renegade-project/linux-next
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-22 04:03:58 +08:00
Code
82fdee7bce
linux-next/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_mmu_hpte.c

348 lines
8.6 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
/*
* Copyright (C) 2010 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All rights reserved.
*
* Authors:
* Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2, as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.
*/
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
#include <linux/hash.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <asm/kvm_ppc.h>
#include <asm/kvm_book3s.h>
#include <asm/machdep.h>
#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
#include <asm/hw_irq.h>
#define PTE_SIZE 12
/* #define DEBUG_MMU */
#ifdef DEBUG_MMU
#define dprintk_mmu(a, ...) printk(KERN_INFO a, __VA_ARGS__)
#else
#define dprintk_mmu(a, ...) do { } while(0)
#endif
static struct kmem_cache *hpte_cache;
static inline u64 kvmppc_mmu_hash_pte(u64 eaddr)
{
return hash_64(eaddr >> PTE_SIZE, HPTEG_HASH_BITS_PTE);
}
KVM: PPC: Add book3s_32 tlbie flush acceleration On Book3s_32 the tlbie instruction flushed effective addresses by the mask 0x0ffff000. This is pretty hard to reflect with a hash that hashes ~0xfff, so to speed up that target we should also keep a special hash around for it. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:19 +08:00
static inline u64 kvmppc_mmu_hash_pte_long(u64 eaddr)
{
return hash_64((eaddr & 0x0ffff000) >> PTE_SIZE,
HPTEG_HASH_BITS_PTE_LONG);
}
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
static inline u64 kvmppc_mmu_hash_vpte(u64 vpage)
{
return hash_64(vpage & 0xfffffffffULL, HPTEG_HASH_BITS_VPTE);
}
static inline u64 kvmppc_mmu_hash_vpte_long(u64 vpage)
{
return hash_64((vpage & 0xffffff000ULL) >> 12,
HPTEG_HASH_BITS_VPTE_LONG);
}
void kvmppc_mmu_hpte_cache_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct hpte_cache *pte)
{
u64 index;
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.mmu_lock);
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
/* Add to ePTE list */
index = kvmppc_mmu_hash_pte(pte->pte.eaddr);
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
hlist_add_head_rcu(&pte->list_pte, &vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_pte[index]);
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
KVM: PPC: Add book3s_32 tlbie flush acceleration On Book3s_32 the tlbie instruction flushed effective addresses by the mask 0x0ffff000. This is pretty hard to reflect with a hash that hashes ~0xfff, so to speed up that target we should also keep a special hash around for it. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:19 +08:00
/* Add to ePTE_long list */
index = kvmppc_mmu_hash_pte_long(pte->pte.eaddr);
hlist_add_head_rcu(&pte->list_pte_long,
&vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_pte_long[index]);
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
/* Add to vPTE list */
index = kvmppc_mmu_hash_vpte(pte->pte.vpage);
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
hlist_add_head_rcu(&pte->list_vpte, &vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_vpte[index]);
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
/* Add to vPTE_long list */
index = kvmppc_mmu_hash_vpte_long(pte->pte.vpage);
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
hlist_add_head_rcu(&pte->list_vpte_long,
&vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_vpte_long[index]);
spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.mmu_lock);
}
static void free_pte_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
{
struct hpte_cache *pte = container_of(head, struct hpte_cache, rcu_head);
kmem_cache_free(hpte_cache, pte);
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
}
static void invalidate_pte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct hpte_cache *pte)
{
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
/* pte already invalidated? */
if (hlist_unhashed(&pte->list_pte))
return;
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
dprintk_mmu("KVM: Flushing SPT: 0x%lx (0x%llx) -> 0x%llx\n",
pte->pte.eaddr, pte->pte.vpage, pte->host_va);
/* Different for 32 and 64 bit */
kvmppc_mmu_invalidate_pte(vcpu, pte);
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.mmu_lock);
hlist_del_init_rcu(&pte->list_pte);
KVM: PPC: Add book3s_32 tlbie flush acceleration On Book3s_32 the tlbie instruction flushed effective addresses by the mask 0x0ffff000. This is pretty hard to reflect with a hash that hashes ~0xfff, so to speed up that target we should also keep a special hash around for it. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:19 +08:00
hlist_del_init_rcu(&pte->list_pte_long);
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
hlist_del_init_rcu(&pte->list_vpte);
hlist_del_init_rcu(&pte->list_vpte_long);
spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.mmu_lock);
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
if (pte->pte.may_write)
kvm_release_pfn_dirty(pte->pfn);
else
kvm_release_pfn_clean(pte->pfn);
vcpu->arch.hpte_cache_count--;
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
call_rcu(&pte->rcu_head, free_pte_rcu);
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
}
static void kvmppc_mmu_pte_flush_all(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct hpte_cache *pte;
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
struct hlist_node *node;
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
int i;
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
rcu_read_lock();
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
for (i = 0; i < HPTEG_HASH_NUM_VPTE_LONG; i++) {
struct hlist_head *list = &vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_vpte_long[i];
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(pte, node, list, list_vpte_long)
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
invalidate_pte(vcpu, pte);
}
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
rcu_read_unlock();
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
}
static void kvmppc_mmu_pte_flush_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ulong guest_ea)
{
struct hlist_head *list;
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
struct hlist_node *node;
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
struct hpte_cache *pte;
/* Find the list of entries in the map */
list = &vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_pte[kvmppc_mmu_hash_pte(guest_ea)];
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
rcu_read_lock();
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
/* Check the list for matching entries and invalidate */
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(pte, node, list, list_pte)
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
if ((pte->pte.eaddr & ~0xfffUL) == guest_ea)
invalidate_pte(vcpu, pte);
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
rcu_read_unlock();
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
}
KVM: PPC: Add book3s_32 tlbie flush acceleration On Book3s_32 the tlbie instruction flushed effective addresses by the mask 0x0ffff000. This is pretty hard to reflect with a hash that hashes ~0xfff, so to speed up that target we should also keep a special hash around for it. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:19 +08:00
static void kvmppc_mmu_pte_flush_long(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ulong guest_ea)
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
{
KVM: PPC: Add book3s_32 tlbie flush acceleration On Book3s_32 the tlbie instruction flushed effective addresses by the mask 0x0ffff000. This is pretty hard to reflect with a hash that hashes ~0xfff, so to speed up that target we should also keep a special hash around for it. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:19 +08:00
struct hlist_head *list;
struct hlist_node *node;
struct hpte_cache *pte;
/* Find the list of entries in the map */
list = &vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_pte_long[
kvmppc_mmu_hash_pte_long(guest_ea)];
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
KVM: PPC: Add book3s_32 tlbie flush acceleration On Book3s_32 the tlbie instruction flushed effective addresses by the mask 0x0ffff000. This is pretty hard to reflect with a hash that hashes ~0xfff, so to speed up that target we should also keep a special hash around for it. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:19 +08:00
rcu_read_lock();
/* Check the list for matching entries and invalidate */
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(pte, node, list, list_pte_long)
if ((pte->pte.eaddr & 0x0ffff000UL) == guest_ea)
invalidate_pte(vcpu, pte);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
void kvmppc_mmu_pte_flush(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ulong guest_ea, ulong ea_mask)
{
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
dprintk_mmu("KVM: Flushing %d Shadow PTEs: 0x%lx & 0x%lx\n",
vcpu->arch.hpte_cache_count, guest_ea, ea_mask);
guest_ea &= ea_mask;
switch (ea_mask) {
case ~0xfffUL:
kvmppc_mmu_pte_flush_page(vcpu, guest_ea);
break;
case 0x0ffff000:
KVM: PPC: Add book3s_32 tlbie flush acceleration On Book3s_32 the tlbie instruction flushed effective addresses by the mask 0x0ffff000. This is pretty hard to reflect with a hash that hashes ~0xfff, so to speed up that target we should also keep a special hash around for it. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:19 +08:00
kvmppc_mmu_pte_flush_long(vcpu, guest_ea);
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
break;
case 0:
/* Doing a complete flush -> start from scratch */
kvmppc_mmu_pte_flush_all(vcpu);
break;
default:
WARN_ON(1);
break;
}
}
/* Flush with mask 0xfffffffff */
static void kvmppc_mmu_pte_vflush_short(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 guest_vp)
{
struct hlist_head *list;
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
struct hlist_node *node;
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
struct hpte_cache *pte;
u64 vp_mask = 0xfffffffffULL;
list = &vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_vpte[kvmppc_mmu_hash_vpte(guest_vp)];
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
rcu_read_lock();
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
/* Check the list for matching entries and invalidate */
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(pte, node, list, list_vpte)
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
if ((pte->pte.vpage & vp_mask) == guest_vp)
invalidate_pte(vcpu, pte);
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
rcu_read_unlock();
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
}
/* Flush with mask 0xffffff000 */
static void kvmppc_mmu_pte_vflush_long(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 guest_vp)
{
struct hlist_head *list;
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
struct hlist_node *node;
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
struct hpte_cache *pte;
u64 vp_mask = 0xffffff000ULL;
list = &vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_vpte_long[
kvmppc_mmu_hash_vpte_long(guest_vp)];
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
rcu_read_lock();
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
/* Check the list for matching entries and invalidate */
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(pte, node, list, list_vpte_long)
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
if ((pte->pte.vpage & vp_mask) == guest_vp)
invalidate_pte(vcpu, pte);
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
rcu_read_unlock();
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
}
void kvmppc_mmu_pte_vflush(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 guest_vp, u64 vp_mask)
{
dprintk_mmu("KVM: Flushing %d Shadow vPTEs: 0x%llx & 0x%llx\n",
vcpu->arch.hpte_cache_count, guest_vp, vp_mask);
guest_vp &= vp_mask;
switch(vp_mask) {
case 0xfffffffffULL:
kvmppc_mmu_pte_vflush_short(vcpu, guest_vp);
break;
case 0xffffff000ULL:
kvmppc_mmu_pte_vflush_long(vcpu, guest_vp);
break;
default:
WARN_ON(1);
return;
}
}
void kvmppc_mmu_pte_pflush(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ulong pa_start, ulong pa_end)
{
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
struct hlist_node *node;
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
struct hpte_cache *pte;
int i;
dprintk_mmu("KVM: Flushing %d Shadow pPTEs: 0x%lx - 0x%lx\n",
vcpu->arch.hpte_cache_count, pa_start, pa_end);
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
rcu_read_lock();
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
for (i = 0; i < HPTEG_HASH_NUM_VPTE_LONG; i++) {
struct hlist_head *list = &vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_vpte_long[i];
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(pte, node, list, list_vpte_long)
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
if ((pte->pte.raddr >= pa_start) &&
(pte->pte.raddr < pa_end))
invalidate_pte(vcpu, pte);
}
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
rcu_read_unlock();
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
}
struct hpte_cache *kvmppc_mmu_hpte_cache_next(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct hpte_cache *pte;
pte = kmem_cache_zalloc(hpte_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
vcpu->arch.hpte_cache_count++;
if (vcpu->arch.hpte_cache_count == HPTEG_CACHE_NUM)
kvmppc_mmu_pte_flush_all(vcpu);
return pte;
}
void kvmppc_mmu_hpte_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
kvmppc_mmu_pte_flush(vcpu, 0, 0);
}
static void kvmppc_mmu_hpte_init_hash(struct hlist_head *hash_list, int len)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&hash_list[i]);
}
int kvmppc_mmu_hpte_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
/* init hpte lookup hashes */
kvmppc_mmu_hpte_init_hash(vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_pte,
ARRAY_SIZE(vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_pte));
KVM: PPC: Add book3s_32 tlbie flush acceleration On Book3s_32 the tlbie instruction flushed effective addresses by the mask 0x0ffff000. This is pretty hard to reflect with a hash that hashes ~0xfff, so to speed up that target we should also keep a special hash around for it. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:19 +08:00
kvmppc_mmu_hpte_init_hash(vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_pte_long,
ARRAY_SIZE(vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_pte_long));
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
kvmppc_mmu_hpte_init_hash(vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_vpte,
ARRAY_SIZE(vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_vpte));
kvmppc_mmu_hpte_init_hash(vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_vpte_long,
ARRAY_SIZE(vcpu->arch.hpte_hash_vpte_long));
KVM: PPC: RCU'ify the Book3s MMU So far we've been running all code without locking of any sort. This wasn't really an issue because I didn't see any parallel access to the shadow MMU code coming. But then I started to implement dirty bitmapping to MOL which has the video code in its own thread, so suddenly we had the dirty bitmap code run in parallel to the shadow mmu code. And with that came trouble. So I went ahead and made the MMU modifying functions as parallelizable as I could think of. I hope I didn't screw up too much RCU logic :-). If you know your way around RCU and locking and what needs to be done when, please take a look at this patch. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
2010-07-29 21:04:17 +08:00
spin_lock_init(&vcpu->arch.mmu_lock);
KVM: PPC: Add generic hpte management functions Currently the shadow paging code keeps an array of entries it knows about. Whenever the guest invalidates an entry, we loop through that entry, trying to invalidate matching parts. While this is a really simple implementation, it is probably the most ineffective one possible. So instead, let's keep an array of lists around that are indexed by a hash. This way each PTE can be added by 4 list_add, removed by 4 list_del invocations and the search only needs to loop through entries that share the same hash. This patch implements said lookup and exports generic functions that both the 32-bit and 64-bit backend can use. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
2010-06-30 21:18:45 +08:00
return 0;
}
int kvmppc_mmu_hpte_sysinit(void)
{
/* init hpte slab cache */
hpte_cache = kmem_cache_create("kvm-spt", sizeof(struct hpte_cache),
sizeof(struct hpte_cache), 0, NULL);
return 0;
}
void kvmppc_mmu_hpte_sysexit(void)
{
kmem_cache_destroy(hpte_cache);
}
Copy Permalink