mirror of
https://github.com/qemu/qemu.git
synced 2024-11-26 12:23:36 +08:00
net: Drop unusual use of do { } while (0);
For a couple of macros in pcnet.c, we have to provide a new scope to avoid compiler warnings about declarations in the middle of a switch statement that aren't in a sub-scope. But use of 'do { ... } while (0);' merely to provide that new scope is arcane overkill, compared to just using '{ ... }'. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20171201232433.25193-2-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
01960e6d21
commit
1b4c0a0436
@ -456,32 +456,32 @@ static inline void pcnet_rmd_store(PCNetState *s, struct pcnet_RMD *rmd,
|
||||
#define CHECK_RMD(ADDR,RES) do { \
|
||||
switch (BCR_SWSTYLE(s)) { \
|
||||
case 0x00: \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
uint16_t rda[4]; \
|
||||
s->phys_mem_read(s->dma_opaque, (ADDR), \
|
||||
(void *)&rda[0], sizeof(rda), 0); \
|
||||
(RES) |= (rda[2] & 0xf000)!=0xf000; \
|
||||
(RES) |= (rda[3] & 0xf000)!=0x0000; \
|
||||
} while (0); \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
break; \
|
||||
case 0x01: \
|
||||
case 0x02: \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
uint32_t rda[4]; \
|
||||
s->phys_mem_read(s->dma_opaque, (ADDR), \
|
||||
(void *)&rda[0], sizeof(rda), 0); \
|
||||
(RES) |= (rda[1] & 0x0000f000L)!=0x0000f000L; \
|
||||
(RES) |= (rda[2] & 0x0000f000L)!=0x00000000L; \
|
||||
} while (0); \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
break; \
|
||||
case 0x03: \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
uint32_t rda[4]; \
|
||||
s->phys_mem_read(s->dma_opaque, (ADDR), \
|
||||
(void *)&rda[0], sizeof(rda), 0); \
|
||||
(RES) |= (rda[0] & 0x0000f000L)!=0x00000000L; \
|
||||
(RES) |= (rda[1] & 0x0000f000L)!=0x0000f000L; \
|
||||
} while (0); \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
break; \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
} while (0)
|
||||
@ -489,22 +489,22 @@ static inline void pcnet_rmd_store(PCNetState *s, struct pcnet_RMD *rmd,
|
||||
#define CHECK_TMD(ADDR,RES) do { \
|
||||
switch (BCR_SWSTYLE(s)) { \
|
||||
case 0x00: \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
uint16_t xda[4]; \
|
||||
s->phys_mem_read(s->dma_opaque, (ADDR), \
|
||||
(void *)&xda[0], sizeof(xda), 0); \
|
||||
(RES) |= (xda[2] & 0xf000)!=0xf000; \
|
||||
} while (0); \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
break; \
|
||||
case 0x01: \
|
||||
case 0x02: \
|
||||
case 0x03: \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
uint32_t xda[4]; \
|
||||
s->phys_mem_read(s->dma_opaque, (ADDR), \
|
||||
(void *)&xda[0], sizeof(xda), 0); \
|
||||
(RES) |= (xda[1] & 0x0000f000L)!=0x0000f000L; \
|
||||
} while (0); \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
break; \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
} while (0)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user