This has been scaring people off.

This commit is contained in:
Andrei Zmievski 2002-02-27 17:32:27 +00:00
parent 46bc04ecdf
commit 313a3602bb
2 changed files with 1 additions and 19 deletions

View File

@ -1,8 +1,3 @@
This extension is experimental.
That's all I'm required to say, as you should know the consequences, but
I'll go ahead and add a few more notes.
The purpose of this extension is to allow user-space overloading of object
property access and method calls. It has only one function, overload() which
takes the name of the class that should have this functionality enabled. But
@ -93,20 +88,7 @@ var_dump($o->COUNT);
?>
What works
----------
Whatever you can get it to do.
What doesn't work
-----------------
Invoking original overloading handlers, if the class had any.
__set() only works to one level of property access, no chains yet
Whatever else I am forgetting about here.
What might change
-----------------
Hell, anything, even the name of extension and its only function.
Feedback, please.
__set() only works to one level of property access, no chains yet.