Add interesting email which explains why disabling -fPIC works on Linux

by Martin v. Loewis <martin@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de>
This commit is contained in:
Sascha Schumann 2000-05-23 17:23:21 +00:00
parent 617266e33e
commit dec92a445f

41
INSTALL
View File

@ -296,6 +296,47 @@ Installing PHP can be done in four simple steps:
Note! If a line has a # at the beginning, then it is commented out
and you need to remove the # for that line to take effect.
WHY DISABLING -fPIC WORKS ON LINUX
From: Martin v. Loewis <martin@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de>
To: glibc-linux@ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu
Subject: Re: Shared library -shared vs. -fpic
[In reply to Kaz Kylheku <kaz@ashi.footprints.net>]
> PIC stands for Position-Independent Code.
Correct.
> Code isn't position-independent (or ``relocatable'') cannot be
> loaded at an arbitrary address;
Wrong.
> it requires some references to be patched at load time.
Correct.
> Shared libraries need to be relocatable because it's not known
> beforehand what address they will be loaded at
Correct, depending on the meaning of "relocatable". PIC code typically
does not contain relocations; that's why its position-independent.
> Just because you don't specify -fPIC doesn't mean that the compiler
> won't emit position-independent code; the option prevents it from
> emitting position-dependent code in situations where it otherwise
> would.
Correct. However, a non-trivial shared library typically won't be
position-independent unless explicitly compiled with
-fPIC. Linux/glibc indeed does not require a shared library to be
position-independent; instead, it will perform the relocations in the
binary, even if they refer to code pages. As a result, those relocated
pages won't be shared across processes, anymore.
Regards,
Martin
USING PHP 3 AND PHP 4 AS CONCURRENT APACHE MODULES