the secret key before we've encrypted it and using the right NID for RC2-64.
Add various arguments to the experimental programs 'dec' and 'enc' to make
testing less painful.
This stuff has now been tested against Netscape Messenger and it can encrypt
and decrypt S/MIME messages with RC2 (128, 64 and 40 bit) DES and triple DES.
Its still experimental though...
(meaning pointer to char) to des_cblock * (meaning pointer to
array with 8 char elements), which allows the compiler to
do more typechecking. (The changed argument types were of type
des_cblock * back in SSLeay, and a lot of ugly casts were
used then to turn them into pointers to elements; but it can be
done without those casts.)
Introduce new type const_des_cblock -- before, the pointers rather
than the elements pointed to were declared const, and for
some reason gcc did not complain about this (but some other
compilers did).
find the right RecipientInfo based on the recipient certificate (so would
fail a lot of the time) and fixup cipher structures to correctly (maybe)
modify the AlgorithmIdentifiers. Largely untested at present... this will be
fixed in due course. Well the stuff was broken to begin with so if its broken
now then you haven't lost anything :-)
thread-safe (where thread-safe counterparts are not available on all
platforms), and don't memcpy to NULL-pointers
Submitted by: Anonymous
Reviewed by: Bodo Moeller
Also, clean up htons vs. ntohs confusions.
instead I've picked "enc", because that's what's in the prototypes.
("_encrypt" is reserved only as an external name, but still
using it in an application doesn't look like good style to me --
and it certainly isn't if the point is just avoiding shadowing,
which is apparently why the previous name "encrypt" was changed.)
While modifying the sources, I found some inconsistencies on the use of
s->cert vs. s->session->sess_cert; I don't know if those could
really have caused problems, but possibly this is a proper bug-fix
and not just a clean-up.
used with negative char values, so I've added casts to unsigned char.
Maybe what really should be done is change all those arrays and
pointers to type unsigned char [] or unsigned char *, respectively;
but using plain char with those predicates is just wrong, so something
had to be done.
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
PR:
so that warnings about unused variables (for certain
-D... constellations) are avoided; this corresponds to the earlier
change for SHA1.
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
PR:
Win32 version of rename() ). There isn't a precise rename() equivalent under
Win95: the standard rename() complains if the destination already exists so
replaced with a combination of unlink() and MoveFile().
