sysfs files on hotplug) there is a problem with CPUs that share cpufreq policy objects with other CPUs and are initially offline. Say CPU1 shares a policy with CPU0 which is online and is registered first. As part of the registration process, cpufreq_add_dev() is called for it. It creates the policy object and a symbolic link to it from the CPU1's sysfs directory. If CPU1 is registered subsequently and it is offline at that time, cpufreq_add_dev() will attempt to create a symbolic link to the policy object for it, but that link is present already, so a warning about that will be triggered. To avoid that warning, make cpufreq use an additional CPU mask containing related CPUs that are actually present for each policy object. That mask is initialized when the policy object is populated after its creation (for the first online CPU using it) and it includes CPUs from the "policy CPUs" mask returned by the cpufreq driver's ->init() callback that are physically present at that time. Symbolic links to the policy are created only for the CPUs in that mask. If cpufreq_add_dev() is invoked for an offline CPU, it checks the new mask and only creates the symlink if the CPU was not in it (the CPU is added to the mask at the same time). In turn, cpufreq_remove_dev() drops the given CPU from the new mask, removes its symlink to the policy object and returns, unless it is the CPU owning the policy object. In that case, the policy object is moved to a new CPU's sysfs directory or deleted if the CPU being removed was the last user of the policy. While at it, notice that cpufreq_remove_dev() can't fail, because its return value is ignored, so make it ignore return values from __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare() and __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish() and prevent these functions from aborting on errors returned by __cpufreq_governor(). Also drop the now unused sif argument from them. Fixes: 87549141d516 (cpufreq: Stop migrating sysfs files on hotplug) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2015-07-26 08:07:47 +08:00
cpumask_var_t real_cpus; /* Related and present */
unsigned int shared_type; /* ACPI: ANY or ALL affected CPUs
should set cpufreq */
unsigned int cpu; /* cpu managing this policy, must be online */
struct clk *clk;
struct cpufreq_cpuinfo cpuinfo;/* see above */
unsigned int min; /* in kHz */
unsigned int max; /* in kHz */
unsigned int cur; /* in kHz, only needed if cpufreq
* governors are used */
cpufreq: add support for intermediate (stable) frequencies Douglas Anderson, recently pointed out an interesting problem due to which udelay() was expiring earlier than it should. While transitioning between frequencies few platforms may temporarily switch to a stable frequency, waiting for the main PLL to stabilize. For example: When we transition between very low frequencies on exynos, like between 200MHz and 300MHz, we may temporarily switch to a PLL running at 800MHz. No CPUFREQ notification is sent for that. That means there's a period of time when we're running at 800MHz but loops_per_jiffy is calibrated at between 200MHz and 300MHz. And so udelay behaves badly. To get this fixed in a generic way, introduce another set of callbacks get_intermediate() and target_intermediate(), only for drivers with target_index() and CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION unset. get_intermediate() should return a stable intermediate frequency platform wants to switch to, and target_intermediate() should set CPU to that frequency, before jumping to the frequency corresponding to 'index'. Core will take care of sending notifications and driver doesn't have to handle them in target_intermediate() or target_index(). NOTE: ->target_index() should restore to policy->restore_freq in case of failures as core would send notifications for that. Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-06-03 01:19:28 +08:00
unsigned int restore_freq; /* = policy->cur before transition */
unsigned int suspend_freq; /* freq to set during suspend */
unsigned int policy; /* see above */
unsigned int last_policy; /* policy before unplug */
struct cpufreq_governor *governor; /* see below */
void *governor_data;
char last_governor[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN]; /* last governor used */
struct work_struct update; /* if update_policy() needs to be
* called, but you're in IRQ context */
struct cpufreq_user_policy user_policy;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
enum cpufreq_table_sorting freq_table_sorted;
struct list_head policy_list;
struct kobject kobj;
struct completion kobj_unregister;
/*
* The rules for this semaphore:
* - Any routine that wants to read from the policy structure will
* do a down_read on this semaphore.
* - Any routine that will write to the policy structure and/or may take away
* the policy altogether (eg. CPU hotplug), will hold this lock in write
* mode before doing so.
*/
struct rw_semaphore rwsem;
cpufreq: Make sure frequency transitions are serialized Whenever we change the frequency of a CPU, we call the PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers. They must be serialized, i.e. PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers should strictly alternate, thereby preventing two different sets of PRECHANGE or POSTCHANGE notifiers from interleaving arbitrarily. The following examples illustrate why this is important: Scenario 1: ----------- A thread reading the value of cpuinfo_cur_freq, will call __cpufreq_cpu_get()->cpufreq_out_of_sync()->cpufreq_notify_transition() The ondemand governor can decide to change the frequency of the CPU at the same time and hence it can end up sending the notifications via ->target(). If the notifiers are not serialized, the following sequence can occur: - PRECHANGE Notification for freq A (from cpuinfo_cur_freq) - PRECHANGE Notification for freq B (from target()) - Freq changed by target() to B - POSTCHANGE Notification for freq B - POSTCHANGE Notification for freq A We can see from the above that the last POSTCHANGE Notification happens for freq A but the hardware is set to run at freq B. Where would we break then?: adjust_jiffies() in cpufreq.c & cpufreq_callback() in arch/arm/kernel/smp.c (which also adjusts the jiffies). All the loops_per_jiffy calculations will get messed up. Scenario 2: ----------- The governor calls __cpufreq_driver_target() to change the frequency. At the same time, if we change scaling_{min|max}_freq from sysfs, it will end up calling the governor's CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS notification, which will also call __cpufreq_driver_target(). And hence we end up issuing concurrent calls to ->target(). Typically, platforms have the following logic in their ->target() routines: (Eg: cpufreq-cpu0, omap, exynos, etc) A. If new freq is more than old: Increase voltage B. Change freq C. If new freq is less than old: decrease voltage Now, if the two concurrent calls to ->target() are X and Y, where X is trying to increase the freq and Y is trying to decrease it, we get the following race condition: X.A: voltage gets increased for larger freq Y.A: nothing happens Y.B: freq gets decreased Y.C: voltage gets decreased X.B: freq gets increased X.C: nothing happens Thus we can end up setting a freq which is not supported by the voltage we have set. That will probably make the clock to the CPU unstable and the system might not work properly anymore. This patch introduces a set of synchronization primitives to serialize frequency transitions, which are to be used as shown below: cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(); //Perform the frequency change cpufreq_freq_transition_end(); The _begin() call sends the PRECHANGE notification whereas the _end() call sends the POSTCHANGE notification. Also, all the necessary synchronization is handled within these calls. In particular, even drivers which set the ASYNC_NOTIFICATION flag can also use these APIs for performing frequency transitions (ie., you can call _begin() from one task, and call the corresponding _end() from a different task). The actual synchronization underneath is not that complicated: The key challenge is to allow drivers to begin the transition from one thread and end it in a completely different thread (this is to enable drivers that do asynchronous POSTCHANGE notification from bottom-halves, to also use the same interface). To achieve this, a 'transition_ongoing' flag, a 'transition_lock' spinlock and a wait-queue are added per-policy. The flag and the wait-queue are used in conjunction to create an "uninterrupted flow" from _begin() to _end(). The spinlock is used to ensure that only one such "flow" is in flight at any given time. Put together, this provides us all the necessary synchronization. Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-03-24 16:05:44 +08:00
/*
* Fast switch flags:
* - fast_switch_possible should be set by the driver if it can
* guarantee that frequency can be changed on any CPU sharing the
* policy and that the change will affect all of the policy CPUs then.
* - fast_switch_enabled is to be set by governors that support fast
* frequency switching with the help of cpufreq_enable_fast_switch().
*/
bool fast_switch_possible;
bool fast_switch_enabled;
/*
* Preferred average time interval between consecutive invocations of
* the driver to set the frequency for this policy. To be set by the
* scaling driver (0, which is the default, means no preference).
*/
unsigned int transition_delay_us;
/*
* Remote DVFS flag (Not added to the driver structure as we don't want
* to access another structure from scheduler hotpath).
*
* Should be set if CPUs can do DVFS on behalf of other CPUs from
* different cpufreq policies.
*/
bool dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu;
/* Cached frequency lookup from cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq. */
unsigned int cached_target_freq;
int cached_resolved_idx;
cpufreq: Make sure frequency transitions are serialized Whenever we change the frequency of a CPU, we call the PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers. They must be serialized, i.e. PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers should strictly alternate, thereby preventing two different sets of PRECHANGE or POSTCHANGE notifiers from interleaving arbitrarily. The following examples illustrate why this is important: Scenario 1: ----------- A thread reading the value of cpuinfo_cur_freq, will call __cpufreq_cpu_get()->cpufreq_out_of_sync()->cpufreq_notify_transition() The ondemand governor can decide to change the frequency of the CPU at the same time and hence it can end up sending the notifications via ->target(). If the notifiers are not serialized, the following sequence can occur: - PRECHANGE Notification for freq A (from cpuinfo_cur_freq) - PRECHANGE Notification for freq B (from target()) - Freq changed by target() to B - POSTCHANGE Notification for freq B - POSTCHANGE Notification for freq A We can see from the above that the last POSTCHANGE Notification happens for freq A but the hardware is set to run at freq B. Where would we break then?: adjust_jiffies() in cpufreq.c & cpufreq_callback() in arch/arm/kernel/smp.c (which also adjusts the jiffies). All the loops_per_jiffy calculations will get messed up. Scenario 2: ----------- The governor calls __cpufreq_driver_target() to change the frequency. At the same time, if we change scaling_{min|max}_freq from sysfs, it will end up calling the governor's CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS notification, which will also call __cpufreq_driver_target(). And hence we end up issuing concurrent calls to ->target(). Typically, platforms have the following logic in their ->target() routines: (Eg: cpufreq-cpu0, omap, exynos, etc) A. If new freq is more than old: Increase voltage B. Change freq C. If new freq is less than old: decrease voltage Now, if the two concurrent calls to ->target() are X and Y, where X is trying to increase the freq and Y is trying to decrease it, we get the following race condition: X.A: voltage gets increased for larger freq Y.A: nothing happens Y.B: freq gets decreased Y.C: voltage gets decreased X.B: freq gets increased X.C: nothing happens Thus we can end up setting a freq which is not supported by the voltage we have set. That will probably make the clock to the CPU unstable and the system might not work properly anymore. This patch introduces a set of synchronization primitives to serialize frequency transitions, which are to be used as shown below: cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(); //Perform the frequency change cpufreq_freq_transition_end(); The _begin() call sends the PRECHANGE notification whereas the _end() call sends the POSTCHANGE notification. Also, all the necessary synchronization is handled within these calls. In particular, even drivers which set the ASYNC_NOTIFICATION flag can also use these APIs for performing frequency transitions (ie., you can call _begin() from one task, and call the corresponding _end() from a different task). The actual synchronization underneath is not that complicated: The key challenge is to allow drivers to begin the transition from one thread and end it in a completely different thread (this is to enable drivers that do asynchronous POSTCHANGE notification from bottom-halves, to also use the same interface). To achieve this, a 'transition_ongoing' flag, a 'transition_lock' spinlock and a wait-queue are added per-policy. The flag and the wait-queue are used in conjunction to create an "uninterrupted flow" from _begin() to _end(). The spinlock is used to ensure that only one such "flow" is in flight at any given time. Put together, this provides us all the necessary synchronization. Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-03-24 16:05:44 +08:00
/* Synchronization for frequency transitions */
bool transition_ongoing; /* Tracks transition status */
spinlock_t transition_lock;
wait_queue_head_t transition_wait;
cpufreq: Catch double invocations of cpufreq_freq_transition_begin/end Some cpufreq drivers were redundantly invoking the _begin() and _end() APIs around frequency transitions, and this double invocation (one from the cpufreq core and the other from the cpufreq driver) used to result in a self-deadlock, leading to system hangs during boot. (The _begin() API makes contending callers wait until the previous invocation is complete. Hence, the cpufreq driver would end up waiting on itself!). Now all such drivers have been fixed, but debugging this issue was not very straight-forward (even lockdep didn't catch this). So let us add a debug infrastructure to the cpufreq core to catch such issues more easily in the future. We add a new field called 'transition_task' to the policy structure, to keep track of the task which is performing the frequency transition. Using this field, we make note of this task during _begin() and print a warning if we find a case where the same task is calling _begin() again, before completing the previous frequency transition using the corresponding _end(). We have left out ASYNC_NOTIFICATION drivers from this debug infrastructure for 2 reasons: 1. At the moment, we have no way to avoid a particular scenario where this debug infrastructure can emit false-positive warnings for such drivers. The scenario is depicted below: Task A Task B /* 1st freq transition */ Invoke _begin() { ... ... } Change the frequency /* 2nd freq transition */ Invoke _begin() { ... //waiting for B to ... //finish _end() for ... //the 1st transition ... | Got interrupt for successful ... | change of frequency (1st one). ... | ... | /* 1st freq transition */ ... | Invoke _end() { ... | ... ... V } ... ... } This scenario is actually deadlock-free because, once Task A changes the frequency, it is Task B's responsibility to invoke the corresponding _end() for the 1st frequency transition. Hence it is perfectly legal for Task A to go ahead and attempt another frequency transition in the meantime. (Of course it won't be able to proceed until Task B finishes the 1st _end(), but this doesn't cause a deadlock or a hang). The debug infrastructure cannot handle this scenario and will treat it as a deadlock and print a warning. To avoid this, we exclude such drivers from the purview of this code. 2. Luckily, we don't _need_ this infrastructure for ASYNC_NOTIFICATION drivers at all! The cpufreq core does not automatically invoke the _begin() and _end() APIs during frequency transitions in such drivers. Thus, the driver alone is responsible for invoking _begin()/_end() and hence there shouldn't be any conflicts which lead to double invocations. So, we can skip these drivers, since the probability that such drivers will hit this problem is extremely low, as outlined above. Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-05-05 15:22:39 +08:00
struct task_struct *transition_task; /* Task which is doing the transition */
/* cpufreq-stats */
struct cpufreq_stats *stats;
/* For cpufreq driver's internal use */
void *driver_data;
};
/* Only for ACPI */
#define CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_NONE (0) /* None */
#define CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_HW (1) /* HW does needed coordination */
#define CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ALL (2) /* All dependent CPUs should set freq */
#define CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY (3) /* Freq can be set from any dependent CPU*/
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu);
struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get(unsigned int cpu);
void cpufreq_cpu_put(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
#else
static inline struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu)
{
return NULL;
}
static inline struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get(unsigned int cpu)
{
return NULL;
}
static inline void cpufreq_cpu_put(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { }
#endif
static inline bool policy_is_shared(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
return cpumask_weight(policy->cpus) > 1;
}
/* /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq: entry point for global variables */
extern struct kobject *cpufreq_global_kobject;
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
unsigned int cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu);
unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get(unsigned int cpu);
unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get_max(unsigned int cpu);
void disable_cpufreq(void);
u64 get_cpu_idle_time(unsigned int cpu, u64 *wall, int io_busy);
int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu);
void cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu);
bool have_governor_per_policy(void);
struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
void cpufreq_enable_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
void cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
#else
static inline unsigned int cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
{
return 0;
}
static inline unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get(unsigned int cpu)
{
return 0;
}
static inline unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get_max(unsigned int cpu)
{
return 0;
}
static inline void disable_cpufreq(void) { }
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT
void cpufreq_stats_create_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
void cpufreq_stats_free_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
void cpufreq_stats_record_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int new_freq);
#else
static inline void cpufreq_stats_create_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { }
static inline void cpufreq_stats_free_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { }
static inline void cpufreq_stats_record_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int new_freq) { }
#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT */
/*********************************************************************
* CPUFREQ DRIVER INTERFACE *
*********************************************************************/
#define CPUFREQ_RELATION_L 0 /* lowest frequency at or above target */
#define CPUFREQ_RELATION_H 1 /* highest frequency below or at target */
#define CPUFREQ_RELATION_C 2 /* closest frequency to target */
struct freq_attr {
struct attribute attr;
ssize_t (*show)(struct cpufreq_policy *, char *);
ssize_t (*store)(struct cpufreq_policy *, const char *, size_t count);
};
#define cpufreq_freq_attr_ro(_name) \
static struct freq_attr _name = \
__ATTR(_name, 0444, show_##_name, NULL)
#define cpufreq_freq_attr_ro_perm(_name, _perm) \
static struct freq_attr _name = \
__ATTR(_name, _perm, show_##_name, NULL)
#define cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(_name) \
static struct freq_attr _name = \
__ATTR(_name, 0644, show_##_name, store_##_name)
#define cpufreq_freq_attr_wo(_name) \
static struct freq_attr _name = \
__ATTR(_name, 0200, NULL, store_##_name)
struct global_attr {
struct attribute attr;
ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj,
struct attribute *attr, char *buf);
ssize_t (*store)(struct kobject *a, struct attribute *b,
const char *c, size_t count);
};
#define define_one_global_ro(_name) \
static struct global_attr _name = \
__ATTR(_name, 0444, show_##_name, NULL)
#define define_one_global_rw(_name) \
static struct global_attr _name = \
__ATTR(_name, 0644, show_##_name, store_##_name)
struct cpufreq_driver {
char name[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN];
u8 flags;
void *driver_data;
/* needed by all drivers */
int (*init)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
int (*verify)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
/* define one out of two */
int (*setpolicy)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
cpufreq: add support for intermediate (stable) frequencies Douglas Anderson, recently pointed out an interesting problem due to which udelay() was expiring earlier than it should. While transitioning between frequencies few platforms may temporarily switch to a stable frequency, waiting for the main PLL to stabilize. For example: When we transition between very low frequencies on exynos, like between 200MHz and 300MHz, we may temporarily switch to a PLL running at 800MHz. No CPUFREQ notification is sent for that. That means there's a period of time when we're running at 800MHz but loops_per_jiffy is calibrated at between 200MHz and 300MHz. And so udelay behaves badly. To get this fixed in a generic way, introduce another set of callbacks get_intermediate() and target_intermediate(), only for drivers with target_index() and CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION unset. get_intermediate() should return a stable intermediate frequency platform wants to switch to, and target_intermediate() should set CPU to that frequency, before jumping to the frequency corresponding to 'index'. Core will take care of sending notifications and driver doesn't have to handle them in target_intermediate() or target_index(). NOTE: ->target_index() should restore to policy->restore_freq in case of failures as core would send notifications for that. Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-06-03 01:19:28 +08:00
/*
* On failure, should always restore frequency to policy->restore_freq
* (i.e. old freq).
*/
int (*target)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq,
unsigned int relation); /* Deprecated */
int (*target_index)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index);
unsigned int (*fast_switch)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq);
/*
* Caches and returns the lowest driver-supported frequency greater than
* or equal to the target frequency, subject to any driver limitations.
* Does not set the frequency. Only to be implemented for drivers with
* target().
*/
unsigned int (*resolve_freq)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq);
cpufreq: add support for intermediate (stable) frequencies Douglas Anderson, recently pointed out an interesting problem due to which udelay() was expiring earlier than it should. While transitioning between frequencies few platforms may temporarily switch to a stable frequency, waiting for the main PLL to stabilize. For example: When we transition between very low frequencies on exynos, like between 200MHz and 300MHz, we may temporarily switch to a PLL running at 800MHz. No CPUFREQ notification is sent for that. That means there's a period of time when we're running at 800MHz but loops_per_jiffy is calibrated at between 200MHz and 300MHz. And so udelay behaves badly. To get this fixed in a generic way, introduce another set of callbacks get_intermediate() and target_intermediate(), only for drivers with target_index() and CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION unset. get_intermediate() should return a stable intermediate frequency platform wants to switch to, and target_intermediate() should set CPU to that frequency, before jumping to the frequency corresponding to 'index'. Core will take care of sending notifications and driver doesn't have to handle them in target_intermediate() or target_index(). NOTE: ->target_index() should restore to policy->restore_freq in case of failures as core would send notifications for that. Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-06-03 01:19:28 +08:00
/*
* Only for drivers with target_index() and CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION
* unset.
*
* get_intermediate should return a stable intermediate frequency
* platform wants to switch to and target_intermediate() should set CPU
* to to that frequency, before jumping to the frequency corresponding
* to 'index'. Core will take care of sending notifications and driver
* doesn't have to handle them in target_intermediate() or
* target_index().
*
* Drivers can return '0' from get_intermediate() in case they don't
* wish to switch to intermediate frequency for some target frequency.
* In that case core will directly call ->target_index().
*/
unsigned int (*get_intermediate)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index);
int (*target_intermediate)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index);
/* should be defined, if possible */
unsigned int (*get)(unsigned int cpu);
/* optional */
int (*bios_limit)(int cpu, unsigned int *limit);
int (*exit)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
void (*stop_cpu)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
int (*suspend)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
int (*resume)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
/* Will be called after the driver is fully initialized */
void (*ready)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
struct freq_attr **attr;
/* platform specific boost support code */
bool boost_enabled;
int (*set_boost)(int state);
};
/* flags */
#define CPUFREQ_STICKY (1 << 0) /* driver isn't removed even if
all ->init() calls failed */
#define CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS (1 << 1) /* loops_per_jiffy or other
kernel "constants" aren't
affected by frequency
transitions */
#define CPUFREQ_PM_NO_WARN (1 << 2) /* don't warn on suspend/resume
speed mismatches */
/*
* This should be set by platforms having multiple clock-domains, i.e.
* supporting multiple policies. With this sysfs directories of governor would
* be created in cpu/cpu<num>/cpufreq/ directory and so they can use the same
* governor with different tunables for different clusters.
*/
#define CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY (1 << 3)
/*
* Driver will do POSTCHANGE notifications from outside of their ->target()
* routine and so must set cpufreq_driver->flags with this flag, so that core
* can handle them specially.
*/
#define CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION (1 << 4)
/*
* Set by drivers which want cpufreq core to check if CPU is running at a
* frequency present in freq-table exposed by the driver. For these drivers if
* CPU is found running at an out of table freq, we will try to set it to a freq
* from the table. And if that fails, we will stop further boot process by
* issuing a BUG_ON().
*/
#define CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK (1 << 5)
int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
const char *cpufreq_get_current_driver(void);
void *cpufreq_get_driver_data(void);
static inline void cpufreq_verify_within_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int min, unsigned int max)
{
if (policy->min < min)
policy->min = min;
if (policy->max < min)
policy->max = min;
if (policy->min > max)
policy->min = max;
if (policy->max > max)
policy->max = max;
if (policy->min > policy->max)
policy->min = policy->max;
return;
}
static inline void
cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, policy->cpuinfo.min_freq,
policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
void cpufreq_suspend(void);
void cpufreq_resume(void);
int cpufreq_generic_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
#else
static inline void cpufreq_suspend(void) {}
static inline void cpufreq_resume(void) {}
#endif
/*********************************************************************
* CPUFREQ NOTIFIER INTERFACE *
*********************************************************************/
#define CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER (0)
#define CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER (1)
/* Transition notifiers */
#define CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE (0)
#define CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE (1)
/* Policy Notifiers */
#define CPUFREQ_ADJUST (0)
#define CPUFREQ_NOTIFY (1)
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
int cpufreq_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned int list);
int cpufreq_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned int list);
cpufreq: Make sure frequency transitions are serialized Whenever we change the frequency of a CPU, we call the PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers. They must be serialized, i.e. PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers should strictly alternate, thereby preventing two different sets of PRECHANGE or POSTCHANGE notifiers from interleaving arbitrarily. The following examples illustrate why this is important: Scenario 1: ----------- A thread reading the value of cpuinfo_cur_freq, will call __cpufreq_cpu_get()->cpufreq_out_of_sync()->cpufreq_notify_transition() The ondemand governor can decide to change the frequency of the CPU at the same time and hence it can end up sending the notifications via ->target(). If the notifiers are not serialized, the following sequence can occur: - PRECHANGE Notification for freq A (from cpuinfo_cur_freq) - PRECHANGE Notification for freq B (from target()) - Freq changed by target() to B - POSTCHANGE Notification for freq B - POSTCHANGE Notification for freq A We can see from the above that the last POSTCHANGE Notification happens for freq A but the hardware is set to run at freq B. Where would we break then?: adjust_jiffies() in cpufreq.c & cpufreq_callback() in arch/arm/kernel/smp.c (which also adjusts the jiffies). All the loops_per_jiffy calculations will get messed up. Scenario 2: ----------- The governor calls __cpufreq_driver_target() to change the frequency. At the same time, if we change scaling_{min|max}_freq from sysfs, it will end up calling the governor's CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS notification, which will also call __cpufreq_driver_target(). And hence we end up issuing concurrent calls to ->target(). Typically, platforms have the following logic in their ->target() routines: (Eg: cpufreq-cpu0, omap, exynos, etc) A. If new freq is more than old: Increase voltage B. Change freq C. If new freq is less than old: decrease voltage Now, if the two concurrent calls to ->target() are X and Y, where X is trying to increase the freq and Y is trying to decrease it, we get the following race condition: X.A: voltage gets increased for larger freq Y.A: nothing happens Y.B: freq gets decreased Y.C: voltage gets decreased X.B: freq gets increased X.C: nothing happens Thus we can end up setting a freq which is not supported by the voltage we have set. That will probably make the clock to the CPU unstable and the system might not work properly anymore. This patch introduces a set of synchronization primitives to serialize frequency transitions, which are to be used as shown below: cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(); //Perform the frequency change cpufreq_freq_transition_end(); The _begin() call sends the PRECHANGE notification whereas the _end() call sends the POSTCHANGE notification. Also, all the necessary synchronization is handled within these calls. In particular, even drivers which set the ASYNC_NOTIFICATION flag can also use these APIs for performing frequency transitions (ie., you can call _begin() from one task, and call the corresponding _end() from a different task). The actual synchronization underneath is not that complicated: The key challenge is to allow drivers to begin the transition from one thread and end it in a completely different thread (this is to enable drivers that do asynchronous POSTCHANGE notification from bottom-halves, to also use the same interface). To achieve this, a 'transition_ongoing' flag, a 'transition_lock' spinlock and a wait-queue are added per-policy. The flag and the wait-queue are used in conjunction to create an "uninterrupted flow" from _begin() to _end(). The spinlock is used to ensure that only one such "flow" is in flight at any given time. Put together, this provides us all the necessary synchronization. Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-03-24 16:05:44 +08:00
void cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs);
void cpufreq_freq_transition_end(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs, int transition_failed);
#else /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
static inline int cpufreq_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned int list)
{
return 0;
}
static inline int cpufreq_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned int list)
{
return 0;
}
#endif /* !CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
/**
* cpufreq_scale - "old * mult / div" calculation for large values (32-bit-arch
* safe)
* @old: old value
* @div: divisor
* @mult: multiplier
*
*
* new = old * mult / div
*/
static inline unsigned long cpufreq_scale(unsigned long old, u_int div,
u_int mult)
{
#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
u64 result = ((u64) old) * ((u64) mult);
do_div(result, div);
return (unsigned long) result;
#elif BITS_PER_LONG == 64
unsigned long result = old * ((u64) mult);
result /= div;
return result;
#endif
}
/*********************************************************************
* CPUFREQ GOVERNORS *
*********************************************************************/
/*
* If (cpufreq_driver->target) exists, the ->governor decides what frequency
* within the limits is used. If (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy> exists, these
* two generic policies are available:
*/
#define CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE (1)
#define CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE (2)
/*
* The polling frequency depends on the capability of the processor. Default
* polling frequency is 1000 times the transition latency of the processor. The
* ondemand governor will work on any processor with transition latency <= 10ms,
* using appropriate sampling rate.
*
* For CPUs with transition latency > 10ms (mostly drivers with CPUFREQ_ETERNAL)
* the ondemand governor will not work. All times here are in us (microseconds).
*/
#define MIN_SAMPLING_RATE_RATIO (2)
#define LATENCY_MULTIPLIER (1000)
#define MIN_LATENCY_MULTIPLIER (20)
#define TRANSITION_LATENCY_LIMIT (10 * 1000 * 1000)
struct cpufreq_governor {
char name[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN];
int (*init)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
void (*exit)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
int (*start)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
void (*stop)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
void (*limits)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
ssize_t (*show_setspeed) (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
char *buf);
int (*store_setspeed) (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int freq);
unsigned int max_transition_latency; /* HW must be able to switch to
next freq faster than this value in nano secs or we
will fallback to performance governor */
struct list_head governor_list;
struct module *owner;
};
/* Pass a target to the cpufreq driver */
unsigned int cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq);
int cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq,
unsigned int relation);
int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq,
unsigned int relation);
unsigned int cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq);
int cpufreq_register_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor);
void cpufreq_unregister_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor);
struct cpufreq_governor *cpufreq_default_governor(void);
struct cpufreq_governor *cpufreq_fallback_governor(void);
static inline void cpufreq_policy_apply_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
if (policy->max < policy->cur)
__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->max, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
else if (policy->min > policy->cur)
__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->min, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
}
/* Governor attribute set */
struct gov_attr_set {
struct kobject kobj;
struct list_head policy_list;
struct mutex update_lock;
int usage_count;
};
/* sysfs ops for cpufreq governors */
extern const struct sysfs_ops governor_sysfs_ops;
void gov_attr_set_init(struct gov_attr_set *attr_set, struct list_head *list_node);
void gov_attr_set_get(struct gov_attr_set *attr_set, struct list_head *list_node);
unsigned int gov_attr_set_put(struct gov_attr_set *attr_set, struct list_head *list_node);
/* Governor sysfs attribute */
struct governor_attr {
struct attribute attr;
ssize_t (*show)(struct gov_attr_set *attr_set, char *buf);
ssize_t (*store)(struct gov_attr_set *attr_set, const char *buf,
size_t count);
};
sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks With Android UI and benchmarks the latency of cpufreq response to certain scheduling events can become very critical. Currently, callbacks into cpufreq governors are only made from the scheduler if the target CPU of the event is the same as the current CPU. This means there are certain situations where a target CPU may not run the cpufreq governor for some time. One testcase to show this behavior is where a task starts running on CPU0, then a new task is also spawned on CPU0 by a task on CPU1. If the system is configured such that the new tasks should receive maximum demand initially, this should result in CPU0 increasing frequency immediately. But because of the above mentioned limitation though, this does not occur. This patch updates the scheduler core to call the cpufreq callbacks for remote CPUs as well. The schedutil, ondemand and conservative governors are updated to process cpufreq utilization update hooks called for remote CPUs where the remote CPU is managed by the cpufreq policy of the local CPU. The intel_pstate driver is updated to always reject remote callbacks. This is tested with couple of usecases (Android: hackbench, recentfling, galleryfling, vellamo, Ubuntu: hackbench) on ARM hikey board (64 bit octa-core, single policy). Only galleryfling showed minor improvements, while others didn't had much deviation. The reason being that this patch only targets a corner case, where following are required to be true to improve performance and that doesn't happen too often with these tests: - Task is migrated to another CPU. - The task has high demand, and should take the target CPU to higher OPPs. - And the target CPU doesn't call into the cpufreq governor until the next tick. Based on initial work from Steve Muckle. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-28 14:46:38 +08:00
static inline bool cpufreq_can_do_remote_dvfs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
/*
* Allow remote callbacks if:
* - dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu flag is set
* - the local and remote CPUs share cpufreq policy
*/
if (policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu ||
cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), policy->cpus))
sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks With Android UI and benchmarks the latency of cpufreq response to certain scheduling events can become very critical. Currently, callbacks into cpufreq governors are only made from the scheduler if the target CPU of the event is the same as the current CPU. This means there are certain situations where a target CPU may not run the cpufreq governor for some time. One testcase to show this behavior is where a task starts running on CPU0, then a new task is also spawned on CPU0 by a task on CPU1. If the system is configured such that the new tasks should receive maximum demand initially, this should result in CPU0 increasing frequency immediately. But because of the above mentioned limitation though, this does not occur. This patch updates the scheduler core to call the cpufreq callbacks for remote CPUs as well. The schedutil, ondemand and conservative governors are updated to process cpufreq utilization update hooks called for remote CPUs where the remote CPU is managed by the cpufreq policy of the local CPU. The intel_pstate driver is updated to always reject remote callbacks. This is tested with couple of usecases (Android: hackbench, recentfling, galleryfling, vellamo, Ubuntu: hackbench) on ARM hikey board (64 bit octa-core, single policy). Only galleryfling showed minor improvements, while others didn't had much deviation. The reason being that this patch only targets a corner case, where following are required to be true to improve performance and that doesn't happen too often with these tests: - Task is migrated to another CPU. - The task has high demand, and should take the target CPU to higher OPPs. - And the target CPU doesn't call into the cpufreq governor until the next tick. Based on initial work from Steve Muckle. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-07-28 14:46:38 +08:00
return true;
return false;
}
/*********************************************************************
* FREQUENCY TABLE HELPERS *
*********************************************************************/
/* Special Values of .frequency field */
#define CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID ~0u
#define CPUFREQ_TABLE_END ~1u
/* Special Values of .flags field */
#define CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ (1 << 0)
struct cpufreq_frequency_table {
unsigned int flags;
unsigned int driver_data; /* driver specific data, not used by core */
unsigned int frequency; /* kHz - doesn't need to be in ascending
* order */
};
#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ) && defined(CONFIG_PM_OPP)
int dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev,
struct cpufreq_frequency_table **table);
void dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev,
struct cpufreq_frequency_table **table);
#else
static inline int dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev,
struct cpufreq_frequency_table
**table)
{
return -EINVAL;
}
static inline void dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev,
struct cpufreq_frequency_table
**table)
{
}
#endif
/*
* cpufreq_for_each_entry - iterate over a cpufreq_frequency_table
* @pos: the cpufreq_frequency_table * to use as a loop cursor.
* @table: the cpufreq_frequency_table * to iterate over.
*/
#define cpufreq_for_each_entry(pos, table) \
for (pos = table; pos->frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; pos++)
/*
* cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry - iterate over a cpufreq_frequency_table
* excluding CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID frequencies.
* @pos: the cpufreq_frequency_table * to use as a loop cursor.
* @table: the cpufreq_frequency_table * to iterate over.
*/
#define cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) \
for (pos = table; pos->frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; pos++) \
if (pos->frequency == CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID) \
continue; \
else
int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table);
int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table);
int cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
int cpufreq_table_index_unsorted(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq,
unsigned int relation);
int cpufreq_frequency_table_get_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int freq);
ssize_t cpufreq_show_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, char *buf);
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state);
int cpufreq_boost_enabled(void);
int cpufreq_enable_boost_support(void);
bool policy_has_boost_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
/* Find lowest freq at or above target in a table in ascending order */
static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_al(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq >= target_freq)
return pos - table;
best = pos;
}
return best - table;
}
/* Find lowest freq at or above target in a table in descending order */
static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_dl(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq == target_freq)
return pos - table;
if (freq > target_freq) {
best = pos;
continue;
}
/* No freq found above target_freq */
if (best == table - 1)
return pos - table;
cpufreq: fix overflow in cpufreq_table_find_index_dl() 'best' is always less or equals to 'pos', so `best - pos' returns a negative value which is then getting casted to `unsigned int' and passed to __cpufreq_driver_target()->acpi_cpufreq_target() for policy->freq_table selection. This results in BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff881019b469f8 IP: [<ffffffffa00356c1>] acpi_cpufreq_target+0x4f/0x190 [acpi_cpufreq] PGD 267f067 PUD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP CPU: 6 PID: 70 Comm: kworker/6:1 Not tainted 4.9.0-rc1-next-20161017-dbg-dirty Workqueue: events dbs_work_handler task: ffff88041b808000 task.stack: ffff88041b810000 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa00356c1>] [<ffffffffa00356c1>] acpi_cpufreq_target+0x4f/0x190 [acpi_cpufreq] RSP: 0018:ffff88041b813c60 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: ffff880419b46a00 RBX: ffff88041b848400 RCX: ffff880419b20f80 RDX: 00000000001dff38 RSI: 00000000ffffffff RDI: ffff88041b848400 RBP: ffff88041b813cb0 R08: 0000000000000006 R09: 0000000000000040 R10: ffffffff8207f9e0 R11: ffffffff8173595b R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff88041f1dff38 R14: 0000000000262900 R15: 0000000bfffffff4 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88041f000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffff881019b469f8 CR3: 000000041a2d3000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 Stack: ffff88041b813cb0 ffffffff813347f9 ffff88041b813ca0 ffffffff81334663 ffff88041f1d4bc0 ffff88041b848400 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000262900 0000000000000000 ffff88041b813d00 ffffffff813355dc Call Trace: [<ffffffff813347f9>] ? cpufreq_freq_transition_begin+0xf1/0xfc [<ffffffff81334663>] ? get_cpu_idle_time+0x97/0xa6 [<ffffffff813355dc>] __cpufreq_driver_target+0x3b6/0x44e [<ffffffff81336ca3>] cs_dbs_timer+0x11a/0x135 [<ffffffff81336fda>] dbs_work_handler+0x39/0x62 [<ffffffff81057823>] process_one_work+0x280/0x4a5 [<ffffffff81058719>] worker_thread+0x24f/0x397 [<ffffffff810584ca>] ? rescuer_thread+0x30b/0x30b [<ffffffff81418380>] ? nl80211_get_key+0x29/0x36a [<ffffffff8105d2b7>] kthread+0xfc/0x104 [<ffffffff8107ceea>] ? put_lock_stats.isra.9+0xe/0x20 [<ffffffff8105d1bb>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x3f/0x3f [<ffffffff814b2092>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Code: 56 4d 6b ff 0c 41 55 41 54 53 48 83 ec 28 48 8b 15 ad 1e 00 00 44 8b 41 08 48 8b 87 c8 00 00 00 49 89 d5 4e 03 2c c5 80 b2 78 81 <46> 8b 74 38 04 45 3b 75 00 75 11 31 c0 83 39 00 0f 84 1c 01 00 RIP [<ffffffffa00356c1>] acpi_cpufreq_target+0x4f/0x190 [acpi_cpufreq] RSP <ffff88041b813c60> CR2: ffff881019b469f8 ---[ end trace 16d9fc7a17897d37 ]--- [ rjw: In some cases this bug may also cause incorrect frequencies to be selected by cpufreq governors. ] Fixes: 899bb6642f2a (cpufreq: skip invalid entries when searching the frequency) Link: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147672030714331&w=2 Reported-and-tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: 4.8+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.8+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-10-17 23:41:12 +08:00
return best - table;
}
cpufreq: fix overflow in cpufreq_table_find_index_dl() 'best' is always less or equals to 'pos', so `best - pos' returns a negative value which is then getting casted to `unsigned int' and passed to __cpufreq_driver_target()->acpi_cpufreq_target() for policy->freq_table selection. This results in BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff881019b469f8 IP: [<ffffffffa00356c1>] acpi_cpufreq_target+0x4f/0x190 [acpi_cpufreq] PGD 267f067 PUD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP CPU: 6 PID: 70 Comm: kworker/6:1 Not tainted 4.9.0-rc1-next-20161017-dbg-dirty Workqueue: events dbs_work_handler task: ffff88041b808000 task.stack: ffff88041b810000 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa00356c1>] [<ffffffffa00356c1>] acpi_cpufreq_target+0x4f/0x190 [acpi_cpufreq] RSP: 0018:ffff88041b813c60 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: ffff880419b46a00 RBX: ffff88041b848400 RCX: ffff880419b20f80 RDX: 00000000001dff38 RSI: 00000000ffffffff RDI: ffff88041b848400 RBP: ffff88041b813cb0 R08: 0000000000000006 R09: 0000000000000040 R10: ffffffff8207f9e0 R11: ffffffff8173595b R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff88041f1dff38 R14: 0000000000262900 R15: 0000000bfffffff4 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88041f000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffff881019b469f8 CR3: 000000041a2d3000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 Stack: ffff88041b813cb0 ffffffff813347f9 ffff88041b813ca0 ffffffff81334663 ffff88041f1d4bc0 ffff88041b848400 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000262900 0000000000000000 ffff88041b813d00 ffffffff813355dc Call Trace: [<ffffffff813347f9>] ? cpufreq_freq_transition_begin+0xf1/0xfc [<ffffffff81334663>] ? get_cpu_idle_time+0x97/0xa6 [<ffffffff813355dc>] __cpufreq_driver_target+0x3b6/0x44e [<ffffffff81336ca3>] cs_dbs_timer+0x11a/0x135 [<ffffffff81336fda>] dbs_work_handler+0x39/0x62 [<ffffffff81057823>] process_one_work+0x280/0x4a5 [<ffffffff81058719>] worker_thread+0x24f/0x397 [<ffffffff810584ca>] ? rescuer_thread+0x30b/0x30b [<ffffffff81418380>] ? nl80211_get_key+0x29/0x36a [<ffffffff8105d2b7>] kthread+0xfc/0x104 [<ffffffff8107ceea>] ? put_lock_stats.isra.9+0xe/0x20 [<ffffffff8105d1bb>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x3f/0x3f [<ffffffff814b2092>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Code: 56 4d 6b ff 0c 41 55 41 54 53 48 83 ec 28 48 8b 15 ad 1e 00 00 44 8b 41 08 48 8b 87 c8 00 00 00 49 89 d5 4e 03 2c c5 80 b2 78 81 <46> 8b 74 38 04 45 3b 75 00 75 11 31 c0 83 39 00 0f 84 1c 01 00 RIP [<ffffffffa00356c1>] acpi_cpufreq_target+0x4f/0x190 [acpi_cpufreq] RSP <ffff88041b813c60> CR2: ffff881019b469f8 ---[ end trace 16d9fc7a17897d37 ]--- [ rjw: In some cases this bug may also cause incorrect frequencies to be selected by cpufreq governors. ] Fixes: 899bb6642f2a (cpufreq: skip invalid entries when searching the frequency) Link: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147672030714331&w=2 Reported-and-tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: 4.8+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.8+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-10-17 23:41:12 +08:00
return best - table;
}
/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_l(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq)
{
target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max);
if (policy->freq_table_sorted == CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_ASCENDING)
return cpufreq_table_find_index_al(policy, target_freq);
else
return cpufreq_table_find_index_dl(policy, target_freq);
}
/* Find highest freq at or below target in a table in ascending order */
static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_ah(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq == target_freq)
return pos - table;
if (freq < target_freq) {
best = pos;
continue;
}
/* No freq found below target_freq */
if (best == table - 1)
return pos - table;
return best - table;
}
return best - table;
}
/* Find highest freq at or below target in a table in descending order */
static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_dh(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq <= target_freq)
return pos - table;
best = pos;
}
return best - table;
}
/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_h(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq)
{
target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max);
if (policy->freq_table_sorted == CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_ASCENDING)
return cpufreq_table_find_index_ah(policy, target_freq);
else
return cpufreq_table_find_index_dh(policy, target_freq);
}
/* Find closest freq to target in a table in ascending order */
static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_ac(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq == target_freq)
return pos - table;
if (freq < target_freq) {
best = pos;
continue;
}
/* No freq found below target_freq */
if (best == table - 1)
return pos - table;
/* Choose the closest freq */
if (target_freq - best->frequency > freq - target_freq)
return pos - table;
return best - table;
}
return best - table;
}
/* Find closest freq to target in a table in descending order */
static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_dc(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *best = table - 1;
unsigned int freq;
cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
freq = pos->frequency;
if (freq == target_freq)
return pos - table;
if (freq > target_freq) {
best = pos;
continue;
}
/* No freq found above target_freq */
if (best == table - 1)
return pos - table;
/* Choose the closest freq */
if (best->frequency - target_freq > target_freq - freq)
return pos - table;
return best - table;
}
return best - table;
}
/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */
static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_c(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq)
{
target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max);
if (policy->freq_table_sorted == CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_ASCENDING)
return cpufreq_table_find_index_ac(policy, target_freq);
else
return cpufreq_table_find_index_dc(policy, target_freq);
}
static inline int cpufreq_frequency_table_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq,
unsigned int relation)
{
if (unlikely(policy->freq_table_sorted == CPUFREQ_TABLE_UNSORTED))
return cpufreq_table_index_unsorted(policy, target_freq,
relation);
switch (relation) {
case CPUFREQ_RELATION_L:
return cpufreq_table_find_index_l(policy, target_freq);
case CPUFREQ_RELATION_H:
return cpufreq_table_find_index_h(policy, target_freq);
case CPUFREQ_RELATION_C:
return cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, target_freq);
default:
pr_err("%s: Invalid relation: %d\n", __func__, relation);
return -EINVAL;
}
}
static inline int cpufreq_table_count_valid_entries(const struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos;
int count = 0;
if (unlikely(!policy->freq_table))
return 0;
cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, policy->freq_table)
count++;
return count;
}
#else
static inline int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
{
return 0;
}
static inline int cpufreq_boost_enabled(void)
{
return 0;
}
static inline int cpufreq_enable_boost_support(void)
{
return -EINVAL;
}
static inline bool policy_has_boost_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
return false;
}
#endif
x86: use common aperfmperf_khz_on_cpu() to calculate KHz using APERF/MPERF The goal of this change is to give users a uniform and meaningful result when they read /sys/...cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq on modern x86 hardware, as compared to what they get today. Modern x86 processors include the hardware needed to accurately calculate frequency over an interval -- APERF, MPERF, and the TSC. Here we provide an x86 routine to make this calculation on supported hardware, and use it in preference to any driver driver-specific cpufreq_driver.get() routine. MHz is computed like so: MHz = base_MHz * delta_APERF / delta_MPERF MHz is the average frequency of the busy processor over a measurement interval. The interval is defined to be the time between successive invocations of aperfmperf_khz_on_cpu(), which are expected to to happen on-demand when users read sysfs attribute cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq. As with previous methods of calculating MHz, idle time is excluded. base_MHz above is from TSC calibration global "cpu_khz". This x86 native method to calculate MHz returns a meaningful result no matter if P-states are controlled by hardware or firmware and/or if the Linux cpufreq sub-system is or is-not installed. When this routine is invoked more frequently, the measurement interval becomes shorter. However, the code limits re-computation to 10ms intervals so that average frequency remains meaningful. Discerning users are encouraged to take advantage of the turbostat(8) utility, which can gracefully handle concurrent measurement intervals of arbitrary length. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-06-24 13:11:52 +08:00
extern unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu);
/* the following are really really optional */
extern struct freq_attr cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs;
extern struct freq_attr cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_boost_freqs;
extern struct freq_attr *cpufreq_generic_attr[];
int cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table);
unsigned int cpufreq_generic_get(unsigned int cpu);
int cpufreq_generic_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table,
unsigned int transition_latency);
#endif /* _LINUX_CPUFREQ_H */