mirror of
https://github.com/qemu/qemu.git
synced 2024-11-28 06:13:46 +08:00
qapi: Reuse code for flat union base validation
Rather than open-code the check for a valid base type, we should reuse the common functionality. This allows for consistent error messages, and also makes it easier for a later patch to turn on support for inline anonymous base structures. Test flat-union-inline is updated to test only one feature (anonymous branch dictionaries), which can be implemented independently (test flat-union-bad-base already covers the idea of an anonymous base dictionary). Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1443565276-4535-10-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9c51b44129
commit
376863ef48
@ -560,15 +560,14 @@ def check_union(expr, expr_info):
|
||||
# Else, it's a flat union.
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# The object must have a string member 'base'.
|
||||
if not isinstance(base, str):
|
||||
check_type(expr_info, "'base' for union '%s'" % name,
|
||||
base, allow_metas=['struct'])
|
||||
if not base:
|
||||
raise QAPIExprError(expr_info,
|
||||
"Flat union '%s' must have a string base field"
|
||||
"Flat union '%s' must have a base"
|
||||
% name)
|
||||
base_fields = find_base_fields(base)
|
||||
if not base_fields:
|
||||
raise QAPIExprError(expr_info,
|
||||
"Base '%s' is not a valid struct"
|
||||
% base)
|
||||
assert base_fields
|
||||
|
||||
# The value of member 'discriminator' must name a non-optional
|
||||
# member of the base struct.
|
||||
|
@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||
tests/qapi-schema/flat-union-bad-base.json:9: Flat union 'TestUnion' must have a string base field
|
||||
tests/qapi-schema/flat-union-bad-base.json:9: 'base' for union 'TestUnion' should be a type name
|
||||
|
@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||
tests/qapi-schema/flat-union-base-any.json:8: Base 'any' is not a valid struct
|
||||
tests/qapi-schema/flat-union-base-any.json:8: 'base' for union 'TestUnion' cannot use built-in type 'any'
|
||||
|
@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||
tests/qapi-schema/flat-union-base-union.json:14: Base 'UnionBase' is not a valid struct
|
||||
tests/qapi-schema/flat-union-base-union.json:14: 'base' for union 'TestUnion' cannot use union type 'UnionBase'
|
||||
|
@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||
tests/qapi-schema/flat-union-inline.json:7: Flat union 'TestUnion' must have a string base field
|
||||
tests/qapi-schema/flat-union-inline.json:7: Member 'value1' of union 'TestUnion' should be a type name
|
||||
|
@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
|
||||
# we require branches to be a struct name
|
||||
# TODO: should we allow anonymous inline types?
|
||||
# TODO: should we allow anonymous inline branch types?
|
||||
{ 'enum': 'TestEnum',
|
||||
'data': [ 'value1', 'value2' ] }
|
||||
{ 'struct': 'Base',
|
||||
'data': { 'enum1': 'TestEnum', 'kind': 'str' } }
|
||||
{ 'union': 'TestUnion',
|
||||
'base': { 'enum1': 'TestEnum', 'kind': 'str' },
|
||||
'base': 'Base',
|
||||
'discriminator': 'enum1',
|
||||
'data': { 'value1': { 'string': 'str' },
|
||||
'value2': { 'integer': 'int' } } }
|
||||
|
@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||
tests/qapi-schema/flat-union-no-base.json:9: Flat union 'TestUnion' must have a string base field
|
||||
tests/qapi-schema/flat-union-no-base.json:9: Flat union 'TestUnion' must have a base
|
||||
|
@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||
tests/qapi-schema/union-invalid-base.json:8: Base 'int' is not a valid struct
|
||||
tests/qapi-schema/union-invalid-base.json:8: 'base' for union 'TestUnion' cannot use built-in type 'int'
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user