Certain warning alerts are ignored if they are received. This can mean that
no progress will be made if one peer continually sends those warning alerts.
Implement a count so that we abort the connection if we receive too many.
Issue reported by Shi Lei.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
The DTLS implementation provides some protection against replay attacks
in accordance with RFC6347 section 4.1.2.6.
A sliding "window" of valid record sequence numbers is maintained with
the "right" hand edge of the window set to the highest sequence number we
have received so far. Records that arrive that are off the "left" hand
edge of the window are rejected. Records within the window are checked
against a list of records received so far. If we already received it then
we also reject the new record.
If we have not already received the record, or the sequence number is off
the right hand edge of the window then we verify the MAC of the record.
If MAC verification fails then we discard the record. Otherwise we mark
the record as received. If the sequence number was off the right hand edge
of the window, then we slide the window along so that the right hand edge
is in line with the newly received sequence number.
Records may arrive for future epochs, i.e. a record from after a CCS being
sent, can arrive before the CCS does if the packets get re-ordered. As we
have not yet received the CCS we are not yet in a position to decrypt or
validate the MAC of those records. OpenSSL places those records on an
unprocessed records queue. It additionally updates the window immediately,
even though we have not yet verified the MAC. This will only occur if
currently in a handshake/renegotiation.
This could be exploited by an attacker by sending a record for the next
epoch (which does not have to decrypt or have a valid MAC), with a very
large sequence number. This means the right hand edge of the window is
moved very far to the right, and all subsequent legitimate packets are
dropped causing a denial of service.
A similar effect can be achieved during the initial handshake. In this
case there is no MAC key negotiated yet. Therefore an attacker can send a
message for the current epoch with a very large sequence number. The code
will process the record as normal. If the hanshake message sequence number
(as opposed to the record sequence number that we have been talking about
so far) is in the future then the injected message is bufferred to be
handled later, but the window is still updated. Therefore all subsequent
legitimate handshake records are dropped. This aspect is not considered a
security issue because there are many ways for an attacker to disrupt the
initial handshake and prevent it from completing successfully (e.g.
injection of a handshake message will cause the Finished MAC to fail and
the handshake to be aborted). This issue comes about as a result of trying
to do replay protection, but having no integrity mechanism in place yet.
Does it even make sense to have replay protection in epoch 0? That
issue isn't addressed here though.
This addressed an OCAP Audit issue.
CVE-2016-2181
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Commit aea145e removed some error codes that are generated
algorithmically: mapping alerts to error texts. Found by
Andreas Karlsson. This restores them, and adds two missing ones.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
The ssl3_init_finished_mac() function can fail, in which case we need to
propagate the error up through the stack.
RT#3198
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
We now send the highest supported version by the client, even if the session
uses an older version.
This fixes 2 problems:
- When you try to reuse a session but the other side doesn't reuse it and
uses a different protocol version the connection will fail.
- When you're trying to reuse a session with an old version you might be
stuck trying to reuse the old version while both sides support a newer
version
Signed-off-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
GH: #852, MR: #2452
Use the new pipeline cipher capability to encrypt multiple records being
written out all in one go. Two new SSL/SSL_CTX parameters can be used to
control how this works: max_pipelines and split_send_fragment.
max_pipelines defines the maximum number of pipelines that can ever be used
in one go for a single connection. It must always be less than or equal to
SSL_MAX_PIPELINES (currently defined to be 32). By default only one
pipeline will be used (i.e. normal non-parallel operation).
split_send_fragment defines how data is split up into pipelines. The number
of pipelines used will be determined by the amount of data provided to the
SSL_write call divided by split_send_fragment. For example if
split_send_fragment is set to 2000 and max_pipelines is 4 then:
SSL_write called with 0-2000 bytes == 1 pipeline used
SSL_write called with 2001-4000 bytes == 2 pipelines used
SSL_write called with 4001-6000 bytes == 3 pipelines used
SSL_write_called with 6001+ bytes == 4 pipelines used
split_send_fragment must always be less than or equal to max_send_fragment.
By default it is set to be equal to max_send_fragment. This will mean that
the same number of records will always be created as would have been
created in the non-parallel case, although the data will be apportioned
differently. In the parallel case data will be spread equally between the
pipelines.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Disabled by default, but can be enabled by setting the
ct_validation_callback on a SSL or SSL_CTX.
Reviewed-by: Ben Laurie <ben@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Adapted from BoringSSL. Added a test.
The extension parsing code is already attempting to already handle this for
some individual extensions, but it is doing so inconsistently. Duplicate
efforts in individual extension parsing will be cleaned up in a follow-up.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
To enable heartbeats for DTLS, configure with enable-heartbeats.
Heartbeats for TLS have been completely removed.
This addresses RT 3647
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
If init failed we'd like to set an error code to indicate that. But if
init failed then when the error system tries to load its strings its going
to fail again. We could get into an infinite loop. Therefore we just set
a single error the first time around. After that no error is set.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Previous commit 7bb196a71 attempted to "fix" a problem with the way
SSL_shutdown() behaved whilst in mid-handshake. The original behaviour had
SSL_shutdown() return immediately having taken no action if called mid-
handshake with a return value of 1 (meaning everything was shutdown
successfully). In fact the shutdown has not been successful.
Commit 7bb196a71 changed that to send a close_notify anyway and then
return. This seems to be causing some problems for some applications so
perhaps a better (much simpler) approach is revert to the previous
behaviour (no attempt at a shutdown), but return -1 (meaning the shutdown
was not successful).
This also fixes a bug where SSL_shutdown always returns 0 when shutdown
*very* early in the handshake (i.e. we are still using SSLv23_method).
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
The DTLSv1_listen function exposed details of the underlying BIO
abstraction and did not properly allow for IPv6. This commit changes the
"peer" argument to be a BIO_ADDR and makes it a first class function
(rather than a ctrl) to ensure proper type checking.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
This was done by the following
find . -name '*.[ch]' | /tmp/pl
where /tmp/pl is the following three-line script:
print unless $. == 1 && m@/\* .*\.[ch] \*/@;
close ARGV if eof; # Close file to reset $.
And then some hand-editing of other files.
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Calling SSL_shutdown while in init previously gave a "1" response, meaning
everything was successfully closed down (even though it wasn't). Better is
to send our close_notify, but fail when trying to receive one.
The problem with doing a shutdown while in the middle of a handshake is
that once our close_notify is sent we shouldn't really do anything else
(including process handshake/CCS messages) until we've received a
close_notify back from the peer. However the peer might send a CCS before
acting on our close_notify - so we won't be able to read it because we're
not acting on CCS messages!
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Only two macros CRYPTO_MDEBUG and CRYPTO_MDEBUG_ABORT to control this.
If CRYPTO_MDEBUG is not set, #ifdef out the whole debug machinery.
(Thanks to Jakob Bohm for the suggestion!)
Make the "change wrapper functions" be the only paradigm.
Wrote documentation!
Format the 'set func' functions so their paramlists are legible.
Format some multi-line comments.
Remove ability to get/set the "memory debug" functions at runtme.
Remove MemCheck_* and CRYPTO_malloc_debug_init macros.
Add CRYPTO_mem_debug(int flag) function.
Add test/memleaktest.
Rename CRYPTO_malloc_init to OPENSSL_malloc_init; remove needless calls.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Also tweak some of the code in demos/bio, to enable interactive
testing of BIO_s_accept's use of SSL_dup. Changed the sconnect
client to authenticate the server, which now exercises the new
SSL_set1_host() function.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
The protocol selection code is now consolidated in a few consecutive
short functions in a single file and is table driven. Protocol-specific
constraints that influence negotiation are moved into the flags
field of the method structure. The same protocol version constraints
are now applied in all code paths. It is now much easier to add
new protocol versions without reworking the protocol selection
logic.
In the presence of "holes" in the list of enabled client protocols
we no longer select client protocols below the hole based on a
subset of the constraints and then fail shortly after when it is
found that these don't meet the remaining constraints (suiteb, FIPS,
security level, ...). Ideally, with the new min/max controls users
will be less likely to create "holes" in the first place.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
