This adds a new switch try-empty-password. If set and none of PKCS#11 or
key files work, it is attempted to unlock the volume with an empty
password, before the user is asked for a password.
Usecase: an installer generates an OS image on one system, which is the
booted up for the first time in a possibly different system. The image
is encrypted using a random volume key, but an empty password. A tool
that runs on first boot then queries the user for a password to set or
enrols the volume in the TPM, removing the empty password. (Of course, in
such a scenario it is important to never reuse the installer image on
multiple systems as they all will have the same volume key, but that's a
different question.)
Let's make loading of keys a bit more automatic and define a common
place where key files can be placed. Specifically, whenever a volume of
name "foo" is attempted, search for a key file in
/etc/cryptsetup-keys.d/foo.key and /run/cryptsetup-keys.d/foo.key,
unless a key file is declared explicitly.
With this scheme we have a simple discovery in place that should make it
more straightfoward wher to place keys, and requires no explicit
configuration to be used.
This is useful when the key file is acquired dynamically in some form
and should be erased after use.
Note that this code tries to be robust, and removes the key file both on
success and on failure.
It annoyed me for quite a while that running "journalctl --file=…" on a
file that is not readable failed with a "File not found" error instead
of a permission error. Let's fix that.
We make this work by using the GLOB_NOCHECK flag for glob() which means
that files are not accessible will be returned in the array as they are
instead of being filtered away. This then means that our later attemps
to open the files will fail cleanly with a good error message.
sd-network: DHCPv6 - add support to send userclass option
21.15. User Class Option
The User Class option is used by a client to identify the type or
category of users or applications it represents.
The format of the User Class option is:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| OPTION_USER_CLASS | option-len |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
. .
. user-class-data .
. .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 26: User Class Option Format
option-code OPTION_USER_CLASS (15).
option-len Length of user-class-data field.
user-class-data The user classes carried by the client. The
length, in octets, is specified by
option-len.
The information contained in the data area of this option is
contained in one or more opaque fields that represent the user class
or classes of which the client is a member. A server selects
configuration information for the client based on the classes
identified in this option. For example, the User Class option can be
used to configure all clients of people in the accounting department
with a different printer than clients of people in the marketing
department. The user class information carried in this option MUST
be configurable on the client.
The data area of the User Class option MUST contain one or more
instances of user-class-data information. Each instance of
user-class-data is formatted as follows:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-...-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| user-class-len | opaque-data |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-...-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 27: Format of user-class-data Field
There's no point in caching this. Let's always get this directly from
sysfs, so that we can never get out-of-date data here (after all this is
going to be cheap, and people might overmount it or so)
Let's not cache the uname(), it's very cheap to get it, and just means
we might get out of sync with what is current. After all, the data might
change IRL, due to setarch and stuff.
This way we can take benefit of the correct block device locking we just
added.
I was thinking whether to instead pull in a regular
systemd-makefs@.service instance, but I couldn't come up with a reason
to, and thus opted for just doing the minimal patch and just replacing
the simply mkfs calls.
Fixes: #10179
Replaces: #13162
