2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-21 19:53:59 +08:00
linux-next/tools/perf/util/path.c

53 lines
1005 B
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* I'm tired of doing "vsnprintf()" etc just to open a
* file, so here's a "return static buffer with printf"
* interface for paths.
*
* It's obviously not thread-safe. Sue me. But it's quite
* useful for doing things like
*
* f = open(mkpath("%s/%s.perf", base, name), O_RDONLY);
*
* which is what it's designed for.
*/
#include "cache.h"
#include "util.h"
#include <limits.h>
static char bad_path[] = "/bad-path/";
/*
* One hack:
*/
static char *get_pathname(void)
{
static char pathname_array[4][PATH_MAX];
perf: Enable more compiler warnings Related to a shadowed variable bug fix Valdis Kletnieks noticed that perf does not get built with -Wshadow, which could have helped us avoid the bug. So enable -Wshadow and also enable the following warnings on perf builds, in addition to the already enabled -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu99 warnings: -Wcast-align -Wformat=2 -Wshadow -Winit-self -Wpacked -Wredundant-decls -Wstack-protector -Wstrict-aliasing=3 -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum -Wno-system-headers -Wundef -Wvolatile-register-var -Wwrite-strings -Wbad-function-cast -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement And change/fix the perf code to build cleanly under GCC 4.3.2. The list of warnings enablement is rather arbitrary: it's based on my (quick) reading of the GCC manpages and trying them on perf. I categorized the warnings based on individually enabling them and looking whether they trigger something in the perf build. If i liked those warnings (i.e. if they trigger for something that arguably could be improved) i enabled the warning. If the warnings seemed to come from language laywers spamming the build with tons of nuisance warnings i generally kept them off. Most of the sign conversion related warnings were in this category. (A second patch enabling some of the sign warnings might be welcome - sign bugs can be nasty.) I also kept warnings that seem to make sense from their manpage description and which produced no actual warnings on our code base. These warnings might still be turned off if they end up being a nuisance. I also left out a few warnings that are not supported in older compilers. [ Note that these changes might break the build on older compilers i did not test, or on non-x86 architectures that produce different warnings, so more testing would be welcome. ] Reported-by: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-08-15 18:26:57 +08:00
static int idx;
return pathname_array[3 & ++idx];
}
static char *cleanup_path(char *path)
{
/* Clean it up */
if (!memcmp(path, "./", 2)) {
path += 2;
while (*path == '/')
path++;
}
return path;
}
char *mkpath(const char *fmt, ...)
{
va_list args;
unsigned len;
char *pathname = get_pathname();
va_start(args, fmt);
len = vsnprintf(pathname, PATH_MAX, fmt, args);
va_end(args);
if (len >= PATH_MAX)
return bad_path;
return cleanup_path(pathname);
}