u-boot/board/advantech/dms-ba16
Masahiro Yamada b75d8dc564 treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle
The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst)
clearly says:

  It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers.

Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make
headers self-contained.

Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header:

  void foo(bd_t *bd);

This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined.

To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h>

  #include <asm/u-boot.h>
  void foo(bd_t *bd);

Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly.

If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward
declaration as follows:

  struct bd_info;
  void foo(struct bd_info *bd);

Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake.

I used coccinelle to generate this commit.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

  <smpl>
  @@
  typedef bd_t;
  @@
  -bd_t
  +struct bd_info
  </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
2020-07-17 09:30:13 -04:00
..
clocks.cfg arm: imx: Add support for Advantech DMS-BA16 board 2016-09-06 18:22:48 +02:00
ddr-setup.cfg arm: imx: Add support for Advantech DMS-BA16 board 2016-09-06 18:22:48 +02:00
dms-ba16_1g.cfg doc: update reference to README.imximage 2020-04-16 23:06:54 -04:00
dms-ba16_2g.cfg doc: update reference to README.imximage 2020-04-16 23:06:54 -04:00
dms-ba16.c treewide: convert bd_t to struct bd_info by coccinelle 2020-07-17 09:30:13 -04:00
Kconfig arm: imx: Add support for Advantech DMS-BA16 board 2016-09-06 18:22:48 +02:00
MAINTAINERS arm: imx: Add support for Advantech DMS-BA16 board 2016-09-06 18:22:48 +02:00
Makefile SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style 2018-05-07 09:34:12 -04:00
micron-1g.cfg arm: imx: Add support for Advantech DMS-BA16 board 2016-09-06 18:22:48 +02:00
samsung-2g.cfg arm: imx: Add support for Advantech DMS-BA16 board 2016-09-06 18:22:48 +02:00