2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-28 23:23:55 +08:00
linux-next/net/dsa/dsa2.c

1647 lines
37 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
/*
* net/dsa/dsa2.c - Hardware switch handling, binding version 2
* Copyright (c) 2008-2009 Marvell Semiconductor
* Copyright (c) 2013 Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
* Copyright (c) 2016 Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
*/
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_net.h>
#include <net/devlink.h>
#include "dsa_priv.h"
static DEFINE_MUTEX(dsa2_mutex);
net: dsa: implement auto-normalization of MTU for bridge hardware datapath Many switches don't have an explicit knob for configuring the MTU (maximum transmission unit per interface). Instead, they do the length-based packet admission checks on the ingress interface, for reasons that are easy to understand (why would you accept a packet in the queuing subsystem if you know you're going to drop it anyway). So it is actually the MRU that these switches permit configuring. In Linux there only exists the IFLA_MTU netlink attribute and the associated dev_set_mtu function. The comments like to play blind and say that it's changing the "maximum transfer unit", which is to say that there isn't any directionality in the meaning of the MTU word. So that is the interpretation that this patch is giving to things: MTU == MRU. When 2 interfaces having different MTUs are bridged, the bridge driver MTU auto-adjustment logic kicks in: what br_mtu_auto_adjust() does is it adjusts the MTU of the bridge net device itself (and not that of the slave net devices) to the minimum value of all slave interfaces, in order for forwarded packets to not exceed the MTU regardless of the interface they are received and send on. The idea behind this behavior, and why the slave MTUs are not adjusted, is that normal termination from Linux over the L2 forwarding domain should happen over the bridge net device, which _is_ properly limited by the minimum MTU. And termination over individual slave devices is possible even if those are bridged. But that is not "forwarding", so there's no reason to do normalization there, since only a single interface sees that packet. The problem with those switches that can only control the MRU is with the offloaded data path, where a packet received on an interface with MRU 9000 would still be forwarded to an interface with MRU 1500. And the br_mtu_auto_adjust() function does not really help, since the MTU configured on the bridge net device is ignored. In order to enforce the de-facto MTU == MRU rule for these switches, we need to do MTU normalization, which means: in order for no packet larger than the MTU configured on this port to be sent, then we need to limit the MRU on all ports that this packet could possibly come from. AKA since we are configuring the MRU via MTU, it means that all ports within a bridge forwarding domain should have the same MTU. And that is exactly what this patch is trying to do. >From an implementation perspective, we try to follow the intent of the user, otherwise there is a risk that we might livelock them (they try to change the MTU on an already-bridged interface, but we just keep changing it back in an attempt to keep the MTU normalized). So the MTU that the bridge is normalized to is either: - The most recently changed one: ip link set dev swp0 master br0 ip link set dev swp1 master br0 ip link set dev swp0 mtu 1400 This sequence will make swp1 inherit MTU 1400 from swp0. - The one of the most recently added interface to the bridge: ip link set dev swp0 master br0 ip link set dev swp1 mtu 1400 ip link set dev swp1 master br0 The above sequence will make swp0 inherit MTU 1400 as well. Suggested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-03-28 03:55:43 +08:00
LIST_HEAD(dsa_tree_list);
/* Track the bridges with forwarding offload enabled */
static unsigned long dsa_fwd_offloading_bridges;
/**
* dsa_tree_notify - Execute code for all switches in a DSA switch tree.
* @dst: collection of struct dsa_switch devices to notify.
* @e: event, must be of type DSA_NOTIFIER_*
* @v: event-specific value.
*
* Given a struct dsa_switch_tree, this can be used to run a function once for
* each member DSA switch. The other alternative of traversing the tree is only
* through its ports list, which does not uniquely list the switches.
*/
int dsa_tree_notify(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, unsigned long e, void *v)
{
struct raw_notifier_head *nh = &dst->nh;
int err;
err = raw_notifier_call_chain(nh, e, v);
return notifier_to_errno(err);
}
/**
* dsa_broadcast - Notify all DSA trees in the system.
* @e: event, must be of type DSA_NOTIFIER_*
* @v: event-specific value.
*
* Can be used to notify the switching fabric of events such as cross-chip
* bridging between disjoint trees (such as islands of tagger-compatible
* switches bridged by an incompatible middle switch).
net: dsa: tag_8021q: don't broadcast during setup/teardown Currently, on my board with multiple sja1105 switches in disjoint trees described in commit f66a6a69f97a ("net: dsa: permit cross-chip bridging between all trees in the system"), rebooting the board triggers the following benign warnings: [ 12.345566] sja1105 spi2.0: port 0 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1088 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.353804] sja1105 spi2.0: port 0 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2112 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.362019] sja1105 spi2.0: port 1 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1089 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.370246] sja1105 spi2.0: port 1 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2113 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.378466] sja1105 spi2.0: port 2 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1090 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.386683] sja1105 spi2.0: port 2 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2114 deletion: -ENOENT Basically switch 1 calls dsa_tag_8021q_unregister, and switch 1's TX and RX VLANs cannot be found on switch 2's CPU port. But why would switch 2 even attempt to delete switch 1's TX and RX tag_8021q VLANs from its CPU port? Well, because we use dsa_broadcast, and it is supposed that it had added those VLANs in the first place (because in dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_match, all CPU ports match regardless of their tree index or switch index). The two trees probe asynchronously, and when switch 1 probed, it called dsa_broadcast which did not notify the tree of switch 2, because that didn't probe yet. But during unbind, switch 2's tree _is_ probed, so it _is_ notified of the deletion. Before jumping to introduce a synchronization mechanism between the probing across disjoint switch trees, let's take a step back and see whether we _need_ to do that in the first place. The RX and TX VLANs of switch 1 would be needed on switch 2's CPU port only if switch 1 and 2 were part of a cross-chip bridge. And dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_join takes care precisely of that (but if probing was synchronous, the bridge_join would just end up bumping the VLANs' refcount, because they are already installed by the setup path). Since by the time the ports are bridged, all DSA trees are already set up, and we don't need the tag_8021q VLANs of one switch installed on the other switches during probe time, the answer is that we don't need to fix the synchronization issue. So make the setup and teardown code paths call dsa_port_notify, which notifies only the local tree, and the bridge code paths call dsa_broadcast, which let the other trees know as well. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-08-11 21:46:06 +08:00
*
* WARNING: this function is not reliable during probe time, because probing
* between trees is asynchronous and not all DSA trees might have probed.
*/
int dsa_broadcast(unsigned long e, void *v)
{
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst;
int err = 0;
list_for_each_entry(dst, &dsa_tree_list, list) {
err = dsa_tree_notify(dst, e, v);
if (err)
break;
}
return err;
}
/**
* dsa_lag_map() - Map LAG netdev to a linear LAG ID
* @dst: Tree in which to record the mapping.
* @lag: Netdev that is to be mapped to an ID.
*
* dsa_lag_id/dsa_lag_dev can then be used to translate between the
* two spaces. The size of the mapping space is determined by the
* driver by setting ds->num_lag_ids. It is perfectly legal to leave
* it unset if it is not needed, in which case these functions become
* no-ops.
*/
void dsa_lag_map(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, struct net_device *lag)
{
unsigned int id;
if (dsa_lag_id(dst, lag) >= 0)
/* Already mapped */
return;
for (id = 0; id < dst->lags_len; id++) {
if (!dsa_lag_dev(dst, id)) {
dst->lags[id] = lag;
return;
}
}
/* No IDs left, which is OK. Some drivers do not need it. The
* ones that do, e.g. mv88e6xxx, will discover that dsa_lag_id
* returns an error for this device when joining the LAG. The
* driver can then return -EOPNOTSUPP back to DSA, which will
* fall back to a software LAG.
*/
}
/**
* dsa_lag_unmap() - Remove a LAG ID mapping
* @dst: Tree in which the mapping is recorded.
* @lag: Netdev that was mapped.
*
* As there may be multiple users of the mapping, it is only removed
* if there are no other references to it.
*/
void dsa_lag_unmap(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, struct net_device *lag)
{
struct dsa_port *dp;
unsigned int id;
dsa_lag_foreach_port(dp, dst, lag)
/* There are remaining users of this mapping */
return;
dsa_lags_foreach_id(id, dst) {
if (dsa_lag_dev(dst, id) == lag) {
dst->lags[id] = NULL;
break;
}
}
}
static int dsa_bridge_num_find(const struct net_device *bridge_dev)
{
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst;
struct dsa_port *dp;
/* When preparing the offload for a port, it will have a valid
* dp->bridge_dev pointer but a not yet valid dp->bridge_num.
* However there might be other ports having the same dp->bridge_dev
* and a valid dp->bridge_num, so just ignore this port.
*/
list_for_each_entry(dst, &dsa_tree_list, list)
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list)
if (dp->bridge_dev == bridge_dev &&
dp->bridge_num != -1)
return dp->bridge_num;
return -1;
}
int dsa_bridge_num_get(const struct net_device *bridge_dev, int max)
{
int bridge_num = dsa_bridge_num_find(bridge_dev);
if (bridge_num < 0) {
/* First port that offloads TX forwarding for this bridge */
bridge_num = find_first_zero_bit(&dsa_fwd_offloading_bridges,
DSA_MAX_NUM_OFFLOADING_BRIDGES);
if (bridge_num >= max)
return -1;
set_bit(bridge_num, &dsa_fwd_offloading_bridges);
}
return bridge_num;
}
void dsa_bridge_num_put(const struct net_device *bridge_dev, int bridge_num)
{
/* Check if the bridge is still in use, otherwise it is time
* to clean it up so we can reuse this bridge_num later.
*/
if (dsa_bridge_num_find(bridge_dev) < 0)
clear_bit(bridge_num, &dsa_fwd_offloading_bridges);
}
struct dsa_switch *dsa_switch_find(int tree_index, int sw_index)
{
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst;
struct dsa_port *dp;
list_for_each_entry(dst, &dsa_tree_list, list) {
if (dst->index != tree_index)
continue;
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) {
if (dp->ds->index != sw_index)
continue;
return dp->ds;
}
}
return NULL;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_switch_find);
static struct dsa_switch_tree *dsa_tree_find(int index)
{
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst;
list_for_each_entry(dst, &dsa_tree_list, list)
if (dst->index == index)
return dst;
return NULL;
}
static struct dsa_switch_tree *dsa_tree_alloc(int index)
{
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst;
dst = kzalloc(sizeof(*dst), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!dst)
return NULL;
dst->index = index;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dst->rtable);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dst->ports);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dst->list);
list_add_tail(&dst->list, &dsa_tree_list);
kref_init(&dst->refcount);
return dst;
}
static void dsa_tree_free(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
net: dsa: keep a copy of the tagging protocol in the DSA switch tree Cascading DSA switches can be done multiple ways. There is the brute force approach / tag stacking, where one upstream switch, located between leaf switches and the host Ethernet controller, will just happily transport the DSA header of those leaf switches as payload. For this kind of setups, DSA works without any special kind of treatment compared to a single switch - they just aren't aware of each other. Then there's the approach where the upstream switch understands the tags it transports from its leaves below, as it doesn't push a tag of its own, but it routes based on the source port & switch id information present in that tag (as opposed to DMAC & VID) and it strips the tag when egressing a front-facing port. Currently only Marvell implements the latter, and Marvell DSA trees contain only Marvell switches. So it is safe to say that DSA trees already have a single tag protocol shared by all switches, and in fact this is what makes the switches able to understand each other. This fact is also implied by the fact that currently, the tagging protocol is reported as part of a sysfs installed on the DSA master and not per port, so it must be the same for all the ports connected to that DSA master regardless of the switch that they belong to. It's time to make this official and enforce it (yes, this also means we won't have any "switch understands tag to some extent but is not able to speak it" hardware oddities that we'll support in the future). This is needed due to the imminent introduction of the dsa_switch_ops:: change_tag_protocol driver API. When that is introduced, we'll have to notify switches of the tagging protocol that they're configured to use. Currently the tag_ops structure pointer is held only for CPU ports. But there are switches which don't have CPU ports and nonetheless still need to be configured. These would be Marvell leaf switches whose upstream port is just a DSA link. How do we inform these of their tagging protocol setup/deletion? One answer to the above would be: iterate through the DSA switch tree's ports once, list the CPU ports, get their tag_ops, then iterate again now that we have it, and notify everybody of that tag_ops. But what to do if conflicts appear between one cpu_dp->tag_ops and another? There's no escaping the fact that conflict resolution needs to be done, so we can be upfront about it. Ease our work and just keep the master copy of the tag_ops inside the struct dsa_switch_tree. Reference counting is now moved to be per-tree too, instead of per-CPU port. There are many places in the data path that access master->dsa_ptr->tag_ops and we would introduce unnecessary performance penalty going through yet another indirection, so keep those right where they are. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-29 09:00:05 +08:00
if (dst->tag_ops)
dsa_tag_driver_put(dst->tag_ops);
list_del(&dst->list);
kfree(dst);
}
static struct dsa_switch_tree *dsa_tree_get(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
if (dst)
kref_get(&dst->refcount);
return dst;
}
static struct dsa_switch_tree *dsa_tree_touch(int index)
{
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst;
dst = dsa_tree_find(index);
if (dst)
return dsa_tree_get(dst);
else
return dsa_tree_alloc(index);
}
static void dsa_tree_release(struct kref *ref)
{
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst;
dst = container_of(ref, struct dsa_switch_tree, refcount);
dsa_tree_free(dst);
}
static void dsa_tree_put(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
if (dst)
kref_put(&dst->refcount, dsa_tree_release);
}
static struct dsa_port *dsa_tree_find_port_by_node(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
struct device_node *dn)
{
struct dsa_port *dp;
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list)
if (dp->dn == dn)
return dp;
return NULL;
}
static struct dsa_link *dsa_link_touch(struct dsa_port *dp,
struct dsa_port *link_dp)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst;
struct dsa_link *dl;
dst = ds->dst;
list_for_each_entry(dl, &dst->rtable, list)
if (dl->dp == dp && dl->link_dp == link_dp)
return dl;
dl = kzalloc(sizeof(*dl), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!dl)
return NULL;
dl->dp = dp;
dl->link_dp = link_dp;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dl->list);
list_add_tail(&dl->list, &dst->rtable);
return dl;
}
static bool dsa_port_setup_routing_table(struct dsa_port *dp)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;
struct device_node *dn = dp->dn;
struct of_phandle_iterator it;
struct dsa_port *link_dp;
struct dsa_link *dl;
int err;
of_for_each_phandle(&it, err, dn, "link", NULL, 0) {
link_dp = dsa_tree_find_port_by_node(dst, it.node);
if (!link_dp) {
of_node_put(it.node);
return false;
}
dl = dsa_link_touch(dp, link_dp);
if (!dl) {
of_node_put(it.node);
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
static bool dsa_tree_setup_routing_table(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
bool complete = true;
struct dsa_port *dp;
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) {
if (dsa_port_is_dsa(dp)) {
complete = dsa_port_setup_routing_table(dp);
if (!complete)
break;
}
}
return complete;
}
static struct dsa_port *dsa_tree_find_first_cpu(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_port *dp;
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list)
if (dsa_port_is_cpu(dp))
return dp;
return NULL;
}
net: dsa: give preference to local CPU ports Be there an "H" switch topology, where there are 2 switches connected as follows: eth0 eth1 | | CPU port CPU port | DSA link | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 -------- sw1p4 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 | | | | | | user user user user user user port port port port port port basically one where each switch has its own CPU port for termination, but there is also a DSA link in case packets need to be forwarded in hardware between one switch and another. DSA insists to see this as a daisy chain topology, basically registering all network interfaces as sw0p0@eth0, ... sw1p0@eth0 and disregarding eth1 as a valid DSA master. This is only half the story, since when asked using dsa_port_is_cpu(), DSA will respond that sw1p1 is a CPU port, however one which has no dp->cpu_dp pointing to it. So sw1p1 is enabled, but not used. Furthermore, be there a driver for switches which support only one upstream port. This driver iterates through its ports and checks using dsa_is_upstream_port() whether the current port is an upstream one. For switch 1, two ports pass the "is upstream port" checks: - sw1p4 is an upstream port because it is a routing port towards the dedicated CPU port assigned using dsa_tree_setup_default_cpu() - sw1p1 is also an upstream port because it is a CPU port, albeit one that is disabled. This is because dsa_upstream_port() returns: if (!cpu_dp) return port; which means that if @dp does not have a ->cpu_dp pointer (which is a characteristic of CPU ports themselves as well as unused ports), then @dp is its own upstream port. So the driver for switch 1 rightfully says: I have two upstream ports, but I don't support multiple upstream ports! So let me error out, I don't know which one to choose and what to do with the other one. Generally I am against enforcing any default policy in the kernel in terms of user to CPU port assignment (like round robin or such) but this case is different. To solve the conundrum, one would have to: - Disable sw1p1 in the device tree or mark it as "not a CPU port" in order to comply with DSA's view of this topology as a daisy chain, where the termination traffic from switch 1 must pass through switch 0. This is counter-productive because it wastes 1Gbps of termination throughput in switch 1. - Disable the DSA link between sw0p4 and sw1p4 and do software forwarding between switch 0 and 1, and basically treat the switches as part of disjoint switch trees. This is counter-productive because it wastes 1Gbps of autonomous forwarding throughput between switch 0 and 1. - Treat sw0p4 and sw1p4 as user ports instead of DSA links. This could work, but it makes cross-chip bridging impossible. In this setup we would need to have 2 separate bridges, br0 spanning the ports of switch 0, and br1 spanning the ports of switch 1, and the "DSA links treated as user ports" sw0p4 (part of br0) and sw1p4 (part of br1) are the gateway ports between one bridge and another. This is hard to manage from a user's perspective, who wants to have a unified view of the switching fabric and the ability to transparently add ports to the same bridge. VLANs would also need to be explicitly managed by the user on these gateway ports. So it seems that the only reasonable thing to do is to make DSA prefer CPU ports that are local to the switch. Meaning that by default, the user and DSA ports of switch 0 will get assigned to the CPU port from switch 0 (sw0p1) and the user and DSA ports of switch 1 will get assigned to the CPU port from switch 1. The way this solves the problem is that sw1p4 is no longer an upstream port as far as switch 1 is concerned (it no longer views sw0p1 as its dedicated CPU port). So here we are, the first multi-CPU port that DSA supports is also perhaps the most uneventful one: the individual switches don't support multiple CPUs, however the DSA switch tree as a whole does have multiple CPU ports. No user space assignment of user ports to CPU ports is desirable, necessary, or possible. Ports that do not have a local CPU port (say there was an extra switch hanging off of sw0p0) default to the standard implementation of getting assigned to the first CPU port of the DSA switch tree. Is that good enough? Probably not (if the downstream switch was hanging off of switch 1, we would most certainly prefer its CPU port to be sw1p1), but in order to support that use case too, we would need to traverse the dst->rtable in search of an optimum dedicated CPU port, one that has the smallest number of hops between dp->ds and dp->cpu_dp->ds. At the moment, the DSA routing table structure does not keep the number of hops between dl->dp and dl->link_dp, and while it is probably deducible, there is zero justification to write that code now. Let's hope DSA will never have to support that use case. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-08-04 21:54:30 +08:00
/* Assign the default CPU port (the first one in the tree) to all ports of the
* fabric which don't already have one as part of their own switch.
*/
static int dsa_tree_setup_default_cpu(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_port *cpu_dp, *dp;
cpu_dp = dsa_tree_find_first_cpu(dst);
if (!cpu_dp) {
pr_err("DSA: tree %d has no CPU port\n", dst->index);
return -EINVAL;
}
net: dsa: give preference to local CPU ports Be there an "H" switch topology, where there are 2 switches connected as follows: eth0 eth1 | | CPU port CPU port | DSA link | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 -------- sw1p4 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 | | | | | | user user user user user user port port port port port port basically one where each switch has its own CPU port for termination, but there is also a DSA link in case packets need to be forwarded in hardware between one switch and another. DSA insists to see this as a daisy chain topology, basically registering all network interfaces as sw0p0@eth0, ... sw1p0@eth0 and disregarding eth1 as a valid DSA master. This is only half the story, since when asked using dsa_port_is_cpu(), DSA will respond that sw1p1 is a CPU port, however one which has no dp->cpu_dp pointing to it. So sw1p1 is enabled, but not used. Furthermore, be there a driver for switches which support only one upstream port. This driver iterates through its ports and checks using dsa_is_upstream_port() whether the current port is an upstream one. For switch 1, two ports pass the "is upstream port" checks: - sw1p4 is an upstream port because it is a routing port towards the dedicated CPU port assigned using dsa_tree_setup_default_cpu() - sw1p1 is also an upstream port because it is a CPU port, albeit one that is disabled. This is because dsa_upstream_port() returns: if (!cpu_dp) return port; which means that if @dp does not have a ->cpu_dp pointer (which is a characteristic of CPU ports themselves as well as unused ports), then @dp is its own upstream port. So the driver for switch 1 rightfully says: I have two upstream ports, but I don't support multiple upstream ports! So let me error out, I don't know which one to choose and what to do with the other one. Generally I am against enforcing any default policy in the kernel in terms of user to CPU port assignment (like round robin or such) but this case is different. To solve the conundrum, one would have to: - Disable sw1p1 in the device tree or mark it as "not a CPU port" in order to comply with DSA's view of this topology as a daisy chain, where the termination traffic from switch 1 must pass through switch 0. This is counter-productive because it wastes 1Gbps of termination throughput in switch 1. - Disable the DSA link between sw0p4 and sw1p4 and do software forwarding between switch 0 and 1, and basically treat the switches as part of disjoint switch trees. This is counter-productive because it wastes 1Gbps of autonomous forwarding throughput between switch 0 and 1. - Treat sw0p4 and sw1p4 as user ports instead of DSA links. This could work, but it makes cross-chip bridging impossible. In this setup we would need to have 2 separate bridges, br0 spanning the ports of switch 0, and br1 spanning the ports of switch 1, and the "DSA links treated as user ports" sw0p4 (part of br0) and sw1p4 (part of br1) are the gateway ports between one bridge and another. This is hard to manage from a user's perspective, who wants to have a unified view of the switching fabric and the ability to transparently add ports to the same bridge. VLANs would also need to be explicitly managed by the user on these gateway ports. So it seems that the only reasonable thing to do is to make DSA prefer CPU ports that are local to the switch. Meaning that by default, the user and DSA ports of switch 0 will get assigned to the CPU port from switch 0 (sw0p1) and the user and DSA ports of switch 1 will get assigned to the CPU port from switch 1. The way this solves the problem is that sw1p4 is no longer an upstream port as far as switch 1 is concerned (it no longer views sw0p1 as its dedicated CPU port). So here we are, the first multi-CPU port that DSA supports is also perhaps the most uneventful one: the individual switches don't support multiple CPUs, however the DSA switch tree as a whole does have multiple CPU ports. No user space assignment of user ports to CPU ports is desirable, necessary, or possible. Ports that do not have a local CPU port (say there was an extra switch hanging off of sw0p0) default to the standard implementation of getting assigned to the first CPU port of the DSA switch tree. Is that good enough? Probably not (if the downstream switch was hanging off of switch 1, we would most certainly prefer its CPU port to be sw1p1), but in order to support that use case too, we would need to traverse the dst->rtable in search of an optimum dedicated CPU port, one that has the smallest number of hops between dp->ds and dp->cpu_dp->ds. At the moment, the DSA routing table structure does not keep the number of hops between dl->dp and dl->link_dp, and while it is probably deducible, there is zero justification to write that code now. Let's hope DSA will never have to support that use case. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-08-04 21:54:30 +08:00
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) {
if (dp->cpu_dp)
continue;
if (dsa_port_is_user(dp) || dsa_port_is_dsa(dp))
dp->cpu_dp = cpu_dp;
net: dsa: give preference to local CPU ports Be there an "H" switch topology, where there are 2 switches connected as follows: eth0 eth1 | | CPU port CPU port | DSA link | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 -------- sw1p4 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 | | | | | | user user user user user user port port port port port port basically one where each switch has its own CPU port for termination, but there is also a DSA link in case packets need to be forwarded in hardware between one switch and another. DSA insists to see this as a daisy chain topology, basically registering all network interfaces as sw0p0@eth0, ... sw1p0@eth0 and disregarding eth1 as a valid DSA master. This is only half the story, since when asked using dsa_port_is_cpu(), DSA will respond that sw1p1 is a CPU port, however one which has no dp->cpu_dp pointing to it. So sw1p1 is enabled, but not used. Furthermore, be there a driver for switches which support only one upstream port. This driver iterates through its ports and checks using dsa_is_upstream_port() whether the current port is an upstream one. For switch 1, two ports pass the "is upstream port" checks: - sw1p4 is an upstream port because it is a routing port towards the dedicated CPU port assigned using dsa_tree_setup_default_cpu() - sw1p1 is also an upstream port because it is a CPU port, albeit one that is disabled. This is because dsa_upstream_port() returns: if (!cpu_dp) return port; which means that if @dp does not have a ->cpu_dp pointer (which is a characteristic of CPU ports themselves as well as unused ports), then @dp is its own upstream port. So the driver for switch 1 rightfully says: I have two upstream ports, but I don't support multiple upstream ports! So let me error out, I don't know which one to choose and what to do with the other one. Generally I am against enforcing any default policy in the kernel in terms of user to CPU port assignment (like round robin or such) but this case is different. To solve the conundrum, one would have to: - Disable sw1p1 in the device tree or mark it as "not a CPU port" in order to comply with DSA's view of this topology as a daisy chain, where the termination traffic from switch 1 must pass through switch 0. This is counter-productive because it wastes 1Gbps of termination throughput in switch 1. - Disable the DSA link between sw0p4 and sw1p4 and do software forwarding between switch 0 and 1, and basically treat the switches as part of disjoint switch trees. This is counter-productive because it wastes 1Gbps of autonomous forwarding throughput between switch 0 and 1. - Treat sw0p4 and sw1p4 as user ports instead of DSA links. This could work, but it makes cross-chip bridging impossible. In this setup we would need to have 2 separate bridges, br0 spanning the ports of switch 0, and br1 spanning the ports of switch 1, and the "DSA links treated as user ports" sw0p4 (part of br0) and sw1p4 (part of br1) are the gateway ports between one bridge and another. This is hard to manage from a user's perspective, who wants to have a unified view of the switching fabric and the ability to transparently add ports to the same bridge. VLANs would also need to be explicitly managed by the user on these gateway ports. So it seems that the only reasonable thing to do is to make DSA prefer CPU ports that are local to the switch. Meaning that by default, the user and DSA ports of switch 0 will get assigned to the CPU port from switch 0 (sw0p1) and the user and DSA ports of switch 1 will get assigned to the CPU port from switch 1. The way this solves the problem is that sw1p4 is no longer an upstream port as far as switch 1 is concerned (it no longer views sw0p1 as its dedicated CPU port). So here we are, the first multi-CPU port that DSA supports is also perhaps the most uneventful one: the individual switches don't support multiple CPUs, however the DSA switch tree as a whole does have multiple CPU ports. No user space assignment of user ports to CPU ports is desirable, necessary, or possible. Ports that do not have a local CPU port (say there was an extra switch hanging off of sw0p0) default to the standard implementation of getting assigned to the first CPU port of the DSA switch tree. Is that good enough? Probably not (if the downstream switch was hanging off of switch 1, we would most certainly prefer its CPU port to be sw1p1), but in order to support that use case too, we would need to traverse the dst->rtable in search of an optimum dedicated CPU port, one that has the smallest number of hops between dp->ds and dp->cpu_dp->ds. At the moment, the DSA routing table structure does not keep the number of hops between dl->dp and dl->link_dp, and while it is probably deducible, there is zero justification to write that code now. Let's hope DSA will never have to support that use case. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-08-04 21:54:30 +08:00
}
return 0;
}
net: dsa: give preference to local CPU ports Be there an "H" switch topology, where there are 2 switches connected as follows: eth0 eth1 | | CPU port CPU port | DSA link | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 -------- sw1p4 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 | | | | | | user user user user user user port port port port port port basically one where each switch has its own CPU port for termination, but there is also a DSA link in case packets need to be forwarded in hardware between one switch and another. DSA insists to see this as a daisy chain topology, basically registering all network interfaces as sw0p0@eth0, ... sw1p0@eth0 and disregarding eth1 as a valid DSA master. This is only half the story, since when asked using dsa_port_is_cpu(), DSA will respond that sw1p1 is a CPU port, however one which has no dp->cpu_dp pointing to it. So sw1p1 is enabled, but not used. Furthermore, be there a driver for switches which support only one upstream port. This driver iterates through its ports and checks using dsa_is_upstream_port() whether the current port is an upstream one. For switch 1, two ports pass the "is upstream port" checks: - sw1p4 is an upstream port because it is a routing port towards the dedicated CPU port assigned using dsa_tree_setup_default_cpu() - sw1p1 is also an upstream port because it is a CPU port, albeit one that is disabled. This is because dsa_upstream_port() returns: if (!cpu_dp) return port; which means that if @dp does not have a ->cpu_dp pointer (which is a characteristic of CPU ports themselves as well as unused ports), then @dp is its own upstream port. So the driver for switch 1 rightfully says: I have two upstream ports, but I don't support multiple upstream ports! So let me error out, I don't know which one to choose and what to do with the other one. Generally I am against enforcing any default policy in the kernel in terms of user to CPU port assignment (like round robin or such) but this case is different. To solve the conundrum, one would have to: - Disable sw1p1 in the device tree or mark it as "not a CPU port" in order to comply with DSA's view of this topology as a daisy chain, where the termination traffic from switch 1 must pass through switch 0. This is counter-productive because it wastes 1Gbps of termination throughput in switch 1. - Disable the DSA link between sw0p4 and sw1p4 and do software forwarding between switch 0 and 1, and basically treat the switches as part of disjoint switch trees. This is counter-productive because it wastes 1Gbps of autonomous forwarding throughput between switch 0 and 1. - Treat sw0p4 and sw1p4 as user ports instead of DSA links. This could work, but it makes cross-chip bridging impossible. In this setup we would need to have 2 separate bridges, br0 spanning the ports of switch 0, and br1 spanning the ports of switch 1, and the "DSA links treated as user ports" sw0p4 (part of br0) and sw1p4 (part of br1) are the gateway ports between one bridge and another. This is hard to manage from a user's perspective, who wants to have a unified view of the switching fabric and the ability to transparently add ports to the same bridge. VLANs would also need to be explicitly managed by the user on these gateway ports. So it seems that the only reasonable thing to do is to make DSA prefer CPU ports that are local to the switch. Meaning that by default, the user and DSA ports of switch 0 will get assigned to the CPU port from switch 0 (sw0p1) and the user and DSA ports of switch 1 will get assigned to the CPU port from switch 1. The way this solves the problem is that sw1p4 is no longer an upstream port as far as switch 1 is concerned (it no longer views sw0p1 as its dedicated CPU port). So here we are, the first multi-CPU port that DSA supports is also perhaps the most uneventful one: the individual switches don't support multiple CPUs, however the DSA switch tree as a whole does have multiple CPU ports. No user space assignment of user ports to CPU ports is desirable, necessary, or possible. Ports that do not have a local CPU port (say there was an extra switch hanging off of sw0p0) default to the standard implementation of getting assigned to the first CPU port of the DSA switch tree. Is that good enough? Probably not (if the downstream switch was hanging off of switch 1, we would most certainly prefer its CPU port to be sw1p1), but in order to support that use case too, we would need to traverse the dst->rtable in search of an optimum dedicated CPU port, one that has the smallest number of hops between dp->ds and dp->cpu_dp->ds. At the moment, the DSA routing table structure does not keep the number of hops between dl->dp and dl->link_dp, and while it is probably deducible, there is zero justification to write that code now. Let's hope DSA will never have to support that use case. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-08-04 21:54:30 +08:00
/* Perform initial assignment of CPU ports to user ports and DSA links in the
* fabric, giving preference to CPU ports local to each switch. Default to
* using the first CPU port in the switch tree if the port does not have a CPU
* port local to this switch.
*/
static int dsa_tree_setup_cpu_ports(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_port *cpu_dp, *dp;
list_for_each_entry(cpu_dp, &dst->ports, list) {
if (!dsa_port_is_cpu(cpu_dp))
continue;
/* Prefer a local CPU port */
dsa_switch_for_each_port(dp, cpu_dp->ds) {
net: dsa: give preference to local CPU ports Be there an "H" switch topology, where there are 2 switches connected as follows: eth0 eth1 | | CPU port CPU port | DSA link | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 -------- sw1p4 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 | | | | | | user user user user user user port port port port port port basically one where each switch has its own CPU port for termination, but there is also a DSA link in case packets need to be forwarded in hardware between one switch and another. DSA insists to see this as a daisy chain topology, basically registering all network interfaces as sw0p0@eth0, ... sw1p0@eth0 and disregarding eth1 as a valid DSA master. This is only half the story, since when asked using dsa_port_is_cpu(), DSA will respond that sw1p1 is a CPU port, however one which has no dp->cpu_dp pointing to it. So sw1p1 is enabled, but not used. Furthermore, be there a driver for switches which support only one upstream port. This driver iterates through its ports and checks using dsa_is_upstream_port() whether the current port is an upstream one. For switch 1, two ports pass the "is upstream port" checks: - sw1p4 is an upstream port because it is a routing port towards the dedicated CPU port assigned using dsa_tree_setup_default_cpu() - sw1p1 is also an upstream port because it is a CPU port, albeit one that is disabled. This is because dsa_upstream_port() returns: if (!cpu_dp) return port; which means that if @dp does not have a ->cpu_dp pointer (which is a characteristic of CPU ports themselves as well as unused ports), then @dp is its own upstream port. So the driver for switch 1 rightfully says: I have two upstream ports, but I don't support multiple upstream ports! So let me error out, I don't know which one to choose and what to do with the other one. Generally I am against enforcing any default policy in the kernel in terms of user to CPU port assignment (like round robin or such) but this case is different. To solve the conundrum, one would have to: - Disable sw1p1 in the device tree or mark it as "not a CPU port" in order to comply with DSA's view of this topology as a daisy chain, where the termination traffic from switch 1 must pass through switch 0. This is counter-productive because it wastes 1Gbps of termination throughput in switch 1. - Disable the DSA link between sw0p4 and sw1p4 and do software forwarding between switch 0 and 1, and basically treat the switches as part of disjoint switch trees. This is counter-productive because it wastes 1Gbps of autonomous forwarding throughput between switch 0 and 1. - Treat sw0p4 and sw1p4 as user ports instead of DSA links. This could work, but it makes cross-chip bridging impossible. In this setup we would need to have 2 separate bridges, br0 spanning the ports of switch 0, and br1 spanning the ports of switch 1, and the "DSA links treated as user ports" sw0p4 (part of br0) and sw1p4 (part of br1) are the gateway ports between one bridge and another. This is hard to manage from a user's perspective, who wants to have a unified view of the switching fabric and the ability to transparently add ports to the same bridge. VLANs would also need to be explicitly managed by the user on these gateway ports. So it seems that the only reasonable thing to do is to make DSA prefer CPU ports that are local to the switch. Meaning that by default, the user and DSA ports of switch 0 will get assigned to the CPU port from switch 0 (sw0p1) and the user and DSA ports of switch 1 will get assigned to the CPU port from switch 1. The way this solves the problem is that sw1p4 is no longer an upstream port as far as switch 1 is concerned (it no longer views sw0p1 as its dedicated CPU port). So here we are, the first multi-CPU port that DSA supports is also perhaps the most uneventful one: the individual switches don't support multiple CPUs, however the DSA switch tree as a whole does have multiple CPU ports. No user space assignment of user ports to CPU ports is desirable, necessary, or possible. Ports that do not have a local CPU port (say there was an extra switch hanging off of sw0p0) default to the standard implementation of getting assigned to the first CPU port of the DSA switch tree. Is that good enough? Probably not (if the downstream switch was hanging off of switch 1, we would most certainly prefer its CPU port to be sw1p1), but in order to support that use case too, we would need to traverse the dst->rtable in search of an optimum dedicated CPU port, one that has the smallest number of hops between dp->ds and dp->cpu_dp->ds. At the moment, the DSA routing table structure does not keep the number of hops between dl->dp and dl->link_dp, and while it is probably deducible, there is zero justification to write that code now. Let's hope DSA will never have to support that use case. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-08-04 21:54:30 +08:00
/* Prefer the first local CPU port found */
if (dp->cpu_dp)
continue;
if (dsa_port_is_user(dp) || dsa_port_is_dsa(dp))
dp->cpu_dp = cpu_dp;
}
}
return dsa_tree_setup_default_cpu(dst);
}
static void dsa_tree_teardown_cpu_ports(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_port *dp;
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list)
if (dsa_port_is_user(dp) || dsa_port_is_dsa(dp))
dp->cpu_dp = NULL;
}
static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp)
{
struct devlink_port *dlp = &dp->devlink_port;
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 20:46:19 +08:00
bool dsa_port_link_registered = false;
net: dsa: tear down devlink port regions when tearing down the devlink port on error Commit 86f8b1c01a0a ("net: dsa: Do not make user port errors fatal") decided it was fine to ignore errors on certain ports that fail to probe, and go on with the ports that do probe fine. Commit fb6ec87f7229 ("net: dsa: Fix type was not set for devlink port") noticed that devlink_port_type_eth_set(dlp, dp->slave); does not get called, and devlink notices after a timeout of 3600 seconds and prints a WARN_ON. So it went ahead to unregister the devlink port. And because there exists an UNUSED port flavour, we actually re-register the devlink port as UNUSED. Commit 08156ba430b4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") added devlink port regions, which are set up by the driver and not by DSA. When we trigger the devlink port deregistration and reregistration as unused, devlink now prints another WARN_ON, from here: devlink_port_unregister: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink_port->region_list)); So the port still has regions, which makes sense, because they were set up by the driver, and the driver doesn't know we're unregistering the devlink port. Somebody needs to tear them down, and optionally (actually it would be nice, to be consistent) set them up again for the new devlink port. But DSA's layering stays in our way quite badly here. The options I've considered are: 1. Introduce a function in devlink to just change a port's type and flavour. No dice, devlink keeps a lot of state, it really wants the port to not be registered when you set its parameters, so changing anything can only be done by destroying what we currently have and recreating it. 2. Make DSA cache the parameters passed to dsa_devlink_port_region_create, and the region returned, keep those in a list, then when the devlink port unregister needs to take place, the existing devlink regions are destroyed by DSA, and we replay the creation of new regions using the cached parameters. Problem: mv88e6xxx keeps the region pointers in chip->ports[port].region, and these will remain stale after DSA frees them. There are many things DSA can do, but updating mv88e6xxx's private pointers is not one of them. 3. Just let the driver do it (i.e. introduce a very specific method called ds->ops->port_reinit_as_unused, which unregisters its devlink port devlink regions, then the old devlink port, then registers the new one, then the devlink port regions for it). While it does work, as opposed to the others, it's pretty horrible from an API perspective and we can do better. 4. Introduce a new pair of methods, ->port_setup and ->port_teardown, which in the case of mv88e6xxx must register and unregister the devlink port regions. Call these 2 methods when the port must be reinitialized as unused. Naturally, I went for the 4th approach. Fixes: 08156ba430b4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-17 22:29:16 +08:00
struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 20:46:19 +08:00
bool dsa_port_enabled = false;
int err = 0;
if (dp->setup)
return 0;
net: dsa: introduce locking for the address lists on CPU and DSA ports Now that the rtnl_mutex is going away for dsa_port_{host_,}fdb_{add,del}, no one is serializing access to the address lists that DSA keeps for the purpose of reference counting on shared ports (CPU and cascade ports). It can happen for one dsa_switch_do_fdb_del to do list_del on a dp->fdbs element while another dsa_switch_do_fdb_{add,del} is traversing dp->fdbs. We need to avoid that. Currently dp->mdbs is not at risk, because dsa_switch_do_mdb_{add,del} still runs under the rtnl_mutex. But it would be nice if it would not depend on that being the case. So let's introduce a mutex per port (the address lists are per port too) and share it between dp->mdbs and dp->fdbs. The place where we put the locking is interesting. It could be tempting to put a DSA-level lock which still serializes calls to .port_fdb_{add,del}, but it would still not avoid concurrency with other driver code paths that are currently under rtnl_mutex (.port_fdb_dump, .port_fast_age). So it would add a very false sense of security (and adding a global switch-wide lock in DSA to resynchronize with the rtnl_lock is also counterproductive and hard). So the locking is intentionally done only where the dp->fdbs and dp->mdbs lists are traversed. That means, from a driver perspective, that .port_fdb_add will be called with the dp->addr_lists_lock mutex held on the CPU port, but not held on user ports. This is done so that driver writers are not encouraged to rely on any guarantee offered by dp->addr_lists_lock. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-10-25 01:17:54 +08:00
mutex_init(&dp->addr_lists_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dp->fdbs);
net: dsa: reference count the MDB entries at the cross-chip notifier level Ever since the cross-chip notifiers were introduced, the design was meant to be simplistic and just get the job done without worrying too much about dangling resources left behind. For example, somebody installs an MDB entry on sw0p0 in this daisy chain topology. It gets installed using ds->ops->port_mdb_add() on sw0p0, sw1p4 and sw2p4. | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ x ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] Then the same person deletes that MDB entry. The cross-chip notifier for deletion only matches sw0p0: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ x ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Why? Because the DSA links are 'trunk' ports, if we just go ahead and delete the MDB from sw1p4 and sw2p4 directly, we might delete those multicast entries when they are still needed. Just consider the fact that somebody does: - add a multicast MAC address towards sw0p0 [ via the cross-chip notifiers it gets installed on the DSA links too ] - add the same multicast MAC address towards sw0p1 (another port of that same switch) - delete the same multicast MAC address from sw0p0. At this point, if we deleted the MAC address from the DSA links, it would be flooded, even though there is still an entry on switch 0 which needs it not to. So that is why deletions only match the targeted source port and nothing on DSA links. Of course, dangling resources means that the hardware tables will eventually run out given enough additions/removals, but hey, at least it's simple. But there is a bigger concern which needs to be addressed, and that is our support for SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB. DSA simply translates such an object into a dsa_port_host_mdb_add() which ends up as ds->ops->port_mdb_add() on the upstream port, and a similar thing happens on deletion: dsa_port_host_mdb_del() will trigger ds->ops->port_mdb_del() on the upstream port. When there are 2 VLAN-unaware bridges spanning the same switch (which is a use case DSA proudly supports), each bridge will install its own SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB entries. But upon deletion, DSA goes ahead and emits a DSA_NOTIFIER_MDB_DEL for dp->cpu_dp, which is shared between the user ports enslaved to br0 and the user ports enslaved to br1. Not good. The host-trapped multicast addresses installed by br1 will be deleted when any state changes in br0 (IGMP timers expire, or ports leave, etc). To avoid this, we could of course go the route of the zero-sum game and delete the DSA_NOTIFIER_MDB_DEL call for dp->cpu_dp. But the better design is to just admit that on shared ports like DSA links and CPU ports, we should be reference counting calls, even if this consumes some dynamic memory which DSA has traditionally avoided. On the flip side, the hardware tables of switches are limited in size, so it would be good if the OS managed them properly instead of having them eventually overflow. To address the memory usage concern, we only apply the refcounting of MDB entries on ports that are really shared (CPU ports and DSA links) and not on user ports. In a typical single-switch setup, this means only the CPU port (and the host MDB entries are not that many, really). The name of the newly introduced data structures (dsa_mac_addr) is chosen in such a way that will be reusable for host FDB entries (next patch). With this change, we can finally have the same matching logic for the MDB additions and deletions, as well as for their host-trapped variants. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-29 22:06:50 +08:00
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dp->mdbs);
net: dsa: tear down devlink port regions when tearing down the devlink port on error Commit 86f8b1c01a0a ("net: dsa: Do not make user port errors fatal") decided it was fine to ignore errors on certain ports that fail to probe, and go on with the ports that do probe fine. Commit fb6ec87f7229 ("net: dsa: Fix type was not set for devlink port") noticed that devlink_port_type_eth_set(dlp, dp->slave); does not get called, and devlink notices after a timeout of 3600 seconds and prints a WARN_ON. So it went ahead to unregister the devlink port. And because there exists an UNUSED port flavour, we actually re-register the devlink port as UNUSED. Commit 08156ba430b4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") added devlink port regions, which are set up by the driver and not by DSA. When we trigger the devlink port deregistration and reregistration as unused, devlink now prints another WARN_ON, from here: devlink_port_unregister: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink_port->region_list)); So the port still has regions, which makes sense, because they were set up by the driver, and the driver doesn't know we're unregistering the devlink port. Somebody needs to tear them down, and optionally (actually it would be nice, to be consistent) set them up again for the new devlink port. But DSA's layering stays in our way quite badly here. The options I've considered are: 1. Introduce a function in devlink to just change a port's type and flavour. No dice, devlink keeps a lot of state, it really wants the port to not be registered when you set its parameters, so changing anything can only be done by destroying what we currently have and recreating it. 2. Make DSA cache the parameters passed to dsa_devlink_port_region_create, and the region returned, keep those in a list, then when the devlink port unregister needs to take place, the existing devlink regions are destroyed by DSA, and we replay the creation of new regions using the cached parameters. Problem: mv88e6xxx keeps the region pointers in chip->ports[port].region, and these will remain stale after DSA frees them. There are many things DSA can do, but updating mv88e6xxx's private pointers is not one of them. 3. Just let the driver do it (i.e. introduce a very specific method called ds->ops->port_reinit_as_unused, which unregisters its devlink port devlink regions, then the old devlink port, then registers the new one, then the devlink port regions for it). While it does work, as opposed to the others, it's pretty horrible from an API perspective and we can do better. 4. Introduce a new pair of methods, ->port_setup and ->port_teardown, which in the case of mv88e6xxx must register and unregister the devlink port regions. Call these 2 methods when the port must be reinitialized as unused. Naturally, I went for the 4th approach. Fixes: 08156ba430b4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-17 22:29:16 +08:00
if (ds->ops->port_setup) {
err = ds->ops->port_setup(ds, dp->index);
if (err)
return err;
}
switch (dp->type) {
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED:
dsa_port_disable(dp);
break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU:
err = dsa_port_link_register_of(dp);
if (err)
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 20:46:19 +08:00
break;
dsa_port_link_registered = true;
err = dsa_port_enable(dp, NULL);
if (err)
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 20:46:19 +08:00
break;
dsa_port_enabled = true;
break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA:
err = dsa_port_link_register_of(dp);
if (err)
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 20:46:19 +08:00
break;
dsa_port_link_registered = true;
err = dsa_port_enable(dp, NULL);
if (err)
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 20:46:19 +08:00
break;
dsa_port_enabled = true;
break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER:
of: net: pass the dst buffer to of_get_mac_address() of_get_mac_address() returns a "const void*" pointer to a MAC address. Lately, support to fetch the MAC address by an NVMEM provider was added. But this will only work with platform devices. It will not work with PCI devices (e.g. of an integrated root complex) and esp. not with DSA ports. There is an of_* variant of the nvmem binding which works without devices. The returned data of a nvmem_cell_read() has to be freed after use. On the other hand the return of_get_mac_address() points to some static data without a lifetime. The trick for now, was to allocate a device resource managed buffer which is then returned. This will only work if we have an actual device. Change it, so that the caller of of_get_mac_address() has to supply a buffer where the MAC address is written to. Unfortunately, this will touch all drivers which use the of_get_mac_address(). Usually the code looks like: const char *addr; addr = of_get_mac_address(np); if (!IS_ERR(addr)) ether_addr_copy(ndev->dev_addr, addr); This can then be simply rewritten as: of_get_mac_address(np, ndev->dev_addr); Sometimes is_valid_ether_addr() is used to test the MAC address. of_get_mac_address() already makes sure, it just returns a valid MAC address. Thus we can just test its return code. But we have to be careful if there are still other sources for the MAC address before the of_get_mac_address(). In this case we have to keep the is_valid_ether_addr() call. The following coccinelle patch was used to convert common cases to the new style. Afterwards, I've manually gone over the drivers and fixed the return code variable: either used a new one or if one was already available use that. Mansour Moufid, thanks for that coccinelle patch! <spml> @a@ identifier x; expression y, z; @@ - x = of_get_mac_address(y); + x = of_get_mac_address(y, z); <... - ether_addr_copy(z, x); ...> @@ identifier a.x; @@ - if (<+... x ...+>) {} @@ identifier a.x; @@ if (<+... x ...+>) { ... } - else {} @@ identifier a.x; expression e; @@ - if (<+... x ...+>@e) - {} - else + if (!(e)) {...} @@ expression x, y, z; @@ - x = of_get_mac_address(y, z); + of_get_mac_address(y, z); ... when != x </spml> All drivers, except drivers/net/ethernet/aeroflex/greth.c, were compile-time tested. Suggested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-04-13 01:47:17 +08:00
of_get_mac_address(dp->dn, dp->mac);
err = dsa_slave_create(dp);
if (err)
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 20:46:19 +08:00
break;
devlink_port_type_eth_set(dlp, dp->slave);
break;
}
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 20:46:19 +08:00
if (err && dsa_port_enabled)
dsa_port_disable(dp);
if (err && dsa_port_link_registered)
dsa_port_link_unregister_of(dp);
net: dsa: tear down devlink port regions when tearing down the devlink port on error Commit 86f8b1c01a0a ("net: dsa: Do not make user port errors fatal") decided it was fine to ignore errors on certain ports that fail to probe, and go on with the ports that do probe fine. Commit fb6ec87f7229 ("net: dsa: Fix type was not set for devlink port") noticed that devlink_port_type_eth_set(dlp, dp->slave); does not get called, and devlink notices after a timeout of 3600 seconds and prints a WARN_ON. So it went ahead to unregister the devlink port. And because there exists an UNUSED port flavour, we actually re-register the devlink port as UNUSED. Commit 08156ba430b4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") added devlink port regions, which are set up by the driver and not by DSA. When we trigger the devlink port deregistration and reregistration as unused, devlink now prints another WARN_ON, from here: devlink_port_unregister: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink_port->region_list)); So the port still has regions, which makes sense, because they were set up by the driver, and the driver doesn't know we're unregistering the devlink port. Somebody needs to tear them down, and optionally (actually it would be nice, to be consistent) set them up again for the new devlink port. But DSA's layering stays in our way quite badly here. The options I've considered are: 1. Introduce a function in devlink to just change a port's type and flavour. No dice, devlink keeps a lot of state, it really wants the port to not be registered when you set its parameters, so changing anything can only be done by destroying what we currently have and recreating it. 2. Make DSA cache the parameters passed to dsa_devlink_port_region_create, and the region returned, keep those in a list, then when the devlink port unregister needs to take place, the existing devlink regions are destroyed by DSA, and we replay the creation of new regions using the cached parameters. Problem: mv88e6xxx keeps the region pointers in chip->ports[port].region, and these will remain stale after DSA frees them. There are many things DSA can do, but updating mv88e6xxx's private pointers is not one of them. 3. Just let the driver do it (i.e. introduce a very specific method called ds->ops->port_reinit_as_unused, which unregisters its devlink port devlink regions, then the old devlink port, then registers the new one, then the devlink port regions for it). While it does work, as opposed to the others, it's pretty horrible from an API perspective and we can do better. 4. Introduce a new pair of methods, ->port_setup and ->port_teardown, which in the case of mv88e6xxx must register and unregister the devlink port regions. Call these 2 methods when the port must be reinitialized as unused. Naturally, I went for the 4th approach. Fixes: 08156ba430b4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-17 22:29:16 +08:00
if (err) {
if (ds->ops->port_teardown)
ds->ops->port_teardown(ds, dp->index);
return err;
net: dsa: tear down devlink port regions when tearing down the devlink port on error Commit 86f8b1c01a0a ("net: dsa: Do not make user port errors fatal") decided it was fine to ignore errors on certain ports that fail to probe, and go on with the ports that do probe fine. Commit fb6ec87f7229 ("net: dsa: Fix type was not set for devlink port") noticed that devlink_port_type_eth_set(dlp, dp->slave); does not get called, and devlink notices after a timeout of 3600 seconds and prints a WARN_ON. So it went ahead to unregister the devlink port. And because there exists an UNUSED port flavour, we actually re-register the devlink port as UNUSED. Commit 08156ba430b4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") added devlink port regions, which are set up by the driver and not by DSA. When we trigger the devlink port deregistration and reregistration as unused, devlink now prints another WARN_ON, from here: devlink_port_unregister: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink_port->region_list)); So the port still has regions, which makes sense, because they were set up by the driver, and the driver doesn't know we're unregistering the devlink port. Somebody needs to tear them down, and optionally (actually it would be nice, to be consistent) set them up again for the new devlink port. But DSA's layering stays in our way quite badly here. The options I've considered are: 1. Introduce a function in devlink to just change a port's type and flavour. No dice, devlink keeps a lot of state, it really wants the port to not be registered when you set its parameters, so changing anything can only be done by destroying what we currently have and recreating it. 2. Make DSA cache the parameters passed to dsa_devlink_port_region_create, and the region returned, keep those in a list, then when the devlink port unregister needs to take place, the existing devlink regions are destroyed by DSA, and we replay the creation of new regions using the cached parameters. Problem: mv88e6xxx keeps the region pointers in chip->ports[port].region, and these will remain stale after DSA frees them. There are many things DSA can do, but updating mv88e6xxx's private pointers is not one of them. 3. Just let the driver do it (i.e. introduce a very specific method called ds->ops->port_reinit_as_unused, which unregisters its devlink port devlink regions, then the old devlink port, then registers the new one, then the devlink port regions for it). While it does work, as opposed to the others, it's pretty horrible from an API perspective and we can do better. 4. Introduce a new pair of methods, ->port_setup and ->port_teardown, which in the case of mv88e6xxx must register and unregister the devlink port regions. Call these 2 methods when the port must be reinitialized as unused. Naturally, I went for the 4th approach. Fixes: 08156ba430b4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-17 22:29:16 +08:00
}
net: dsa: Fix off-by-one number of calls to devlink_port_unregister When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following stack trace can be seen: [ 2.038342] sja1105 spi0.1: Probed switch chip: SJA1105T [ 2.054556] sja1105 spi0.1: Reset switch and programmed static config [ 2.063837] sja1105 spi0.1: Enabled switch tagging [ 2.068706] fsl-gianfar soc:ethernet@2d90000 eth2: error -19 setting up slave phy [ 2.076371] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2.080973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 21 at net/core/devlink.c:6184 devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0 [ 2.088954] Modules linked in: [ 2.092005] CPU: 1 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-01360-g41b52e38d2b6-dirty #1746 [ 2.100912] Hardware name: Freescale LS1021A [ 2.105162] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func [ 2.110287] [<c03133a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.117992] [<c030d8cc>] (show_stack) from [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xc8) [ 2.125180] [<c10b08d8>] (dump_stack) from [<c0349d04>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 2.132018] [<c0349d04>] (__warn) from [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 2.139549] [<c0349e34>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free+0x1b4/0x1c0) [ 2.147772] [<c0f19d74>] (devlink_free) from [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown+0x60/0x6c) [ 2.155907] [<c1064fc0>] (dsa_switch_teardown) from [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch+0x8e4/0xaa8) [ 2.164821] [<c1065950>] (dsa_register_switch) from [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe+0x21c/0x2ec) [ 2.173216] [<c0ba7fe4>] (sja1105_probe) from [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe+0x80/0xa4) [ 2.180920] [<c0b35948>] (spi_drv_probe) from [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe+0x108/0x400) [ 2.188711] [<c0a4c1cc>] (really_probe) from [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1bc) [ 2.196933] [<c0a4c694>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0xb8) [ 2.205414] [<c0a4a3dc>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach+0xd0/0x168) [ 2.213637] [<c0a4c024>] (__device_attach) from [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c) [ 2.221772] [<c0a4b1d0>] (bus_probe_device) from [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func+0x84/0xc4) [ 2.230686] [<c0a4b72c>] (deferred_probe_work_func) from [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work+0x218/0x510) [ 2.239772] [<c03650a4>] (process_one_work) from [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread+0x2a8/0x5c0) [ 2.247908] [<c03660d8>] (worker_thread) from [<c036b348>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.255265] [<c036b348>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 2.262444] Exception stack(0xea965fb0 to 0xea965ff8) [ 2.267466] 5fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.275598] 5fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.283729] 5fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 2.290333] ---[ end trace ca5d506728a0581a ]--- devlink_free is complaining right here: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list)); This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed. Vivien said about this change that: Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error. which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_ being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set up. ports_teardown: for (i = 0; i < port; i++) dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]); Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a smart idea. The list might go on. So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state. Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-31 20:46:19 +08:00
dp->setup = true;
return 0;
}
static int dsa_port_devlink_setup(struct dsa_port *dp)
{
struct devlink_port *dlp = &dp->devlink_port;
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = dp->ds->dst;
struct devlink_port_attrs attrs = {};
struct devlink *dl = dp->ds->devlink;
const unsigned char *id;
unsigned char len;
int err;
id = (const unsigned char *)&dst->index;
len = sizeof(dst->index);
attrs.phys.port_number = dp->index;
memcpy(attrs.switch_id.id, id, len);
attrs.switch_id.id_len = len;
memset(dlp, 0, sizeof(*dlp));
switch (dp->type) {
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED:
attrs.flavour = DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_UNUSED;
break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU:
attrs.flavour = DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_CPU;
break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA:
attrs.flavour = DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_DSA;
break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER:
attrs.flavour = DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PHYSICAL;
break;
}
devlink_port_attrs_set(dlp, &attrs);
err = devlink_port_register(dl, dlp, dp->index);
if (!err)
dp->devlink_port_setup = true;
return err;
}
static void dsa_port_teardown(struct dsa_port *dp)
{
net: dsa: clear devlink port type before unregistering slave netdevs Florian reported a use-after-free bug in devlink_nl_port_fill found with KASAN: (devlink_nl_port_fill) (devlink_port_notify) (devlink_port_unregister) (dsa_switch_teardown.part.3) (dsa_tree_teardown_switches) (dsa_unregister_switch) (bcm_sf2_sw_remove) (platform_remove) (device_release_driver_internal) (device_links_unbind_consumers) (device_release_driver_internal) (device_driver_detach) (unbind_store) Allocated by task 31: alloc_netdev_mqs+0x5c/0x50c dsa_slave_create+0x110/0x9c8 dsa_register_switch+0xdb0/0x13a4 b53_switch_register+0x47c/0x6dc bcm_sf2_sw_probe+0xaa4/0xc98 platform_probe+0x90/0xf4 really_probe+0x184/0x728 driver_probe_device+0xa4/0x278 __device_attach_driver+0xe8/0x148 bus_for_each_drv+0x108/0x158 Freed by task 249: free_netdev+0x170/0x194 dsa_slave_destroy+0xac/0xb0 dsa_port_teardown.part.2+0xa0/0xb4 dsa_tree_teardown_switches+0x50/0xc4 dsa_unregister_switch+0x124/0x250 bcm_sf2_sw_remove+0x98/0x13c platform_remove+0x44/0x5c device_release_driver_internal+0x150/0x254 device_links_unbind_consumers+0xf8/0x12c device_release_driver_internal+0x84/0x254 device_driver_detach+0x30/0x34 unbind_store+0x90/0x134 What happens is that devlink_port_unregister emits a netlink DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_DEL message which associates the devlink port that is getting unregistered with the ifindex of its corresponding net_device. Only trouble is, the net_device has already been unregistered. It looks like we can stub out the search for a corresponding net_device if we clear the devlink_port's type. This looks like a bit of a hack, but also seems to be the reason why the devlink_port_type_clear function exists in the first place. Fixes: 3122433eb533 ("net: dsa: Register devlink ports before calling DSA driver setup()") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Tested-by: Florian fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reported-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210112004831.3778323-1-olteanv@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-12 08:48:31 +08:00
struct devlink_port *dlp = &dp->devlink_port;
net: dsa: tear down devlink port regions when tearing down the devlink port on error Commit 86f8b1c01a0a ("net: dsa: Do not make user port errors fatal") decided it was fine to ignore errors on certain ports that fail to probe, and go on with the ports that do probe fine. Commit fb6ec87f7229 ("net: dsa: Fix type was not set for devlink port") noticed that devlink_port_type_eth_set(dlp, dp->slave); does not get called, and devlink notices after a timeout of 3600 seconds and prints a WARN_ON. So it went ahead to unregister the devlink port. And because there exists an UNUSED port flavour, we actually re-register the devlink port as UNUSED. Commit 08156ba430b4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") added devlink port regions, which are set up by the driver and not by DSA. When we trigger the devlink port deregistration and reregistration as unused, devlink now prints another WARN_ON, from here: devlink_port_unregister: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink_port->region_list)); So the port still has regions, which makes sense, because they were set up by the driver, and the driver doesn't know we're unregistering the devlink port. Somebody needs to tear them down, and optionally (actually it would be nice, to be consistent) set them up again for the new devlink port. But DSA's layering stays in our way quite badly here. The options I've considered are: 1. Introduce a function in devlink to just change a port's type and flavour. No dice, devlink keeps a lot of state, it really wants the port to not be registered when you set its parameters, so changing anything can only be done by destroying what we currently have and recreating it. 2. Make DSA cache the parameters passed to dsa_devlink_port_region_create, and the region returned, keep those in a list, then when the devlink port unregister needs to take place, the existing devlink regions are destroyed by DSA, and we replay the creation of new regions using the cached parameters. Problem: mv88e6xxx keeps the region pointers in chip->ports[port].region, and these will remain stale after DSA frees them. There are many things DSA can do, but updating mv88e6xxx's private pointers is not one of them. 3. Just let the driver do it (i.e. introduce a very specific method called ds->ops->port_reinit_as_unused, which unregisters its devlink port devlink regions, then the old devlink port, then registers the new one, then the devlink port regions for it). While it does work, as opposed to the others, it's pretty horrible from an API perspective and we can do better. 4. Introduce a new pair of methods, ->port_setup and ->port_teardown, which in the case of mv88e6xxx must register and unregister the devlink port regions. Call these 2 methods when the port must be reinitialized as unused. Naturally, I went for the 4th approach. Fixes: 08156ba430b4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-17 22:29:16 +08:00
struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
net: dsa: reference count the MDB entries at the cross-chip notifier level Ever since the cross-chip notifiers were introduced, the design was meant to be simplistic and just get the job done without worrying too much about dangling resources left behind. For example, somebody installs an MDB entry on sw0p0 in this daisy chain topology. It gets installed using ds->ops->port_mdb_add() on sw0p0, sw1p4 and sw2p4. | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ x ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] Then the same person deletes that MDB entry. The cross-chip notifier for deletion only matches sw0p0: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ x ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Why? Because the DSA links are 'trunk' ports, if we just go ahead and delete the MDB from sw1p4 and sw2p4 directly, we might delete those multicast entries when they are still needed. Just consider the fact that somebody does: - add a multicast MAC address towards sw0p0 [ via the cross-chip notifiers it gets installed on the DSA links too ] - add the same multicast MAC address towards sw0p1 (another port of that same switch) - delete the same multicast MAC address from sw0p0. At this point, if we deleted the MAC address from the DSA links, it would be flooded, even though there is still an entry on switch 0 which needs it not to. So that is why deletions only match the targeted source port and nothing on DSA links. Of course, dangling resources means that the hardware tables will eventually run out given enough additions/removals, but hey, at least it's simple. But there is a bigger concern which needs to be addressed, and that is our support for SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB. DSA simply translates such an object into a dsa_port_host_mdb_add() which ends up as ds->ops->port_mdb_add() on the upstream port, and a similar thing happens on deletion: dsa_port_host_mdb_del() will trigger ds->ops->port_mdb_del() on the upstream port. When there are 2 VLAN-unaware bridges spanning the same switch (which is a use case DSA proudly supports), each bridge will install its own SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB entries. But upon deletion, DSA goes ahead and emits a DSA_NOTIFIER_MDB_DEL for dp->cpu_dp, which is shared between the user ports enslaved to br0 and the user ports enslaved to br1. Not good. The host-trapped multicast addresses installed by br1 will be deleted when any state changes in br0 (IGMP timers expire, or ports leave, etc). To avoid this, we could of course go the route of the zero-sum game and delete the DSA_NOTIFIER_MDB_DEL call for dp->cpu_dp. But the better design is to just admit that on shared ports like DSA links and CPU ports, we should be reference counting calls, even if this consumes some dynamic memory which DSA has traditionally avoided. On the flip side, the hardware tables of switches are limited in size, so it would be good if the OS managed them properly instead of having them eventually overflow. To address the memory usage concern, we only apply the refcounting of MDB entries on ports that are really shared (CPU ports and DSA links) and not on user ports. In a typical single-switch setup, this means only the CPU port (and the host MDB entries are not that many, really). The name of the newly introduced data structures (dsa_mac_addr) is chosen in such a way that will be reusable for host FDB entries (next patch). With this change, we can finally have the same matching logic for the MDB additions and deletions, as well as for their host-trapped variants. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-29 22:06:50 +08:00
struct dsa_mac_addr *a, *tmp;
net: dsa: clear devlink port type before unregistering slave netdevs Florian reported a use-after-free bug in devlink_nl_port_fill found with KASAN: (devlink_nl_port_fill) (devlink_port_notify) (devlink_port_unregister) (dsa_switch_teardown.part.3) (dsa_tree_teardown_switches) (dsa_unregister_switch) (bcm_sf2_sw_remove) (platform_remove) (device_release_driver_internal) (device_links_unbind_consumers) (device_release_driver_internal) (device_driver_detach) (unbind_store) Allocated by task 31: alloc_netdev_mqs+0x5c/0x50c dsa_slave_create+0x110/0x9c8 dsa_register_switch+0xdb0/0x13a4 b53_switch_register+0x47c/0x6dc bcm_sf2_sw_probe+0xaa4/0xc98 platform_probe+0x90/0xf4 really_probe+0x184/0x728 driver_probe_device+0xa4/0x278 __device_attach_driver+0xe8/0x148 bus_for_each_drv+0x108/0x158 Freed by task 249: free_netdev+0x170/0x194 dsa_slave_destroy+0xac/0xb0 dsa_port_teardown.part.2+0xa0/0xb4 dsa_tree_teardown_switches+0x50/0xc4 dsa_unregister_switch+0x124/0x250 bcm_sf2_sw_remove+0x98/0x13c platform_remove+0x44/0x5c device_release_driver_internal+0x150/0x254 device_links_unbind_consumers+0xf8/0x12c device_release_driver_internal+0x84/0x254 device_driver_detach+0x30/0x34 unbind_store+0x90/0x134 What happens is that devlink_port_unregister emits a netlink DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_DEL message which associates the devlink port that is getting unregistered with the ifindex of its corresponding net_device. Only trouble is, the net_device has already been unregistered. It looks like we can stub out the search for a corresponding net_device if we clear the devlink_port's type. This looks like a bit of a hack, but also seems to be the reason why the devlink_port_type_clear function exists in the first place. Fixes: 3122433eb533 ("net: dsa: Register devlink ports before calling DSA driver setup()") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Tested-by: Florian fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reported-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210112004831.3778323-1-olteanv@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-12 08:48:31 +08:00
if (!dp->setup)
return;
net: dsa: tear down devlink port regions when tearing down the devlink port on error Commit 86f8b1c01a0a ("net: dsa: Do not make user port errors fatal") decided it was fine to ignore errors on certain ports that fail to probe, and go on with the ports that do probe fine. Commit fb6ec87f7229 ("net: dsa: Fix type was not set for devlink port") noticed that devlink_port_type_eth_set(dlp, dp->slave); does not get called, and devlink notices after a timeout of 3600 seconds and prints a WARN_ON. So it went ahead to unregister the devlink port. And because there exists an UNUSED port flavour, we actually re-register the devlink port as UNUSED. Commit 08156ba430b4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") added devlink port regions, which are set up by the driver and not by DSA. When we trigger the devlink port deregistration and reregistration as unused, devlink now prints another WARN_ON, from here: devlink_port_unregister: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink_port->region_list)); So the port still has regions, which makes sense, because they were set up by the driver, and the driver doesn't know we're unregistering the devlink port. Somebody needs to tear them down, and optionally (actually it would be nice, to be consistent) set them up again for the new devlink port. But DSA's layering stays in our way quite badly here. The options I've considered are: 1. Introduce a function in devlink to just change a port's type and flavour. No dice, devlink keeps a lot of state, it really wants the port to not be registered when you set its parameters, so changing anything can only be done by destroying what we currently have and recreating it. 2. Make DSA cache the parameters passed to dsa_devlink_port_region_create, and the region returned, keep those in a list, then when the devlink port unregister needs to take place, the existing devlink regions are destroyed by DSA, and we replay the creation of new regions using the cached parameters. Problem: mv88e6xxx keeps the region pointers in chip->ports[port].region, and these will remain stale after DSA frees them. There are many things DSA can do, but updating mv88e6xxx's private pointers is not one of them. 3. Just let the driver do it (i.e. introduce a very specific method called ds->ops->port_reinit_as_unused, which unregisters its devlink port devlink regions, then the old devlink port, then registers the new one, then the devlink port regions for it). While it does work, as opposed to the others, it's pretty horrible from an API perspective and we can do better. 4. Introduce a new pair of methods, ->port_setup and ->port_teardown, which in the case of mv88e6xxx must register and unregister the devlink port regions. Call these 2 methods when the port must be reinitialized as unused. Naturally, I went for the 4th approach. Fixes: 08156ba430b4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-17 22:29:16 +08:00
if (ds->ops->port_teardown)
ds->ops->port_teardown(ds, dp->index);
net: dsa: clear devlink port type before unregistering slave netdevs Florian reported a use-after-free bug in devlink_nl_port_fill found with KASAN: (devlink_nl_port_fill) (devlink_port_notify) (devlink_port_unregister) (dsa_switch_teardown.part.3) (dsa_tree_teardown_switches) (dsa_unregister_switch) (bcm_sf2_sw_remove) (platform_remove) (device_release_driver_internal) (device_links_unbind_consumers) (device_release_driver_internal) (device_driver_detach) (unbind_store) Allocated by task 31: alloc_netdev_mqs+0x5c/0x50c dsa_slave_create+0x110/0x9c8 dsa_register_switch+0xdb0/0x13a4 b53_switch_register+0x47c/0x6dc bcm_sf2_sw_probe+0xaa4/0xc98 platform_probe+0x90/0xf4 really_probe+0x184/0x728 driver_probe_device+0xa4/0x278 __device_attach_driver+0xe8/0x148 bus_for_each_drv+0x108/0x158 Freed by task 249: free_netdev+0x170/0x194 dsa_slave_destroy+0xac/0xb0 dsa_port_teardown.part.2+0xa0/0xb4 dsa_tree_teardown_switches+0x50/0xc4 dsa_unregister_switch+0x124/0x250 bcm_sf2_sw_remove+0x98/0x13c platform_remove+0x44/0x5c device_release_driver_internal+0x150/0x254 device_links_unbind_consumers+0xf8/0x12c device_release_driver_internal+0x84/0x254 device_driver_detach+0x30/0x34 unbind_store+0x90/0x134 What happens is that devlink_port_unregister emits a netlink DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_DEL message which associates the devlink port that is getting unregistered with the ifindex of its corresponding net_device. Only trouble is, the net_device has already been unregistered. It looks like we can stub out the search for a corresponding net_device if we clear the devlink_port's type. This looks like a bit of a hack, but also seems to be the reason why the devlink_port_type_clear function exists in the first place. Fixes: 3122433eb533 ("net: dsa: Register devlink ports before calling DSA driver setup()") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Tested-by: Florian fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reported-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210112004831.3778323-1-olteanv@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-12 08:48:31 +08:00
devlink_port_type_clear(dlp);
switch (dp->type) {
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED:
break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU:
dsa_port_disable(dp);
dsa_port_link_unregister_of(dp);
break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA:
dsa_port_disable(dp);
dsa_port_link_unregister_of(dp);
break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER:
if (dp->slave) {
dsa_slave_destroy(dp->slave);
dp->slave = NULL;
}
break;
}
list_for_each_entry_safe(a, tmp, &dp->fdbs, list) {
list_del(&a->list);
kfree(a);
}
net: dsa: reference count the MDB entries at the cross-chip notifier level Ever since the cross-chip notifiers were introduced, the design was meant to be simplistic and just get the job done without worrying too much about dangling resources left behind. For example, somebody installs an MDB entry on sw0p0 in this daisy chain topology. It gets installed using ds->ops->port_mdb_add() on sw0p0, sw1p4 and sw2p4. | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ x ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] Then the same person deletes that MDB entry. The cross-chip notifier for deletion only matches sw0p0: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ x ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Why? Because the DSA links are 'trunk' ports, if we just go ahead and delete the MDB from sw1p4 and sw2p4 directly, we might delete those multicast entries when they are still needed. Just consider the fact that somebody does: - add a multicast MAC address towards sw0p0 [ via the cross-chip notifiers it gets installed on the DSA links too ] - add the same multicast MAC address towards sw0p1 (another port of that same switch) - delete the same multicast MAC address from sw0p0. At this point, if we deleted the MAC address from the DSA links, it would be flooded, even though there is still an entry on switch 0 which needs it not to. So that is why deletions only match the targeted source port and nothing on DSA links. Of course, dangling resources means that the hardware tables will eventually run out given enough additions/removals, but hey, at least it's simple. But there is a bigger concern which needs to be addressed, and that is our support for SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB. DSA simply translates such an object into a dsa_port_host_mdb_add() which ends up as ds->ops->port_mdb_add() on the upstream port, and a similar thing happens on deletion: dsa_port_host_mdb_del() will trigger ds->ops->port_mdb_del() on the upstream port. When there are 2 VLAN-unaware bridges spanning the same switch (which is a use case DSA proudly supports), each bridge will install its own SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB entries. But upon deletion, DSA goes ahead and emits a DSA_NOTIFIER_MDB_DEL for dp->cpu_dp, which is shared between the user ports enslaved to br0 and the user ports enslaved to br1. Not good. The host-trapped multicast addresses installed by br1 will be deleted when any state changes in br0 (IGMP timers expire, or ports leave, etc). To avoid this, we could of course go the route of the zero-sum game and delete the DSA_NOTIFIER_MDB_DEL call for dp->cpu_dp. But the better design is to just admit that on shared ports like DSA links and CPU ports, we should be reference counting calls, even if this consumes some dynamic memory which DSA has traditionally avoided. On the flip side, the hardware tables of switches are limited in size, so it would be good if the OS managed them properly instead of having them eventually overflow. To address the memory usage concern, we only apply the refcounting of MDB entries on ports that are really shared (CPU ports and DSA links) and not on user ports. In a typical single-switch setup, this means only the CPU port (and the host MDB entries are not that many, really). The name of the newly introduced data structures (dsa_mac_addr) is chosen in such a way that will be reusable for host FDB entries (next patch). With this change, we can finally have the same matching logic for the MDB additions and deletions, as well as for their host-trapped variants. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-29 22:06:50 +08:00
list_for_each_entry_safe(a, tmp, &dp->mdbs, list) {
list_del(&a->list);
kfree(a);
}
dp->setup = false;
}
static void dsa_port_devlink_teardown(struct dsa_port *dp)
{
struct devlink_port *dlp = &dp->devlink_port;
if (dp->devlink_port_setup)
devlink_port_unregister(dlp);
dp->devlink_port_setup = false;
}
net: dsa: tear down devlink port regions when tearing down the devlink port on error Commit 86f8b1c01a0a ("net: dsa: Do not make user port errors fatal") decided it was fine to ignore errors on certain ports that fail to probe, and go on with the ports that do probe fine. Commit fb6ec87f7229 ("net: dsa: Fix type was not set for devlink port") noticed that devlink_port_type_eth_set(dlp, dp->slave); does not get called, and devlink notices after a timeout of 3600 seconds and prints a WARN_ON. So it went ahead to unregister the devlink port. And because there exists an UNUSED port flavour, we actually re-register the devlink port as UNUSED. Commit 08156ba430b4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") added devlink port regions, which are set up by the driver and not by DSA. When we trigger the devlink port deregistration and reregistration as unused, devlink now prints another WARN_ON, from here: devlink_port_unregister: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink_port->region_list)); So the port still has regions, which makes sense, because they were set up by the driver, and the driver doesn't know we're unregistering the devlink port. Somebody needs to tear them down, and optionally (actually it would be nice, to be consistent) set them up again for the new devlink port. But DSA's layering stays in our way quite badly here. The options I've considered are: 1. Introduce a function in devlink to just change a port's type and flavour. No dice, devlink keeps a lot of state, it really wants the port to not be registered when you set its parameters, so changing anything can only be done by destroying what we currently have and recreating it. 2. Make DSA cache the parameters passed to dsa_devlink_port_region_create, and the region returned, keep those in a list, then when the devlink port unregister needs to take place, the existing devlink regions are destroyed by DSA, and we replay the creation of new regions using the cached parameters. Problem: mv88e6xxx keeps the region pointers in chip->ports[port].region, and these will remain stale after DSA frees them. There are many things DSA can do, but updating mv88e6xxx's private pointers is not one of them. 3. Just let the driver do it (i.e. introduce a very specific method called ds->ops->port_reinit_as_unused, which unregisters its devlink port devlink regions, then the old devlink port, then registers the new one, then the devlink port regions for it). While it does work, as opposed to the others, it's pretty horrible from an API perspective and we can do better. 4. Introduce a new pair of methods, ->port_setup and ->port_teardown, which in the case of mv88e6xxx must register and unregister the devlink port regions. Call these 2 methods when the port must be reinitialized as unused. Naturally, I went for the 4th approach. Fixes: 08156ba430b4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-17 22:29:16 +08:00
/* Destroy the current devlink port, and create a new one which has the UNUSED
* flavour. At this point, any call to ds->ops->port_setup has been already
* balanced out by a call to ds->ops->port_teardown, so we know that any
* devlink port regions the driver had are now unregistered. We then call its
* ds->ops->port_setup again, in order for the driver to re-create them on the
* new devlink port.
*/
static int dsa_port_reinit_as_unused(struct dsa_port *dp)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
int err;
dsa_port_devlink_teardown(dp);
dp->type = DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED;
err = dsa_port_devlink_setup(dp);
if (err)
return err;
if (ds->ops->port_setup) {
/* On error, leave the devlink port registered,
* dsa_switch_teardown will clean it up later.
*/
err = ds->ops->port_setup(ds, dp->index);
if (err)
return err;
}
return 0;
}
static int dsa_devlink_info_get(struct devlink *dl,
struct devlink_info_req *req,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dsa_devlink_to_ds(dl);
if (ds->ops->devlink_info_get)
return ds->ops->devlink_info_get(ds, req, extack);
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
static int dsa_devlink_sb_pool_get(struct devlink *dl,
unsigned int sb_index, u16 pool_index,
struct devlink_sb_pool_info *pool_info)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dsa_devlink_to_ds(dl);
if (!ds->ops->devlink_sb_pool_get)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
return ds->ops->devlink_sb_pool_get(ds, sb_index, pool_index,
pool_info);
}
static int dsa_devlink_sb_pool_set(struct devlink *dl, unsigned int sb_index,
u16 pool_index, u32 size,
enum devlink_sb_threshold_type threshold_type,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dsa_devlink_to_ds(dl);
if (!ds->ops->devlink_sb_pool_set)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
return ds->ops->devlink_sb_pool_set(ds, sb_index, pool_index, size,
threshold_type, extack);
}
static int dsa_devlink_sb_port_pool_get(struct devlink_port *dlp,
unsigned int sb_index, u16 pool_index,
u32 *p_threshold)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dsa_devlink_port_to_ds(dlp);
int port = dsa_devlink_port_to_port(dlp);
if (!ds->ops->devlink_sb_port_pool_get)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
return ds->ops->devlink_sb_port_pool_get(ds, port, sb_index,
pool_index, p_threshold);
}
static int dsa_devlink_sb_port_pool_set(struct devlink_port *dlp,
unsigned int sb_index, u16 pool_index,
u32 threshold,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dsa_devlink_port_to_ds(dlp);
int port = dsa_devlink_port_to_port(dlp);
if (!ds->ops->devlink_sb_port_pool_set)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
return ds->ops->devlink_sb_port_pool_set(ds, port, sb_index,
pool_index, threshold, extack);
}
static int
dsa_devlink_sb_tc_pool_bind_get(struct devlink_port *dlp,
unsigned int sb_index, u16 tc_index,
enum devlink_sb_pool_type pool_type,
u16 *p_pool_index, u32 *p_threshold)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dsa_devlink_port_to_ds(dlp);
int port = dsa_devlink_port_to_port(dlp);
if (!ds->ops->devlink_sb_tc_pool_bind_get)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
return ds->ops->devlink_sb_tc_pool_bind_get(ds, port, sb_index,
tc_index, pool_type,
p_pool_index, p_threshold);
}
static int
dsa_devlink_sb_tc_pool_bind_set(struct devlink_port *dlp,
unsigned int sb_index, u16 tc_index,
enum devlink_sb_pool_type pool_type,
u16 pool_index, u32 threshold,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dsa_devlink_port_to_ds(dlp);
int port = dsa_devlink_port_to_port(dlp);
if (!ds->ops->devlink_sb_tc_pool_bind_set)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
return ds->ops->devlink_sb_tc_pool_bind_set(ds, port, sb_index,
tc_index, pool_type,
pool_index, threshold,
extack);
}
static int dsa_devlink_sb_occ_snapshot(struct devlink *dl,
unsigned int sb_index)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dsa_devlink_to_ds(dl);
if (!ds->ops->devlink_sb_occ_snapshot)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
return ds->ops->devlink_sb_occ_snapshot(ds, sb_index);
}
static int dsa_devlink_sb_occ_max_clear(struct devlink *dl,
unsigned int sb_index)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dsa_devlink_to_ds(dl);
if (!ds->ops->devlink_sb_occ_max_clear)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
return ds->ops->devlink_sb_occ_max_clear(ds, sb_index);
}
static int dsa_devlink_sb_occ_port_pool_get(struct devlink_port *dlp,
unsigned int sb_index,
u16 pool_index, u32 *p_cur,
u32 *p_max)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dsa_devlink_port_to_ds(dlp);
int port = dsa_devlink_port_to_port(dlp);
if (!ds->ops->devlink_sb_occ_port_pool_get)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
return ds->ops->devlink_sb_occ_port_pool_get(ds, port, sb_index,
pool_index, p_cur, p_max);
}
static int
dsa_devlink_sb_occ_tc_port_bind_get(struct devlink_port *dlp,
unsigned int sb_index, u16 tc_index,
enum devlink_sb_pool_type pool_type,
u32 *p_cur, u32 *p_max)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dsa_devlink_port_to_ds(dlp);
int port = dsa_devlink_port_to_port(dlp);
if (!ds->ops->devlink_sb_occ_tc_port_bind_get)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
return ds->ops->devlink_sb_occ_tc_port_bind_get(ds, port,
sb_index, tc_index,
pool_type, p_cur,
p_max);
}
static const struct devlink_ops dsa_devlink_ops = {
.info_get = dsa_devlink_info_get,
.sb_pool_get = dsa_devlink_sb_pool_get,
.sb_pool_set = dsa_devlink_sb_pool_set,
.sb_port_pool_get = dsa_devlink_sb_port_pool_get,
.sb_port_pool_set = dsa_devlink_sb_port_pool_set,
.sb_tc_pool_bind_get = dsa_devlink_sb_tc_pool_bind_get,
.sb_tc_pool_bind_set = dsa_devlink_sb_tc_pool_bind_set,
.sb_occ_snapshot = dsa_devlink_sb_occ_snapshot,
.sb_occ_max_clear = dsa_devlink_sb_occ_max_clear,
.sb_occ_port_pool_get = dsa_devlink_sb_occ_port_pool_get,
.sb_occ_tc_port_bind_get = dsa_devlink_sb_occ_tc_port_bind_get,
};
static int dsa_switch_setup_tag_protocol(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
const struct dsa_device_ops *tag_ops = ds->dst->tag_ops;
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;
struct dsa_port *cpu_dp;
int err;
if (tag_ops->proto == dst->default_proto)
return 0;
dsa_switch_for_each_cpu_port(cpu_dp, ds) {
net: dsa: hold rtnl_lock in dsa_switch_setup_tag_protocol It was a documented fact that ds->ops->change_tag_protocol() offered rtnetlink mutex protection to the switch driver, since there was an ASSERT_RTNL right before the call in dsa_switch_change_tag_proto() (initiated from sysfs). The blamed commit introduced another call path for ds->ops->change_tag_protocol() which does not hold the rtnl_mutex. This is: dsa_tree_setup -> dsa_tree_setup_switches -> dsa_switch_setup -> dsa_switch_setup_tag_protocol -> ds->ops->change_tag_protocol() -> dsa_port_setup -> dsa_slave_create -> register_netdevice(slave_dev) -> dsa_tree_setup_master -> dsa_master_setup -> dev->dsa_ptr = cpu_dp The reason why the rtnl_mutex is held in the sysfs call path is to ensure that, once the master and all the DSA interfaces are down (which is required so that no packets flow), they remain down during the tagging protocol change. The above calling order illustrates the fact that it should not be risky to change the initial tagging protocol to the one specified in the device tree at the given time: - packets cannot enter the dsa_switch_rcv() packet type handler since netdev_uses_dsa() for the master will not yet return true, since dev->dsa_ptr has not yet been populated - packets cannot enter the dsa_slave_xmit() function because no DSA interface has yet been registered So from the DSA core's perspective, holding the rtnl_mutex is indeed not necessary. Yet, drivers may need to do things which need rtnl_mutex protection. For example: felix_set_tag_protocol -> felix_setup_tag_8021q -> dsa_tag_8021q_register -> dsa_tag_8021q_setup -> dsa_tag_8021q_port_setup -> vlan_vid_add -> ASSERT_RTNL These drivers do not really have a choice to take the rtnl_mutex themselves, since in the sysfs case, the rtnl_mutex is already held. Fixes: deff710703d8 ("net: dsa: Allow default tag protocol to be overridden from DT") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-10-09 20:26:07 +08:00
rtnl_lock();
err = ds->ops->change_tag_protocol(ds, cpu_dp->index,
tag_ops->proto);
net: dsa: hold rtnl_lock in dsa_switch_setup_tag_protocol It was a documented fact that ds->ops->change_tag_protocol() offered rtnetlink mutex protection to the switch driver, since there was an ASSERT_RTNL right before the call in dsa_switch_change_tag_proto() (initiated from sysfs). The blamed commit introduced another call path for ds->ops->change_tag_protocol() which does not hold the rtnl_mutex. This is: dsa_tree_setup -> dsa_tree_setup_switches -> dsa_switch_setup -> dsa_switch_setup_tag_protocol -> ds->ops->change_tag_protocol() -> dsa_port_setup -> dsa_slave_create -> register_netdevice(slave_dev) -> dsa_tree_setup_master -> dsa_master_setup -> dev->dsa_ptr = cpu_dp The reason why the rtnl_mutex is held in the sysfs call path is to ensure that, once the master and all the DSA interfaces are down (which is required so that no packets flow), they remain down during the tagging protocol change. The above calling order illustrates the fact that it should not be risky to change the initial tagging protocol to the one specified in the device tree at the given time: - packets cannot enter the dsa_switch_rcv() packet type handler since netdev_uses_dsa() for the master will not yet return true, since dev->dsa_ptr has not yet been populated - packets cannot enter the dsa_slave_xmit() function because no DSA interface has yet been registered So from the DSA core's perspective, holding the rtnl_mutex is indeed not necessary. Yet, drivers may need to do things which need rtnl_mutex protection. For example: felix_set_tag_protocol -> felix_setup_tag_8021q -> dsa_tag_8021q_register -> dsa_tag_8021q_setup -> dsa_tag_8021q_port_setup -> vlan_vid_add -> ASSERT_RTNL These drivers do not really have a choice to take the rtnl_mutex themselves, since in the sysfs case, the rtnl_mutex is already held. Fixes: deff710703d8 ("net: dsa: Allow default tag protocol to be overridden from DT") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-10-09 20:26:07 +08:00
rtnl_unlock();
if (err) {
dev_err(ds->dev, "Unable to use tag protocol \"%s\": %pe\n",
tag_ops->name, ERR_PTR(err));
return err;
}
}
return 0;
}
static int dsa_switch_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
struct dsa_devlink_priv *dl_priv;
struct dsa_port *dp;
int err;
if (ds->setup)
return 0;
/* Initialize ds->phys_mii_mask before registering the slave MDIO bus
* driver and before ops->setup() has run, since the switch drivers and
* the slave MDIO bus driver rely on these values for probing PHY
* devices or not
*/
ds->phys_mii_mask |= dsa_user_ports(ds);
/* Add the switch to devlink before calling setup, so that setup can
* add dpipe tables
*/
ds->devlink =
devlink_alloc(&dsa_devlink_ops, sizeof(*dl_priv), ds->dev);
if (!ds->devlink)
return -ENOMEM;
dl_priv = devlink_priv(ds->devlink);
dl_priv->ds = ds;
/* Setup devlink port instances now, so that the switch
* setup() can register regions etc, against the ports
*/
dsa_switch_for_each_port(dp, ds) {
err = dsa_port_devlink_setup(dp);
if (err)
goto unregister_devlink_ports;
}
err = dsa_switch_register_notifier(ds);
if (err)
goto unregister_devlink_ports;
net: dsa: set configure_vlan_while_not_filtering to true by default As explained in commit 54a0ed0df496 ("net: dsa: provide an option for drivers to always receive bridge VLANs"), DSA has historically been skipping VLAN switchdev operations when the bridge wasn't in vlan_filtering mode, but the reason why it was doing that has never been clear. So the configure_vlan_while_not_filtering option is there merely to preserve functionality for existing drivers. It isn't some behavior that drivers should opt into. Ideally, when all drivers leave this flag set, we can delete the dsa_port_skip_vlan_configuration() function. New drivers always seem to omit setting this flag, for some reason. So let's reverse the logic: the DSA core sets it by default to true before the .setup() callback, and legacy drivers can turn it off. This way, new drivers get the new behavior by default, unless they explicitly set the flag to false, which is more obvious during review. Remove the assignment from drivers which were setting it to true, and add the assignment to false for the drivers that didn't previously have it. This way, it should be easier to see how many we have left. The following drivers: lan9303, mv88e6060 were skipped from setting this flag to false, because they didn't have any VLAN offload ops in the first place. The Broadcom Starfighter 2 driver calls the common b53_switch_alloc and therefore also inherits the configure_vlan_while_not_filtering=true behavior. Also, print a message through netlink extack every time a VLAN has been skipped. This is mildly annoying on purpose, so that (a) it is at least clear that VLANs are being skipped - the legacy behavior in itself is confusing, and the extack should be much more difficult to miss, unlike kernel logs - and (b) people have one more incentive to convert to the new behavior. No behavior change except for the added prints is intended at this time. $ ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 0 $ ip link set sw0p2 master br0 [ 60.315148] br0: port 1(sw0p2) entered blocking state [ 60.320350] br0: port 1(sw0p2) entered disabled state [ 60.327839] device sw0p2 entered promiscuous mode [ 60.334905] br0: port 1(sw0p2) entered blocking state [ 60.340142] br0: port 1(sw0p2) entered forwarding state Warning: dsa_core: skipping configuration of VLAN. # This was the pvid $ bridge vlan add dev sw0p2 vid 100 Warning: dsa_core: skipping configuration of VLAN. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210115231919.43834-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-16 07:19:19 +08:00
ds->configure_vlan_while_not_filtering = true;
err = ds->ops->setup(ds);
if (err < 0)
goto unregister_notifier;
err = dsa_switch_setup_tag_protocol(ds);
if (err)
goto teardown;
if (!ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read) {
net: dsa: don't allocate the slave_mii_bus using devres The Linux device model permits both the ->shutdown and ->remove driver methods to get called during a shutdown procedure. Example: a DSA switch which sits on an SPI bus, and the SPI bus driver calls this on its ->shutdown method: spi_unregister_controller -> device_for_each_child(&ctlr->dev, NULL, __unregister); -> spi_unregister_device(to_spi_device(dev)); -> device_del(&spi->dev); So this is a simple pattern which can theoretically appear on any bus, although the only other buses on which I've been able to find it are I2C: i2c_del_adapter -> device_for_each_child(&adap->dev, NULL, __unregister_client); -> i2c_unregister_device(client); -> device_unregister(&client->dev); The implication of this pattern is that devices on these buses can be unregistered after having been shut down. The drivers for these devices might choose to return early either from ->remove or ->shutdown if the other callback has already run once, and they might choose that the ->shutdown method should only perform a subset of the teardown done by ->remove (to avoid unnecessary delays when rebooting). So in other words, the device driver may choose on ->remove to not do anything (therefore to not unregister an MDIO bus it has registered on ->probe), because this ->remove is actually triggered by the device_shutdown path, and its ->shutdown method has already run and done the minimally required cleanup. This used to be fine until the blamed commit, but now, the following BUG_ON triggers: void mdiobus_free(struct mii_bus *bus) { /* For compatibility with error handling in drivers. */ if (bus->state == MDIOBUS_ALLOCATED) { kfree(bus); return; } BUG_ON(bus->state != MDIOBUS_UNREGISTERED); bus->state = MDIOBUS_RELEASED; put_device(&bus->dev); } In other words, there is an attempt to free an MDIO bus which was not unregistered. The attempt to free it comes from the devres release callbacks of the SPI device, which are executed after the device is unregistered. I'm not saying that the fact that MDIO buses allocated using devres would automatically get unregistered wasn't strange. I'm just saying that the commit didn't care about auditing existing call paths in the kernel, and now, the following code sequences are potentially buggy: (a) devm_mdiobus_alloc followed by plain mdiobus_register, for a device located on a bus that unregisters its children on shutdown. After the blamed patch, either both the alloc and the register should use devres, or none should. (b) devm_mdiobus_alloc followed by plain mdiobus_register, and then no mdiobus_unregister at all in the remove path. After the blamed patch, nobody unregisters the MDIO bus anymore, so this is even more buggy than the previous case which needs a specific bus configuration to be seen, this one is an unconditional bug. In this case, DSA falls into category (a), it tries to be helpful and registers an MDIO bus on behalf of the switch, which might be on such a bus. I've no idea why it does it under devres. It does this on probe: if (!ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read) alloc and register mdio bus and this on remove: if (ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read) unregister mdio bus I _could_ imagine using devres because the condition used on remove is different than the condition used on probe. So strictly speaking, DSA cannot determine whether the ds->slave_mii_bus it sees on remove is the ds->slave_mii_bus that _it_ has allocated on probe. Using devres would have solved that problem. But nonetheless, the existing code already proceeds to unregister the MDIO bus, even though it might be unregistering an MDIO bus it has never registered. So I can only guess that no driver that implements ds->ops->phy_read also allocates and registers ds->slave_mii_bus itself. So in that case, if unregistering is fine, freeing must be fine too. Stop using devres and free the MDIO bus manually. This will make devres stop attempting to free a still registered MDIO bus on ->shutdown. Fixes: ac3a68d56651 ("net: phy: don't abuse devres in devm_mdiobus_register()") Reported-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Tested-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-21 05:42:08 +08:00
ds->slave_mii_bus = mdiobus_alloc();
if (!ds->slave_mii_bus) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto teardown;
}
dsa_slave_mii_bus_init(ds);
err = mdiobus_register(ds->slave_mii_bus);
if (err < 0)
net: dsa: don't allocate the slave_mii_bus using devres The Linux device model permits both the ->shutdown and ->remove driver methods to get called during a shutdown procedure. Example: a DSA switch which sits on an SPI bus, and the SPI bus driver calls this on its ->shutdown method: spi_unregister_controller -> device_for_each_child(&ctlr->dev, NULL, __unregister); -> spi_unregister_device(to_spi_device(dev)); -> device_del(&spi->dev); So this is a simple pattern which can theoretically appear on any bus, although the only other buses on which I've been able to find it are I2C: i2c_del_adapter -> device_for_each_child(&adap->dev, NULL, __unregister_client); -> i2c_unregister_device(client); -> device_unregister(&client->dev); The implication of this pattern is that devices on these buses can be unregistered after having been shut down. The drivers for these devices might choose to return early either from ->remove or ->shutdown if the other callback has already run once, and they might choose that the ->shutdown method should only perform a subset of the teardown done by ->remove (to avoid unnecessary delays when rebooting). So in other words, the device driver may choose on ->remove to not do anything (therefore to not unregister an MDIO bus it has registered on ->probe), because this ->remove is actually triggered by the device_shutdown path, and its ->shutdown method has already run and done the minimally required cleanup. This used to be fine until the blamed commit, but now, the following BUG_ON triggers: void mdiobus_free(struct mii_bus *bus) { /* For compatibility with error handling in drivers. */ if (bus->state == MDIOBUS_ALLOCATED) { kfree(bus); return; } BUG_ON(bus->state != MDIOBUS_UNREGISTERED); bus->state = MDIOBUS_RELEASED; put_device(&bus->dev); } In other words, there is an attempt to free an MDIO bus which was not unregistered. The attempt to free it comes from the devres release callbacks of the SPI device, which are executed after the device is unregistered. I'm not saying that the fact that MDIO buses allocated using devres would automatically get unregistered wasn't strange. I'm just saying that the commit didn't care about auditing existing call paths in the kernel, and now, the following code sequences are potentially buggy: (a) devm_mdiobus_alloc followed by plain mdiobus_register, for a device located on a bus that unregisters its children on shutdown. After the blamed patch, either both the alloc and the register should use devres, or none should. (b) devm_mdiobus_alloc followed by plain mdiobus_register, and then no mdiobus_unregister at all in the remove path. After the blamed patch, nobody unregisters the MDIO bus anymore, so this is even more buggy than the previous case which needs a specific bus configuration to be seen, this one is an unconditional bug. In this case, DSA falls into category (a), it tries to be helpful and registers an MDIO bus on behalf of the switch, which might be on such a bus. I've no idea why it does it under devres. It does this on probe: if (!ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read) alloc and register mdio bus and this on remove: if (ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read) unregister mdio bus I _could_ imagine using devres because the condition used on remove is different than the condition used on probe. So strictly speaking, DSA cannot determine whether the ds->slave_mii_bus it sees on remove is the ds->slave_mii_bus that _it_ has allocated on probe. Using devres would have solved that problem. But nonetheless, the existing code already proceeds to unregister the MDIO bus, even though it might be unregistering an MDIO bus it has never registered. So I can only guess that no driver that implements ds->ops->phy_read also allocates and registers ds->slave_mii_bus itself. So in that case, if unregistering is fine, freeing must be fine too. Stop using devres and free the MDIO bus manually. This will make devres stop attempting to free a still registered MDIO bus on ->shutdown. Fixes: ac3a68d56651 ("net: phy: don't abuse devres in devm_mdiobus_register()") Reported-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Tested-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-21 05:42:08 +08:00
goto free_slave_mii_bus;
}
ds->setup = true;
devlink_register(ds->devlink);
return 0;
net: dsa: don't allocate the slave_mii_bus using devres The Linux device model permits both the ->shutdown and ->remove driver methods to get called during a shutdown procedure. Example: a DSA switch which sits on an SPI bus, and the SPI bus driver calls this on its ->shutdown method: spi_unregister_controller -> device_for_each_child(&ctlr->dev, NULL, __unregister); -> spi_unregister_device(to_spi_device(dev)); -> device_del(&spi->dev); So this is a simple pattern which can theoretically appear on any bus, although the only other buses on which I've been able to find it are I2C: i2c_del_adapter -> device_for_each_child(&adap->dev, NULL, __unregister_client); -> i2c_unregister_device(client); -> device_unregister(&client->dev); The implication of this pattern is that devices on these buses can be unregistered after having been shut down. The drivers for these devices might choose to return early either from ->remove or ->shutdown if the other callback has already run once, and they might choose that the ->shutdown method should only perform a subset of the teardown done by ->remove (to avoid unnecessary delays when rebooting). So in other words, the device driver may choose on ->remove to not do anything (therefore to not unregister an MDIO bus it has registered on ->probe), because this ->remove is actually triggered by the device_shutdown path, and its ->shutdown method has already run and done the minimally required cleanup. This used to be fine until the blamed commit, but now, the following BUG_ON triggers: void mdiobus_free(struct mii_bus *bus) { /* For compatibility with error handling in drivers. */ if (bus->state == MDIOBUS_ALLOCATED) { kfree(bus); return; } BUG_ON(bus->state != MDIOBUS_UNREGISTERED); bus->state = MDIOBUS_RELEASED; put_device(&bus->dev); } In other words, there is an attempt to free an MDIO bus which was not unregistered. The attempt to free it comes from the devres release callbacks of the SPI device, which are executed after the device is unregistered. I'm not saying that the fact that MDIO buses allocated using devres would automatically get unregistered wasn't strange. I'm just saying that the commit didn't care about auditing existing call paths in the kernel, and now, the following code sequences are potentially buggy: (a) devm_mdiobus_alloc followed by plain mdiobus_register, for a device located on a bus that unregisters its children on shutdown. After the blamed patch, either both the alloc and the register should use devres, or none should. (b) devm_mdiobus_alloc followed by plain mdiobus_register, and then no mdiobus_unregister at all in the remove path. After the blamed patch, nobody unregisters the MDIO bus anymore, so this is even more buggy than the previous case which needs a specific bus configuration to be seen, this one is an unconditional bug. In this case, DSA falls into category (a), it tries to be helpful and registers an MDIO bus on behalf of the switch, which might be on such a bus. I've no idea why it does it under devres. It does this on probe: if (!ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read) alloc and register mdio bus and this on remove: if (ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read) unregister mdio bus I _could_ imagine using devres because the condition used on remove is different than the condition used on probe. So strictly speaking, DSA cannot determine whether the ds->slave_mii_bus it sees on remove is the ds->slave_mii_bus that _it_ has allocated on probe. Using devres would have solved that problem. But nonetheless, the existing code already proceeds to unregister the MDIO bus, even though it might be unregistering an MDIO bus it has never registered. So I can only guess that no driver that implements ds->ops->phy_read also allocates and registers ds->slave_mii_bus itself. So in that case, if unregistering is fine, freeing must be fine too. Stop using devres and free the MDIO bus manually. This will make devres stop attempting to free a still registered MDIO bus on ->shutdown. Fixes: ac3a68d56651 ("net: phy: don't abuse devres in devm_mdiobus_register()") Reported-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Tested-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-21 05:42:08 +08:00
free_slave_mii_bus:
if (ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read)
mdiobus_free(ds->slave_mii_bus);
teardown:
if (ds->ops->teardown)
ds->ops->teardown(ds);
unregister_notifier:
dsa_switch_unregister_notifier(ds);
unregister_devlink_ports:
dsa_switch_for_each_port(dp, ds)
dsa_port_devlink_teardown(dp);
devlink_free(ds->devlink);
ds->devlink = NULL;
return err;
}
static void dsa_switch_teardown(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
struct dsa_port *dp;
if (!ds->setup)
return;
if (ds->devlink)
devlink_unregister(ds->devlink);
net: dsa: don't allocate the slave_mii_bus using devres The Linux device model permits both the ->shutdown and ->remove driver methods to get called during a shutdown procedure. Example: a DSA switch which sits on an SPI bus, and the SPI bus driver calls this on its ->shutdown method: spi_unregister_controller -> device_for_each_child(&ctlr->dev, NULL, __unregister); -> spi_unregister_device(to_spi_device(dev)); -> device_del(&spi->dev); So this is a simple pattern which can theoretically appear on any bus, although the only other buses on which I've been able to find it are I2C: i2c_del_adapter -> device_for_each_child(&adap->dev, NULL, __unregister_client); -> i2c_unregister_device(client); -> device_unregister(&client->dev); The implication of this pattern is that devices on these buses can be unregistered after having been shut down. The drivers for these devices might choose to return early either from ->remove or ->shutdown if the other callback has already run once, and they might choose that the ->shutdown method should only perform a subset of the teardown done by ->remove (to avoid unnecessary delays when rebooting). So in other words, the device driver may choose on ->remove to not do anything (therefore to not unregister an MDIO bus it has registered on ->probe), because this ->remove is actually triggered by the device_shutdown path, and its ->shutdown method has already run and done the minimally required cleanup. This used to be fine until the blamed commit, but now, the following BUG_ON triggers: void mdiobus_free(struct mii_bus *bus) { /* For compatibility with error handling in drivers. */ if (bus->state == MDIOBUS_ALLOCATED) { kfree(bus); return; } BUG_ON(bus->state != MDIOBUS_UNREGISTERED); bus->state = MDIOBUS_RELEASED; put_device(&bus->dev); } In other words, there is an attempt to free an MDIO bus which was not unregistered. The attempt to free it comes from the devres release callbacks of the SPI device, which are executed after the device is unregistered. I'm not saying that the fact that MDIO buses allocated using devres would automatically get unregistered wasn't strange. I'm just saying that the commit didn't care about auditing existing call paths in the kernel, and now, the following code sequences are potentially buggy: (a) devm_mdiobus_alloc followed by plain mdiobus_register, for a device located on a bus that unregisters its children on shutdown. After the blamed patch, either both the alloc and the register should use devres, or none should. (b) devm_mdiobus_alloc followed by plain mdiobus_register, and then no mdiobus_unregister at all in the remove path. After the blamed patch, nobody unregisters the MDIO bus anymore, so this is even more buggy than the previous case which needs a specific bus configuration to be seen, this one is an unconditional bug. In this case, DSA falls into category (a), it tries to be helpful and registers an MDIO bus on behalf of the switch, which might be on such a bus. I've no idea why it does it under devres. It does this on probe: if (!ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read) alloc and register mdio bus and this on remove: if (ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read) unregister mdio bus I _could_ imagine using devres because the condition used on remove is different than the condition used on probe. So strictly speaking, DSA cannot determine whether the ds->slave_mii_bus it sees on remove is the ds->slave_mii_bus that _it_ has allocated on probe. Using devres would have solved that problem. But nonetheless, the existing code already proceeds to unregister the MDIO bus, even though it might be unregistering an MDIO bus it has never registered. So I can only guess that no driver that implements ds->ops->phy_read also allocates and registers ds->slave_mii_bus itself. So in that case, if unregistering is fine, freeing must be fine too. Stop using devres and free the MDIO bus manually. This will make devres stop attempting to free a still registered MDIO bus on ->shutdown. Fixes: ac3a68d56651 ("net: phy: don't abuse devres in devm_mdiobus_register()") Reported-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Tested-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-21 05:42:08 +08:00
if (ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read) {
mdiobus_unregister(ds->slave_mii_bus);
net: dsa: don't allocate the slave_mii_bus using devres The Linux device model permits both the ->shutdown and ->remove driver methods to get called during a shutdown procedure. Example: a DSA switch which sits on an SPI bus, and the SPI bus driver calls this on its ->shutdown method: spi_unregister_controller -> device_for_each_child(&ctlr->dev, NULL, __unregister); -> spi_unregister_device(to_spi_device(dev)); -> device_del(&spi->dev); So this is a simple pattern which can theoretically appear on any bus, although the only other buses on which I've been able to find it are I2C: i2c_del_adapter -> device_for_each_child(&adap->dev, NULL, __unregister_client); -> i2c_unregister_device(client); -> device_unregister(&client->dev); The implication of this pattern is that devices on these buses can be unregistered after having been shut down. The drivers for these devices might choose to return early either from ->remove or ->shutdown if the other callback has already run once, and they might choose that the ->shutdown method should only perform a subset of the teardown done by ->remove (to avoid unnecessary delays when rebooting). So in other words, the device driver may choose on ->remove to not do anything (therefore to not unregister an MDIO bus it has registered on ->probe), because this ->remove is actually triggered by the device_shutdown path, and its ->shutdown method has already run and done the minimally required cleanup. This used to be fine until the blamed commit, but now, the following BUG_ON triggers: void mdiobus_free(struct mii_bus *bus) { /* For compatibility with error handling in drivers. */ if (bus->state == MDIOBUS_ALLOCATED) { kfree(bus); return; } BUG_ON(bus->state != MDIOBUS_UNREGISTERED); bus->state = MDIOBUS_RELEASED; put_device(&bus->dev); } In other words, there is an attempt to free an MDIO bus which was not unregistered. The attempt to free it comes from the devres release callbacks of the SPI device, which are executed after the device is unregistered. I'm not saying that the fact that MDIO buses allocated using devres would automatically get unregistered wasn't strange. I'm just saying that the commit didn't care about auditing existing call paths in the kernel, and now, the following code sequences are potentially buggy: (a) devm_mdiobus_alloc followed by plain mdiobus_register, for a device located on a bus that unregisters its children on shutdown. After the blamed patch, either both the alloc and the register should use devres, or none should. (b) devm_mdiobus_alloc followed by plain mdiobus_register, and then no mdiobus_unregister at all in the remove path. After the blamed patch, nobody unregisters the MDIO bus anymore, so this is even more buggy than the previous case which needs a specific bus configuration to be seen, this one is an unconditional bug. In this case, DSA falls into category (a), it tries to be helpful and registers an MDIO bus on behalf of the switch, which might be on such a bus. I've no idea why it does it under devres. It does this on probe: if (!ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read) alloc and register mdio bus and this on remove: if (ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read) unregister mdio bus I _could_ imagine using devres because the condition used on remove is different than the condition used on probe. So strictly speaking, DSA cannot determine whether the ds->slave_mii_bus it sees on remove is the ds->slave_mii_bus that _it_ has allocated on probe. Using devres would have solved that problem. But nonetheless, the existing code already proceeds to unregister the MDIO bus, even though it might be unregistering an MDIO bus it has never registered. So I can only guess that no driver that implements ds->ops->phy_read also allocates and registers ds->slave_mii_bus itself. So in that case, if unregistering is fine, freeing must be fine too. Stop using devres and free the MDIO bus manually. This will make devres stop attempting to free a still registered MDIO bus on ->shutdown. Fixes: ac3a68d56651 ("net: phy: don't abuse devres in devm_mdiobus_register()") Reported-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Tested-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-21 05:42:08 +08:00
mdiobus_free(ds->slave_mii_bus);
ds->slave_mii_bus = NULL;
}
if (ds->ops->teardown)
ds->ops->teardown(ds);
dsa_switch_unregister_notifier(ds);
if (ds->devlink) {
dsa_switch_for_each_port(dp, ds)
dsa_port_devlink_teardown(dp);
devlink_free(ds->devlink);
ds->devlink = NULL;
}
ds->setup = false;
}
net: dsa: flush switchdev workqueue before tearing down CPU/DSA ports Sometimes when unbinding the mv88e6xxx driver on Turris MOX, these error messages appear: mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete be:79:b4:9e:9e:96 vid 1 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete be:79:b4:9e:9e:96 vid 0 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete d8:58:d7:00:ca:6d vid 100 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete d8:58:d7:00:ca:6d vid 1 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete d8:58:d7:00:ca:6d vid 0 from fdb: -2 (and similarly for other ports) What happens is that DSA has a policy "even if there are bugs, let's at least not leak memory" and dsa_port_teardown() clears the dp->fdbs and dp->mdbs lists, which are supposed to be empty. But deleting that cleanup code, the warnings go away. => the FDB and MDB lists (used for refcounting on shared ports, aka CPU and DSA ports) will eventually be empty, but are not empty by the time we tear down those ports. Aka we are deleting them too soon. The addresses that DSA complains about are host-trapped addresses: the local addresses of the ports, and the MAC address of the bridge device. The problem is that offloading those entries happens from a deferred work item scheduled by the SWITCHDEV_FDB_DEL_TO_DEVICE handler, and this races with the teardown of the CPU and DSA ports where the refcounting is kept. In fact, not only it races, but fundamentally speaking, if we iterate through the port list linearly, we might end up tearing down the shared ports even before we delete a DSA user port which has a bridge upper. So as it turns out, we need to first tear down the user ports (and the unused ones, for no better place of doing that), then the shared ports (the CPU and DSA ports). In between, we need to ensure that all work items scheduled by our switchdev handlers (which only run for user ports, hence the reason why we tear them down first) have finished. Fixes: 161ca59d39e9 ("net: dsa: reference count the MDB entries at the cross-chip notifier level") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210914134726.2305133-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-09-14 21:47:26 +08:00
/* First tear down the non-shared, then the shared ports. This ensures that
* all work items scheduled by our switchdev handlers for user ports have
* completed before we destroy the refcounting kept on the shared ports.
*/
static void dsa_tree_teardown_ports(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_port *dp;
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list)
if (dsa_port_is_user(dp) || dsa_port_is_unused(dp))
dsa_port_teardown(dp);
dsa_flush_workqueue();
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list)
if (dsa_port_is_dsa(dp) || dsa_port_is_cpu(dp))
dsa_port_teardown(dp);
}
static void dsa_tree_teardown_switches(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_port *dp;
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list)
dsa_switch_teardown(dp->ds);
}
static int dsa_tree_setup_switches(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_port *dp;
int err;
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) {
err = dsa_switch_setup(dp->ds);
if (err)
goto teardown;
}
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) {
err = dsa_port_setup(dp);
if (err) {
net: dsa: tear down devlink port regions when tearing down the devlink port on error Commit 86f8b1c01a0a ("net: dsa: Do not make user port errors fatal") decided it was fine to ignore errors on certain ports that fail to probe, and go on with the ports that do probe fine. Commit fb6ec87f7229 ("net: dsa: Fix type was not set for devlink port") noticed that devlink_port_type_eth_set(dlp, dp->slave); does not get called, and devlink notices after a timeout of 3600 seconds and prints a WARN_ON. So it went ahead to unregister the devlink port. And because there exists an UNUSED port flavour, we actually re-register the devlink port as UNUSED. Commit 08156ba430b4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") added devlink port regions, which are set up by the driver and not by DSA. When we trigger the devlink port deregistration and reregistration as unused, devlink now prints another WARN_ON, from here: devlink_port_unregister: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink_port->region_list)); So the port still has regions, which makes sense, because they were set up by the driver, and the driver doesn't know we're unregistering the devlink port. Somebody needs to tear them down, and optionally (actually it would be nice, to be consistent) set them up again for the new devlink port. But DSA's layering stays in our way quite badly here. The options I've considered are: 1. Introduce a function in devlink to just change a port's type and flavour. No dice, devlink keeps a lot of state, it really wants the port to not be registered when you set its parameters, so changing anything can only be done by destroying what we currently have and recreating it. 2. Make DSA cache the parameters passed to dsa_devlink_port_region_create, and the region returned, keep those in a list, then when the devlink port unregister needs to take place, the existing devlink regions are destroyed by DSA, and we replay the creation of new regions using the cached parameters. Problem: mv88e6xxx keeps the region pointers in chip->ports[port].region, and these will remain stale after DSA frees them. There are many things DSA can do, but updating mv88e6xxx's private pointers is not one of them. 3. Just let the driver do it (i.e. introduce a very specific method called ds->ops->port_reinit_as_unused, which unregisters its devlink port devlink regions, then the old devlink port, then registers the new one, then the devlink port regions for it). While it does work, as opposed to the others, it's pretty horrible from an API perspective and we can do better. 4. Introduce a new pair of methods, ->port_setup and ->port_teardown, which in the case of mv88e6xxx must register and unregister the devlink port regions. Call these 2 methods when the port must be reinitialized as unused. Naturally, I went for the 4th approach. Fixes: 08156ba430b4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-17 22:29:16 +08:00
err = dsa_port_reinit_as_unused(dp);
if (err)
goto teardown;
}
}
return 0;
teardown:
net: dsa: flush switchdev workqueue before tearing down CPU/DSA ports Sometimes when unbinding the mv88e6xxx driver on Turris MOX, these error messages appear: mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete be:79:b4:9e:9e:96 vid 1 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete be:79:b4:9e:9e:96 vid 0 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete d8:58:d7:00:ca:6d vid 100 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete d8:58:d7:00:ca:6d vid 1 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete d8:58:d7:00:ca:6d vid 0 from fdb: -2 (and similarly for other ports) What happens is that DSA has a policy "even if there are bugs, let's at least not leak memory" and dsa_port_teardown() clears the dp->fdbs and dp->mdbs lists, which are supposed to be empty. But deleting that cleanup code, the warnings go away. => the FDB and MDB lists (used for refcounting on shared ports, aka CPU and DSA ports) will eventually be empty, but are not empty by the time we tear down those ports. Aka we are deleting them too soon. The addresses that DSA complains about are host-trapped addresses: the local addresses of the ports, and the MAC address of the bridge device. The problem is that offloading those entries happens from a deferred work item scheduled by the SWITCHDEV_FDB_DEL_TO_DEVICE handler, and this races with the teardown of the CPU and DSA ports where the refcounting is kept. In fact, not only it races, but fundamentally speaking, if we iterate through the port list linearly, we might end up tearing down the shared ports even before we delete a DSA user port which has a bridge upper. So as it turns out, we need to first tear down the user ports (and the unused ones, for no better place of doing that), then the shared ports (the CPU and DSA ports). In between, we need to ensure that all work items scheduled by our switchdev handlers (which only run for user ports, hence the reason why we tear them down first) have finished. Fixes: 161ca59d39e9 ("net: dsa: reference count the MDB entries at the cross-chip notifier level") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210914134726.2305133-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-09-14 21:47:26 +08:00
dsa_tree_teardown_ports(dst);
net: dsa: flush switchdev workqueue before tearing down CPU/DSA ports Sometimes when unbinding the mv88e6xxx driver on Turris MOX, these error messages appear: mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete be:79:b4:9e:9e:96 vid 1 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete be:79:b4:9e:9e:96 vid 0 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete d8:58:d7:00:ca:6d vid 100 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete d8:58:d7:00:ca:6d vid 1 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete d8:58:d7:00:ca:6d vid 0 from fdb: -2 (and similarly for other ports) What happens is that DSA has a policy "even if there are bugs, let's at least not leak memory" and dsa_port_teardown() clears the dp->fdbs and dp->mdbs lists, which are supposed to be empty. But deleting that cleanup code, the warnings go away. => the FDB and MDB lists (used for refcounting on shared ports, aka CPU and DSA ports) will eventually be empty, but are not empty by the time we tear down those ports. Aka we are deleting them too soon. The addresses that DSA complains about are host-trapped addresses: the local addresses of the ports, and the MAC address of the bridge device. The problem is that offloading those entries happens from a deferred work item scheduled by the SWITCHDEV_FDB_DEL_TO_DEVICE handler, and this races with the teardown of the CPU and DSA ports where the refcounting is kept. In fact, not only it races, but fundamentally speaking, if we iterate through the port list linearly, we might end up tearing down the shared ports even before we delete a DSA user port which has a bridge upper. So as it turns out, we need to first tear down the user ports (and the unused ones, for no better place of doing that), then the shared ports (the CPU and DSA ports). In between, we need to ensure that all work items scheduled by our switchdev handlers (which only run for user ports, hence the reason why we tear them down first) have finished. Fixes: 161ca59d39e9 ("net: dsa: reference count the MDB entries at the cross-chip notifier level") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210914134726.2305133-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-09-14 21:47:26 +08:00
dsa_tree_teardown_switches(dst);
return err;
}
static int dsa_tree_setup_master(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_port *dp;
int err;
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) {
if (dsa_port_is_cpu(dp)) {
err = dsa_master_setup(dp->master, dp);
if (err)
return err;
}
}
return 0;
}
static void dsa_tree_teardown_master(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_port *dp;
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list)
if (dsa_port_is_cpu(dp))
dsa_master_teardown(dp->master);
}
static int dsa_tree_setup_lags(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
unsigned int len = 0;
struct dsa_port *dp;
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) {
if (dp->ds->num_lag_ids > len)
len = dp->ds->num_lag_ids;
}
if (!len)
return 0;
dst->lags = kcalloc(len, sizeof(*dst->lags), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!dst->lags)
return -ENOMEM;
dst->lags_len = len;
return 0;
}
static void dsa_tree_teardown_lags(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
kfree(dst->lags);
}
static int dsa_tree_setup(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
bool complete;
int err;
if (dst->setup) {
pr_err("DSA: tree %d already setup! Disjoint trees?\n",
dst->index);
return -EEXIST;
}
complete = dsa_tree_setup_routing_table(dst);
if (!complete)
return 0;
net: dsa: give preference to local CPU ports Be there an "H" switch topology, where there are 2 switches connected as follows: eth0 eth1 | | CPU port CPU port | DSA link | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 -------- sw1p4 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 | | | | | | user user user user user user port port port port port port basically one where each switch has its own CPU port for termination, but there is also a DSA link in case packets need to be forwarded in hardware between one switch and another. DSA insists to see this as a daisy chain topology, basically registering all network interfaces as sw0p0@eth0, ... sw1p0@eth0 and disregarding eth1 as a valid DSA master. This is only half the story, since when asked using dsa_port_is_cpu(), DSA will respond that sw1p1 is a CPU port, however one which has no dp->cpu_dp pointing to it. So sw1p1 is enabled, but not used. Furthermore, be there a driver for switches which support only one upstream port. This driver iterates through its ports and checks using dsa_is_upstream_port() whether the current port is an upstream one. For switch 1, two ports pass the "is upstream port" checks: - sw1p4 is an upstream port because it is a routing port towards the dedicated CPU port assigned using dsa_tree_setup_default_cpu() - sw1p1 is also an upstream port because it is a CPU port, albeit one that is disabled. This is because dsa_upstream_port() returns: if (!cpu_dp) return port; which means that if @dp does not have a ->cpu_dp pointer (which is a characteristic of CPU ports themselves as well as unused ports), then @dp is its own upstream port. So the driver for switch 1 rightfully says: I have two upstream ports, but I don't support multiple upstream ports! So let me error out, I don't know which one to choose and what to do with the other one. Generally I am against enforcing any default policy in the kernel in terms of user to CPU port assignment (like round robin or such) but this case is different. To solve the conundrum, one would have to: - Disable sw1p1 in the device tree or mark it as "not a CPU port" in order to comply with DSA's view of this topology as a daisy chain, where the termination traffic from switch 1 must pass through switch 0. This is counter-productive because it wastes 1Gbps of termination throughput in switch 1. - Disable the DSA link between sw0p4 and sw1p4 and do software forwarding between switch 0 and 1, and basically treat the switches as part of disjoint switch trees. This is counter-productive because it wastes 1Gbps of autonomous forwarding throughput between switch 0 and 1. - Treat sw0p4 and sw1p4 as user ports instead of DSA links. This could work, but it makes cross-chip bridging impossible. In this setup we would need to have 2 separate bridges, br0 spanning the ports of switch 0, and br1 spanning the ports of switch 1, and the "DSA links treated as user ports" sw0p4 (part of br0) and sw1p4 (part of br1) are the gateway ports between one bridge and another. This is hard to manage from a user's perspective, who wants to have a unified view of the switching fabric and the ability to transparently add ports to the same bridge. VLANs would also need to be explicitly managed by the user on these gateway ports. So it seems that the only reasonable thing to do is to make DSA prefer CPU ports that are local to the switch. Meaning that by default, the user and DSA ports of switch 0 will get assigned to the CPU port from switch 0 (sw0p1) and the user and DSA ports of switch 1 will get assigned to the CPU port from switch 1. The way this solves the problem is that sw1p4 is no longer an upstream port as far as switch 1 is concerned (it no longer views sw0p1 as its dedicated CPU port). So here we are, the first multi-CPU port that DSA supports is also perhaps the most uneventful one: the individual switches don't support multiple CPUs, however the DSA switch tree as a whole does have multiple CPU ports. No user space assignment of user ports to CPU ports is desirable, necessary, or possible. Ports that do not have a local CPU port (say there was an extra switch hanging off of sw0p0) default to the standard implementation of getting assigned to the first CPU port of the DSA switch tree. Is that good enough? Probably not (if the downstream switch was hanging off of switch 1, we would most certainly prefer its CPU port to be sw1p1), but in order to support that use case too, we would need to traverse the dst->rtable in search of an optimum dedicated CPU port, one that has the smallest number of hops between dp->ds and dp->cpu_dp->ds. At the moment, the DSA routing table structure does not keep the number of hops between dl->dp and dl->link_dp, and while it is probably deducible, there is zero justification to write that code now. Let's hope DSA will never have to support that use case. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-08-04 21:54:30 +08:00
err = dsa_tree_setup_cpu_ports(dst);
if (err)
return err;
err = dsa_tree_setup_switches(dst);
if (err)
goto teardown_cpu_ports;
err = dsa_tree_setup_master(dst);
if (err)
goto teardown_switches;
err = dsa_tree_setup_lags(dst);
if (err)
goto teardown_master;
dst->setup = true;
pr_info("DSA: tree %d setup\n", dst->index);
return 0;
teardown_master:
dsa_tree_teardown_master(dst);
teardown_switches:
dsa_tree_teardown_ports(dst);
dsa_tree_teardown_switches(dst);
teardown_cpu_ports:
dsa_tree_teardown_cpu_ports(dst);
return err;
}
static void dsa_tree_teardown(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
{
struct dsa_link *dl, *next;
if (!dst->setup)
return;
dsa_tree_teardown_lags(dst);
dsa_tree_teardown_master(dst);
net: dsa: flush switchdev workqueue before tearing down CPU/DSA ports Sometimes when unbinding the mv88e6xxx driver on Turris MOX, these error messages appear: mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete be:79:b4:9e:9e:96 vid 1 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete be:79:b4:9e:9e:96 vid 0 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete d8:58:d7:00:ca:6d vid 100 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete d8:58:d7:00:ca:6d vid 1 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete d8:58:d7:00:ca:6d vid 0 from fdb: -2 (and similarly for other ports) What happens is that DSA has a policy "even if there are bugs, let's at least not leak memory" and dsa_port_teardown() clears the dp->fdbs and dp->mdbs lists, which are supposed to be empty. But deleting that cleanup code, the warnings go away. => the FDB and MDB lists (used for refcounting on shared ports, aka CPU and DSA ports) will eventually be empty, but are not empty by the time we tear down those ports. Aka we are deleting them too soon. The addresses that DSA complains about are host-trapped addresses: the local addresses of the ports, and the MAC address of the bridge device. The problem is that offloading those entries happens from a deferred work item scheduled by the SWITCHDEV_FDB_DEL_TO_DEVICE handler, and this races with the teardown of the CPU and DSA ports where the refcounting is kept. In fact, not only it races, but fundamentally speaking, if we iterate through the port list linearly, we might end up tearing down the shared ports even before we delete a DSA user port which has a bridge upper. So as it turns out, we need to first tear down the user ports (and the unused ones, for no better place of doing that), then the shared ports (the CPU and DSA ports). In between, we need to ensure that all work items scheduled by our switchdev handlers (which only run for user ports, hence the reason why we tear them down first) have finished. Fixes: 161ca59d39e9 ("net: dsa: reference count the MDB entries at the cross-chip notifier level") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210914134726.2305133-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-09-14 21:47:26 +08:00
dsa_tree_teardown_ports(dst);
dsa_tree_teardown_switches(dst);
dsa_tree_teardown_cpu_ports(dst);
list_for_each_entry_safe(dl, next, &dst->rtable, list) {
list_del(&dl->list);
kfree(dl);
}
pr_info("DSA: tree %d torn down\n", dst->index);
dst->setup = false;
}
net: dsa: allow changing the tag protocol via the "tagging" device attribute Currently DSA exposes the following sysfs: $ cat /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging ocelot which is a read-only device attribute, introduced in the kernel as commit 98cdb4807123 ("net: dsa: Expose tagging protocol to user-space"), and used by libpcap since its commit 993db3800d7d ("Add support for DSA link-layer types"). It would be nice if we could extend this device attribute by making it writable: $ echo ocelot-8021q > /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging This is useful with DSA switches that can make use of more than one tagging protocol. It may be useful in dsa_loop in the future too, to perform offline testing of various taggers, or for changing between dsa and edsa on Marvell switches, if that is desirable. In terms of implementation, drivers can support this feature by implementing .change_tag_protocol, which should always leave the switch in a consistent state: either with the new protocol if things went well, or with the old one if something failed. Teardown of the old protocol, if necessary, must be handled by the driver. Some things remain as before: - The .get_tag_protocol is currently only called at probe time, to load the initial tagging protocol driver. Nonetheless, new drivers should report the tagging protocol in current use now. - The driver should manage by itself the initial setup of tagging protocol, no later than the .setup() method, as well as destroying resources used by the last tagger in use, no earlier than the .teardown() method. For multi-switch DSA trees, error handling is a bit more complicated, since e.g. the 5th out of 7 switches may fail to change the tag protocol. When that happens, a revert to the original tag protocol is attempted, but that may fail too, leaving the tree in an inconsistent state despite each individual switch implementing .change_tag_protocol transactionally. Since the intersection between drivers that implement .change_tag_protocol and drivers that support D in DSA is currently the empty set, the possibility for this error to happen is ignored for now. Testing: $ insmod mscc_felix.ko [ 79.549784] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Adding to iommu group 14 [ 79.565712] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Failed to register DSA switch: -517 $ insmod tag_ocelot.ko $ rmmod mscc_felix.ko $ insmod mscc_felix.ko [ 97.261724] libphy: VSC9959 internal MDIO bus: probed [ 97.267363] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Found PCS at internal MDIO address 0 [ 97.274998] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Found PCS at internal MDIO address 1 [ 97.282561] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Found PCS at internal MDIO address 2 [ 97.289700] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Found PCS at internal MDIO address 3 [ 97.599163] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp0 (uninitialized): PHY [0000:00:00.3:10] driver [Microsemi GE VSC8514 SyncE] (irq=POLL) [ 97.862034] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp1 (uninitialized): PHY [0000:00:00.3:11] driver [Microsemi GE VSC8514 SyncE] (irq=POLL) [ 97.950731] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp0: configuring for inband/qsgmii link mode [ 97.964278] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device swp0 [ 98.146161] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp2 (uninitialized): PHY [0000:00:00.3:12] driver [Microsemi GE VSC8514 SyncE] (irq=POLL) [ 98.238649] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp1: configuring for inband/qsgmii link mode [ 98.251845] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device swp1 [ 98.433916] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp3 (uninitialized): PHY [0000:00:00.3:13] driver [Microsemi GE VSC8514 SyncE] (irq=POLL) [ 98.485542] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: configuring for fixed/internal link mode [ 98.503584] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Link is Up - 2.5Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx [ 98.527948] device eno2 entered promiscuous mode [ 98.544755] DSA: tree 0 setup $ ping 10.0.0.1 PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=0 ttl=64 time=2.337 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.754 ms ^C - 10.0.0.1 ping statistics - 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 0.754/1.545/2.337 ms $ cat /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging ocelot $ cat ./test_ocelot_8021q.sh #!/bin/bash ip link set swp0 down ip link set swp1 down ip link set swp2 down ip link set swp3 down ip link set swp5 down ip link set eno2 down echo ocelot-8021q > /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging ip link set eno2 up ip link set swp0 up ip link set swp1 up ip link set swp2 up ip link set swp3 up ip link set swp5 up $ ./test_ocelot_8021q.sh ./test_ocelot_8021q.sh: line 9: echo: write error: Protocol not available $ rmmod tag_ocelot.ko rmmod: can't unload module 'tag_ocelot': Resource temporarily unavailable $ insmod tag_ocelot_8021q.ko $ ./test_ocelot_8021q.sh $ cat /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging ocelot-8021q $ rmmod tag_ocelot.ko $ rmmod tag_ocelot_8021q.ko rmmod: can't unload module 'tag_ocelot_8021q': Resource temporarily unavailable $ ping 10.0.0.1 PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.953 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.787 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.771 ms $ rmmod mscc_felix.ko [ 645.544426] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Link is Down [ 645.838608] DSA: tree 0 torn down $ rmmod tag_ocelot_8021q.ko Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-29 09:00:06 +08:00
/* Since the dsa/tagging sysfs device attribute is per master, the assumption
* is that all DSA switches within a tree share the same tagger, otherwise
* they would have formed disjoint trees (different "dsa,member" values).
*/
int dsa_tree_change_tag_proto(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
struct net_device *master,
const struct dsa_device_ops *tag_ops,
const struct dsa_device_ops *old_tag_ops)
{
struct dsa_notifier_tag_proto_info info;
struct dsa_port *dp;
int err = -EBUSY;
if (!rtnl_trylock())
return restart_syscall();
/* At the moment we don't allow changing the tag protocol under
* traffic. The rtnl_mutex also happens to serialize concurrent
* attempts to change the tagging protocol. If we ever lift the IFF_UP
* restriction, there needs to be another mutex which serializes this.
*/
if (master->flags & IFF_UP)
goto out_unlock;
list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) {
if (!dsa_port_is_user(dp))
net: dsa: allow changing the tag protocol via the "tagging" device attribute Currently DSA exposes the following sysfs: $ cat /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging ocelot which is a read-only device attribute, introduced in the kernel as commit 98cdb4807123 ("net: dsa: Expose tagging protocol to user-space"), and used by libpcap since its commit 993db3800d7d ("Add support for DSA link-layer types"). It would be nice if we could extend this device attribute by making it writable: $ echo ocelot-8021q > /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging This is useful with DSA switches that can make use of more than one tagging protocol. It may be useful in dsa_loop in the future too, to perform offline testing of various taggers, or for changing between dsa and edsa on Marvell switches, if that is desirable. In terms of implementation, drivers can support this feature by implementing .change_tag_protocol, which should always leave the switch in a consistent state: either with the new protocol if things went well, or with the old one if something failed. Teardown of the old protocol, if necessary, must be handled by the driver. Some things remain as before: - The .get_tag_protocol is currently only called at probe time, to load the initial tagging protocol driver. Nonetheless, new drivers should report the tagging protocol in current use now. - The driver should manage by itself the initial setup of tagging protocol, no later than the .setup() method, as well as destroying resources used by the last tagger in use, no earlier than the .teardown() method. For multi-switch DSA trees, error handling is a bit more complicated, since e.g. the 5th out of 7 switches may fail to change the tag protocol. When that happens, a revert to the original tag protocol is attempted, but that may fail too, leaving the tree in an inconsistent state despite each individual switch implementing .change_tag_protocol transactionally. Since the intersection between drivers that implement .change_tag_protocol and drivers that support D in DSA is currently the empty set, the possibility for this error to happen is ignored for now. Testing: $ insmod mscc_felix.ko [ 79.549784] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Adding to iommu group 14 [ 79.565712] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Failed to register DSA switch: -517 $ insmod tag_ocelot.ko $ rmmod mscc_felix.ko $ insmod mscc_felix.ko [ 97.261724] libphy: VSC9959 internal MDIO bus: probed [ 97.267363] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Found PCS at internal MDIO address 0 [ 97.274998] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Found PCS at internal MDIO address 1 [ 97.282561] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Found PCS at internal MDIO address 2 [ 97.289700] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Found PCS at internal MDIO address 3 [ 97.599163] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp0 (uninitialized): PHY [0000:00:00.3:10] driver [Microsemi GE VSC8514 SyncE] (irq=POLL) [ 97.862034] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp1 (uninitialized): PHY [0000:00:00.3:11] driver [Microsemi GE VSC8514 SyncE] (irq=POLL) [ 97.950731] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp0: configuring for inband/qsgmii link mode [ 97.964278] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device swp0 [ 98.146161] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp2 (uninitialized): PHY [0000:00:00.3:12] driver [Microsemi GE VSC8514 SyncE] (irq=POLL) [ 98.238649] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp1: configuring for inband/qsgmii link mode [ 98.251845] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device swp1 [ 98.433916] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp3 (uninitialized): PHY [0000:00:00.3:13] driver [Microsemi GE VSC8514 SyncE] (irq=POLL) [ 98.485542] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: configuring for fixed/internal link mode [ 98.503584] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Link is Up - 2.5Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx [ 98.527948] device eno2 entered promiscuous mode [ 98.544755] DSA: tree 0 setup $ ping 10.0.0.1 PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=0 ttl=64 time=2.337 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.754 ms ^C - 10.0.0.1 ping statistics - 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 0.754/1.545/2.337 ms $ cat /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging ocelot $ cat ./test_ocelot_8021q.sh #!/bin/bash ip link set swp0 down ip link set swp1 down ip link set swp2 down ip link set swp3 down ip link set swp5 down ip link set eno2 down echo ocelot-8021q > /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging ip link set eno2 up ip link set swp0 up ip link set swp1 up ip link set swp2 up ip link set swp3 up ip link set swp5 up $ ./test_ocelot_8021q.sh ./test_ocelot_8021q.sh: line 9: echo: write error: Protocol not available $ rmmod tag_ocelot.ko rmmod: can't unload module 'tag_ocelot': Resource temporarily unavailable $ insmod tag_ocelot_8021q.ko $ ./test_ocelot_8021q.sh $ cat /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging ocelot-8021q $ rmmod tag_ocelot.ko $ rmmod tag_ocelot_8021q.ko rmmod: can't unload module 'tag_ocelot_8021q': Resource temporarily unavailable $ ping 10.0.0.1 PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.953 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.787 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.771 ms $ rmmod mscc_felix.ko [ 645.544426] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Link is Down [ 645.838608] DSA: tree 0 torn down $ rmmod tag_ocelot_8021q.ko Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-29 09:00:06 +08:00
continue;
if (dp->slave->flags & IFF_UP)
goto out_unlock;
}
info.tag_ops = tag_ops;
err = dsa_tree_notify(dst, DSA_NOTIFIER_TAG_PROTO, &info);
if (err)
goto out_unwind_tagger;
dst->tag_ops = tag_ops;
rtnl_unlock();
return 0;
out_unwind_tagger:
info.tag_ops = old_tag_ops;
dsa_tree_notify(dst, DSA_NOTIFIER_TAG_PROTO, &info);
out_unlock:
rtnl_unlock();
return err;
}
static struct dsa_port *dsa_port_touch(struct dsa_switch *ds, int index)
{
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;
struct dsa_port *dp;
dsa_switch_for_each_port(dp, ds)
if (dp->index == index)
return dp;
dp = kzalloc(sizeof(*dp), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!dp)
return NULL;
dp->ds = ds;
dp->index = index;
net: dsa: add support for bridge TX forwarding offload For a DSA switch, to offload the forwarding process of a bridge device means to send the packets coming from the software bridge as data plane packets. This is contrary to everything that DSA has done so far, because the current taggers only know to send control packets (ones that target a specific destination port), whereas data plane packets are supposed to be forwarded according to the FDB lookup, much like packets ingressing on any regular ingress port. If the FDB lookup process returns multiple destination ports (flooding, multicast), then replication is also handled by the switch hardware - the bridge only sends a single packet and avoids the skb_clone(). DSA keeps for each bridge port a zero-based index (the number of the bridge). Multiple ports performing TX forwarding offload to the same bridge have the same dp->bridge_num value, and ports not offloading the TX data plane of a bridge have dp->bridge_num = -1. The tagger can check if the packet that is being transmitted on has skb->offload_fwd_mark = true or not. If it does, it can be sure that the packet belongs to the data plane of a bridge, further information about which can be obtained based on dp->bridge_dev and dp->bridge_num. It can then compose a DSA tag for injecting a data plane packet into that bridge number. For the switch driver side, we offer two new dsa_switch_ops methods, called .port_bridge_fwd_offload_{add,del}, which are modeled after .port_bridge_{join,leave}. These methods are provided in case the driver needs to configure the hardware to treat packets coming from that bridge software interface as data plane packets. The switchdev <-> bridge interaction happens during the netdev_master_upper_dev_link() call, so to switch drivers, the effect is that the .port_bridge_fwd_offload_add() method is called immediately after .port_bridge_join(). If the bridge number exceeds the number of bridges for which the switch driver can offload the TX data plane (and this includes the case where the driver can offload none), DSA falls back to simply returning tx_fwd_offload = false in the switchdev_bridge_port_offload() call. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-22 23:55:40 +08:00
dp->bridge_num = -1;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dp->list);
list_add_tail(&dp->list, &dst->ports);
return dp;
}
static int dsa_port_parse_user(struct dsa_port *dp, const char *name)
{
if (!name)
name = "eth%d";
dp->type = DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER;
dp->name = name;
return 0;
}
static int dsa_port_parse_dsa(struct dsa_port *dp)
{
dp->type = DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA;
return 0;
}
static enum dsa_tag_protocol dsa_get_tag_protocol(struct dsa_port *dp,
struct net_device *master)
{
enum dsa_tag_protocol tag_protocol = DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE;
struct dsa_switch *mds, *ds = dp->ds;
unsigned int mdp_upstream;
struct dsa_port *mdp;
/* It is possible to stack DSA switches onto one another when that
* happens the switch driver may want to know if its tagging protocol
* is going to work in such a configuration.
*/
if (dsa_slave_dev_check(master)) {
mdp = dsa_slave_to_port(master);
mds = mdp->ds;
mdp_upstream = dsa_upstream_port(mds, mdp->index);
tag_protocol = mds->ops->get_tag_protocol(mds, mdp_upstream,
DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE);
}
/* If the master device is not itself a DSA slave in a disjoint DSA
* tree, then return immediately.
*/
return ds->ops->get_tag_protocol(ds, dp->index, tag_protocol);
}
static int dsa_port_parse_cpu(struct dsa_port *dp, struct net_device *master,
const char *user_protocol)
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;
const struct dsa_device_ops *tag_ops;
enum dsa_tag_protocol default_proto;
/* Find out which protocol the switch would prefer. */
default_proto = dsa_get_tag_protocol(dp, master);
if (dst->default_proto) {
if (dst->default_proto != default_proto) {
dev_err(ds->dev,
"A DSA switch tree can have only one tagging protocol\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
} else {
dst->default_proto = default_proto;
}
/* See if the user wants to override that preference. */
if (user_protocol) {
if (!ds->ops->change_tag_protocol) {
dev_err(ds->dev, "Tag protocol cannot be modified\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
tag_ops = dsa_find_tagger_by_name(user_protocol);
} else {
tag_ops = dsa_tag_driver_get(default_proto);
}
if (IS_ERR(tag_ops)) {
if (PTR_ERR(tag_ops) == -ENOPROTOOPT)
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
dev_warn(ds->dev, "No tagger for this switch\n");
return PTR_ERR(tag_ops);
}
net: dsa: keep a copy of the tagging protocol in the DSA switch tree Cascading DSA switches can be done multiple ways. There is the brute force approach / tag stacking, where one upstream switch, located between leaf switches and the host Ethernet controller, will just happily transport the DSA header of those leaf switches as payload. For this kind of setups, DSA works without any special kind of treatment compared to a single switch - they just aren't aware of each other. Then there's the approach where the upstream switch understands the tags it transports from its leaves below, as it doesn't push a tag of its own, but it routes based on the source port & switch id information present in that tag (as opposed to DMAC & VID) and it strips the tag when egressing a front-facing port. Currently only Marvell implements the latter, and Marvell DSA trees contain only Marvell switches. So it is safe to say that DSA trees already have a single tag protocol shared by all switches, and in fact this is what makes the switches able to understand each other. This fact is also implied by the fact that currently, the tagging protocol is reported as part of a sysfs installed on the DSA master and not per port, so it must be the same for all the ports connected to that DSA master regardless of the switch that they belong to. It's time to make this official and enforce it (yes, this also means we won't have any "switch understands tag to some extent but is not able to speak it" hardware oddities that we'll support in the future). This is needed due to the imminent introduction of the dsa_switch_ops:: change_tag_protocol driver API. When that is introduced, we'll have to notify switches of the tagging protocol that they're configured to use. Currently the tag_ops structure pointer is held only for CPU ports. But there are switches which don't have CPU ports and nonetheless still need to be configured. These would be Marvell leaf switches whose upstream port is just a DSA link. How do we inform these of their tagging protocol setup/deletion? One answer to the above would be: iterate through the DSA switch tree's ports once, list the CPU ports, get their tag_ops, then iterate again now that we have it, and notify everybody of that tag_ops. But what to do if conflicts appear between one cpu_dp->tag_ops and another? There's no escaping the fact that conflict resolution needs to be done, so we can be upfront about it. Ease our work and just keep the master copy of the tag_ops inside the struct dsa_switch_tree. Reference counting is now moved to be per-tree too, instead of per-CPU port. There are many places in the data path that access master->dsa_ptr->tag_ops and we would introduce unnecessary performance penalty going through yet another indirection, so keep those right where they are. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-29 09:00:05 +08:00
if (dst->tag_ops) {
if (dst->tag_ops != tag_ops) {
net: dsa: keep a copy of the tagging protocol in the DSA switch tree Cascading DSA switches can be done multiple ways. There is the brute force approach / tag stacking, where one upstream switch, located between leaf switches and the host Ethernet controller, will just happily transport the DSA header of those leaf switches as payload. For this kind of setups, DSA works without any special kind of treatment compared to a single switch - they just aren't aware of each other. Then there's the approach where the upstream switch understands the tags it transports from its leaves below, as it doesn't push a tag of its own, but it routes based on the source port & switch id information present in that tag (as opposed to DMAC & VID) and it strips the tag when egressing a front-facing port. Currently only Marvell implements the latter, and Marvell DSA trees contain only Marvell switches. So it is safe to say that DSA trees already have a single tag protocol shared by all switches, and in fact this is what makes the switches able to understand each other. This fact is also implied by the fact that currently, the tagging protocol is reported as part of a sysfs installed on the DSA master and not per port, so it must be the same for all the ports connected to that DSA master regardless of the switch that they belong to. It's time to make this official and enforce it (yes, this also means we won't have any "switch understands tag to some extent but is not able to speak it" hardware oddities that we'll support in the future). This is needed due to the imminent introduction of the dsa_switch_ops:: change_tag_protocol driver API. When that is introduced, we'll have to notify switches of the tagging protocol that they're configured to use. Currently the tag_ops structure pointer is held only for CPU ports. But there are switches which don't have CPU ports and nonetheless still need to be configured. These would be Marvell leaf switches whose upstream port is just a DSA link. How do we inform these of their tagging protocol setup/deletion? One answer to the above would be: iterate through the DSA switch tree's ports once, list the CPU ports, get their tag_ops, then iterate again now that we have it, and notify everybody of that tag_ops. But what to do if conflicts appear between one cpu_dp->tag_ops and another? There's no escaping the fact that conflict resolution needs to be done, so we can be upfront about it. Ease our work and just keep the master copy of the tag_ops inside the struct dsa_switch_tree. Reference counting is now moved to be per-tree too, instead of per-CPU port. There are many places in the data path that access master->dsa_ptr->tag_ops and we would introduce unnecessary performance penalty going through yet another indirection, so keep those right where they are. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-29 09:00:05 +08:00
dev_err(ds->dev,
"A DSA switch tree can have only one tagging protocol\n");
dsa_tag_driver_put(tag_ops);
net: dsa: keep a copy of the tagging protocol in the DSA switch tree Cascading DSA switches can be done multiple ways. There is the brute force approach / tag stacking, where one upstream switch, located between leaf switches and the host Ethernet controller, will just happily transport the DSA header of those leaf switches as payload. For this kind of setups, DSA works without any special kind of treatment compared to a single switch - they just aren't aware of each other. Then there's the approach where the upstream switch understands the tags it transports from its leaves below, as it doesn't push a tag of its own, but it routes based on the source port & switch id information present in that tag (as opposed to DMAC & VID) and it strips the tag when egressing a front-facing port. Currently only Marvell implements the latter, and Marvell DSA trees contain only Marvell switches. So it is safe to say that DSA trees already have a single tag protocol shared by all switches, and in fact this is what makes the switches able to understand each other. This fact is also implied by the fact that currently, the tagging protocol is reported as part of a sysfs installed on the DSA master and not per port, so it must be the same for all the ports connected to that DSA master regardless of the switch that they belong to. It's time to make this official and enforce it (yes, this also means we won't have any "switch understands tag to some extent but is not able to speak it" hardware oddities that we'll support in the future). This is needed due to the imminent introduction of the dsa_switch_ops:: change_tag_protocol driver API. When that is introduced, we'll have to notify switches of the tagging protocol that they're configured to use. Currently the tag_ops structure pointer is held only for CPU ports. But there are switches which don't have CPU ports and nonetheless still need to be configured. These would be Marvell leaf switches whose upstream port is just a DSA link. How do we inform these of their tagging protocol setup/deletion? One answer to the above would be: iterate through the DSA switch tree's ports once, list the CPU ports, get their tag_ops, then iterate again now that we have it, and notify everybody of that tag_ops. But what to do if conflicts appear between one cpu_dp->tag_ops and another? There's no escaping the fact that conflict resolution needs to be done, so we can be upfront about it. Ease our work and just keep the master copy of the tag_ops inside the struct dsa_switch_tree. Reference counting is now moved to be per-tree too, instead of per-CPU port. There are many places in the data path that access master->dsa_ptr->tag_ops and we would introduce unnecessary performance penalty going through yet another indirection, so keep those right where they are. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-29 09:00:05 +08:00
return -EINVAL;
}
net: dsa: keep a copy of the tagging protocol in the DSA switch tree Cascading DSA switches can be done multiple ways. There is the brute force approach / tag stacking, where one upstream switch, located between leaf switches and the host Ethernet controller, will just happily transport the DSA header of those leaf switches as payload. For this kind of setups, DSA works without any special kind of treatment compared to a single switch - they just aren't aware of each other. Then there's the approach where the upstream switch understands the tags it transports from its leaves below, as it doesn't push a tag of its own, but it routes based on the source port & switch id information present in that tag (as opposed to DMAC & VID) and it strips the tag when egressing a front-facing port. Currently only Marvell implements the latter, and Marvell DSA trees contain only Marvell switches. So it is safe to say that DSA trees already have a single tag protocol shared by all switches, and in fact this is what makes the switches able to understand each other. This fact is also implied by the fact that currently, the tagging protocol is reported as part of a sysfs installed on the DSA master and not per port, so it must be the same for all the ports connected to that DSA master regardless of the switch that they belong to. It's time to make this official and enforce it (yes, this also means we won't have any "switch understands tag to some extent but is not able to speak it" hardware oddities that we'll support in the future). This is needed due to the imminent introduction of the dsa_switch_ops:: change_tag_protocol driver API. When that is introduced, we'll have to notify switches of the tagging protocol that they're configured to use. Currently the tag_ops structure pointer is held only for CPU ports. But there are switches which don't have CPU ports and nonetheless still need to be configured. These would be Marvell leaf switches whose upstream port is just a DSA link. How do we inform these of their tagging protocol setup/deletion? One answer to the above would be: iterate through the DSA switch tree's ports once, list the CPU ports, get their tag_ops, then iterate again now that we have it, and notify everybody of that tag_ops. But what to do if conflicts appear between one cpu_dp->tag_ops and another? There's no escaping the fact that conflict resolution needs to be done, so we can be upfront about it. Ease our work and just keep the master copy of the tag_ops inside the struct dsa_switch_tree. Reference counting is now moved to be per-tree too, instead of per-CPU port. There are many places in the data path that access master->dsa_ptr->tag_ops and we would introduce unnecessary performance penalty going through yet another indirection, so keep those right where they are. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-29 09:00:05 +08:00
/* In the case of multiple CPU ports per switch, the tagging
* protocol is still reference-counted only per switch tree.
net: dsa: keep a copy of the tagging protocol in the DSA switch tree Cascading DSA switches can be done multiple ways. There is the brute force approach / tag stacking, where one upstream switch, located between leaf switches and the host Ethernet controller, will just happily transport the DSA header of those leaf switches as payload. For this kind of setups, DSA works without any special kind of treatment compared to a single switch - they just aren't aware of each other. Then there's the approach where the upstream switch understands the tags it transports from its leaves below, as it doesn't push a tag of its own, but it routes based on the source port & switch id information present in that tag (as opposed to DMAC & VID) and it strips the tag when egressing a front-facing port. Currently only Marvell implements the latter, and Marvell DSA trees contain only Marvell switches. So it is safe to say that DSA trees already have a single tag protocol shared by all switches, and in fact this is what makes the switches able to understand each other. This fact is also implied by the fact that currently, the tagging protocol is reported as part of a sysfs installed on the DSA master and not per port, so it must be the same for all the ports connected to that DSA master regardless of the switch that they belong to. It's time to make this official and enforce it (yes, this also means we won't have any "switch understands tag to some extent but is not able to speak it" hardware oddities that we'll support in the future). This is needed due to the imminent introduction of the dsa_switch_ops:: change_tag_protocol driver API. When that is introduced, we'll have to notify switches of the tagging protocol that they're configured to use. Currently the tag_ops structure pointer is held only for CPU ports. But there are switches which don't have CPU ports and nonetheless still need to be configured. These would be Marvell leaf switches whose upstream port is just a DSA link. How do we inform these of their tagging protocol setup/deletion? One answer to the above would be: iterate through the DSA switch tree's ports once, list the CPU ports, get their tag_ops, then iterate again now that we have it, and notify everybody of that tag_ops. But what to do if conflicts appear between one cpu_dp->tag_ops and another? There's no escaping the fact that conflict resolution needs to be done, so we can be upfront about it. Ease our work and just keep the master copy of the tag_ops inside the struct dsa_switch_tree. Reference counting is now moved to be per-tree too, instead of per-CPU port. There are many places in the data path that access master->dsa_ptr->tag_ops and we would introduce unnecessary performance penalty going through yet another indirection, so keep those right where they are. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-29 09:00:05 +08:00
*/
dsa_tag_driver_put(tag_ops);
net: dsa: keep a copy of the tagging protocol in the DSA switch tree Cascading DSA switches can be done multiple ways. There is the brute force approach / tag stacking, where one upstream switch, located between leaf switches and the host Ethernet controller, will just happily transport the DSA header of those leaf switches as payload. For this kind of setups, DSA works without any special kind of treatment compared to a single switch - they just aren't aware of each other. Then there's the approach where the upstream switch understands the tags it transports from its leaves below, as it doesn't push a tag of its own, but it routes based on the source port & switch id information present in that tag (as opposed to DMAC & VID) and it strips the tag when egressing a front-facing port. Currently only Marvell implements the latter, and Marvell DSA trees contain only Marvell switches. So it is safe to say that DSA trees already have a single tag protocol shared by all switches, and in fact this is what makes the switches able to understand each other. This fact is also implied by the fact that currently, the tagging protocol is reported as part of a sysfs installed on the DSA master and not per port, so it must be the same for all the ports connected to that DSA master regardless of the switch that they belong to. It's time to make this official and enforce it (yes, this also means we won't have any "switch understands tag to some extent but is not able to speak it" hardware oddities that we'll support in the future). This is needed due to the imminent introduction of the dsa_switch_ops:: change_tag_protocol driver API. When that is introduced, we'll have to notify switches of the tagging protocol that they're configured to use. Currently the tag_ops structure pointer is held only for CPU ports. But there are switches which don't have CPU ports and nonetheless still need to be configured. These would be Marvell leaf switches whose upstream port is just a DSA link. How do we inform these of their tagging protocol setup/deletion? One answer to the above would be: iterate through the DSA switch tree's ports once, list the CPU ports, get their tag_ops, then iterate again now that we have it, and notify everybody of that tag_ops. But what to do if conflicts appear between one cpu_dp->tag_ops and another? There's no escaping the fact that conflict resolution needs to be done, so we can be upfront about it. Ease our work and just keep the master copy of the tag_ops inside the struct dsa_switch_tree. Reference counting is now moved to be per-tree too, instead of per-CPU port. There are many places in the data path that access master->dsa_ptr->tag_ops and we would introduce unnecessary performance penalty going through yet another indirection, so keep those right where they are. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-29 09:00:05 +08:00
} else {
dst->tag_ops = tag_ops;
}
dp->master = master;
dp->type = DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU;
net: dsa: allow changing the tag protocol via the "tagging" device attribute Currently DSA exposes the following sysfs: $ cat /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging ocelot which is a read-only device attribute, introduced in the kernel as commit 98cdb4807123 ("net: dsa: Expose tagging protocol to user-space"), and used by libpcap since its commit 993db3800d7d ("Add support for DSA link-layer types"). It would be nice if we could extend this device attribute by making it writable: $ echo ocelot-8021q > /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging This is useful with DSA switches that can make use of more than one tagging protocol. It may be useful in dsa_loop in the future too, to perform offline testing of various taggers, or for changing between dsa and edsa on Marvell switches, if that is desirable. In terms of implementation, drivers can support this feature by implementing .change_tag_protocol, which should always leave the switch in a consistent state: either with the new protocol if things went well, or with the old one if something failed. Teardown of the old protocol, if necessary, must be handled by the driver. Some things remain as before: - The .get_tag_protocol is currently only called at probe time, to load the initial tagging protocol driver. Nonetheless, new drivers should report the tagging protocol in current use now. - The driver should manage by itself the initial setup of tagging protocol, no later than the .setup() method, as well as destroying resources used by the last tagger in use, no earlier than the .teardown() method. For multi-switch DSA trees, error handling is a bit more complicated, since e.g. the 5th out of 7 switches may fail to change the tag protocol. When that happens, a revert to the original tag protocol is attempted, but that may fail too, leaving the tree in an inconsistent state despite each individual switch implementing .change_tag_protocol transactionally. Since the intersection between drivers that implement .change_tag_protocol and drivers that support D in DSA is currently the empty set, the possibility for this error to happen is ignored for now. Testing: $ insmod mscc_felix.ko [ 79.549784] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Adding to iommu group 14 [ 79.565712] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Failed to register DSA switch: -517 $ insmod tag_ocelot.ko $ rmmod mscc_felix.ko $ insmod mscc_felix.ko [ 97.261724] libphy: VSC9959 internal MDIO bus: probed [ 97.267363] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Found PCS at internal MDIO address 0 [ 97.274998] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Found PCS at internal MDIO address 1 [ 97.282561] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Found PCS at internal MDIO address 2 [ 97.289700] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Found PCS at internal MDIO address 3 [ 97.599163] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp0 (uninitialized): PHY [0000:00:00.3:10] driver [Microsemi GE VSC8514 SyncE] (irq=POLL) [ 97.862034] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp1 (uninitialized): PHY [0000:00:00.3:11] driver [Microsemi GE VSC8514 SyncE] (irq=POLL) [ 97.950731] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp0: configuring for inband/qsgmii link mode [ 97.964278] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device swp0 [ 98.146161] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp2 (uninitialized): PHY [0000:00:00.3:12] driver [Microsemi GE VSC8514 SyncE] (irq=POLL) [ 98.238649] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp1: configuring for inband/qsgmii link mode [ 98.251845] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device swp1 [ 98.433916] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp3 (uninitialized): PHY [0000:00:00.3:13] driver [Microsemi GE VSC8514 SyncE] (irq=POLL) [ 98.485542] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: configuring for fixed/internal link mode [ 98.503584] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Link is Up - 2.5Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx [ 98.527948] device eno2 entered promiscuous mode [ 98.544755] DSA: tree 0 setup $ ping 10.0.0.1 PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=0 ttl=64 time=2.337 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.754 ms ^C - 10.0.0.1 ping statistics - 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 0.754/1.545/2.337 ms $ cat /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging ocelot $ cat ./test_ocelot_8021q.sh #!/bin/bash ip link set swp0 down ip link set swp1 down ip link set swp2 down ip link set swp3 down ip link set swp5 down ip link set eno2 down echo ocelot-8021q > /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging ip link set eno2 up ip link set swp0 up ip link set swp1 up ip link set swp2 up ip link set swp3 up ip link set swp5 up $ ./test_ocelot_8021q.sh ./test_ocelot_8021q.sh: line 9: echo: write error: Protocol not available $ rmmod tag_ocelot.ko rmmod: can't unload module 'tag_ocelot': Resource temporarily unavailable $ insmod tag_ocelot_8021q.ko $ ./test_ocelot_8021q.sh $ cat /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging ocelot-8021q $ rmmod tag_ocelot.ko $ rmmod tag_ocelot_8021q.ko rmmod: can't unload module 'tag_ocelot_8021q': Resource temporarily unavailable $ ping 10.0.0.1 PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.953 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.787 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.771 ms $ rmmod mscc_felix.ko [ 645.544426] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Link is Down [ 645.838608] DSA: tree 0 torn down $ rmmod tag_ocelot_8021q.ko Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2021-01-29 09:00:06 +08:00
dsa_port_set_tag_protocol(dp, dst->tag_ops);
dp->dst = dst;
/* At this point, the tree may be configured to use a different
* tagger than the one chosen by the switch driver during
* .setup, in the case when a user selects a custom protocol
* through the DT.
*
* This is resolved by syncing the driver with the tree in
* dsa_switch_setup_tag_protocol once .setup has run and the
* driver is ready to accept calls to .change_tag_protocol. If
* the driver does not support the custom protocol at that
* point, the tree is wholly rejected, thereby ensuring that the
* tree and driver are always in agreement on the protocol to
* use.
*/
return 0;
}
static int dsa_port_parse_of(struct dsa_port *dp, struct device_node *dn)
{
struct device_node *ethernet = of_parse_phandle(dn, "ethernet", 0);
const char *name = of_get_property(dn, "label", NULL);
bool link = of_property_read_bool(dn, "link");
dp->dn = dn;
if (ethernet) {
struct net_device *master;
const char *user_protocol;
master = of_find_net_device_by_node(ethernet);
if (!master)
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
user_protocol = of_get_property(dn, "dsa-tag-protocol", NULL);
return dsa_port_parse_cpu(dp, master, user_protocol);
}
if (link)
return dsa_port_parse_dsa(dp);
return dsa_port_parse_user(dp, name);
}
static int dsa_switch_parse_ports_of(struct dsa_switch *ds,
struct device_node *dn)
{
struct device_node *ports, *port;
struct dsa_port *dp;
net: dsa: fix a leaked reference by adding missing of_node_put The call to of_parse_phandle returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./net/dsa/port.c:294:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 284, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:627:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:630:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:636:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:639:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-25 15:22:19 +08:00
int err = 0;
u32 reg;
ports = of_get_child_by_name(dn, "ports");
if (!ports) {
/* The second possibility is "ethernet-ports" */
ports = of_get_child_by_name(dn, "ethernet-ports");
if (!ports) {
dev_err(ds->dev, "no ports child node found\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
}
for_each_available_child_of_node(ports, port) {
err = of_property_read_u32(port, "reg", &reg);
if (err) {
of_node_put(port);
net: dsa: fix a leaked reference by adding missing of_node_put The call to of_parse_phandle returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./net/dsa/port.c:294:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 284, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:627:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:630:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:636:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:639:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-25 15:22:19 +08:00
goto out_put_node;
}
net: dsa: fix a leaked reference by adding missing of_node_put The call to of_parse_phandle returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./net/dsa/port.c:294:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 284, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:627:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:630:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:636:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:639:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-25 15:22:19 +08:00
if (reg >= ds->num_ports) {
dev_err(ds->dev, "port %pOF index %u exceeds num_ports (%zu)\n",
port, reg, ds->num_ports);
of_node_put(port);
net: dsa: fix a leaked reference by adding missing of_node_put The call to of_parse_phandle returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./net/dsa/port.c:294:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 284, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:627:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:630:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:636:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:639:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-25 15:22:19 +08:00
err = -EINVAL;
goto out_put_node;
}
dp = dsa_to_port(ds, reg);
err = dsa_port_parse_of(dp, port);
if (err) {
of_node_put(port);
net: dsa: fix a leaked reference by adding missing of_node_put The call to of_parse_phandle returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./net/dsa/port.c:294:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 284, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:627:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:630:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:636:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:639:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-25 15:22:19 +08:00
goto out_put_node;
}
}
net: dsa: fix a leaked reference by adding missing of_node_put The call to of_parse_phandle returns a node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicitly decremented after the last usage. Detected by coccinelle with the following warnings: ./net/dsa/port.c:294:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 284, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:627:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:630:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:636:3-9: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. ./net/dsa/dsa2.c:639:1-7: ERROR: missing of_node_put; acquired a node pointer with refcount incremented on line 618, but without a corresponding object release within this function. Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-25 15:22:19 +08:00
out_put_node:
of_node_put(ports);
return err;
}
static int dsa_switch_parse_member_of(struct dsa_switch *ds,
struct device_node *dn)
{
u32 m[2] = { 0, 0 };
int sz;
/* Don't error out if this optional property isn't found */
sz = of_property_read_variable_u32_array(dn, "dsa,member", m, 2, 2);
if (sz < 0 && sz != -EINVAL)
return sz;
ds->index = m[1];
ds->dst = dsa_tree_touch(m[0]);
if (!ds->dst)
return -ENOMEM;
if (dsa_switch_find(ds->dst->index, ds->index)) {
dev_err(ds->dev,
"A DSA switch with index %d already exists in tree %d\n",
ds->index, ds->dst->index);
return -EEXIST;
}
if (ds->dst->last_switch < ds->index)
ds->dst->last_switch = ds->index;
return 0;
}
static int dsa_switch_touch_ports(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
struct dsa_port *dp;
int port;
for (port = 0; port < ds->num_ports; port++) {
dp = dsa_port_touch(ds, port);
if (!dp)
return -ENOMEM;
}
return 0;
}
static int dsa_switch_parse_of(struct dsa_switch *ds, struct device_node *dn)
{
int err;
err = dsa_switch_parse_member_of(ds, dn);
if (err)
return err;
err = dsa_switch_touch_ports(ds);
if (err)
return err;
return dsa_switch_parse_ports_of(ds, dn);
}
static int dsa_port_parse(struct dsa_port *dp, const char *name,
struct device *dev)
{
if (!strcmp(name, "cpu")) {
struct net_device *master;
master = dsa_dev_to_net_device(dev);
if (!master)
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
dev_put(master);
return dsa_port_parse_cpu(dp, master, NULL);
}
if (!strcmp(name, "dsa"))
return dsa_port_parse_dsa(dp);
return dsa_port_parse_user(dp, name);
}
static int dsa_switch_parse_ports(struct dsa_switch *ds,
struct dsa_chip_data *cd)
{
bool valid_name_found = false;
struct dsa_port *dp;
struct device *dev;
const char *name;
unsigned int i;
int err;
for (i = 0; i < DSA_MAX_PORTS; i++) {
name = cd->port_names[i];
dev = cd->netdev[i];
dp = dsa_to_port(ds, i);
if (!name)
continue;
err = dsa_port_parse(dp, name, dev);
if (err)
return err;
valid_name_found = true;
}
if (!valid_name_found && i == DSA_MAX_PORTS)
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
}
static int dsa_switch_parse(struct dsa_switch *ds, struct dsa_chip_data *cd)
{
int err;
ds->cd = cd;
/* We don't support interconnected switches nor multiple trees via
* platform data, so this is the unique switch of the tree.
*/
ds->index = 0;
ds->dst = dsa_tree_touch(0);
if (!ds->dst)
return -ENOMEM;
err = dsa_switch_touch_ports(ds);
if (err)
return err;
return dsa_switch_parse_ports(ds, cd);
}
net: dsa: Fix use-after-free in probing of DSA switch tree DSA sets up a switch tree little by little. Every switch of the N members of the tree calls dsa_register_switch, and (N - 1) will just touch the dst->ports list with their ports and quickly exit. Only the last switch that calls dsa_register_switch will find all DSA links complete in dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, and not return zero as a result but instead go ahead and set up the entire DSA switch tree (practically on behalf of the other switches too). The trouble is that the (N - 1) switches don't clean up after themselves after they get an error such as EPROBE_DEFER. Their footprint left in dst->ports by dsa_switch_touch_ports is still there. And switch N, the one responsible with actually setting up the tree, is going to work with those stale dp, dp->ds and dp->ds->dev pointers. In particular ds and ds->dev might get freed by the device driver. Be there a 2-switch tree and the following calling order: - Switch 1 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Calls dsa_port_parse_cpu, gets -EPROBE_DEFER, exits. - Switch 2 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Probe doesn't get deferred, so it goes ahead. - Calls dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, which returns "complete == true" due to Switch 1 having called dsa_switch_touch_ports before. - Because the DSA links are complete, it calls dsa_tree_setup_switches now. - dsa_tree_setup_switches iterates through dst->ports, initializing the Switch 1 ds structure (invalid) and the Switch 2 ds structure (valid). - Undefined behavior (use after free, sometimes NULL pointers, etc). Real example below (debugging prints added by me, as well as guards against NULL pointers): [ 5.477947] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.313002] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.319932] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.329693] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.339458] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.349226] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.358991] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.368758] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.378524] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.388291] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.398057] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.407912] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.417682] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.427446] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.437212] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.446979] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.456744] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.466512] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.476277] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.486043] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.495810] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.505577] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.515433] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.354120] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.361045] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.370805] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.380571] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.390337] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.400104] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.409872] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.419637] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.429403] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.439169] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) The solution is to recognize that the functions that call dsa_switch_touch_ports (dsa_switch_parse_of, dsa_switch_parse) have side effects, and therefore one should clean up their side effects on error path. The cleanup of dst->ports was taken from dsa_switch_remove and moved into a dedicated dsa_switch_release_ports function, which should really be per-switch (free only the members of dst->ports that are also members of ds, instead of all switch ports). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-01-26 05:01:11 +08:00
static void dsa_switch_release_ports(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
struct dsa_port *dp, *next;
dsa_switch_for_each_port_safe(dp, next, ds) {
net: dsa: Fix use-after-free in probing of DSA switch tree DSA sets up a switch tree little by little. Every switch of the N members of the tree calls dsa_register_switch, and (N - 1) will just touch the dst->ports list with their ports and quickly exit. Only the last switch that calls dsa_register_switch will find all DSA links complete in dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, and not return zero as a result but instead go ahead and set up the entire DSA switch tree (practically on behalf of the other switches too). The trouble is that the (N - 1) switches don't clean up after themselves after they get an error such as EPROBE_DEFER. Their footprint left in dst->ports by dsa_switch_touch_ports is still there. And switch N, the one responsible with actually setting up the tree, is going to work with those stale dp, dp->ds and dp->ds->dev pointers. In particular ds and ds->dev might get freed by the device driver. Be there a 2-switch tree and the following calling order: - Switch 1 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Calls dsa_port_parse_cpu, gets -EPROBE_DEFER, exits. - Switch 2 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Probe doesn't get deferred, so it goes ahead. - Calls dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, which returns "complete == true" due to Switch 1 having called dsa_switch_touch_ports before. - Because the DSA links are complete, it calls dsa_tree_setup_switches now. - dsa_tree_setup_switches iterates through dst->ports, initializing the Switch 1 ds structure (invalid) and the Switch 2 ds structure (valid). - Undefined behavior (use after free, sometimes NULL pointers, etc). Real example below (debugging prints added by me, as well as guards against NULL pointers): [ 5.477947] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.313002] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.319932] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.329693] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.339458] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.349226] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.358991] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.368758] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.378524] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.388291] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.398057] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.407912] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.417682] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.427446] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.437212] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.446979] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.456744] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.466512] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.476277] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.486043] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.495810] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.505577] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.515433] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.354120] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.361045] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.370805] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.380571] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.390337] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.400104] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.409872] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.419637] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.429403] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.439169] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) The solution is to recognize that the functions that call dsa_switch_touch_ports (dsa_switch_parse_of, dsa_switch_parse) have side effects, and therefore one should clean up their side effects on error path. The cleanup of dst->ports was taken from dsa_switch_remove and moved into a dedicated dsa_switch_release_ports function, which should really be per-switch (free only the members of dst->ports that are also members of ds, instead of all switch ports). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-01-26 05:01:11 +08:00
list_del(&dp->list);
kfree(dp);
}
}
static int dsa_switch_probe(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst;
struct dsa_chip_data *pdata;
struct device_node *np;
int err;
if (!ds->dev)
return -ENODEV;
pdata = ds->dev->platform_data;
np = ds->dev->of_node;
if (!ds->num_ports)
return -EINVAL;
net: dsa: Fix use-after-free in probing of DSA switch tree DSA sets up a switch tree little by little. Every switch of the N members of the tree calls dsa_register_switch, and (N - 1) will just touch the dst->ports list with their ports and quickly exit. Only the last switch that calls dsa_register_switch will find all DSA links complete in dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, and not return zero as a result but instead go ahead and set up the entire DSA switch tree (practically on behalf of the other switches too). The trouble is that the (N - 1) switches don't clean up after themselves after they get an error such as EPROBE_DEFER. Their footprint left in dst->ports by dsa_switch_touch_ports is still there. And switch N, the one responsible with actually setting up the tree, is going to work with those stale dp, dp->ds and dp->ds->dev pointers. In particular ds and ds->dev might get freed by the device driver. Be there a 2-switch tree and the following calling order: - Switch 1 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Calls dsa_port_parse_cpu, gets -EPROBE_DEFER, exits. - Switch 2 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Probe doesn't get deferred, so it goes ahead. - Calls dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, which returns "complete == true" due to Switch 1 having called dsa_switch_touch_ports before. - Because the DSA links are complete, it calls dsa_tree_setup_switches now. - dsa_tree_setup_switches iterates through dst->ports, initializing the Switch 1 ds structure (invalid) and the Switch 2 ds structure (valid). - Undefined behavior (use after free, sometimes NULL pointers, etc). Real example below (debugging prints added by me, as well as guards against NULL pointers): [ 5.477947] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.313002] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.319932] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.329693] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.339458] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.349226] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.358991] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.368758] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.378524] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.388291] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.398057] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.407912] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.417682] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.427446] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.437212] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.446979] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.456744] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.466512] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.476277] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.486043] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.495810] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.505577] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.515433] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.354120] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.361045] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.370805] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.380571] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.390337] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.400104] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.409872] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.419637] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.429403] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.439169] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) The solution is to recognize that the functions that call dsa_switch_touch_ports (dsa_switch_parse_of, dsa_switch_parse) have side effects, and therefore one should clean up their side effects on error path. The cleanup of dst->ports was taken from dsa_switch_remove and moved into a dedicated dsa_switch_release_ports function, which should really be per-switch (free only the members of dst->ports that are also members of ds, instead of all switch ports). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-01-26 05:01:11 +08:00
if (np) {
err = dsa_switch_parse_of(ds, np);
net: dsa: Fix use-after-free in probing of DSA switch tree DSA sets up a switch tree little by little. Every switch of the N members of the tree calls dsa_register_switch, and (N - 1) will just touch the dst->ports list with their ports and quickly exit. Only the last switch that calls dsa_register_switch will find all DSA links complete in dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, and not return zero as a result but instead go ahead and set up the entire DSA switch tree (practically on behalf of the other switches too). The trouble is that the (N - 1) switches don't clean up after themselves after they get an error such as EPROBE_DEFER. Their footprint left in dst->ports by dsa_switch_touch_ports is still there. And switch N, the one responsible with actually setting up the tree, is going to work with those stale dp, dp->ds and dp->ds->dev pointers. In particular ds and ds->dev might get freed by the device driver. Be there a 2-switch tree and the following calling order: - Switch 1 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Calls dsa_port_parse_cpu, gets -EPROBE_DEFER, exits. - Switch 2 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Probe doesn't get deferred, so it goes ahead. - Calls dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, which returns "complete == true" due to Switch 1 having called dsa_switch_touch_ports before. - Because the DSA links are complete, it calls dsa_tree_setup_switches now. - dsa_tree_setup_switches iterates through dst->ports, initializing the Switch 1 ds structure (invalid) and the Switch 2 ds structure (valid). - Undefined behavior (use after free, sometimes NULL pointers, etc). Real example below (debugging prints added by me, as well as guards against NULL pointers): [ 5.477947] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.313002] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.319932] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.329693] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.339458] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.349226] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.358991] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.368758] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.378524] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.388291] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.398057] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.407912] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.417682] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.427446] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.437212] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.446979] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.456744] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.466512] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.476277] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.486043] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.495810] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.505577] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.515433] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.354120] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.361045] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.370805] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.380571] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.390337] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.400104] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.409872] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.419637] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.429403] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.439169] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) The solution is to recognize that the functions that call dsa_switch_touch_ports (dsa_switch_parse_of, dsa_switch_parse) have side effects, and therefore one should clean up their side effects on error path. The cleanup of dst->ports was taken from dsa_switch_remove and moved into a dedicated dsa_switch_release_ports function, which should really be per-switch (free only the members of dst->ports that are also members of ds, instead of all switch ports). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-01-26 05:01:11 +08:00
if (err)
dsa_switch_release_ports(ds);
} else if (pdata) {
err = dsa_switch_parse(ds, pdata);
net: dsa: Fix use-after-free in probing of DSA switch tree DSA sets up a switch tree little by little. Every switch of the N members of the tree calls dsa_register_switch, and (N - 1) will just touch the dst->ports list with their ports and quickly exit. Only the last switch that calls dsa_register_switch will find all DSA links complete in dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, and not return zero as a result but instead go ahead and set up the entire DSA switch tree (practically on behalf of the other switches too). The trouble is that the (N - 1) switches don't clean up after themselves after they get an error such as EPROBE_DEFER. Their footprint left in dst->ports by dsa_switch_touch_ports is still there. And switch N, the one responsible with actually setting up the tree, is going to work with those stale dp, dp->ds and dp->ds->dev pointers. In particular ds and ds->dev might get freed by the device driver. Be there a 2-switch tree and the following calling order: - Switch 1 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Calls dsa_port_parse_cpu, gets -EPROBE_DEFER, exits. - Switch 2 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Probe doesn't get deferred, so it goes ahead. - Calls dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, which returns "complete == true" due to Switch 1 having called dsa_switch_touch_ports before. - Because the DSA links are complete, it calls dsa_tree_setup_switches now. - dsa_tree_setup_switches iterates through dst->ports, initializing the Switch 1 ds structure (invalid) and the Switch 2 ds structure (valid). - Undefined behavior (use after free, sometimes NULL pointers, etc). Real example below (debugging prints added by me, as well as guards against NULL pointers): [ 5.477947] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.313002] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.319932] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.329693] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.339458] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.349226] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.358991] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.368758] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.378524] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.388291] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.398057] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.407912] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.417682] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.427446] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.437212] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.446979] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.456744] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.466512] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.476277] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.486043] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.495810] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.505577] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.515433] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.354120] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.361045] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.370805] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.380571] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.390337] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.400104] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.409872] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.419637] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.429403] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.439169] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) The solution is to recognize that the functions that call dsa_switch_touch_ports (dsa_switch_parse_of, dsa_switch_parse) have side effects, and therefore one should clean up their side effects on error path. The cleanup of dst->ports was taken from dsa_switch_remove and moved into a dedicated dsa_switch_release_ports function, which should really be per-switch (free only the members of dst->ports that are also members of ds, instead of all switch ports). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-01-26 05:01:11 +08:00
if (err)
dsa_switch_release_ports(ds);
} else {
err = -ENODEV;
net: dsa: Fix use-after-free in probing of DSA switch tree DSA sets up a switch tree little by little. Every switch of the N members of the tree calls dsa_register_switch, and (N - 1) will just touch the dst->ports list with their ports and quickly exit. Only the last switch that calls dsa_register_switch will find all DSA links complete in dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, and not return zero as a result but instead go ahead and set up the entire DSA switch tree (practically on behalf of the other switches too). The trouble is that the (N - 1) switches don't clean up after themselves after they get an error such as EPROBE_DEFER. Their footprint left in dst->ports by dsa_switch_touch_ports is still there. And switch N, the one responsible with actually setting up the tree, is going to work with those stale dp, dp->ds and dp->ds->dev pointers. In particular ds and ds->dev might get freed by the device driver. Be there a 2-switch tree and the following calling order: - Switch 1 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Calls dsa_port_parse_cpu, gets -EPROBE_DEFER, exits. - Switch 2 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Probe doesn't get deferred, so it goes ahead. - Calls dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, which returns "complete == true" due to Switch 1 having called dsa_switch_touch_ports before. - Because the DSA links are complete, it calls dsa_tree_setup_switches now. - dsa_tree_setup_switches iterates through dst->ports, initializing the Switch 1 ds structure (invalid) and the Switch 2 ds structure (valid). - Undefined behavior (use after free, sometimes NULL pointers, etc). Real example below (debugging prints added by me, as well as guards against NULL pointers): [ 5.477947] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.313002] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.319932] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.329693] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.339458] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.349226] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.358991] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.368758] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.378524] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.388291] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.398057] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.407912] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.417682] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.427446] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.437212] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.446979] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.456744] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.466512] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.476277] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.486043] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.495810] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.505577] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.515433] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.354120] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.361045] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.370805] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.380571] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.390337] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.400104] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.409872] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.419637] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.429403] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.439169] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) The solution is to recognize that the functions that call dsa_switch_touch_ports (dsa_switch_parse_of, dsa_switch_parse) have side effects, and therefore one should clean up their side effects on error path. The cleanup of dst->ports was taken from dsa_switch_remove and moved into a dedicated dsa_switch_release_ports function, which should really be per-switch (free only the members of dst->ports that are also members of ds, instead of all switch ports). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-01-26 05:01:11 +08:00
}
if (err)
return err;
dst = ds->dst;
dsa_tree_get(dst);
err = dsa_tree_setup(dst);
net: dsa: Fix use-after-free in probing of DSA switch tree DSA sets up a switch tree little by little. Every switch of the N members of the tree calls dsa_register_switch, and (N - 1) will just touch the dst->ports list with their ports and quickly exit. Only the last switch that calls dsa_register_switch will find all DSA links complete in dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, and not return zero as a result but instead go ahead and set up the entire DSA switch tree (practically on behalf of the other switches too). The trouble is that the (N - 1) switches don't clean up after themselves after they get an error such as EPROBE_DEFER. Their footprint left in dst->ports by dsa_switch_touch_ports is still there. And switch N, the one responsible with actually setting up the tree, is going to work with those stale dp, dp->ds and dp->ds->dev pointers. In particular ds and ds->dev might get freed by the device driver. Be there a 2-switch tree and the following calling order: - Switch 1 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Calls dsa_port_parse_cpu, gets -EPROBE_DEFER, exits. - Switch 2 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Probe doesn't get deferred, so it goes ahead. - Calls dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, which returns "complete == true" due to Switch 1 having called dsa_switch_touch_ports before. - Because the DSA links are complete, it calls dsa_tree_setup_switches now. - dsa_tree_setup_switches iterates through dst->ports, initializing the Switch 1 ds structure (invalid) and the Switch 2 ds structure (valid). - Undefined behavior (use after free, sometimes NULL pointers, etc). Real example below (debugging prints added by me, as well as guards against NULL pointers): [ 5.477947] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.313002] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.319932] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.329693] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.339458] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.349226] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.358991] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.368758] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.378524] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.388291] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.398057] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.407912] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.417682] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.427446] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.437212] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.446979] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.456744] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.466512] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.476277] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.486043] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.495810] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.505577] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.515433] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.354120] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.361045] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.370805] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.380571] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.390337] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.400104] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.409872] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.419637] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.429403] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.439169] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) The solution is to recognize that the functions that call dsa_switch_touch_ports (dsa_switch_parse_of, dsa_switch_parse) have side effects, and therefore one should clean up their side effects on error path. The cleanup of dst->ports was taken from dsa_switch_remove and moved into a dedicated dsa_switch_release_ports function, which should really be per-switch (free only the members of dst->ports that are also members of ds, instead of all switch ports). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-01-26 05:01:11 +08:00
if (err) {
dsa_switch_release_ports(ds);
dsa_tree_put(dst);
net: dsa: Fix use-after-free in probing of DSA switch tree DSA sets up a switch tree little by little. Every switch of the N members of the tree calls dsa_register_switch, and (N - 1) will just touch the dst->ports list with their ports and quickly exit. Only the last switch that calls dsa_register_switch will find all DSA links complete in dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, and not return zero as a result but instead go ahead and set up the entire DSA switch tree (practically on behalf of the other switches too). The trouble is that the (N - 1) switches don't clean up after themselves after they get an error such as EPROBE_DEFER. Their footprint left in dst->ports by dsa_switch_touch_ports is still there. And switch N, the one responsible with actually setting up the tree, is going to work with those stale dp, dp->ds and dp->ds->dev pointers. In particular ds and ds->dev might get freed by the device driver. Be there a 2-switch tree and the following calling order: - Switch 1 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Calls dsa_port_parse_cpu, gets -EPROBE_DEFER, exits. - Switch 2 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Probe doesn't get deferred, so it goes ahead. - Calls dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, which returns "complete == true" due to Switch 1 having called dsa_switch_touch_ports before. - Because the DSA links are complete, it calls dsa_tree_setup_switches now. - dsa_tree_setup_switches iterates through dst->ports, initializing the Switch 1 ds structure (invalid) and the Switch 2 ds structure (valid). - Undefined behavior (use after free, sometimes NULL pointers, etc). Real example below (debugging prints added by me, as well as guards against NULL pointers): [ 5.477947] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.313002] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.319932] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.329693] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.339458] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.349226] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.358991] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.368758] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.378524] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.388291] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.398057] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.407912] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.417682] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.427446] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.437212] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.446979] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.456744] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.466512] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.476277] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.486043] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.495810] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.505577] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.515433] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.354120] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.361045] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.370805] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.380571] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.390337] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.400104] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.409872] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.419637] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.429403] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.439169] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) The solution is to recognize that the functions that call dsa_switch_touch_ports (dsa_switch_parse_of, dsa_switch_parse) have side effects, and therefore one should clean up their side effects on error path. The cleanup of dst->ports was taken from dsa_switch_remove and moved into a dedicated dsa_switch_release_ports function, which should really be per-switch (free only the members of dst->ports that are also members of ds, instead of all switch ports). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-01-26 05:01:11 +08:00
}
return err;
}
int dsa_register_switch(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
int err;
mutex_lock(&dsa2_mutex);
err = dsa_switch_probe(ds);
dsa_tree_put(ds->dst);
mutex_unlock(&dsa2_mutex);
return err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_register_switch);
static void dsa_switch_remove(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;
dsa_tree_teardown(dst);
net: dsa: Fix use-after-free in probing of DSA switch tree DSA sets up a switch tree little by little. Every switch of the N members of the tree calls dsa_register_switch, and (N - 1) will just touch the dst->ports list with their ports and quickly exit. Only the last switch that calls dsa_register_switch will find all DSA links complete in dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, and not return zero as a result but instead go ahead and set up the entire DSA switch tree (practically on behalf of the other switches too). The trouble is that the (N - 1) switches don't clean up after themselves after they get an error such as EPROBE_DEFER. Their footprint left in dst->ports by dsa_switch_touch_ports is still there. And switch N, the one responsible with actually setting up the tree, is going to work with those stale dp, dp->ds and dp->ds->dev pointers. In particular ds and ds->dev might get freed by the device driver. Be there a 2-switch tree and the following calling order: - Switch 1 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Calls dsa_port_parse_cpu, gets -EPROBE_DEFER, exits. - Switch 2 calls dsa_register_switch - Calls dsa_switch_touch_ports, populates dst->ports - Probe doesn't get deferred, so it goes ahead. - Calls dsa_tree_setup_routing_table, which returns "complete == true" due to Switch 1 having called dsa_switch_touch_ports before. - Because the DSA links are complete, it calls dsa_tree_setup_switches now. - dsa_tree_setup_switches iterates through dst->ports, initializing the Switch 1 ds structure (invalid) and the Switch 2 ds structure (valid). - Undefined behavior (use after free, sometimes NULL pointers, etc). Real example below (debugging prints added by me, as well as guards against NULL pointers): [ 5.477947] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.313002] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.319932] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.329693] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.339458] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.349226] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.358991] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.368758] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.378524] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.388291] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.398057] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803df0b980 (dev ffffff803f775c00) [ 6.407912] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.417682] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.427446] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.437212] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.446979] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.456744] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.466512] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.476277] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.486043] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.495810] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.505577] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803da02f80 (dev 0000000000000000) [ 6.515433] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 0 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.354120] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 1 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.361045] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 2 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.370805] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 3 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.380571] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 4 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.390337] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 5 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.400104] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 6 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.409872] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 7 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.419637] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 8 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.429403] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 9 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) [ 7.439169] dsa_tree_setup_switches: Setting up port 10 of switch ffffff803db15b80 (dev ffffff803d8e4800) The solution is to recognize that the functions that call dsa_switch_touch_ports (dsa_switch_parse_of, dsa_switch_parse) have side effects, and therefore one should clean up their side effects on error path. The cleanup of dst->ports was taken from dsa_switch_remove and moved into a dedicated dsa_switch_release_ports function, which should really be per-switch (free only the members of dst->ports that are also members of ds, instead of all switch ports). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-01-26 05:01:11 +08:00
dsa_switch_release_ports(ds);
dsa_tree_put(dst);
}
void dsa_unregister_switch(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
mutex_lock(&dsa2_mutex);
dsa_switch_remove(ds);
mutex_unlock(&dsa2_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_unregister_switch);
net: dsa: be compatible with masters which unregister on shutdown Lino reports that on his system with bcmgenet as DSA master and KSZ9897 as a switch, rebooting or shutting down never works properly. What does the bcmgenet driver have special to trigger this, that other DSA masters do not? It has an implementation of ->shutdown which simply calls its ->remove implementation. Otherwise said, it unregisters its network interface on shutdown. This message can be seen in a loop, and it hangs the reboot process there: unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0 to become free. Usage count = 3 So why 3? A usage count of 1 is normal for a registered network interface, and any virtual interface which links itself as an upper of that will increment it via dev_hold. In the case of DSA, this is the call path: dsa_slave_create -> netdev_upper_dev_link -> __netdev_upper_dev_link -> __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert -> dev_hold So a DSA switch with 3 interfaces will result in a usage count elevated by two, and netdev_wait_allrefs will wait until they have gone away. Other stacked interfaces, like VLAN, watch NETDEV_UNREGISTER events and delete themselves, but DSA cannot just vanish and go poof, at most it can unbind itself from the switch devices, but that must happen strictly earlier compared to when the DSA master unregisters its net_device, so reacting on the NETDEV_UNREGISTER event is way too late. It seems that it is a pretty established pattern to have a driver's ->shutdown hook redirect to its ->remove hook, so the same code is executed regardless of whether the driver is unbound from the device, or the system is just shutting down. As Florian puts it, it is quite a big hammer for bcmgenet to unregister its net_device during shutdown, but having a common code path with the driver unbind helps ensure it is well tested. So DSA, for better or for worse, has to live with that and engage in an arms race of implementing the ->shutdown hook too, from all individual drivers, and do something sane when paired with masters that unregister their net_device there. The only sane thing to do, of course, is to unlink from the master. However, complications arise really quickly. The pattern of redirecting ->shutdown to ->remove is not unique to bcmgenet or even to net_device drivers. In fact, SPI controllers do it too (see dspi_shutdown -> dspi_remove), and presumably, I2C controllers and MDIO controllers do it too (this is something I have not researched too deeply, but even if this is not the case today, it is certainly plausible to happen in the future, and must be taken into consideration). Since DSA switches might be SPI devices, I2C devices, MDIO devices, the insane implication is that for the exact same DSA switch device, we might have both ->shutdown and ->remove getting called. So we need to do something with that insane environment. The pattern I've come up with is "if this, then not that", so if either ->shutdown or ->remove gets called, we set the device's drvdata to NULL, and in the other hook, we check whether the drvdata is NULL and just do nothing. This is probably not necessary for platform devices, just for devices on buses, but I would really insist for consistency among drivers, because when code is copy-pasted, it is not always copy-pasted from the best sources. So depending on whether the DSA switch's ->remove or ->shutdown will get called first, we cannot really guarantee even for the same driver if rebooting will result in the same code path on all platforms. But nonetheless, we need to do something minimally reasonable on ->shutdown too to fix the bug. Of course, the ->remove will do more (a full teardown of the tree, with all data structures freed, and this is why the bug was not caught for so long). The new ->shutdown method is kept separate from dsa_unregister_switch not because we couldn't have unregistered the switch, but simply in the interest of doing something quick and to the point. The big question is: does the DSA switch's ->shutdown get called earlier than the DSA master's ->shutdown? If not, there is still a risk that we might still trigger the WARN_ON in unregister_netdevice that says we are attempting to unregister a net_device which has uppers. That's no good. Although the reference to the master net_device won't physically go away even if DSA's ->shutdown comes afterwards, remember we have a dev_hold on it. The answer to that question lies in this comment above device_link_add: * A side effect of the link creation is re-ordering of dpm_list and the * devices_kset list by moving the consumer device and all devices depending * on it to the ends of these lists (that does not happen to devices that have * not been registered when this function is called). so the fact that DSA uses device_link_add towards its master is not exactly for nothing. device_shutdown() walks devices_kset from the back, so this is our guarantee that DSA's shutdown happens before the master's shutdown. Fixes: 2f1e8ea726e9 ("net: dsa: link interfaces with the DSA master to get rid of lockdep warnings") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210909095324.12978-1-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de/ Reported-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-17 21:34:33 +08:00
/* If the DSA master chooses to unregister its net_device on .shutdown, DSA is
* blocking that operation from completion, due to the dev_hold taken inside
* netdev_upper_dev_link. Unlink the DSA slave interfaces from being uppers of
* the DSA master, so that the system can reboot successfully.
*/
void dsa_switch_shutdown(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
struct net_device *master, *slave_dev;
LIST_HEAD(unregister_list);
struct dsa_port *dp;
mutex_lock(&dsa2_mutex);
rtnl_lock();
dsa_switch_for_each_user_port(dp, ds) {
net: dsa: be compatible with masters which unregister on shutdown Lino reports that on his system with bcmgenet as DSA master and KSZ9897 as a switch, rebooting or shutting down never works properly. What does the bcmgenet driver have special to trigger this, that other DSA masters do not? It has an implementation of ->shutdown which simply calls its ->remove implementation. Otherwise said, it unregisters its network interface on shutdown. This message can be seen in a loop, and it hangs the reboot process there: unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0 to become free. Usage count = 3 So why 3? A usage count of 1 is normal for a registered network interface, and any virtual interface which links itself as an upper of that will increment it via dev_hold. In the case of DSA, this is the call path: dsa_slave_create -> netdev_upper_dev_link -> __netdev_upper_dev_link -> __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert -> dev_hold So a DSA switch with 3 interfaces will result in a usage count elevated by two, and netdev_wait_allrefs will wait until they have gone away. Other stacked interfaces, like VLAN, watch NETDEV_UNREGISTER events and delete themselves, but DSA cannot just vanish and go poof, at most it can unbind itself from the switch devices, but that must happen strictly earlier compared to when the DSA master unregisters its net_device, so reacting on the NETDEV_UNREGISTER event is way too late. It seems that it is a pretty established pattern to have a driver's ->shutdown hook redirect to its ->remove hook, so the same code is executed regardless of whether the driver is unbound from the device, or the system is just shutting down. As Florian puts it, it is quite a big hammer for bcmgenet to unregister its net_device during shutdown, but having a common code path with the driver unbind helps ensure it is well tested. So DSA, for better or for worse, has to live with that and engage in an arms race of implementing the ->shutdown hook too, from all individual drivers, and do something sane when paired with masters that unregister their net_device there. The only sane thing to do, of course, is to unlink from the master. However, complications arise really quickly. The pattern of redirecting ->shutdown to ->remove is not unique to bcmgenet or even to net_device drivers. In fact, SPI controllers do it too (see dspi_shutdown -> dspi_remove), and presumably, I2C controllers and MDIO controllers do it too (this is something I have not researched too deeply, but even if this is not the case today, it is certainly plausible to happen in the future, and must be taken into consideration). Since DSA switches might be SPI devices, I2C devices, MDIO devices, the insane implication is that for the exact same DSA switch device, we might have both ->shutdown and ->remove getting called. So we need to do something with that insane environment. The pattern I've come up with is "if this, then not that", so if either ->shutdown or ->remove gets called, we set the device's drvdata to NULL, and in the other hook, we check whether the drvdata is NULL and just do nothing. This is probably not necessary for platform devices, just for devices on buses, but I would really insist for consistency among drivers, because when code is copy-pasted, it is not always copy-pasted from the best sources. So depending on whether the DSA switch's ->remove or ->shutdown will get called first, we cannot really guarantee even for the same driver if rebooting will result in the same code path on all platforms. But nonetheless, we need to do something minimally reasonable on ->shutdown too to fix the bug. Of course, the ->remove will do more (a full teardown of the tree, with all data structures freed, and this is why the bug was not caught for so long). The new ->shutdown method is kept separate from dsa_unregister_switch not because we couldn't have unregistered the switch, but simply in the interest of doing something quick and to the point. The big question is: does the DSA switch's ->shutdown get called earlier than the DSA master's ->shutdown? If not, there is still a risk that we might still trigger the WARN_ON in unregister_netdevice that says we are attempting to unregister a net_device which has uppers. That's no good. Although the reference to the master net_device won't physically go away even if DSA's ->shutdown comes afterwards, remember we have a dev_hold on it. The answer to that question lies in this comment above device_link_add: * A side effect of the link creation is re-ordering of dpm_list and the * devices_kset list by moving the consumer device and all devices depending * on it to the ends of these lists (that does not happen to devices that have * not been registered when this function is called). so the fact that DSA uses device_link_add towards its master is not exactly for nothing. device_shutdown() walks devices_kset from the back, so this is our guarantee that DSA's shutdown happens before the master's shutdown. Fixes: 2f1e8ea726e9 ("net: dsa: link interfaces with the DSA master to get rid of lockdep warnings") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210909095324.12978-1-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de/ Reported-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-17 21:34:33 +08:00
master = dp->cpu_dp->master;
slave_dev = dp->slave;
netdev_upper_dev_unlink(master, slave_dev);
/* Just unlinking ourselves as uppers of the master is not
* sufficient. When the master net device unregisters, that will
* also call dev_close, which we will catch as NETDEV_GOING_DOWN
* and trigger a dev_close on our own devices (dsa_slave_close).
* In turn, that will call dev_mc_unsync on the master's net
* device. If the master is also a DSA switch port, this will
* trigger dsa_slave_set_rx_mode which will call dev_mc_sync on
* its own master. Lockdep will complain about the fact that
* all cascaded masters have the same dsa_master_addr_list_lock_key,
* which it normally would not do if the cascaded masters would
* be in a proper upper/lower relationship, which we've just
* destroyed.
* To suppress the lockdep warnings, let's actually unregister
* the DSA slave interfaces too, to avoid the nonsensical
* multicast address list synchronization on shutdown.
*/
unregister_netdevice_queue(slave_dev, &unregister_list);
}
unregister_netdevice_many(&unregister_list);
rtnl_unlock();
mutex_unlock(&dsa2_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_switch_shutdown);