mirror of
https://github.com/qemu/qemu.git
synced 2024-11-25 03:43:37 +08:00
65c1b5b622
This is the first step towards having fine-grained critical sections in
dataplane threads, which will resolve lock ordering problems between
address_space_* functions (which need the BQL when doing MMIO, even
after we complete RCU-based dispatch) and the AioContext.
Because AioContext does not use contention callbacks anymore, the
unit test has to be changed.
Previously applied as a0710f7995 and
then reverted.
Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1477565348-5458-19-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
141 lines
6.6 KiB
Plaintext
141 lines
6.6 KiB
Plaintext
Copyright (c) 2014 Red Hat Inc.
|
|
|
|
This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later. See
|
|
the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document explains the IOThread feature and how to write code that runs
|
|
outside the QEMU global mutex.
|
|
|
|
The main loop and IOThreads
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
QEMU is an event-driven program that can do several things at once using an
|
|
event loop. The VNC server and the QMP monitor are both processed from the
|
|
same event loop, which monitors their file descriptors until they become
|
|
readable and then invokes a callback.
|
|
|
|
The default event loop is called the main loop (see main-loop.c). It is
|
|
possible to create additional event loop threads using -object
|
|
iothread,id=my-iothread.
|
|
|
|
Side note: The main loop and IOThread are both event loops but their code is
|
|
not shared completely. Sometimes it is useful to remember that although they
|
|
are conceptually similar they are currently not interchangeable.
|
|
|
|
Why IOThreads are useful
|
|
------------------------
|
|
IOThreads allow the user to control the placement of work. The main loop is a
|
|
scalability bottleneck on hosts with many CPUs. Work can be spread across
|
|
several IOThreads instead of just one main loop. When set up correctly this
|
|
can improve I/O latency and reduce jitter seen by the guest.
|
|
|
|
The main loop is also deeply associated with the QEMU global mutex, which is a
|
|
scalability bottleneck in itself. vCPU threads and the main loop use the QEMU
|
|
global mutex to serialize execution of QEMU code. This mutex is necessary
|
|
because a lot of QEMU's code historically was not thread-safe.
|
|
|
|
The fact that all I/O processing is done in a single main loop and that the
|
|
QEMU global mutex is contended by all vCPU threads and the main loop explain
|
|
why it is desirable to place work into IOThreads.
|
|
|
|
The experimental virtio-blk data-plane implementation has been benchmarked and
|
|
shows these effects:
|
|
ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/linux/pdfs/KVM_Virtualized_IO_Performance_Paper.pdf
|
|
|
|
How to program for IOThreads
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
The main difference between legacy code and new code that can run in an
|
|
IOThread is dealing explicitly with the event loop object, AioContext
|
|
(see include/block/aio.h). Code that only works in the main loop
|
|
implicitly uses the main loop's AioContext. Code that supports running
|
|
in IOThreads must be aware of its AioContext.
|
|
|
|
AioContext supports the following services:
|
|
* File descriptor monitoring (read/write/error on POSIX hosts)
|
|
* Event notifiers (inter-thread signalling)
|
|
* Timers
|
|
* Bottom Halves (BH) deferred callbacks
|
|
|
|
There are several old APIs that use the main loop AioContext:
|
|
* LEGACY qemu_aio_set_fd_handler() - monitor a file descriptor
|
|
* LEGACY qemu_aio_set_event_notifier() - monitor an event notifier
|
|
* LEGACY timer_new_ms() - create a timer
|
|
* LEGACY qemu_bh_new() - create a BH
|
|
* LEGACY qemu_aio_wait() - run an event loop iteration
|
|
|
|
Since they implicitly work on the main loop they cannot be used in code that
|
|
runs in an IOThread. They might cause a crash or deadlock if called from an
|
|
IOThread since the QEMU global mutex is not held.
|
|
|
|
Instead, use the AioContext functions directly (see include/block/aio.h):
|
|
* aio_set_fd_handler() - monitor a file descriptor
|
|
* aio_set_event_notifier() - monitor an event notifier
|
|
* aio_timer_new() - create a timer
|
|
* aio_bh_new() - create a BH
|
|
* aio_poll() - run an event loop iteration
|
|
|
|
The AioContext can be obtained from the IOThread using
|
|
iothread_get_aio_context() or for the main loop using qemu_get_aio_context().
|
|
Code that takes an AioContext argument works both in IOThreads or the main
|
|
loop, depending on which AioContext instance the caller passes in.
|
|
|
|
How to synchronize with an IOThread
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
AioContext is not thread-safe so some rules must be followed when using file
|
|
descriptors, event notifiers, timers, or BHs across threads:
|
|
|
|
1. AioContext functions can be called safely from file descriptor, event
|
|
notifier, timer, or BH callbacks invoked by the AioContext. No locking is
|
|
necessary.
|
|
|
|
2. Other threads wishing to access the AioContext must use
|
|
aio_context_acquire()/aio_context_release() for mutual exclusion. Once the
|
|
context is acquired no other thread can access it or run event loop iterations
|
|
in this AioContext.
|
|
|
|
aio_context_acquire()/aio_context_release() calls may be nested. This
|
|
means you can call them if you're not sure whether #1 applies.
|
|
|
|
There is currently no lock ordering rule if a thread needs to acquire multiple
|
|
AioContexts simultaneously. Therefore, it is only safe for code holding the
|
|
QEMU global mutex to acquire other AioContexts.
|
|
|
|
Side note: the best way to schedule a function call across threads is to create
|
|
a BH in the target AioContext beforehand and then call qemu_bh_schedule(). No
|
|
acquire/release or locking is needed for the qemu_bh_schedule() call. But be
|
|
sure to acquire the AioContext for aio_bh_new() if necessary.
|
|
|
|
AioContext and the block layer
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
The AioContext originates from the QEMU block layer, even though nowadays
|
|
AioContext is a generic event loop that can be used by any QEMU subsystem.
|
|
|
|
The block layer has support for AioContext integrated. Each BlockDriverState
|
|
is associated with an AioContext using bdrv_set_aio_context() and
|
|
bdrv_get_aio_context(). This allows block layer code to process I/O inside the
|
|
right AioContext. Other subsystems may wish to follow a similar approach.
|
|
|
|
Block layer code must therefore expect to run in an IOThread and avoid using
|
|
old APIs that implicitly use the main loop. See the "How to program for
|
|
IOThreads" above for information on how to do that.
|
|
|
|
If main loop code such as a QMP function wishes to access a BlockDriverState
|
|
it must first call aio_context_acquire(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs)) to ensure
|
|
that callbacks in the IOThread do not run in parallel.
|
|
|
|
Code running in the monitor typically needs to ensure that past
|
|
requests from the guest are completed. When a block device is running
|
|
in an IOThread, the IOThread can also process requests from the guest
|
|
(via ioeventfd). To achieve both objects, wrap the code between
|
|
bdrv_drained_begin() and bdrv_drained_end(), thus creating a "drained
|
|
section". The functions must be called between aio_context_acquire()
|
|
and aio_context_release(). You can freely release and re-acquire the
|
|
AioContext within a drained section.
|
|
|
|
Long-running jobs (usually in the form of coroutines) are best scheduled in
|
|
the BlockDriverState's AioContext to avoid the need to acquire/release around
|
|
each bdrv_*() call. The functions bdrv_add/remove_aio_context_notifier,
|
|
or alternatively blk_add/remove_aio_context_notifier if you use BlockBackends,
|
|
can be used to get a notification whenever bdrv_set_aio_context() moves a
|
|
BlockDriverState to a different AioContext.
|