mirror of
https://github.com/qemu/qemu.git
synced 2024-11-27 05:43:47 +08:00
6bc30f1949
Stop acquiring/releasing the AioContext lock in bdrv_graph_wrlock()/bdrv_graph_unlock() since the lock no longer has any effect. The distinction between bdrv_graph_wrunlock() and bdrv_graph_wrunlock_ctx() becomes meaningless and they can be collapsed into one function. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231205182011.1976568-6-stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
282 lines
9.2 KiB
C
282 lines
9.2 KiB
C
/*
|
|
* Graph lock: rwlock to protect block layer graph manipulations (add/remove
|
|
* edges and nodes)
|
|
*
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2022 Red Hat
|
|
*
|
|
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
|
|
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
|
|
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
|
|
* version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
|
|
*
|
|
* This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
|
|
* Lesser General Public License for more details.
|
|
*
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
|
|
* License along with this library; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include "qemu/osdep.h"
|
|
#include "qemu/main-loop.h"
|
|
#include "block/graph-lock.h"
|
|
#include "block/block.h"
|
|
#include "block/block_int.h"
|
|
|
|
/* Dummy lock object to use for Thread Safety Analysis (TSA) */
|
|
BdrvGraphLock graph_lock;
|
|
|
|
/* Protects the list of aiocontext and orphaned_reader_count */
|
|
static QemuMutex aio_context_list_lock;
|
|
|
|
/* Written and read with atomic operations. */
|
|
static int has_writer;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* A reader coroutine could move from an AioContext to another.
|
|
* If this happens, there is no problem from the point of view of
|
|
* counters. The problem is that the total count becomes
|
|
* unbalanced if one of the two AioContexts gets deleted.
|
|
* The count of readers must remain correct, so the AioContext's
|
|
* balance is transferred to this glboal variable.
|
|
* Protected by aio_context_list_lock.
|
|
*/
|
|
static uint32_t orphaned_reader_count;
|
|
|
|
/* Queue of readers waiting for the writer to finish */
|
|
static CoQueue reader_queue;
|
|
|
|
struct BdrvGraphRWlock {
|
|
/* How many readers are currently reading the graph. */
|
|
uint32_t reader_count;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* List of BdrvGraphRWlock kept in graph-lock.c
|
|
* Protected by aio_context_list_lock
|
|
*/
|
|
QTAILQ_ENTRY(BdrvGraphRWlock) next_aio;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* List of BdrvGraphRWlock. This list ensures that each BdrvGraphRWlock
|
|
* can safely modify only its own counter, avoid reading/writing
|
|
* others and thus improving performances by avoiding cacheline bounces.
|
|
*/
|
|
static QTAILQ_HEAD(, BdrvGraphRWlock) aio_context_list =
|
|
QTAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(aio_context_list);
|
|
|
|
static void __attribute__((__constructor__)) bdrv_init_graph_lock(void)
|
|
{
|
|
qemu_mutex_init(&aio_context_list_lock);
|
|
qemu_co_queue_init(&reader_queue);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void register_aiocontext(AioContext *ctx)
|
|
{
|
|
ctx->bdrv_graph = g_new0(BdrvGraphRWlock, 1);
|
|
QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&aio_context_list_lock);
|
|
assert(ctx->bdrv_graph->reader_count == 0);
|
|
QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&aio_context_list, ctx->bdrv_graph, next_aio);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void unregister_aiocontext(AioContext *ctx)
|
|
{
|
|
QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&aio_context_list_lock);
|
|
orphaned_reader_count += ctx->bdrv_graph->reader_count;
|
|
QTAILQ_REMOVE(&aio_context_list, ctx->bdrv_graph, next_aio);
|
|
g_free(ctx->bdrv_graph);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static uint32_t reader_count(void)
|
|
{
|
|
BdrvGraphRWlock *brdv_graph;
|
|
uint32_t rd;
|
|
|
|
QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&aio_context_list_lock);
|
|
|
|
/* rd can temporarily be negative, but the total will *always* be >= 0 */
|
|
rd = orphaned_reader_count;
|
|
QTAILQ_FOREACH(brdv_graph, &aio_context_list, next_aio) {
|
|
rd += qatomic_read(&brdv_graph->reader_count);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* shouldn't overflow unless there are 2^31 readers */
|
|
assert((int32_t)rd >= 0);
|
|
return rd;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void no_coroutine_fn bdrv_graph_wrlock(void)
|
|
{
|
|
GLOBAL_STATE_CODE();
|
|
assert(!qatomic_read(&has_writer));
|
|
assert(!qemu_in_coroutine());
|
|
|
|
/* Make sure that constantly arriving new I/O doesn't cause starvation */
|
|
bdrv_drain_all_begin_nopoll();
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* reader_count == 0: this means writer will read has_reader as 1
|
|
* reader_count >= 1: we don't know if writer read has_writer == 0 or 1,
|
|
* but we need to wait.
|
|
* Wait by allowing other coroutine (and possible readers) to continue.
|
|
*/
|
|
do {
|
|
/*
|
|
* has_writer must be 0 while polling, otherwise we get a deadlock if
|
|
* any callback involved during AIO_WAIT_WHILE() tries to acquire the
|
|
* reader lock.
|
|
*/
|
|
qatomic_set(&has_writer, 0);
|
|
AIO_WAIT_WHILE_UNLOCKED(NULL, reader_count() >= 1);
|
|
qatomic_set(&has_writer, 1);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* We want to only check reader_count() after has_writer = 1 is visible
|
|
* to other threads. That way no more readers can sneak in after we've
|
|
* determined reader_count() == 0.
|
|
*/
|
|
smp_mb();
|
|
} while (reader_count() >= 1);
|
|
|
|
bdrv_drain_all_end();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void no_coroutine_fn bdrv_graph_wrunlock(void)
|
|
{
|
|
GLOBAL_STATE_CODE();
|
|
assert(qatomic_read(&has_writer));
|
|
|
|
WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&aio_context_list_lock) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* No need for memory barriers, this works in pair with
|
|
* the slow path of rdlock() and both take the lock.
|
|
*/
|
|
qatomic_store_release(&has_writer, 0);
|
|
|
|
/* Wake up all coroutines that are waiting to read the graph */
|
|
qemu_co_enter_all(&reader_queue, &aio_context_list_lock);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Run any BHs that were scheduled during the wrlock section and that
|
|
* callers might expect to have finished (in particular, this is important
|
|
* for bdrv_schedule_unref()).
|
|
*
|
|
* Do this only after restarting coroutines so that nested event loops in
|
|
* BHs don't deadlock if their condition relies on the coroutine making
|
|
* progress.
|
|
*/
|
|
aio_bh_poll(qemu_get_aio_context());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void coroutine_fn bdrv_graph_co_rdlock(void)
|
|
{
|
|
BdrvGraphRWlock *bdrv_graph;
|
|
bdrv_graph = qemu_get_current_aio_context()->bdrv_graph;
|
|
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
qatomic_set(&bdrv_graph->reader_count,
|
|
bdrv_graph->reader_count + 1);
|
|
/* make sure writer sees reader_count before we check has_writer */
|
|
smp_mb();
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* has_writer == 0: this means writer will read reader_count as >= 1
|
|
* has_writer == 1: we don't know if writer read reader_count == 0
|
|
* or > 0, but we need to wait anyways because
|
|
* it will write.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (!qatomic_read(&has_writer)) {
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Synchronize access with reader_count() in bdrv_graph_wrlock().
|
|
* Case 1:
|
|
* If this critical section gets executed first, reader_count will
|
|
* decrease and the reader will go to sleep.
|
|
* Then the writer will read reader_count that does not take into
|
|
* account this reader, and if there's no other reader it will
|
|
* enter the write section.
|
|
* Case 2:
|
|
* If reader_count() critical section gets executed first,
|
|
* then writer will read reader_count >= 1.
|
|
* It will wait in AIO_WAIT_WHILE(), but once it releases the lock
|
|
* we will enter this critical section and call aio_wait_kick().
|
|
*/
|
|
WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&aio_context_list_lock) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* Additional check when we use the above lock to synchronize
|
|
* with bdrv_graph_wrunlock().
|
|
* Case 1:
|
|
* If this gets executed first, has_writer is still 1, so we reduce
|
|
* reader_count and go to sleep.
|
|
* Then the writer will set has_writer to 0 and wake up all readers,
|
|
* us included.
|
|
* Case 2:
|
|
* If bdrv_graph_wrunlock() critical section gets executed first,
|
|
* then it will set has_writer to 0 and wake up all other readers.
|
|
* Then we execute this critical section, and therefore must check
|
|
* again for has_writer, otherwise we sleep without any writer
|
|
* actually running.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (!qatomic_read(&has_writer)) {
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* slow path where reader sleeps */
|
|
bdrv_graph->reader_count--;
|
|
aio_wait_kick();
|
|
qemu_co_queue_wait(&reader_queue, &aio_context_list_lock);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void coroutine_fn bdrv_graph_co_rdunlock(void)
|
|
{
|
|
BdrvGraphRWlock *bdrv_graph;
|
|
bdrv_graph = qemu_get_current_aio_context()->bdrv_graph;
|
|
|
|
qatomic_store_release(&bdrv_graph->reader_count,
|
|
bdrv_graph->reader_count - 1);
|
|
/* make sure writer sees reader_count before we check has_writer */
|
|
smp_mb();
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* has_writer == 0: this means reader will read reader_count decreased
|
|
* has_writer == 1: we don't know if writer read reader_count old or
|
|
* new. Therefore, kick again so on next iteration
|
|
* writer will for sure read the updated value.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (qatomic_read(&has_writer)) {
|
|
aio_wait_kick();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void bdrv_graph_rdlock_main_loop(void)
|
|
{
|
|
GLOBAL_STATE_CODE();
|
|
assert(!qemu_in_coroutine());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void bdrv_graph_rdunlock_main_loop(void)
|
|
{
|
|
GLOBAL_STATE_CODE();
|
|
assert(!qemu_in_coroutine());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void assert_bdrv_graph_readable(void)
|
|
{
|
|
/* reader_count() is slow due to aio_context_list_lock lock contention */
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_GRAPH_LOCK
|
|
assert(qemu_in_main_thread() || reader_count());
|
|
#endif
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void assert_bdrv_graph_writable(void)
|
|
{
|
|
assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
|
|
assert(qatomic_read(&has_writer));
|
|
}
|