mirror of
https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot.git
synced 2024-11-24 20:54:24 +08:00
lib: rsa: take spl/non-spl into account when building rsa_verify_with_pkey()
Right now in multiple places there are only checks for the full CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY option, not split into main,spl,tpl variants. This breaks when the rsa functions get enabled for SPL, for example to verify u-boot proper from spl. So fix this by using the existing helpers to distinguis between build-steps. Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3075eb70c9
commit
447b1d7580
@ -6,5 +6,5 @@
|
||||
# Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, wd@denx.de.
|
||||
|
||||
obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)RSA_VERIFY) += rsa-verify.o rsa-checksum.o
|
||||
obj-$(CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY) += rsa-keyprop.o
|
||||
obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY) += rsa-keyprop.o
|
||||
obj-$(CONFIG_RSA_SOFTWARE_EXP) += rsa-mod-exp.o
|
||||
|
@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ out:
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FIT_SIGNATURE) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY)
|
||||
#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FIT_SIGNATURE) || CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY)
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* rsa_verify_key() - Verify a signature against some data using RSA Key
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static int rsa_verify_key(struct image_sign_info *info,
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY
|
||||
#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY)
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* rsa_verify_with_pkey() - Verify a signature against some data using
|
||||
* only modulus and exponent as RSA key properties.
|
||||
@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ int rsa_verify(struct image_sign_info *info,
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY) && !info->fdt_blob) {
|
||||
if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY) && !info->fdt_blob) {
|
||||
/* don't rely on fdt properties */
|
||||
ret = rsa_verify_with_pkey(info, hash, sig, sig_len);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user