renegade-project/linux-next
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-27 14:43:58 +08:00
Code
03f87c0b45
linux-next/kernel/bpf/percpu_freelist.h

33 lines
1.0 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 206 Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of version 2 of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 107 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Steve Winslow <swinslow@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190528171438.615055994@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-29 01:10:09 +08:00
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
bpf: introduce percpu_freelist Introduce simple percpu_freelist to keep single list of elements spread across per-cpu singly linked lists. /* push element into the list */ void pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist *, struct pcpu_freelist_node *); /* pop element from the list */ struct pcpu_freelist_node *pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *); The object is pushed to the current cpu list. Pop first trying to get the object from the current cpu list, if it's empty goes to the neigbour cpu list. For bpf program usage pattern the collision rate is very low, since programs push and pop the objects typically on the same cpu. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-03-08 13:57:14 +08:00
/* Copyright (c) 2016 Facebook
*/
#ifndef __PERCPU_FREELIST_H__
#define __PERCPU_FREELIST_H__
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/percpu.h>
struct pcpu_freelist_head {
struct pcpu_freelist_node *first;
raw_spinlock_t lock;
};
struct pcpu_freelist {
struct pcpu_freelist_head __percpu *freelist;
};
struct pcpu_freelist_node {
struct pcpu_freelist_node *next;
};
bpf: fix lockdep false positive in percpu_freelist Lockdep warns about false positive: [ 12.492084] 00000000e6b28347 (&head->lock){+...}, at: pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.492696] but this lock was taken by another, HARDIRQ-safe lock in the past: [ 12.493275] (&rq->lock){-.-.} [ 12.493276] [ 12.493276] [ 12.493276] and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. [ 12.493276] [ 12.494435] [ 12.494435] other info that might help us debug this: [ 12.494979] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: [ 12.494979] [ 12.495518] CPU0 CPU1 [ 12.495879] ---- ---- [ 12.496243] lock(&head->lock); [ 12.496502] local_irq_disable(); [ 12.496969] lock(&rq->lock); [ 12.497431] lock(&head->lock); [ 12.497890] <Interrupt> [ 12.498104] lock(&rq->lock); [ 12.498368] [ 12.498368] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 12.498368] [ 12.498837] 1 lock held by dd/276: [ 12.499110] #0: 00000000c58cb2ee (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: trace_call_bpf+0x5e/0x240 [ 12.499747] [ 12.499747] the shortest dependencies between 2nd lock and 1st lock: [ 12.500389] -> (&rq->lock){-.-.} { [ 12.500669] IN-HARDIRQ-W at: [ 12.500934] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.501373] scheduler_tick+0x4c/0xf0 [ 12.501812] update_process_times+0x40/0x50 [ 12.502294] tick_periodic+0x27/0xb0 [ 12.502723] tick_handle_periodic+0x1f/0x60 [ 12.503203] timer_interrupt+0x11/0x20 [ 12.503651] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x43/0x2c0 [ 12.504167] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x20/0x50 [ 12.504674] handle_irq_event+0x37/0x60 [ 12.505139] handle_level_irq+0xa7/0x120 [ 12.505601] handle_irq+0xa1/0x150 [ 12.506018] do_IRQ+0x77/0x140 [ 12.506411] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d [ 12.506834] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x53/0x60 [ 12.507362] __setup_irq+0x481/0x730 [ 12.507789] setup_irq+0x49/0x80 [ 12.508195] hpet_time_init+0x21/0x32 [ 12.508644] x86_late_time_init+0xb/0x16 [ 12.509106] start_kernel+0x390/0x42a [ 12.509554] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 [ 12.510034] IN-SOFTIRQ-W at: [ 12.510305] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.510772] try_to_wake_up+0x1c7/0x4e0 [ 12.511220] swake_up_locked+0x20/0x40 [ 12.511657] swake_up_one+0x1a/0x30 [ 12.512070] rcu_process_callbacks+0xc5/0x650 [ 12.512553] __do_softirq+0xe6/0x47b [ 12.512978] irq_exit+0xc3/0xd0 [ 12.513372] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa9/0x250 [ 12.513876] apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 [ 12.514343] default_idle+0x1c/0x170 [ 12.514765] do_idle+0x199/0x240 [ 12.515159] cpu_startup_entry+0x19/0x20 [ 12.515614] start_kernel+0x422/0x42a [ 12.516045] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 [ 12.516521] INITIAL USE at: [ 12.516774] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x38/0x50 [ 12.517258] rq_attach_root+0x16/0xd0 [ 12.517685] sched_init+0x2f2/0x3eb [ 12.518096] start_kernel+0x1fb/0x42a [ 12.518525] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 [ 12.518986] } [ 12.519132] ... key at: [<ffffffff82b7bc28>] __key.71384+0x0/0x8 [ 12.519649] ... acquired at: [ 12.519892] pcpu_freelist_pop+0x7b/0xd0 [ 12.520221] bpf_get_stackid+0x1d2/0x4d0 [ 12.520563] ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 [ 12.520887] [ 12.521008] -> (&head->lock){+...} { [ 12.521292] HARDIRQ-ON-W at: [ 12.521539] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.521950] pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.522396] bpf_get_stackid+0x494/0x4d0 [ 12.522828] ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 [ 12.523296] INITIAL USE at: [ 12.523537] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.523944] pcpu_freelist_populate+0xc0/0x120 [ 12.524417] htab_map_alloc+0x405/0x500 [ 12.524835] __do_sys_bpf+0x1a3/0x1a90 [ 12.525253] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x180 [ 12.525659] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 12.526167] } [ 12.526311] ... key at: [<ffffffff838f7668>] __key.13130+0x0/0x8 [ 12.526812] ... acquired at: [ 12.527047] __lock_acquire+0x521/0x1350 [ 12.527371] lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 12.527680] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.527994] pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.528325] bpf_get_stackid+0x494/0x4d0 [ 12.528645] ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 [ 12.528970] [ 12.529092] [ 12.529092] stack backtrace: [ 12.529444] CPU: 0 PID: 276 Comm: dd Not tainted 5.0.0-rc3-00018-g2fa53f892422 #475 [ 12.530043] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 [ 12.530750] Call Trace: [ 12.530948] dump_stack+0x5f/0x8b [ 12.531248] check_usage_backwards+0x10c/0x120 [ 12.531598] ? ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 [ 12.531935] ? mark_lock+0x382/0x560 [ 12.532229] mark_lock+0x382/0x560 [ 12.532496] ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies+0x180/0x180 [ 12.532928] __lock_acquire+0x521/0x1350 [ 12.533271] ? find_get_entry+0x17f/0x2e0 [ 12.533586] ? find_get_entry+0x19c/0x2e0 [ 12.533902] ? lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 12.534196] lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 12.534482] ? pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.534810] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.535099] ? pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.535432] pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.535750] bpf_get_stackid+0x494/0x4d0 [ 12.536062] ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 It has been explained that is a false positive here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/25/756 Recap: - stackmap uses pcpu_freelist - The lock in pcpu_freelist is a percpu lock - stackmap is only used by tracing bpf_prog - A tracing bpf_prog cannot be run if another bpf_prog has already been running (ensured by the percpu bpf_prog_active counter). Eric pointed out that this lockdep splats stops other legit lockdep splats in selftests/bpf/test_progs.c. Fix this by calling local_irq_save/restore for stackmap. Another false positive had also been worked around by calling local_irq_save in commit 89ad2fa3f043 ("bpf: fix lockdep splat"). That commit added unnecessary irq_save/restore to fast path of bpf hash map. irqs are already disabled at that point, since htab is holding per bucket spin_lock with irqsave. Let's reduce overhead for htab by introducing __pcpu_freelist_push/pop function w/o irqsave and convert pcpu_freelist_push/pop to irqsave to be used elsewhere (right now only in stackmap). It stops lockdep false positive in stackmap with a bit of acceptable overhead. Fixes: 557c0c6e7df8 ("bpf: convert stackmap to pre-allocation") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-31 10:12:43 +08:00
/* pcpu_freelist_* do spin_lock_irqsave. */
bpf: introduce percpu_freelist Introduce simple percpu_freelist to keep single list of elements spread across per-cpu singly linked lists. /* push element into the list */ void pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist *, struct pcpu_freelist_node *); /* pop element from the list */ struct pcpu_freelist_node *pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *); The object is pushed to the current cpu list. Pop first trying to get the object from the current cpu list, if it's empty goes to the neigbour cpu list. For bpf program usage pattern the collision rate is very low, since programs push and pop the objects typically on the same cpu. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-03-08 13:57:14 +08:00
void pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist *, struct pcpu_freelist_node *);
struct pcpu_freelist_node *pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *);
bpf: fix lockdep false positive in percpu_freelist Lockdep warns about false positive: [ 12.492084] 00000000e6b28347 (&head->lock){+...}, at: pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.492696] but this lock was taken by another, HARDIRQ-safe lock in the past: [ 12.493275] (&rq->lock){-.-.} [ 12.493276] [ 12.493276] [ 12.493276] and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. [ 12.493276] [ 12.494435] [ 12.494435] other info that might help us debug this: [ 12.494979] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: [ 12.494979] [ 12.495518] CPU0 CPU1 [ 12.495879] ---- ---- [ 12.496243] lock(&head->lock); [ 12.496502] local_irq_disable(); [ 12.496969] lock(&rq->lock); [ 12.497431] lock(&head->lock); [ 12.497890] <Interrupt> [ 12.498104] lock(&rq->lock); [ 12.498368] [ 12.498368] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 12.498368] [ 12.498837] 1 lock held by dd/276: [ 12.499110] #0: 00000000c58cb2ee (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: trace_call_bpf+0x5e/0x240 [ 12.499747] [ 12.499747] the shortest dependencies between 2nd lock and 1st lock: [ 12.500389] -> (&rq->lock){-.-.} { [ 12.500669] IN-HARDIRQ-W at: [ 12.500934] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.501373] scheduler_tick+0x4c/0xf0 [ 12.501812] update_process_times+0x40/0x50 [ 12.502294] tick_periodic+0x27/0xb0 [ 12.502723] tick_handle_periodic+0x1f/0x60 [ 12.503203] timer_interrupt+0x11/0x20 [ 12.503651] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x43/0x2c0 [ 12.504167] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x20/0x50 [ 12.504674] handle_irq_event+0x37/0x60 [ 12.505139] handle_level_irq+0xa7/0x120 [ 12.505601] handle_irq+0xa1/0x150 [ 12.506018] do_IRQ+0x77/0x140 [ 12.506411] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d [ 12.506834] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x53/0x60 [ 12.507362] __setup_irq+0x481/0x730 [ 12.507789] setup_irq+0x49/0x80 [ 12.508195] hpet_time_init+0x21/0x32 [ 12.508644] x86_late_time_init+0xb/0x16 [ 12.509106] start_kernel+0x390/0x42a [ 12.509554] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 [ 12.510034] IN-SOFTIRQ-W at: [ 12.510305] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.510772] try_to_wake_up+0x1c7/0x4e0 [ 12.511220] swake_up_locked+0x20/0x40 [ 12.511657] swake_up_one+0x1a/0x30 [ 12.512070] rcu_process_callbacks+0xc5/0x650 [ 12.512553] __do_softirq+0xe6/0x47b [ 12.512978] irq_exit+0xc3/0xd0 [ 12.513372] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa9/0x250 [ 12.513876] apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 [ 12.514343] default_idle+0x1c/0x170 [ 12.514765] do_idle+0x199/0x240 [ 12.515159] cpu_startup_entry+0x19/0x20 [ 12.515614] start_kernel+0x422/0x42a [ 12.516045] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 [ 12.516521] INITIAL USE at: [ 12.516774] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x38/0x50 [ 12.517258] rq_attach_root+0x16/0xd0 [ 12.517685] sched_init+0x2f2/0x3eb [ 12.518096] start_kernel+0x1fb/0x42a [ 12.518525] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 [ 12.518986] } [ 12.519132] ... key at: [<ffffffff82b7bc28>] __key.71384+0x0/0x8 [ 12.519649] ... acquired at: [ 12.519892] pcpu_freelist_pop+0x7b/0xd0 [ 12.520221] bpf_get_stackid+0x1d2/0x4d0 [ 12.520563] ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 [ 12.520887] [ 12.521008] -> (&head->lock){+...} { [ 12.521292] HARDIRQ-ON-W at: [ 12.521539] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.521950] pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.522396] bpf_get_stackid+0x494/0x4d0 [ 12.522828] ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 [ 12.523296] INITIAL USE at: [ 12.523537] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.523944] pcpu_freelist_populate+0xc0/0x120 [ 12.524417] htab_map_alloc+0x405/0x500 [ 12.524835] __do_sys_bpf+0x1a3/0x1a90 [ 12.525253] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x180 [ 12.525659] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 12.526167] } [ 12.526311] ... key at: [<ffffffff838f7668>] __key.13130+0x0/0x8 [ 12.526812] ... acquired at: [ 12.527047] __lock_acquire+0x521/0x1350 [ 12.527371] lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 12.527680] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.527994] pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.528325] bpf_get_stackid+0x494/0x4d0 [ 12.528645] ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 [ 12.528970] [ 12.529092] [ 12.529092] stack backtrace: [ 12.529444] CPU: 0 PID: 276 Comm: dd Not tainted 5.0.0-rc3-00018-g2fa53f892422 #475 [ 12.530043] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 [ 12.530750] Call Trace: [ 12.530948] dump_stack+0x5f/0x8b [ 12.531248] check_usage_backwards+0x10c/0x120 [ 12.531598] ? ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 [ 12.531935] ? mark_lock+0x382/0x560 [ 12.532229] mark_lock+0x382/0x560 [ 12.532496] ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies+0x180/0x180 [ 12.532928] __lock_acquire+0x521/0x1350 [ 12.533271] ? find_get_entry+0x17f/0x2e0 [ 12.533586] ? find_get_entry+0x19c/0x2e0 [ 12.533902] ? lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 12.534196] lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 12.534482] ? pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.534810] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.535099] ? pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.535432] pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.535750] bpf_get_stackid+0x494/0x4d0 [ 12.536062] ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 It has been explained that is a false positive here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/25/756 Recap: - stackmap uses pcpu_freelist - The lock in pcpu_freelist is a percpu lock - stackmap is only used by tracing bpf_prog - A tracing bpf_prog cannot be run if another bpf_prog has already been running (ensured by the percpu bpf_prog_active counter). Eric pointed out that this lockdep splats stops other legit lockdep splats in selftests/bpf/test_progs.c. Fix this by calling local_irq_save/restore for stackmap. Another false positive had also been worked around by calling local_irq_save in commit 89ad2fa3f043 ("bpf: fix lockdep splat"). That commit added unnecessary irq_save/restore to fast path of bpf hash map. irqs are already disabled at that point, since htab is holding per bucket spin_lock with irqsave. Let's reduce overhead for htab by introducing __pcpu_freelist_push/pop function w/o irqsave and convert pcpu_freelist_push/pop to irqsave to be used elsewhere (right now only in stackmap). It stops lockdep false positive in stackmap with a bit of acceptable overhead. Fixes: 557c0c6e7df8 ("bpf: convert stackmap to pre-allocation") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-31 10:12:43 +08:00
/* __pcpu_freelist_* do spin_lock only. caller must disable irqs. */
void __pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist *, struct pcpu_freelist_node *);
struct pcpu_freelist_node *__pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *);
bpf: introduce percpu_freelist Introduce simple percpu_freelist to keep single list of elements spread across per-cpu singly linked lists. /* push element into the list */ void pcpu_freelist_push(struct pcpu_freelist *, struct pcpu_freelist_node *); /* pop element from the list */ struct pcpu_freelist_node *pcpu_freelist_pop(struct pcpu_freelist *); The object is pushed to the current cpu list. Pop first trying to get the object from the current cpu list, if it's empty goes to the neigbour cpu list. For bpf program usage pattern the collision rate is very low, since programs push and pop the objects typically on the same cpu. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-03-08 13:57:14 +08:00
void pcpu_freelist_populate(struct pcpu_freelist *s, void *buf, u32 elem_size,
u32 nr_elems);
int pcpu_freelist_init(struct pcpu_freelist *);
void pcpu_freelist_destroy(struct pcpu_freelist *s);
#endif
Copy Permalink