2011-10-05 01:16:30 +08:00
|
|
|
Why does "ps -aux" complain about a bogus '-'?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-08 07:05:05 +08:00
|
|
|
According to the POSIX and UNIX standards, the above command asks to
|
|
|
|
|
display all processes with a TTY (generally the commands users are
|
|
|
|
|
running) plus all processes owned by a user named "x". If that user
|
|
|
|
|
doesn't exist, then ps will assume you really meant "ps aux". The
|
|
|
|
|
warning is given to gently break you of a habit that will cause you
|
|
|
|
|
trouble if a user named "x" were created.
|
2011-10-05 01:16:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why don't I see SMP (per-CPU) stats in top?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-08 07:05:05 +08:00
|
|
|
You didn't enable it. Press '?' for built-in help or read the man
|
|
|
|
|
page. Per-CPU stats are disabled by default because they take up too
|
|
|
|
|
much space. Some Linux systems have hundreds of CPUs.
|
2011-10-05 01:16:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why do long usernames get printed as numbers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-08 07:05:05 +08:00
|
|
|
The UNIX and POSIX standards require that user names and group names
|
|
|
|
|
be printed as decimal integers when there is not enough room in the
|
|
|
|
|
column. Truncating the names, besides being a violation of the
|
|
|
|
|
standard, would lead to confusion between names like MichelleRichards
|
|
|
|
|
and MichelleRichardson. The UNIX and POSIX way to change column
|
|
|
|
|
width is to rename the column:
|
2011-10-05 01:16:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-01-08 07:05:05 +08:00
|
|
|
ps -o pid,user=CumbersomeUserNames -o comm
|
2011-10-05 01:16:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-01-08 07:05:05 +08:00
|
|
|
The easy way is to directly specify the desired width:
|
2011-10-05 01:16:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2012-01-08 07:05:05 +08:00
|
|
|
ps -o pid,user:19,comm
|
2011-10-05 01:16:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why is %CPU underreported for multi-threaded (Java, etc.) apps?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-08 07:05:05 +08:00
|
|
|
You need to upgrade to the 2.6.10 kernel at least. Older kernels do
|
|
|
|
|
not provide a reasonable way to get this information.
|
2011-10-05 01:16:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why do ps and top show threads individually?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-08 07:05:05 +08:00
|
|
|
The 2.4.xx kernel does not provide proper support for grouping
|
|
|
|
|
threads by process. Hacks exist to group them anyway, but such hacks
|
|
|
|
|
will falsely group similar tasks and will fail to group tasks due to
|
|
|
|
|
race conditions. The hacks are also slow. As none of this is
|
|
|
|
|
acceptable in a critical system tool, task grouping is not currently
|
|
|
|
|
available for the 2.4.xx kernel. The 2.6.xx kernel allows for proper
|
|
|
|
|
thread grouping and reporting. To take advantage of this, your
|
|
|
|
|
programs must use a threading library that features the CLONE_THREAD
|
|
|
|
|
flag. The NPTL pthreads provided by recent glibc releases use
|
|
|
|
|
CLONE_THREAD.
|
2011-10-05 01:16:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What systems are supported?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-06-01 14:32:44 +08:00
|
|
|
Linux 2.4.xx 2.6.xx and 3.xx are commonly tested and expected to work
|
2012-01-08 07:05:05 +08:00
|
|
|
well. SMP is well supported. Multi-node cluster views require a
|
|
|
|
|
multi-node /proc filesystem; without that you will see a single-node
|
|
|
|
|
view.
|
2011-10-05 01:16:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where to I send bug reports?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-08 07:05:05 +08:00
|
|
|
You may use the Debian bug tracking system or send your report to
|
|
|
|
|
procps@freelists.org (no subscription required) instead.
|
2011-10-05 01:16:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why are there so many procps projects?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-08 07:05:05 +08:00
|
|
|
The original maintainer seems to have had little time for procps.
|
|
|
|
|
Whatever his reasons, the project didn't get maintained. Starting in
|
|
|
|
|
1997, Albert Cahalan wrote a new ps program for the package. For the
|
|
|
|
|
next few years, Albert quietly helped the Debian package maintainer
|
|
|
|
|
fix bugs. In 2001, Rik van Riel decided to do something about what
|
|
|
|
|
appeared to be the lack of a maintainer. He picked up the buggy old
|
|
|
|
|
code in Red Hat's CVS and started adding patches. Meanwhile, other
|
|
|
|
|
people have patched procps in a great many ways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2002, Albert moved procps to http://procps.sourceforge.net. This
|
|
|
|
|
was done to ensure that years of testing and bug fixes would not be
|
|
|
|
|
lost. The major version number was changed to 3, partly to avoid
|
|
|
|
|
confusing users and partly because the top program had been redone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After development essentially stopped on sourceforge.net, in 2011 the
|
|
|
|
|
project found a new home at http://gitorious.org/procps. This
|
|
|
|
|
represents the Debian, Fedora and openSUSE fork of procps. To avoid
|
|
|
|
|
confusion and potential name clashes the package is now known as
|
|
|
|
|
procps-ng (next generation), the version number was raised to 3.3.0
|
2012-04-29 23:34:54 +08:00
|
|
|
and the library so-name changed to libprocps.so
|
2011-10-05 01:17:23 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is being done to procps-ng at its new home?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-08 07:05:05 +08:00
|
|
|
All programs are in the process of being modernized, both in terms of
|
|
|
|
|
coding style and supporting documentation. Autotools have been
|
|
|
|
|
integrated and the library API has been expanded with many new fields
|
|
|
|
|
supported such as control groups, supplementary groups, etc. The top
|
|
|
|
|
program has been rewritten offering many new capabilities while
|
|
|
|
|
providing performance improvements up to 300%.
|
2011-10-05 01:16:30 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why does ps get signal 17?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-08 07:05:05 +08:00
|
|
|
No ps release has ever had this problem. Most likely your system has
|
|
|
|
|
been broken into. You might want to install a more recent version of
|
|
|
|
|
the OS. If you'd rather take your chances, simply upgrade procps.
|
