2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-16 01:04:08 +08:00
linux-next/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsparse.c

272 lines
7.5 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0
/******************************************************************************
*
* Module Name: nsparse - namespace interface to AML parser
*
* Copyright (C) 2000 - 2021, Intel Corp.
*
*****************************************************************************/
#include <acpi/acpi.h>
#include "accommon.h"
#include "acnamesp.h"
#include "acparser.h"
#include "acdispat.h"
#include "actables.h"
ACPICA: Namespace: Fix dynamic table loading issues ACPICA commit 767ee53354e0c4b7e8e7c57c6dd7bf569f0d52bb There are issues related to the namespace/interpreter locks, which causes several ACPI functionalities not specification compliant. The lock issues were detectec when we were trying to fix the functionalities (please see Link # [1] for the details). What's the lock issues? Let's first look into the namespace/interpreter lock usages inside of the object evaluation and the table loading which are the key AML interpretion code paths: Table loading: acpi_ns_load_table L(Namespace) acpi_ns_parse_table acpi_ns_one_complete_parse(LOAD_PASS1/LOAD_PASS2) acpi_ds_load1_begion_op acpi_ds_load1_end_op acpi_ds_load2_begion_op acpi_ds_load2_end_op U(Namespace) Object evaluation: acpi_ns_evaluate L(Interpreter) acpi_ps_execute_method acpi_ds_exec_begin_op acpi_ds_exec_end_op U(Interpreter) acpi_ns_load_table L(Namespace) U(Namespace) acpi_ev_initialize_region L(Namespace) U(Namespace) address_space.Setup address_space.Handler acpi_os_wait_semaphore acpi_os_acquire_mutex acpi_os_sleep L(Interpreter) U(Interpreter) L(Interpreter) acpi_ex_resolve_node_to_value U(Interpreter) acpi_ns_check_return_value Where: 1. L(Interpreter) means acquire(MTX_INTERPRETER); 2. U(Interpreter) means release(MTX_INTERPRETER); 3. L(Namespace) means acquire(MTX_NAMESPACE); 4. U(Namespace) means release(MTX_NAMESPACE); We can see that acpi_ns_exec_module_code() (which invokes acpi_ns_evaluate) is implemented in a deferred way just in order to avoid to reacquire the namespace lock. This is in fact the root cause of many other ACPICA issues: 1. We now know for sure that the module code should be executed right in place by the Windows AML interpreter. So in the current design, if the region initializations/accesses or the table loadings (where the namespace surely should be locked again) happening during the table loading period, dead lock could happen because ACPICA never unlocks the namespace during the AML interpretion. 2. ACPICA interpreter just ensures that all static namespace nodes (named objects created during the acpi_load_tables()) are created (acpi_ns_lookup()) with the correct lock held, but doesn't ensure that the named objects created by the control method are created with the same correct lock held. It requires the control methods to be executed in a serial way after "loading a table", that's why ACPICA requires method auto serialization. This patch fixes these software design issues by extending interpreter enter/exit APIs to hold both interpreter/namespace locks to ensure the lock order correctness, so that we can get these code paths: Table loading: acpi_ns_load_table E(Interpreter) acpi_ns_parse_table acpi_ns_one_complete_parse acpi_ns_execute_table X(Interpreter) acpi_ns_load_table acpi_ev_initialize_region address_space.Setup address_space.Handler acpi_os_wait_semaphore acpi_os_acquire_mutex acpi_os_sleep E(Interpreter) X(Interpreter) Object evaluation: acpi_ns_evaluate E(Interpreter) acpi_ps_execute_method X(Interpreter) acpi_ns_load_table acpi_ev_initialize_region address_space.Setup address_space.Handler acpi_os_wait_semaphore acpi_os_acquire_mutex acpi_os_sleep E(Interpreter) X(Interpreter) Where: 1. E(Interpreter) means acquire(MTX_INTERPRETER, MTX_NAMESPACE); 2. X(Interpreter) means release(MTX_NAMESPACE, MTX_INTERPRETER); After this change, we can see: 1. All namespace nodes creations are locked by the namespace lock. 2. All namespace nodes referencing are locked with the same lock. 3. But we also can notice a defact that, all namespace nodes deletions could be affected by this change. As a consequence, acpi_ns_delete_namespace_subtree() may delete a static namespace node that is still referenced by the interpreter (for example, the parser scopes). Currently, we needn't worry about the last defact because in ACPICA, table unloading is not fully functioning, its design strictly relies on the fact that when the namespace deletion happens, either the AML table or the OSPMs should have been notified and thus either the AML table or the OSPMs shouldn't reference deletion-related namespace nodes during the namespace deletion. And this change still works with the above restrictions applied. While making this a-step-forward helps us to correct the wrong grammar to pull many things back to the correct rail. And pulling things back to the correct rail in return makes it possible for us to support fully functioning table unloading after doing many cleanups. While this patch is generated, all namespace locks are examined to ensure that they can meet either of the following pattens: 1. L(Namespace) U(Namespace) 2. E(Interpreter) X(Interpreter) 3. E(Interpreter) X(Interpreter) L(Namespace) U(Namespace) E(Interpreter) X(Interpreter) We ensure this by adding X(Interpreter)/E(Interpreter) or removing U(Namespace)/L(Namespace) for those currently are executed in the following order: E(Interpreter) L(Namespace) U(Namespace) X(Interpreter) And adding E(Interpreter)/X(Interpreter) for those currently are executed in the following order: X(Interpreter) E(Interpreter) Originally, the interpreter lock is held for the execution AML opcodes, the namespace lock is held for the named object creation AML opcodes. Since they are actually same in MS interpreter (can all be executed during the table loading), we can combine the 2 locks and tune the locking code better in this way. Lv Zheng. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153541 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121701 # [1] Link: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1323 Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/767ee533 Reported-and-tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Greg White <gwhite@kupulau.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Dutch Guy <lucht_piloot@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-07 14:07:10 +08:00
#include "acinterp.h"
#define _COMPONENT ACPI_NAMESPACE
ACPI_MODULE_NAME("nsparse")
ACPICA: Interpreter: Fix MLC issues by switching to new term_list grammar for table loading ACPICA commit 0e24fb67cde08d7df7671d7d7b183490dc79707e The MLC (Module Level Code) is an ACPICA terminology describing the AML code out of any control method, its support is an indication of the interpreter behavior during the table loading. The original implementation of MLC in ACPICA had several issues: 1. Out of any control method, besides of the object creating opcodes, only the code blocks wrapped by "If/Else/While" opcodes were supported. 2. The supported MLC code blocks were executed after loading the table rather than being executed right in place. ============================================================ The demo of this order issue is as follows: Name (OBJ1, 1) If (CND1 == 1) { Name (OBJ2, 2) } Name (OBJ3, 3) The original MLC support created OBJ2 after OBJ3's creation. ============================================================ Other than these limitations, MLC support in ACPICA looks correct. And supporting this should be easy/natural for ACPICA, but enabling of this was blocked by some ACPICA internal and OSPM specific initialization order issues we've fixed recently. The wrong support started from the following false bug fixing commit: Commit: 7f0c826a437157d2b19662977e9cf3b472cf24a6 Subject: ACPICA: Add support for module-level executable AML code Commit: 9a884ab64a4d092b4c3bf24fd9a30f7fbd4591e7 Subject: ACPICA: Add additional module-level code support ... We can confirm Windows interpreter behavior via reverse engineering means. It can be proven that not only If/Else/While wrapped code blocks, all opcodes can be executed at the module level, including operation region accesses. And it can be proven that the MLC should be executed right in place, not in such a deferred way executed after loading the table. And the above facts indeed reflect the spec words around ACPI definition block tables (DSDT/SSDT/...), the entire table and the Scope object is defined by the AML specification in BNF style as: AMLCode := def_block_header term_list def_scope := scope_op pkg_length name_string term_list The bodies of the scope opening terms (AMLCode/Scope) are all term_list, thus the table loading should be no difference than the control method evaluations as the body of the Method is also defined by the AML specification as term_list: def_method := method_op pkg_length name_string method_flags term_list The only difference is: after evaluating control method, created named objects may be freed due to no reference, while named objects created by the table loading should only be freed after unloading the table. So this patch follows the spec and the de-facto standard behavior, enables the new grammar (term_list) for the table loading. By doing so, beyond the fixes to the above issues, we can see additional differences comparing to the old grammar based table loading: 1. Originally, beyond the scope opening terms (AMLCode/Scope), If/Else/While wrapped code blocks under the scope creating terms (Device/power_resource/Processor/thermal_zone) are also supported as deferred MLC, which violates the spec defined grammar where object_list is enforced. With MLC support improved as non-deferred, the interpreter parses such scope creating terms as term_list rather object_list like the scope opening terms. After probing the Windows behavior and proving that it also parses these terms as term_list, we submitted an ECR (Engineering Change Request) to the ASWG (ACPI Specification Working Group) to clarify this. The ECR is titled as "ASL Grammar Clarification for Executable AML Opcodes" and has been accepted by the ASWG. The new grammar will appear in ACPI specification 6.2. 2. Originally, Buffer/Package/operation_region/create_XXXField/bank_field arguments are evaluated in a deferred way after loading the table. With MLC support improved, they are also parsed right in place during the table loading. This is also Windows compliant and the only difference is the removal of the debugging messages implemented before acpi_ds_execute_arguments(), see Link # [1] for the details. A previous commit should have ensured that acpi_check_address_range() won't regress. Note that enabling this feature may cause regressions due to long term Linux ACPI support on top of the wrong grammar. So this patch also prepares a global option to be used to roll back to the old grammar during the period between a regression is reported and the regression is root-cause-fixed. Lv Zheng. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112911 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117671 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153541 # [1] Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/issues/122 Link: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=963 Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/0e24fb67 Reported-and-tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com> Reported-by: Ehsan <dashesy@gmail.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Dutch Guy <lucht_piloot@gmx.net> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-07 14:06:54 +08:00
/*******************************************************************************
*
* FUNCTION: ns_execute_table
*
* PARAMETERS: table_desc - An ACPI table descriptor for table to parse
* start_node - Where to enter the table into the namespace
*
* RETURN: Status
*
* DESCRIPTION: Load ACPI/AML table by executing the entire table as a single
* large control method.
*
* NOTE: The point of this is to execute any module-level code in-place
* as the table is parsed. Some AML code depends on this behavior.
*
* It is a run-time option at this time, but will eventually become
* the default.
*
* Note: This causes the table to only have a single-pass parse.
* However, this is compatible with other ACPI implementations.
ACPICA: Interpreter: Fix MLC issues by switching to new term_list grammar for table loading ACPICA commit 0e24fb67cde08d7df7671d7d7b183490dc79707e The MLC (Module Level Code) is an ACPICA terminology describing the AML code out of any control method, its support is an indication of the interpreter behavior during the table loading. The original implementation of MLC in ACPICA had several issues: 1. Out of any control method, besides of the object creating opcodes, only the code blocks wrapped by "If/Else/While" opcodes were supported. 2. The supported MLC code blocks were executed after loading the table rather than being executed right in place. ============================================================ The demo of this order issue is as follows: Name (OBJ1, 1) If (CND1 == 1) { Name (OBJ2, 2) } Name (OBJ3, 3) The original MLC support created OBJ2 after OBJ3's creation. ============================================================ Other than these limitations, MLC support in ACPICA looks correct. And supporting this should be easy/natural for ACPICA, but enabling of this was blocked by some ACPICA internal and OSPM specific initialization order issues we've fixed recently. The wrong support started from the following false bug fixing commit: Commit: 7f0c826a437157d2b19662977e9cf3b472cf24a6 Subject: ACPICA: Add support for module-level executable AML code Commit: 9a884ab64a4d092b4c3bf24fd9a30f7fbd4591e7 Subject: ACPICA: Add additional module-level code support ... We can confirm Windows interpreter behavior via reverse engineering means. It can be proven that not only If/Else/While wrapped code blocks, all opcodes can be executed at the module level, including operation region accesses. And it can be proven that the MLC should be executed right in place, not in such a deferred way executed after loading the table. And the above facts indeed reflect the spec words around ACPI definition block tables (DSDT/SSDT/...), the entire table and the Scope object is defined by the AML specification in BNF style as: AMLCode := def_block_header term_list def_scope := scope_op pkg_length name_string term_list The bodies of the scope opening terms (AMLCode/Scope) are all term_list, thus the table loading should be no difference than the control method evaluations as the body of the Method is also defined by the AML specification as term_list: def_method := method_op pkg_length name_string method_flags term_list The only difference is: after evaluating control method, created named objects may be freed due to no reference, while named objects created by the table loading should only be freed after unloading the table. So this patch follows the spec and the de-facto standard behavior, enables the new grammar (term_list) for the table loading. By doing so, beyond the fixes to the above issues, we can see additional differences comparing to the old grammar based table loading: 1. Originally, beyond the scope opening terms (AMLCode/Scope), If/Else/While wrapped code blocks under the scope creating terms (Device/power_resource/Processor/thermal_zone) are also supported as deferred MLC, which violates the spec defined grammar where object_list is enforced. With MLC support improved as non-deferred, the interpreter parses such scope creating terms as term_list rather object_list like the scope opening terms. After probing the Windows behavior and proving that it also parses these terms as term_list, we submitted an ECR (Engineering Change Request) to the ASWG (ACPI Specification Working Group) to clarify this. The ECR is titled as "ASL Grammar Clarification for Executable AML Opcodes" and has been accepted by the ASWG. The new grammar will appear in ACPI specification 6.2. 2. Originally, Buffer/Package/operation_region/create_XXXField/bank_field arguments are evaluated in a deferred way after loading the table. With MLC support improved, they are also parsed right in place during the table loading. This is also Windows compliant and the only difference is the removal of the debugging messages implemented before acpi_ds_execute_arguments(), see Link # [1] for the details. A previous commit should have ensured that acpi_check_address_range() won't regress. Note that enabling this feature may cause regressions due to long term Linux ACPI support on top of the wrong grammar. So this patch also prepares a global option to be used to roll back to the old grammar during the period between a regression is reported and the regression is root-cause-fixed. Lv Zheng. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112911 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117671 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153541 # [1] Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/issues/122 Link: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=963 Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/0e24fb67 Reported-and-tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com> Reported-by: Ehsan <dashesy@gmail.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Dutch Guy <lucht_piloot@gmx.net> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-07 14:06:54 +08:00
*
******************************************************************************/
acpi_status
acpi_ns_execute_table(u32 table_index, struct acpi_namespace_node *start_node)
{
acpi_status status;
struct acpi_table_header *table;
acpi_owner_id owner_id;
struct acpi_evaluate_info *info = NULL;
u32 aml_length;
u8 *aml_start;
union acpi_operand_object *method_obj = NULL;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(ns_execute_table);
status = acpi_get_table_by_index(table_index, &table);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}
/* Table must consist of at least a complete header */
if (table->length < sizeof(struct acpi_table_header)) {
return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_BAD_HEADER);
}
aml_start = (u8 *)table + sizeof(struct acpi_table_header);
aml_length = table->length - sizeof(struct acpi_table_header);
status = acpi_tb_get_owner_id(table_index, &owner_id);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}
/* Create, initialize, and link a new temporary method object */
method_obj = acpi_ut_create_internal_object(ACPI_TYPE_METHOD);
if (!method_obj) {
return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NO_MEMORY);
}
/* Allocate the evaluation information block */
info = ACPI_ALLOCATE_ZEROED(sizeof(struct acpi_evaluate_info));
if (!info) {
status = AE_NO_MEMORY;
goto cleanup;
}
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT_RAW((ACPI_DB_PARSE,
"%s: Create table pseudo-method for [%4.4s] @%p, method %p\n",
ACPI_GET_FUNCTION_NAME, table->signature, table,
method_obj));
ACPICA: Interpreter: Fix MLC issues by switching to new term_list grammar for table loading ACPICA commit 0e24fb67cde08d7df7671d7d7b183490dc79707e The MLC (Module Level Code) is an ACPICA terminology describing the AML code out of any control method, its support is an indication of the interpreter behavior during the table loading. The original implementation of MLC in ACPICA had several issues: 1. Out of any control method, besides of the object creating opcodes, only the code blocks wrapped by "If/Else/While" opcodes were supported. 2. The supported MLC code blocks were executed after loading the table rather than being executed right in place. ============================================================ The demo of this order issue is as follows: Name (OBJ1, 1) If (CND1 == 1) { Name (OBJ2, 2) } Name (OBJ3, 3) The original MLC support created OBJ2 after OBJ3's creation. ============================================================ Other than these limitations, MLC support in ACPICA looks correct. And supporting this should be easy/natural for ACPICA, but enabling of this was blocked by some ACPICA internal and OSPM specific initialization order issues we've fixed recently. The wrong support started from the following false bug fixing commit: Commit: 7f0c826a437157d2b19662977e9cf3b472cf24a6 Subject: ACPICA: Add support for module-level executable AML code Commit: 9a884ab64a4d092b4c3bf24fd9a30f7fbd4591e7 Subject: ACPICA: Add additional module-level code support ... We can confirm Windows interpreter behavior via reverse engineering means. It can be proven that not only If/Else/While wrapped code blocks, all opcodes can be executed at the module level, including operation region accesses. And it can be proven that the MLC should be executed right in place, not in such a deferred way executed after loading the table. And the above facts indeed reflect the spec words around ACPI definition block tables (DSDT/SSDT/...), the entire table and the Scope object is defined by the AML specification in BNF style as: AMLCode := def_block_header term_list def_scope := scope_op pkg_length name_string term_list The bodies of the scope opening terms (AMLCode/Scope) are all term_list, thus the table loading should be no difference than the control method evaluations as the body of the Method is also defined by the AML specification as term_list: def_method := method_op pkg_length name_string method_flags term_list The only difference is: after evaluating control method, created named objects may be freed due to no reference, while named objects created by the table loading should only be freed after unloading the table. So this patch follows the spec and the de-facto standard behavior, enables the new grammar (term_list) for the table loading. By doing so, beyond the fixes to the above issues, we can see additional differences comparing to the old grammar based table loading: 1. Originally, beyond the scope opening terms (AMLCode/Scope), If/Else/While wrapped code blocks under the scope creating terms (Device/power_resource/Processor/thermal_zone) are also supported as deferred MLC, which violates the spec defined grammar where object_list is enforced. With MLC support improved as non-deferred, the interpreter parses such scope creating terms as term_list rather object_list like the scope opening terms. After probing the Windows behavior and proving that it also parses these terms as term_list, we submitted an ECR (Engineering Change Request) to the ASWG (ACPI Specification Working Group) to clarify this. The ECR is titled as "ASL Grammar Clarification for Executable AML Opcodes" and has been accepted by the ASWG. The new grammar will appear in ACPI specification 6.2. 2. Originally, Buffer/Package/operation_region/create_XXXField/bank_field arguments are evaluated in a deferred way after loading the table. With MLC support improved, they are also parsed right in place during the table loading. This is also Windows compliant and the only difference is the removal of the debugging messages implemented before acpi_ds_execute_arguments(), see Link # [1] for the details. A previous commit should have ensured that acpi_check_address_range() won't regress. Note that enabling this feature may cause regressions due to long term Linux ACPI support on top of the wrong grammar. So this patch also prepares a global option to be used to roll back to the old grammar during the period between a regression is reported and the regression is root-cause-fixed. Lv Zheng. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112911 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117671 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153541 # [1] Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/issues/122 Link: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=963 Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/0e24fb67 Reported-and-tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com> Reported-by: Ehsan <dashesy@gmail.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Dutch Guy <lucht_piloot@gmx.net> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-07 14:06:54 +08:00
method_obj->method.aml_start = aml_start;
method_obj->method.aml_length = aml_length;
method_obj->method.owner_id = owner_id;
method_obj->method.info_flags |= ACPI_METHOD_MODULE_LEVEL;
info->pass_number = ACPI_IMODE_EXECUTE;
info->node = start_node;
info->obj_desc = method_obj;
info->node_flags = info->node->flags;
info->full_pathname = acpi_ns_get_normalized_pathname(info->node, TRUE);
if (!info->full_pathname) {
status = AE_NO_MEMORY;
goto cleanup;
}
/* Optional object evaluation log */
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT_RAW((ACPI_DB_EVALUATION,
"%-26s: (Definition Block level)\n",
"Module-level evaluation"));
ACPICA: Interpreter: Fix MLC issues by switching to new term_list grammar for table loading ACPICA commit 0e24fb67cde08d7df7671d7d7b183490dc79707e The MLC (Module Level Code) is an ACPICA terminology describing the AML code out of any control method, its support is an indication of the interpreter behavior during the table loading. The original implementation of MLC in ACPICA had several issues: 1. Out of any control method, besides of the object creating opcodes, only the code blocks wrapped by "If/Else/While" opcodes were supported. 2. The supported MLC code blocks were executed after loading the table rather than being executed right in place. ============================================================ The demo of this order issue is as follows: Name (OBJ1, 1) If (CND1 == 1) { Name (OBJ2, 2) } Name (OBJ3, 3) The original MLC support created OBJ2 after OBJ3's creation. ============================================================ Other than these limitations, MLC support in ACPICA looks correct. And supporting this should be easy/natural for ACPICA, but enabling of this was blocked by some ACPICA internal and OSPM specific initialization order issues we've fixed recently. The wrong support started from the following false bug fixing commit: Commit: 7f0c826a437157d2b19662977e9cf3b472cf24a6 Subject: ACPICA: Add support for module-level executable AML code Commit: 9a884ab64a4d092b4c3bf24fd9a30f7fbd4591e7 Subject: ACPICA: Add additional module-level code support ... We can confirm Windows interpreter behavior via reverse engineering means. It can be proven that not only If/Else/While wrapped code blocks, all opcodes can be executed at the module level, including operation region accesses. And it can be proven that the MLC should be executed right in place, not in such a deferred way executed after loading the table. And the above facts indeed reflect the spec words around ACPI definition block tables (DSDT/SSDT/...), the entire table and the Scope object is defined by the AML specification in BNF style as: AMLCode := def_block_header term_list def_scope := scope_op pkg_length name_string term_list The bodies of the scope opening terms (AMLCode/Scope) are all term_list, thus the table loading should be no difference than the control method evaluations as the body of the Method is also defined by the AML specification as term_list: def_method := method_op pkg_length name_string method_flags term_list The only difference is: after evaluating control method, created named objects may be freed due to no reference, while named objects created by the table loading should only be freed after unloading the table. So this patch follows the spec and the de-facto standard behavior, enables the new grammar (term_list) for the table loading. By doing so, beyond the fixes to the above issues, we can see additional differences comparing to the old grammar based table loading: 1. Originally, beyond the scope opening terms (AMLCode/Scope), If/Else/While wrapped code blocks under the scope creating terms (Device/power_resource/Processor/thermal_zone) are also supported as deferred MLC, which violates the spec defined grammar where object_list is enforced. With MLC support improved as non-deferred, the interpreter parses such scope creating terms as term_list rather object_list like the scope opening terms. After probing the Windows behavior and proving that it also parses these terms as term_list, we submitted an ECR (Engineering Change Request) to the ASWG (ACPI Specification Working Group) to clarify this. The ECR is titled as "ASL Grammar Clarification for Executable AML Opcodes" and has been accepted by the ASWG. The new grammar will appear in ACPI specification 6.2. 2. Originally, Buffer/Package/operation_region/create_XXXField/bank_field arguments are evaluated in a deferred way after loading the table. With MLC support improved, they are also parsed right in place during the table loading. This is also Windows compliant and the only difference is the removal of the debugging messages implemented before acpi_ds_execute_arguments(), see Link # [1] for the details. A previous commit should have ensured that acpi_check_address_range() won't regress. Note that enabling this feature may cause regressions due to long term Linux ACPI support on top of the wrong grammar. So this patch also prepares a global option to be used to roll back to the old grammar during the period between a regression is reported and the regression is root-cause-fixed. Lv Zheng. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112911 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117671 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153541 # [1] Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/issues/122 Link: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=963 Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/0e24fb67 Reported-and-tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com> Reported-by: Ehsan <dashesy@gmail.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Dutch Guy <lucht_piloot@gmx.net> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-07 14:06:54 +08:00
status = acpi_ps_execute_table(info);
/* Optional object evaluation log */
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT_RAW((ACPI_DB_EVALUATION,
"%-26s: (Definition Block level)\n",
"Module-level complete"));
ACPICA: Interpreter: Fix MLC issues by switching to new term_list grammar for table loading ACPICA commit 0e24fb67cde08d7df7671d7d7b183490dc79707e The MLC (Module Level Code) is an ACPICA terminology describing the AML code out of any control method, its support is an indication of the interpreter behavior during the table loading. The original implementation of MLC in ACPICA had several issues: 1. Out of any control method, besides of the object creating opcodes, only the code blocks wrapped by "If/Else/While" opcodes were supported. 2. The supported MLC code blocks were executed after loading the table rather than being executed right in place. ============================================================ The demo of this order issue is as follows: Name (OBJ1, 1) If (CND1 == 1) { Name (OBJ2, 2) } Name (OBJ3, 3) The original MLC support created OBJ2 after OBJ3's creation. ============================================================ Other than these limitations, MLC support in ACPICA looks correct. And supporting this should be easy/natural for ACPICA, but enabling of this was blocked by some ACPICA internal and OSPM specific initialization order issues we've fixed recently. The wrong support started from the following false bug fixing commit: Commit: 7f0c826a437157d2b19662977e9cf3b472cf24a6 Subject: ACPICA: Add support for module-level executable AML code Commit: 9a884ab64a4d092b4c3bf24fd9a30f7fbd4591e7 Subject: ACPICA: Add additional module-level code support ... We can confirm Windows interpreter behavior via reverse engineering means. It can be proven that not only If/Else/While wrapped code blocks, all opcodes can be executed at the module level, including operation region accesses. And it can be proven that the MLC should be executed right in place, not in such a deferred way executed after loading the table. And the above facts indeed reflect the spec words around ACPI definition block tables (DSDT/SSDT/...), the entire table and the Scope object is defined by the AML specification in BNF style as: AMLCode := def_block_header term_list def_scope := scope_op pkg_length name_string term_list The bodies of the scope opening terms (AMLCode/Scope) are all term_list, thus the table loading should be no difference than the control method evaluations as the body of the Method is also defined by the AML specification as term_list: def_method := method_op pkg_length name_string method_flags term_list The only difference is: after evaluating control method, created named objects may be freed due to no reference, while named objects created by the table loading should only be freed after unloading the table. So this patch follows the spec and the de-facto standard behavior, enables the new grammar (term_list) for the table loading. By doing so, beyond the fixes to the above issues, we can see additional differences comparing to the old grammar based table loading: 1. Originally, beyond the scope opening terms (AMLCode/Scope), If/Else/While wrapped code blocks under the scope creating terms (Device/power_resource/Processor/thermal_zone) are also supported as deferred MLC, which violates the spec defined grammar where object_list is enforced. With MLC support improved as non-deferred, the interpreter parses such scope creating terms as term_list rather object_list like the scope opening terms. After probing the Windows behavior and proving that it also parses these terms as term_list, we submitted an ECR (Engineering Change Request) to the ASWG (ACPI Specification Working Group) to clarify this. The ECR is titled as "ASL Grammar Clarification for Executable AML Opcodes" and has been accepted by the ASWG. The new grammar will appear in ACPI specification 6.2. 2. Originally, Buffer/Package/operation_region/create_XXXField/bank_field arguments are evaluated in a deferred way after loading the table. With MLC support improved, they are also parsed right in place during the table loading. This is also Windows compliant and the only difference is the removal of the debugging messages implemented before acpi_ds_execute_arguments(), see Link # [1] for the details. A previous commit should have ensured that acpi_check_address_range() won't regress. Note that enabling this feature may cause regressions due to long term Linux ACPI support on top of the wrong grammar. So this patch also prepares a global option to be used to roll back to the old grammar during the period between a regression is reported and the regression is root-cause-fixed. Lv Zheng. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112911 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117671 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153541 # [1] Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/issues/122 Link: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=963 Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/0e24fb67 Reported-and-tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com> Reported-by: Ehsan <dashesy@gmail.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Dutch Guy <lucht_piloot@gmx.net> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-07 14:06:54 +08:00
cleanup:
if (info) {
ACPI_FREE(info->full_pathname);
info->full_pathname = NULL;
}
ACPI_FREE(info);
acpi_ut_remove_reference(method_obj);
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}
/*******************************************************************************
*
* FUNCTION: ns_one_complete_parse
*
* PARAMETERS: pass_number - 1 or 2
* table_desc - The table to be parsed.
*
* RETURN: Status
*
* DESCRIPTION: Perform one complete parse of an ACPI/AML table.
*
******************************************************************************/
ACPICA: Interpreter: Fix MLC issues by switching to new term_list grammar for table loading ACPICA commit 0e24fb67cde08d7df7671d7d7b183490dc79707e The MLC (Module Level Code) is an ACPICA terminology describing the AML code out of any control method, its support is an indication of the interpreter behavior during the table loading. The original implementation of MLC in ACPICA had several issues: 1. Out of any control method, besides of the object creating opcodes, only the code blocks wrapped by "If/Else/While" opcodes were supported. 2. The supported MLC code blocks were executed after loading the table rather than being executed right in place. ============================================================ The demo of this order issue is as follows: Name (OBJ1, 1) If (CND1 == 1) { Name (OBJ2, 2) } Name (OBJ3, 3) The original MLC support created OBJ2 after OBJ3's creation. ============================================================ Other than these limitations, MLC support in ACPICA looks correct. And supporting this should be easy/natural for ACPICA, but enabling of this was blocked by some ACPICA internal and OSPM specific initialization order issues we've fixed recently. The wrong support started from the following false bug fixing commit: Commit: 7f0c826a437157d2b19662977e9cf3b472cf24a6 Subject: ACPICA: Add support for module-level executable AML code Commit: 9a884ab64a4d092b4c3bf24fd9a30f7fbd4591e7 Subject: ACPICA: Add additional module-level code support ... We can confirm Windows interpreter behavior via reverse engineering means. It can be proven that not only If/Else/While wrapped code blocks, all opcodes can be executed at the module level, including operation region accesses. And it can be proven that the MLC should be executed right in place, not in such a deferred way executed after loading the table. And the above facts indeed reflect the spec words around ACPI definition block tables (DSDT/SSDT/...), the entire table and the Scope object is defined by the AML specification in BNF style as: AMLCode := def_block_header term_list def_scope := scope_op pkg_length name_string term_list The bodies of the scope opening terms (AMLCode/Scope) are all term_list, thus the table loading should be no difference than the control method evaluations as the body of the Method is also defined by the AML specification as term_list: def_method := method_op pkg_length name_string method_flags term_list The only difference is: after evaluating control method, created named objects may be freed due to no reference, while named objects created by the table loading should only be freed after unloading the table. So this patch follows the spec and the de-facto standard behavior, enables the new grammar (term_list) for the table loading. By doing so, beyond the fixes to the above issues, we can see additional differences comparing to the old grammar based table loading: 1. Originally, beyond the scope opening terms (AMLCode/Scope), If/Else/While wrapped code blocks under the scope creating terms (Device/power_resource/Processor/thermal_zone) are also supported as deferred MLC, which violates the spec defined grammar where object_list is enforced. With MLC support improved as non-deferred, the interpreter parses such scope creating terms as term_list rather object_list like the scope opening terms. After probing the Windows behavior and proving that it also parses these terms as term_list, we submitted an ECR (Engineering Change Request) to the ASWG (ACPI Specification Working Group) to clarify this. The ECR is titled as "ASL Grammar Clarification for Executable AML Opcodes" and has been accepted by the ASWG. The new grammar will appear in ACPI specification 6.2. 2. Originally, Buffer/Package/operation_region/create_XXXField/bank_field arguments are evaluated in a deferred way after loading the table. With MLC support improved, they are also parsed right in place during the table loading. This is also Windows compliant and the only difference is the removal of the debugging messages implemented before acpi_ds_execute_arguments(), see Link # [1] for the details. A previous commit should have ensured that acpi_check_address_range() won't regress. Note that enabling this feature may cause regressions due to long term Linux ACPI support on top of the wrong grammar. So this patch also prepares a global option to be used to roll back to the old grammar during the period between a regression is reported and the regression is root-cause-fixed. Lv Zheng. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112911 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117671 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153541 # [1] Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/issues/122 Link: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=963 Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/0e24fb67 Reported-and-tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com> Reported-by: Ehsan <dashesy@gmail.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Dutch Guy <lucht_piloot@gmx.net> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-07 14:06:54 +08:00
acpi_status
acpi_ns_one_complete_parse(u32 pass_number,
u32 table_index,
struct acpi_namespace_node *start_node)
{
union acpi_parse_object *parse_root;
acpi_status status;
u32 aml_length;
u8 *aml_start;
struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state;
struct acpi_table_header *table;
acpi_owner_id owner_id;
ACPI: ACPICA 20060421 Removed a device initialization optimization introduced in 20051216 where the _STA method was not run unless an _INI was also present for the same device. This optimization could cause problems because it could allow _INI methods to be run within a not-present device subtree (If a not-present device had no _INI, _STA would not be run, the not-present status would not be discovered, and the children of the device would be incorrectly traversed.) Implemented a new _STA optimization where namespace subtrees that do not contain _INI are identified and ignored during device initialization. Selectively running _STA can significantly improve boot time on large machines (with assistance from Len Brown.) Implemented support for the device initialization case where the returned _STA flags indicate a device not-present but functioning. In this case, _INI is not run, but the device children are examined for presence, as per the ACPI specification. Implemented an additional change to the IndexField support in order to conform to MS behavior. The value written to the Index Register is not simply a byte offset, it is a byte offset in units of the access width of the parent Index Field. (Fiodor Suietov) Defined and deployed a new OSL interface, acpi_os_validate_address(). This interface is called during the creation of all AML operation regions, and allows the host OS to exert control over what addresses it will allow the AML code to access. Operation Regions whose addresses are disallowed will cause a runtime exception when they are actually accessed (will not affect or abort table loading.) Defined and deployed a new OSL interface, acpi_os_validate_interface(). This interface allows the host OS to match the various "optional" interface/behavior strings for the _OSI predefined control method as appropriate (with assistance from Bjorn Helgaas.) Restructured and corrected various problems in the exception handling code paths within DsCallControlMethod and DsTerminateControlMethod in dsmethod (with assistance from Takayoshi Kochi.) Modified the Linux source converter to ignore quoted string literals while converting identifiers from mixed to lower case. This will correct problems with the disassembler and other areas where such strings must not be modified. The ACPI_FUNCTION_* macros no longer require quotes around the function name. This allows the Linux source converter to convert the names, now that the converter ignores quoted strings. Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2006-04-22 05:15:00 +08:00
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(ns_one_complete_parse);
ACPICA: Dispatcher: Cleanup union acpi_operand_object's AML address assignments ACPICA commit afb52611dbe7403551f93504d3798534f5c343f4 This patch cleans up the code of assigning the AML address to the union acpi_operand_object. The idea behind this cleanup is: The AML address of the union acpi_operand_object should always be determined at the point where the object is encountered. It should be started from the first byte of the object. For example, the opcode of the object, the name string of the user_term object, or the first byte of the packaged object (where a pkg_length is prefixed). So it's not cleaner to have it assigned here and there in the entire ACPICA source tree. There are some special cases for the internal opcodes, before cleaning up the internal opcodes, we should also determine the rules for the AML addresses of the internal opcodes: 1. INT_NAMEPATH_OP: the address of the first byte for the name_string. 2. INT_METHODCALL_OP: the address of the first byte for the name_string. 3. INT_BYTELIST_OP: the address of the first byte for the byte_data list. 4. INT_EVAL_SUBTREE_OP: the address of the first byte for the Region/Package/Buffer/bank_field/Field arguments. 5. INT_NAMEDFIELD_OP: the address to the name_seg. 6. INT_RESERVEDFIELD_OP: the address to the 0x00 prefix. 7. INT_ACCESSFIELD_OP: the address to the 0x01 prefix. 8. INT_CONNECTION_OP: the address to the 0x02 prefix. 9: INT_EXTACCESSFIELD_OP: the address to the 0x03 prefix. 10.INT_RETURN_VALUE_OP: the address of the replaced operand. 11.computational_data: the address to the Byte/Word/Dword/Qword/string_prefix. Before cleaning up the internal root scope of the aml_walk, turning it into the term_list, we need to remember the aml_start address as the "Aml" attribute for the union acpi_operand_object created by acpi_ps_create_scope_op(). Finally, we can delete some redundant AML address assignment in psloop.c. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/afb52611 Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-07-23 12:52:24 +08:00
status = acpi_get_table_by_index(table_index, &table);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}
/* Table must consist of at least a complete header */
if (table->length < sizeof(struct acpi_table_header)) {
return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_BAD_HEADER);
}
aml_start = (u8 *)table + sizeof(struct acpi_table_header);
aml_length = table->length - sizeof(struct acpi_table_header);
status = acpi_tb_get_owner_id(table_index, &owner_id);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}
/* Create and init a Root Node */
ACPICA: Dispatcher: Cleanup union acpi_operand_object's AML address assignments ACPICA commit afb52611dbe7403551f93504d3798534f5c343f4 This patch cleans up the code of assigning the AML address to the union acpi_operand_object. The idea behind this cleanup is: The AML address of the union acpi_operand_object should always be determined at the point where the object is encountered. It should be started from the first byte of the object. For example, the opcode of the object, the name string of the user_term object, or the first byte of the packaged object (where a pkg_length is prefixed). So it's not cleaner to have it assigned here and there in the entire ACPICA source tree. There are some special cases for the internal opcodes, before cleaning up the internal opcodes, we should also determine the rules for the AML addresses of the internal opcodes: 1. INT_NAMEPATH_OP: the address of the first byte for the name_string. 2. INT_METHODCALL_OP: the address of the first byte for the name_string. 3. INT_BYTELIST_OP: the address of the first byte for the byte_data list. 4. INT_EVAL_SUBTREE_OP: the address of the first byte for the Region/Package/Buffer/bank_field/Field arguments. 5. INT_NAMEDFIELD_OP: the address to the name_seg. 6. INT_RESERVEDFIELD_OP: the address to the 0x00 prefix. 7. INT_ACCESSFIELD_OP: the address to the 0x01 prefix. 8. INT_CONNECTION_OP: the address to the 0x02 prefix. 9: INT_EXTACCESSFIELD_OP: the address to the 0x03 prefix. 10.INT_RETURN_VALUE_OP: the address of the replaced operand. 11.computational_data: the address to the Byte/Word/Dword/Qword/string_prefix. Before cleaning up the internal root scope of the aml_walk, turning it into the term_list, we need to remember the aml_start address as the "Aml" attribute for the union acpi_operand_object created by acpi_ps_create_scope_op(). Finally, we can delete some redundant AML address assignment in psloop.c. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/afb52611 Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-07-23 12:52:24 +08:00
parse_root = acpi_ps_create_scope_op(aml_start);
if (!parse_root) {
return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NO_MEMORY);
}
/* Create and initialize a new walk state */
walk_state = acpi_ds_create_walk_state(owner_id, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (!walk_state) {
acpi_ps_free_op(parse_root);
return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NO_MEMORY);
}
ACPICA: Dispatcher: Cleanup union acpi_operand_object's AML address assignments ACPICA commit afb52611dbe7403551f93504d3798534f5c343f4 This patch cleans up the code of assigning the AML address to the union acpi_operand_object. The idea behind this cleanup is: The AML address of the union acpi_operand_object should always be determined at the point where the object is encountered. It should be started from the first byte of the object. For example, the opcode of the object, the name string of the user_term object, or the first byte of the packaged object (where a pkg_length is prefixed). So it's not cleaner to have it assigned here and there in the entire ACPICA source tree. There are some special cases for the internal opcodes, before cleaning up the internal opcodes, we should also determine the rules for the AML addresses of the internal opcodes: 1. INT_NAMEPATH_OP: the address of the first byte for the name_string. 2. INT_METHODCALL_OP: the address of the first byte for the name_string. 3. INT_BYTELIST_OP: the address of the first byte for the byte_data list. 4. INT_EVAL_SUBTREE_OP: the address of the first byte for the Region/Package/Buffer/bank_field/Field arguments. 5. INT_NAMEDFIELD_OP: the address to the name_seg. 6. INT_RESERVEDFIELD_OP: the address to the 0x00 prefix. 7. INT_ACCESSFIELD_OP: the address to the 0x01 prefix. 8. INT_CONNECTION_OP: the address to the 0x02 prefix. 9: INT_EXTACCESSFIELD_OP: the address to the 0x03 prefix. 10.INT_RETURN_VALUE_OP: the address of the replaced operand. 11.computational_data: the address to the Byte/Word/Dword/Qword/string_prefix. Before cleaning up the internal root scope of the aml_walk, turning it into the term_list, we need to remember the aml_start address as the "Aml" attribute for the union acpi_operand_object created by acpi_ps_create_scope_op(). Finally, we can delete some redundant AML address assignment in psloop.c. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/afb52611 Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-07-23 12:52:24 +08:00
status = acpi_ds_init_aml_walk(walk_state, parse_root, NULL,
aml_start, aml_length, NULL,
(u8)pass_number);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
acpi_ds_delete_walk_state(walk_state);
ACPICA: Dispatcher: Cleanup union acpi_operand_object's AML address assignments ACPICA commit afb52611dbe7403551f93504d3798534f5c343f4 This patch cleans up the code of assigning the AML address to the union acpi_operand_object. The idea behind this cleanup is: The AML address of the union acpi_operand_object should always be determined at the point where the object is encountered. It should be started from the first byte of the object. For example, the opcode of the object, the name string of the user_term object, or the first byte of the packaged object (where a pkg_length is prefixed). So it's not cleaner to have it assigned here and there in the entire ACPICA source tree. There are some special cases for the internal opcodes, before cleaning up the internal opcodes, we should also determine the rules for the AML addresses of the internal opcodes: 1. INT_NAMEPATH_OP: the address of the first byte for the name_string. 2. INT_METHODCALL_OP: the address of the first byte for the name_string. 3. INT_BYTELIST_OP: the address of the first byte for the byte_data list. 4. INT_EVAL_SUBTREE_OP: the address of the first byte for the Region/Package/Buffer/bank_field/Field arguments. 5. INT_NAMEDFIELD_OP: the address to the name_seg. 6. INT_RESERVEDFIELD_OP: the address to the 0x00 prefix. 7. INT_ACCESSFIELD_OP: the address to the 0x01 prefix. 8. INT_CONNECTION_OP: the address to the 0x02 prefix. 9: INT_EXTACCESSFIELD_OP: the address to the 0x03 prefix. 10.INT_RETURN_VALUE_OP: the address of the replaced operand. 11.computational_data: the address to the Byte/Word/Dword/Qword/string_prefix. Before cleaning up the internal root scope of the aml_walk, turning it into the term_list, we need to remember the aml_start address as the "Aml" attribute for the union acpi_operand_object created by acpi_ps_create_scope_op(). Finally, we can delete some redundant AML address assignment in psloop.c. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/afb52611 Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-07-23 12:52:24 +08:00
goto cleanup;
}
/* Found OSDT table, enable the namespace override feature */
if (ACPI_COMPARE_NAMESEG(table->signature, ACPI_SIG_OSDT) &&
pass_number == ACPI_IMODE_LOAD_PASS1) {
walk_state->namespace_override = TRUE;
}
/* start_node is the default location to load the table */
if (start_node && start_node != acpi_gbl_root_node) {
status =
acpi_ds_scope_stack_push(start_node, ACPI_TYPE_METHOD,
walk_state);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
acpi_ds_delete_walk_state(walk_state);
goto cleanup;
}
}
/* Parse the AML */
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_PARSE,
"*PARSE* pass %u parse\n", pass_number));
ACPICA: Namespace: Fix dynamic table loading issues ACPICA commit 767ee53354e0c4b7e8e7c57c6dd7bf569f0d52bb There are issues related to the namespace/interpreter locks, which causes several ACPI functionalities not specification compliant. The lock issues were detectec when we were trying to fix the functionalities (please see Link # [1] for the details). What's the lock issues? Let's first look into the namespace/interpreter lock usages inside of the object evaluation and the table loading which are the key AML interpretion code paths: Table loading: acpi_ns_load_table L(Namespace) acpi_ns_parse_table acpi_ns_one_complete_parse(LOAD_PASS1/LOAD_PASS2) acpi_ds_load1_begion_op acpi_ds_load1_end_op acpi_ds_load2_begion_op acpi_ds_load2_end_op U(Namespace) Object evaluation: acpi_ns_evaluate L(Interpreter) acpi_ps_execute_method acpi_ds_exec_begin_op acpi_ds_exec_end_op U(Interpreter) acpi_ns_load_table L(Namespace) U(Namespace) acpi_ev_initialize_region L(Namespace) U(Namespace) address_space.Setup address_space.Handler acpi_os_wait_semaphore acpi_os_acquire_mutex acpi_os_sleep L(Interpreter) U(Interpreter) L(Interpreter) acpi_ex_resolve_node_to_value U(Interpreter) acpi_ns_check_return_value Where: 1. L(Interpreter) means acquire(MTX_INTERPRETER); 2. U(Interpreter) means release(MTX_INTERPRETER); 3. L(Namespace) means acquire(MTX_NAMESPACE); 4. U(Namespace) means release(MTX_NAMESPACE); We can see that acpi_ns_exec_module_code() (which invokes acpi_ns_evaluate) is implemented in a deferred way just in order to avoid to reacquire the namespace lock. This is in fact the root cause of many other ACPICA issues: 1. We now know for sure that the module code should be executed right in place by the Windows AML interpreter. So in the current design, if the region initializations/accesses or the table loadings (where the namespace surely should be locked again) happening during the table loading period, dead lock could happen because ACPICA never unlocks the namespace during the AML interpretion. 2. ACPICA interpreter just ensures that all static namespace nodes (named objects created during the acpi_load_tables()) are created (acpi_ns_lookup()) with the correct lock held, but doesn't ensure that the named objects created by the control method are created with the same correct lock held. It requires the control methods to be executed in a serial way after "loading a table", that's why ACPICA requires method auto serialization. This patch fixes these software design issues by extending interpreter enter/exit APIs to hold both interpreter/namespace locks to ensure the lock order correctness, so that we can get these code paths: Table loading: acpi_ns_load_table E(Interpreter) acpi_ns_parse_table acpi_ns_one_complete_parse acpi_ns_execute_table X(Interpreter) acpi_ns_load_table acpi_ev_initialize_region address_space.Setup address_space.Handler acpi_os_wait_semaphore acpi_os_acquire_mutex acpi_os_sleep E(Interpreter) X(Interpreter) Object evaluation: acpi_ns_evaluate E(Interpreter) acpi_ps_execute_method X(Interpreter) acpi_ns_load_table acpi_ev_initialize_region address_space.Setup address_space.Handler acpi_os_wait_semaphore acpi_os_acquire_mutex acpi_os_sleep E(Interpreter) X(Interpreter) Where: 1. E(Interpreter) means acquire(MTX_INTERPRETER, MTX_NAMESPACE); 2. X(Interpreter) means release(MTX_NAMESPACE, MTX_INTERPRETER); After this change, we can see: 1. All namespace nodes creations are locked by the namespace lock. 2. All namespace nodes referencing are locked with the same lock. 3. But we also can notice a defact that, all namespace nodes deletions could be affected by this change. As a consequence, acpi_ns_delete_namespace_subtree() may delete a static namespace node that is still referenced by the interpreter (for example, the parser scopes). Currently, we needn't worry about the last defact because in ACPICA, table unloading is not fully functioning, its design strictly relies on the fact that when the namespace deletion happens, either the AML table or the OSPMs should have been notified and thus either the AML table or the OSPMs shouldn't reference deletion-related namespace nodes during the namespace deletion. And this change still works with the above restrictions applied. While making this a-step-forward helps us to correct the wrong grammar to pull many things back to the correct rail. And pulling things back to the correct rail in return makes it possible for us to support fully functioning table unloading after doing many cleanups. While this patch is generated, all namespace locks are examined to ensure that they can meet either of the following pattens: 1. L(Namespace) U(Namespace) 2. E(Interpreter) X(Interpreter) 3. E(Interpreter) X(Interpreter) L(Namespace) U(Namespace) E(Interpreter) X(Interpreter) We ensure this by adding X(Interpreter)/E(Interpreter) or removing U(Namespace)/L(Namespace) for those currently are executed in the following order: E(Interpreter) L(Namespace) U(Namespace) X(Interpreter) And adding E(Interpreter)/X(Interpreter) for those currently are executed in the following order: X(Interpreter) E(Interpreter) Originally, the interpreter lock is held for the execution AML opcodes, the namespace lock is held for the named object creation AML opcodes. Since they are actually same in MS interpreter (can all be executed during the table loading), we can combine the 2 locks and tune the locking code better in this way. Lv Zheng. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153541 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121701 # [1] Link: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1323 Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/767ee533 Reported-and-tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Greg White <gwhite@kupulau.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Dutch Guy <lucht_piloot@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-07 14:07:10 +08:00
acpi_ex_enter_interpreter();
status = acpi_ps_parse_aml(walk_state);
ACPICA: Namespace: Fix dynamic table loading issues ACPICA commit 767ee53354e0c4b7e8e7c57c6dd7bf569f0d52bb There are issues related to the namespace/interpreter locks, which causes several ACPI functionalities not specification compliant. The lock issues were detectec when we were trying to fix the functionalities (please see Link # [1] for the details). What's the lock issues? Let's first look into the namespace/interpreter lock usages inside of the object evaluation and the table loading which are the key AML interpretion code paths: Table loading: acpi_ns_load_table L(Namespace) acpi_ns_parse_table acpi_ns_one_complete_parse(LOAD_PASS1/LOAD_PASS2) acpi_ds_load1_begion_op acpi_ds_load1_end_op acpi_ds_load2_begion_op acpi_ds_load2_end_op U(Namespace) Object evaluation: acpi_ns_evaluate L(Interpreter) acpi_ps_execute_method acpi_ds_exec_begin_op acpi_ds_exec_end_op U(Interpreter) acpi_ns_load_table L(Namespace) U(Namespace) acpi_ev_initialize_region L(Namespace) U(Namespace) address_space.Setup address_space.Handler acpi_os_wait_semaphore acpi_os_acquire_mutex acpi_os_sleep L(Interpreter) U(Interpreter) L(Interpreter) acpi_ex_resolve_node_to_value U(Interpreter) acpi_ns_check_return_value Where: 1. L(Interpreter) means acquire(MTX_INTERPRETER); 2. U(Interpreter) means release(MTX_INTERPRETER); 3. L(Namespace) means acquire(MTX_NAMESPACE); 4. U(Namespace) means release(MTX_NAMESPACE); We can see that acpi_ns_exec_module_code() (which invokes acpi_ns_evaluate) is implemented in a deferred way just in order to avoid to reacquire the namespace lock. This is in fact the root cause of many other ACPICA issues: 1. We now know for sure that the module code should be executed right in place by the Windows AML interpreter. So in the current design, if the region initializations/accesses or the table loadings (where the namespace surely should be locked again) happening during the table loading period, dead lock could happen because ACPICA never unlocks the namespace during the AML interpretion. 2. ACPICA interpreter just ensures that all static namespace nodes (named objects created during the acpi_load_tables()) are created (acpi_ns_lookup()) with the correct lock held, but doesn't ensure that the named objects created by the control method are created with the same correct lock held. It requires the control methods to be executed in a serial way after "loading a table", that's why ACPICA requires method auto serialization. This patch fixes these software design issues by extending interpreter enter/exit APIs to hold both interpreter/namespace locks to ensure the lock order correctness, so that we can get these code paths: Table loading: acpi_ns_load_table E(Interpreter) acpi_ns_parse_table acpi_ns_one_complete_parse acpi_ns_execute_table X(Interpreter) acpi_ns_load_table acpi_ev_initialize_region address_space.Setup address_space.Handler acpi_os_wait_semaphore acpi_os_acquire_mutex acpi_os_sleep E(Interpreter) X(Interpreter) Object evaluation: acpi_ns_evaluate E(Interpreter) acpi_ps_execute_method X(Interpreter) acpi_ns_load_table acpi_ev_initialize_region address_space.Setup address_space.Handler acpi_os_wait_semaphore acpi_os_acquire_mutex acpi_os_sleep E(Interpreter) X(Interpreter) Where: 1. E(Interpreter) means acquire(MTX_INTERPRETER, MTX_NAMESPACE); 2. X(Interpreter) means release(MTX_NAMESPACE, MTX_INTERPRETER); After this change, we can see: 1. All namespace nodes creations are locked by the namespace lock. 2. All namespace nodes referencing are locked with the same lock. 3. But we also can notice a defact that, all namespace nodes deletions could be affected by this change. As a consequence, acpi_ns_delete_namespace_subtree() may delete a static namespace node that is still referenced by the interpreter (for example, the parser scopes). Currently, we needn't worry about the last defact because in ACPICA, table unloading is not fully functioning, its design strictly relies on the fact that when the namespace deletion happens, either the AML table or the OSPMs should have been notified and thus either the AML table or the OSPMs shouldn't reference deletion-related namespace nodes during the namespace deletion. And this change still works with the above restrictions applied. While making this a-step-forward helps us to correct the wrong grammar to pull many things back to the correct rail. And pulling things back to the correct rail in return makes it possible for us to support fully functioning table unloading after doing many cleanups. While this patch is generated, all namespace locks are examined to ensure that they can meet either of the following pattens: 1. L(Namespace) U(Namespace) 2. E(Interpreter) X(Interpreter) 3. E(Interpreter) X(Interpreter) L(Namespace) U(Namespace) E(Interpreter) X(Interpreter) We ensure this by adding X(Interpreter)/E(Interpreter) or removing U(Namespace)/L(Namespace) for those currently are executed in the following order: E(Interpreter) L(Namespace) U(Namespace) X(Interpreter) And adding E(Interpreter)/X(Interpreter) for those currently are executed in the following order: X(Interpreter) E(Interpreter) Originally, the interpreter lock is held for the execution AML opcodes, the namespace lock is held for the named object creation AML opcodes. Since they are actually same in MS interpreter (can all be executed during the table loading), we can combine the 2 locks and tune the locking code better in this way. Lv Zheng. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153541 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121701 # [1] Link: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1323 Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/767ee533 Reported-and-tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Greg White <gwhite@kupulau.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Dutch Guy <lucht_piloot@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-07 14:07:10 +08:00
acpi_ex_exit_interpreter();
cleanup:
acpi_ps_delete_parse_tree(parse_root);
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}
/*******************************************************************************
*
* FUNCTION: acpi_ns_parse_table
*
* PARAMETERS: table_desc - An ACPI table descriptor for table to parse
* start_node - Where to enter the table into the namespace
*
* RETURN: Status
*
* DESCRIPTION: Parse AML within an ACPI table and return a tree of ops
*
******************************************************************************/
acpi_status
acpi_ns_parse_table(u32 table_index, struct acpi_namespace_node *start_node)
{
acpi_status status;
ACPI: ACPICA 20060421 Removed a device initialization optimization introduced in 20051216 where the _STA method was not run unless an _INI was also present for the same device. This optimization could cause problems because it could allow _INI methods to be run within a not-present device subtree (If a not-present device had no _INI, _STA would not be run, the not-present status would not be discovered, and the children of the device would be incorrectly traversed.) Implemented a new _STA optimization where namespace subtrees that do not contain _INI are identified and ignored during device initialization. Selectively running _STA can significantly improve boot time on large machines (with assistance from Len Brown.) Implemented support for the device initialization case where the returned _STA flags indicate a device not-present but functioning. In this case, _INI is not run, but the device children are examined for presence, as per the ACPI specification. Implemented an additional change to the IndexField support in order to conform to MS behavior. The value written to the Index Register is not simply a byte offset, it is a byte offset in units of the access width of the parent Index Field. (Fiodor Suietov) Defined and deployed a new OSL interface, acpi_os_validate_address(). This interface is called during the creation of all AML operation regions, and allows the host OS to exert control over what addresses it will allow the AML code to access. Operation Regions whose addresses are disallowed will cause a runtime exception when they are actually accessed (will not affect or abort table loading.) Defined and deployed a new OSL interface, acpi_os_validate_interface(). This interface allows the host OS to match the various "optional" interface/behavior strings for the _OSI predefined control method as appropriate (with assistance from Bjorn Helgaas.) Restructured and corrected various problems in the exception handling code paths within DsCallControlMethod and DsTerminateControlMethod in dsmethod (with assistance from Takayoshi Kochi.) Modified the Linux source converter to ignore quoted string literals while converting identifiers from mixed to lower case. This will correct problems with the disassembler and other areas where such strings must not be modified. The ACPI_FUNCTION_* macros no longer require quotes around the function name. This allows the Linux source converter to convert the names, now that the converter ignores quoted strings. Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2006-04-22 05:15:00 +08:00
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(ns_parse_table);
ACPICA: Remove legacy module-level code support ACPICA commit 47f5607c204719d9239a12b889df725225098c8f Module-level code refers to executable ASL code that runs during table load. This is typically used in ASL to declare named objects based on a condition evaluated during table load like so: definition_block(...) { opreation_region (OPR1, system_memory, ...) Field (OPR1) { FLD1, 8 /* Assume that FLD1's value is 0x1 */ } /* The if statement below is referred to as module-level code */ If (FLD1) { /* Declare DEV1 conditionally */ Device (DEV1) {...} } Device (DEV2) { ... } } In legacy module-level code, the execution of the If statement was deferred after other modules were loaded. The order of code execution for the table above is the following: 1.) Load OPR1 to the ACPI Namespace 2.) Load FLD1 to the ACPI Namespace (not intended for drivers) 3.) Load DEV2 to the ACPI Namespace 4.) Execute If (FLD1) and load DEV1 if the condition is true This legacy approach can be problematic for tables that look like the following: definition_block(...) { opreation_region (OPR1, system_memory, ...) Field (OPR1) { FLD1, 8 /* Assume that FLD1's value is 0x1 */ } /* The if statement below is referred to as module-level code */ If (FLD1) { /* Declare DEV1 conditionally */ Device (DEV1) {...} } Scope (DEV1) { /* Add objects DEV1's scope */ Name (OBJ1, 0x1234) } } When loading this in the legacy approach, Scope DEV1 gets evaluated before the If statement. The following is the order of execution: 1.) Load OPR1 to the ACPI Namespace 2.) Load FLD1 to the ACPI Namespace (not intended for drivers) 3.) Add OBJ1 under DEV1's scope -- ERROR. DEV1 does not exist 4.) Execute If (FLD1) and load DEV1 if the condition is true The legacy approach can never succeed for tables like this due to the deferral of the module-level code. Due to this limitation, a new module-level code was developed. This new approach exeutes if statements in the order that they appear in the definition block. With this approach, the order of execution for the above defintion block is as follows: 1.) Load OPR1 to the ACPI Namespace 2.) Load FLD1 to the ACPI Namespace (not intended for drivers) 3.) Execute If (FLD1) and load DEV1 because the condition is true 4.) Add OBJ1 under DEV1's scope. Since DEV1 is loaded in the namespace in step 3, step 4 executes successfully. This change removes support for the legacy module-level code execution. From this point onward, the new module-level code execution will be the official approach. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/47f5607c Signed-off-by: Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-02-16 05:36:06 +08:00
/*
* Executes the AML table as one large control method.
* The point of this is to execute any module-level code in-place
* as the table is parsed. Some AML code depends on this behavior.
*
* Note: This causes the table to only have a single-pass parse.
* However, this is compatible with other ACPI implementations.
*/
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT_RAW((ACPI_DB_PARSE,
"%s: **** Start table execution pass\n",
ACPI_GET_FUNCTION_NAME));
ACPICA: Interpreter: Fix MLC issues by switching to new term_list grammar for table loading ACPICA commit 0e24fb67cde08d7df7671d7d7b183490dc79707e The MLC (Module Level Code) is an ACPICA terminology describing the AML code out of any control method, its support is an indication of the interpreter behavior during the table loading. The original implementation of MLC in ACPICA had several issues: 1. Out of any control method, besides of the object creating opcodes, only the code blocks wrapped by "If/Else/While" opcodes were supported. 2. The supported MLC code blocks were executed after loading the table rather than being executed right in place. ============================================================ The demo of this order issue is as follows: Name (OBJ1, 1) If (CND1 == 1) { Name (OBJ2, 2) } Name (OBJ3, 3) The original MLC support created OBJ2 after OBJ3's creation. ============================================================ Other than these limitations, MLC support in ACPICA looks correct. And supporting this should be easy/natural for ACPICA, but enabling of this was blocked by some ACPICA internal and OSPM specific initialization order issues we've fixed recently. The wrong support started from the following false bug fixing commit: Commit: 7f0c826a437157d2b19662977e9cf3b472cf24a6 Subject: ACPICA: Add support for module-level executable AML code Commit: 9a884ab64a4d092b4c3bf24fd9a30f7fbd4591e7 Subject: ACPICA: Add additional module-level code support ... We can confirm Windows interpreter behavior via reverse engineering means. It can be proven that not only If/Else/While wrapped code blocks, all opcodes can be executed at the module level, including operation region accesses. And it can be proven that the MLC should be executed right in place, not in such a deferred way executed after loading the table. And the above facts indeed reflect the spec words around ACPI definition block tables (DSDT/SSDT/...), the entire table and the Scope object is defined by the AML specification in BNF style as: AMLCode := def_block_header term_list def_scope := scope_op pkg_length name_string term_list The bodies of the scope opening terms (AMLCode/Scope) are all term_list, thus the table loading should be no difference than the control method evaluations as the body of the Method is also defined by the AML specification as term_list: def_method := method_op pkg_length name_string method_flags term_list The only difference is: after evaluating control method, created named objects may be freed due to no reference, while named objects created by the table loading should only be freed after unloading the table. So this patch follows the spec and the de-facto standard behavior, enables the new grammar (term_list) for the table loading. By doing so, beyond the fixes to the above issues, we can see additional differences comparing to the old grammar based table loading: 1. Originally, beyond the scope opening terms (AMLCode/Scope), If/Else/While wrapped code blocks under the scope creating terms (Device/power_resource/Processor/thermal_zone) are also supported as deferred MLC, which violates the spec defined grammar where object_list is enforced. With MLC support improved as non-deferred, the interpreter parses such scope creating terms as term_list rather object_list like the scope opening terms. After probing the Windows behavior and proving that it also parses these terms as term_list, we submitted an ECR (Engineering Change Request) to the ASWG (ACPI Specification Working Group) to clarify this. The ECR is titled as "ASL Grammar Clarification for Executable AML Opcodes" and has been accepted by the ASWG. The new grammar will appear in ACPI specification 6.2. 2. Originally, Buffer/Package/operation_region/create_XXXField/bank_field arguments are evaluated in a deferred way after loading the table. With MLC support improved, they are also parsed right in place during the table loading. This is also Windows compliant and the only difference is the removal of the debugging messages implemented before acpi_ds_execute_arguments(), see Link # [1] for the details. A previous commit should have ensured that acpi_check_address_range() won't regress. Note that enabling this feature may cause regressions due to long term Linux ACPI support on top of the wrong grammar. So this patch also prepares a global option to be used to roll back to the old grammar during the period between a regression is reported and the regression is root-cause-fixed. Lv Zheng. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112911 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117671 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153541 # [1] Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/issues/122 Link: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=963 Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/0e24fb67 Reported-and-tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com> Reported-by: Ehsan <dashesy@gmail.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Dutch Guy <lucht_piloot@gmx.net> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-07 14:06:54 +08:00
ACPICA: Remove legacy module-level code support ACPICA commit 47f5607c204719d9239a12b889df725225098c8f Module-level code refers to executable ASL code that runs during table load. This is typically used in ASL to declare named objects based on a condition evaluated during table load like so: definition_block(...) { opreation_region (OPR1, system_memory, ...) Field (OPR1) { FLD1, 8 /* Assume that FLD1's value is 0x1 */ } /* The if statement below is referred to as module-level code */ If (FLD1) { /* Declare DEV1 conditionally */ Device (DEV1) {...} } Device (DEV2) { ... } } In legacy module-level code, the execution of the If statement was deferred after other modules were loaded. The order of code execution for the table above is the following: 1.) Load OPR1 to the ACPI Namespace 2.) Load FLD1 to the ACPI Namespace (not intended for drivers) 3.) Load DEV2 to the ACPI Namespace 4.) Execute If (FLD1) and load DEV1 if the condition is true This legacy approach can be problematic for tables that look like the following: definition_block(...) { opreation_region (OPR1, system_memory, ...) Field (OPR1) { FLD1, 8 /* Assume that FLD1's value is 0x1 */ } /* The if statement below is referred to as module-level code */ If (FLD1) { /* Declare DEV1 conditionally */ Device (DEV1) {...} } Scope (DEV1) { /* Add objects DEV1's scope */ Name (OBJ1, 0x1234) } } When loading this in the legacy approach, Scope DEV1 gets evaluated before the If statement. The following is the order of execution: 1.) Load OPR1 to the ACPI Namespace 2.) Load FLD1 to the ACPI Namespace (not intended for drivers) 3.) Add OBJ1 under DEV1's scope -- ERROR. DEV1 does not exist 4.) Execute If (FLD1) and load DEV1 if the condition is true The legacy approach can never succeed for tables like this due to the deferral of the module-level code. Due to this limitation, a new module-level code was developed. This new approach exeutes if statements in the order that they appear in the definition block. With this approach, the order of execution for the above defintion block is as follows: 1.) Load OPR1 to the ACPI Namespace 2.) Load FLD1 to the ACPI Namespace (not intended for drivers) 3.) Execute If (FLD1) and load DEV1 because the condition is true 4.) Add OBJ1 under DEV1's scope. Since DEV1 is loaded in the namespace in step 3, step 4 executes successfully. This change removes support for the legacy module-level code execution. From this point onward, the new module-level code execution will be the official approach. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/47f5607c Signed-off-by: Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-02-16 05:36:06 +08:00
status = acpi_ns_execute_table(table_index, start_node);
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}