mirror of
https://github.com/paulusmack/ppp.git
synced 2024-11-23 02:13:28 +08:00
Add Submitting-patches.md
This adds a file that describes the standards expected for patches and pull requests. The standards are different from those for most projects on github.com and hence need to be spelled out. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8e77984ac5
commit
347904e33a
105
Submitting-patches.md
Normal file
105
Submitting-patches.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
|
||||
How to contribute patches to the PPP project.
|
||||
=============================================
|
||||
|
||||
The PPP project source code is maintained in a Git repository, which
|
||||
is publicly available at
|
||||
|
||||
git://git.ozlabs.org/~paulus/ppp.git
|
||||
|
||||
and
|
||||
|
||||
https://github.com/paulusmack/ppp.git
|
||||
|
||||
The linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org mailing list is a suitable place to
|
||||
discuss issues relating to the PPP code and to post patches.
|
||||
|
||||
Although there is a copy of the repository on github.com, the PPP
|
||||
project is not a "github project", in the sense that the development
|
||||
of the code does not depend on github infrastructure. In particular,
|
||||
patch descriptions should be understandable without reference to any
|
||||
github.com web page. Thus, patches or commits whose description
|
||||
consists only of something like "Closes #123" will be rejected. See
|
||||
below for the minimum standards for patch descriptions.
|
||||
|
||||
There are two ways in which patches can be submitted for review:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Post the patch on the linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org mailing list. This
|
||||
is my preferred way to receive patches, because it provides more
|
||||
opportunity for other interested people to review the patches.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Create a pull request on github.com. However, please don't make
|
||||
the mistake of creating a commit with a minimal commit message and
|
||||
then explaining the rationale for the change in the pull request.
|
||||
Put the rationale in the commit message.
|
||||
|
||||
Requirements for patch/commit description
|
||||
-----------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The description on a patch, which becomes the commit message in the
|
||||
resulting commit, should describe the reason why the change is being
|
||||
made. If it fixes a bug, it should describe the bug in enough detail
|
||||
for the reader to understand why and how the change being made fixes
|
||||
the bug. If it adds a feature, it should describe the feature and how
|
||||
it might be used and why it would be desirable to have the feature.
|
||||
|
||||
Normally the patch description should be a few paragraphs in length --
|
||||
it can be longer for a really subtle bug or complex feature, or
|
||||
shorter for obvious or trivial changes such as fixing spelling
|
||||
mistakes.
|
||||
|
||||
The first line of the commit message is the "headline", corresponding
|
||||
to the subject line of an emailed patch. If the patch is concerned
|
||||
with one particular area of the package, it is helpful to put that at
|
||||
the beginning, followed by a colon (':'), for example, "pppd: Fix bug
|
||||
in vslprintf". The remainder of the headline should be a sentence and
|
||||
should start with a capital letter.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that as maintainer I will edit the headline or the commit message
|
||||
if necessary to make it clearer or to fix spelling or grammatical
|
||||
errors. For a github pull request I may cherry-pick the commits and
|
||||
modify their commit messages.
|
||||
|
||||
References to information on web sites are permitted provided that the
|
||||
full URL is given, and that reference to the web site is not essential
|
||||
for understanding the change being made. For example, you can refer
|
||||
to a github issue provided that you also put the essential details of
|
||||
the issue in the commit message, and put the full URL for the issue,
|
||||
not just the issue number.
|
||||
|
||||
Signoff
|
||||
-------
|
||||
|
||||
In order to forestall possible (though unlikely) future legal
|
||||
problems, this project requires a "Signed-off-by" line on all
|
||||
non-trivial patches, with a real name (not just initials, and no
|
||||
pseudonyms). Signing off indicates that you certify that your patch
|
||||
meets the 'Developer's Certificate of Origin' below (taken from the
|
||||
DCO 1.1 in the Linux kernel source tree).
|
||||
|
||||
Developer's Certificate of Origin
|
||||
---------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
|
||||
|
||||
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
|
||||
have the right to submit it under the open source license
|
||||
indicated in the file; or
|
||||
|
||||
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
|
||||
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
|
||||
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
|
||||
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
|
||||
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
|
||||
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
|
||||
in the file; or
|
||||
|
||||
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
|
||||
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
|
||||
it.
|
||||
|
||||
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
|
||||
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
|
||||
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
|
||||
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
|
||||
this project or the open source license(s) involved.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user