qapi: add QMP input test for large integers

Large integers previously got capped to LLONG_MAX/LLONG_MIN so we could
store them as int64_t. This could lead to silent errors occuring.

Now, we use a double to handle these cases.

Add a test to confirm that QMPInputVisitor handles this as expected if
we're expected an integer value: errors for out of range integer values
that got promoted to doubles in this fashion.

Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Michael Roth 2013-05-10 17:46:06 -05:00 committed by Luiz Capitulino
parent 3d5b3ec6d4
commit e92cfa0d90

View File

@ -75,6 +75,24 @@ static void test_visitor_in_int(TestInputVisitorData *data,
g_assert_cmpint(res, ==, value);
}
static void test_visitor_in_int_overflow(TestInputVisitorData *data,
const void *unused)
{
int64_t res = 0;
Error *errp = NULL;
Visitor *v;
/* this will overflow a Qint/int64, so should be deserialized into
* a QFloat/double field instead, leading to an error if we pass it
* to visit_type_int. confirm this.
*/
v = visitor_input_test_init(data, "%f", DBL_MAX);
visit_type_int(v, &res, NULL, &errp);
g_assert(error_is_set(&errp));
error_free(errp);
}
static void test_visitor_in_bool(TestInputVisitorData *data,
const void *unused)
{
@ -292,6 +310,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
input_visitor_test_add("/visitor/input/int",
&in_visitor_data, test_visitor_in_int);
input_visitor_test_add("/visitor/input/int_overflow",
&in_visitor_data, test_visitor_in_int_overflow);
input_visitor_test_add("/visitor/input/bool",
&in_visitor_data, test_visitor_in_bool);
input_visitor_test_add("/visitor/input/number",