All pending tokens are already serialized correctly and will be handled
when the mount unit is done.
Without this a 'daemon-reload' cancels all pending tokens. Any process
waiting for the mount will continue with EHOSTDOWN.
This can happen when the mount unit waits for it's dependencies, e.g.
network, devices, fsck, etc.
This is important if a job was queued for a unit but not yet started.
Without this, the job will be canceled and is never executed even though
IgnoreOnIsolate it set to 'true'.
As suggested by @mbiebl we already use the "!" special char in unit file
assignments for negation, hence we should not use it in a different context for
privileged execution. Let's use "+" instead.
To "search something", in the meaning of looking for it, is valid,
but "search _for_ something" is much more commonly used, especially when
the meaning could be confused with "looking _through_ something"
(for some other object).
(C.f. "the police search a person", "the police search for a person".)
Also reword the rest of the paragraph to avoid using "automatically"
three times.
"strict versioned dependency" suggests that version "231" of the library
is stable. But the ABI or API might be changed in any patch, so reword
the text to avoid using "version".
Not as many people use chroot as before, so make the flow a bit nicer by
talking less about chroot.
"change to the either" is awkward and unclear. Just remove that part,
because all changes are lost, period.
User expectations are broken when "systemctl enable /some/path/service.service"
behaves differently to "systemctl link ..." followed by "systemctl enable".
From user's POV, "enable" with the full path just combines the two steps into
one.
Fixes#3010.
If user isolates rescue target from multi-user or graphical target (or just
starts the service), IgnoreOnIsolate will cause issues with sulogin which is
directly started on current virtual console. This patch adds necessary
Conflicts= and Before= against rescue.service.
Note that this is not needed for emergency target, as implicit Requires= and
After= against sysinit.target is in effect for this service
(DefaultDependencies=yes).
Before this patch, a service file with ReadWriteDirectories=/file...
could fail if the file exists but is not a mountpoint, despite being
listed in /proc/self/mountinfo. It could happen with masked mounts.
Fixes https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3793
Clarify that "systemctl enable" can operate either on unit names or on unit
file paths (also, adjust the --help text to clarify this). Say that "systemctl
enable" on unit file paths also links the unit into the search path.
Many other fixes.
This should improve the documentation to avoid further confusion around #3706.
Let's not mention the supposed security benefit of turning off caching. It is
really questionnable, and I#d rather not create the impression that we actually
believed turning off caching would be a good idea.
Instead, mention that Cache=no is implicit if a DNS server on the local host is
used.
Don't check inhibitors when operating remotely. The interactivity inhibitors
imply can#t be provided anyway, and the current code checks for local sessions
directly, via various sd_session_xyz() APIs, hence bypass it entirely if we
operate on remote systems.
Fixes: #3476
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/3685 introduced
/run/systemd/inaccessible/{chr,blk} to map inacessible devices,
this patch allows systemd running inside a nspawn container to create
/run/systemd/inaccessible/{chr,blk}.
Because /run/systemd/inaccessible/{chr,blk} are devices with
major=0 and minor=0 it might be possible that these devices cannot be created
so we use /run/systemd/inaccessible/sock instead to map them.
To remove the hard dependency on systemd, for packages, which function
without a running systemd the %systemd_ordering macro can be used to
ensure ordering in the rpm transaction. %systemd_ordering makes sure,
the systemd rpm is installed prior to the package, so the %pre/%post
scripts can execute the systemd parts.
Installing systemd afterwards though, does not result in the same outcome.
As it turns out 512 is max number of tasks per service is hit by too many
applications, hence let's bump it a bit, and make it relative to the system's
maximum number of PIDs. With this change the new default is 15%. At the
kernel's default pids_max value of 32768 this translates to 4915. At machined's
default TasksMax= setting of 16384 this translates to 2457.
Why 15%? Because it sounds like a round number and is close enough to 4096
which I was going for, i.e. an eight-fold increase over the old 512
Summary:
| on the host | in a container
old default | 512 | 512
new default | 4915 | 2457
Let's change from a fixed value of 12288 tasks per user to a relative value of
33%, which with the kernel's default of 32768 translates to 10813. This is a
slight decrease of the limit, for no other reason than "33%" sounding like a nice
round number that is close enough to 12288 (which would translate to 37.5%).
(Well, it also has the nice effect of still leaving a bit of room in the PID
space if there are 3 cooperating evil users that try to consume all PIDs...
Also, I like my bikesheds blue).
Since the new value is taken relative, and machined's TasksMax= setting
defaults to 16384, 33% inside of containers is usually equivalent to 5406,
which should still be ample space.
To summarize:
| on the host | in the container
old default | 12288 | 12288
new default | 10813 | 5406
That way, we can neatly keep this in line with the new TasksMaxScale= option.
Note that we didn't release a version with MemoryLimitByPhysicalMemory= yet,
hence this change should be unproblematic without breaking API.
This adds support for a TasksMax=40% syntax for specifying values relative to
the system's configured maximum number of processes. This is useful in order to
neatly subdivide the available room for tasks within containers.
