2012-08-13 16:11:15 +08:00
|
|
|
menu "ST-Ericsson AB U300/U335 Platform"
|
2009-04-23 17:22:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
comment "ST-Ericsson Mobile Platform Products"
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-03 00:01:46 +08:00
|
|
|
config ARCH_U300
|
2013-06-20 08:26:37 +08:00
|
|
|
bool "ST-Ericsson U300 Series" if ARCH_MULTI_V5
|
2013-05-03 00:01:46 +08:00
|
|
|
depends on MMU
|
|
|
|
|
select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
|
|
|
|
|
select ARM_AMBA
|
|
|
|
|
select ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT
|
|
|
|
|
select ARM_VIC
|
|
|
|
|
select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
|
|
|
|
|
select CLKSRC_MMIO
|
|
|
|
|
select CLKSRC_OF
|
|
|
|
|
select COMMON_CLK
|
|
|
|
|
select CPU_ARM926T
|
|
|
|
|
select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
|
|
|
|
|
select HAVE_TCM
|
2011-05-03 02:54:38 +08:00
|
|
|
select PINCTRL
|
2011-11-16 16:22:59 +08:00
|
|
|
select PINCTRL_COH901
|
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-07 00:12:25 +08:00
|
|
|
select PINCTRL_U300
|
2013-05-03 00:01:46 +08:00
|
|
|
select SPARSE_IRQ
|
2013-06-14 03:21:31 +08:00
|
|
|
select MFD_SYSCON
|
2013-05-03 00:01:46 +08:00
|
|
|
select USE_OF
|
|
|
|
|
help
|
|
|
|
|
Support for ST-Ericsson U300 series mobile platforms.
|
2009-04-23 17:22:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-08-13 16:11:15 +08:00
|
|
|
comment "ST-Ericsson U300/U335 Feature Selections"
|
2009-04-23 17:22:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-03 00:01:46 +08:00
|
|
|
config MACH_U300
|
|
|
|
|
depends on ARCH_U300
|
|
|
|
|
bool "U300"
|
|
|
|
|
default y
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-04-23 17:22:13 +08:00
|
|
|
config U300_DEBUG
|
2013-05-03 00:01:46 +08:00
|
|
|
depends on ARCH_U300
|
2009-04-23 17:22:13 +08:00
|
|
|
bool "Debug support for U300"
|
|
|
|
|
depends on PM
|
|
|
|
|
help
|
|
|
|
|
Debug support for U300 in sysfs, procfs etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-14 17:59:05 +08:00
|
|
|
config MACH_U300_SPIDUMMY
|
2013-05-03 00:01:46 +08:00
|
|
|
depends on ARCH_U300
|
2009-08-14 17:59:05 +08:00
|
|
|
bool "SSP/SPI dummy chip"
|
|
|
|
|
select SPI
|
|
|
|
|
select SPI_MASTER
|
|
|
|
|
select SPI_PL022
|
|
|
|
|
help
|
|
|
|
|
This creates a small kernel module that creates a dummy
|
|
|
|
|
SPI device to be used for loopback tests. Regularly used
|
|
|
|
|
to test reference designs. If you're not testing SPI,
|
|
|
|
|
you don't need it. Selecting this will activate the
|
|
|
|
|
SPI framework and ARM PL022 support.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-04-23 17:22:13 +08:00
|
|
|
endmenu
|
