mirror of
https://github.com/openssl/openssl.git
synced 2024-11-28 20:44:10 +08:00
rsa/rsa_pk1.c: remove memcpy calls from RSA_padding_check_PKCS1_type_2.
And make RSAErr call unconditional. Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
89072e0c2a
commit
e875b0cf2f
@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ int RSA_padding_check_PKCS1_type_2(unsigned char *to, int tlen,
|
|||||||
int i;
|
int i;
|
||||||
/* |em| is the encoded message, zero-padded to exactly |num| bytes */
|
/* |em| is the encoded message, zero-padded to exactly |num| bytes */
|
||||||
unsigned char *em = NULL;
|
unsigned char *em = NULL;
|
||||||
unsigned int good, found_zero_byte;
|
unsigned int good, found_zero_byte, mask;
|
||||||
int zero_index = 0, msg_index, mlen = -1;
|
int zero_index = 0, msg_index, mlen = -1;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (tlen < 0 || flen < 0)
|
if (tlen < 0 || flen < 0)
|
||||||
@ -169,39 +169,41 @@ int RSA_padding_check_PKCS1_type_2(unsigned char *to, int tlen,
|
|||||||
* section 7.2.2.
|
* section 7.2.2.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (flen > num)
|
if (flen > num || num < 11) {
|
||||||
goto err;
|
RSAerr(RSA_F_RSA_PADDING_CHECK_PKCS1_TYPE_2,
|
||||||
|
RSA_R_PKCS_DECODING_ERROR);
|
||||||
if (num < 11)
|
return -1;
|
||||||
goto err;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (flen != num) {
|
|
||||||
em = OPENSSL_zalloc(num);
|
|
||||||
if (em == NULL) {
|
|
||||||
RSAerr(RSA_F_RSA_PADDING_CHECK_PKCS1_TYPE_2, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE);
|
|
||||||
return -1;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
/*
|
|
||||||
* Caller is encouraged to pass zero-padded message created with
|
|
||||||
* BN_bn2binpad, but if it doesn't, we do this zero-padding copy
|
|
||||||
* to avoid leaking that information. The copy still leaks some
|
|
||||||
* side-channel information, but it's impossible to have a fixed
|
|
||||||
* memory access pattern since we can't read out of the bounds of
|
|
||||||
* |from|.
|
|
||||||
*/
|
|
||||||
memcpy(em + num - flen, from, flen);
|
|
||||||
from = em;
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
em = OPENSSL_malloc(num);
|
||||||
|
if (em == NULL) {
|
||||||
|
RSAerr(RSA_F_RSA_PADDING_CHECK_PKCS1_TYPE_2, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE);
|
||||||
|
return -1;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* Caller is encouraged to pass zero-padded message created with
|
||||||
|
* BN_bn2binpad. Trouble is that since we can't read out of |from|'s
|
||||||
|
* bounds, it's impossible to have an invariant memory access pattern
|
||||||
|
* in case |from| was not zero-padded in advance.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
for (from += flen, em += num, i = 0; i < num; i++) {
|
||||||
|
mask = ~constant_time_is_zero(flen);
|
||||||
|
flen -= 1 & mask;
|
||||||
|
from -= 1 & mask;
|
||||||
|
*--em = *from & mask;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
from = em;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
good = constant_time_is_zero(from[0]);
|
good = constant_time_is_zero(from[0]);
|
||||||
good &= constant_time_eq(from[1], 2);
|
good &= constant_time_eq(from[1], 2);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/* scan over padding data */
|
||||||
found_zero_byte = 0;
|
found_zero_byte = 0;
|
||||||
for (i = 2; i < num; i++) {
|
for (i = 2; i < num; i++) {
|
||||||
unsigned int equals0 = constant_time_is_zero(from[i]);
|
unsigned int equals0 = constant_time_is_zero(from[i]);
|
||||||
zero_index =
|
|
||||||
constant_time_select_int(~found_zero_byte & equals0, i,
|
zero_index = constant_time_select_int(~found_zero_byte & equals0,
|
||||||
zero_index);
|
i, zero_index);
|
||||||
found_zero_byte |= equals0;
|
found_zero_byte |= equals0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -210,7 +212,7 @@ int RSA_padding_check_PKCS1_type_2(unsigned char *to, int tlen,
|
|||||||
* If we never found a 0-byte, then |zero_index| is 0 and the check
|
* If we never found a 0-byte, then |zero_index| is 0 and the check
|
||||||
* also fails.
|
* also fails.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
good &= constant_time_ge((unsigned int)(zero_index), 2 + 8);
|
good &= constant_time_ge(zero_index, 2 + 8);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* Skip the zero byte. This is incorrect if we never found a zero-byte
|
* Skip the zero byte. This is incorrect if we never found a zero-byte
|
||||||
@ -220,27 +222,34 @@ int RSA_padding_check_PKCS1_type_2(unsigned char *to, int tlen,
|
|||||||
mlen = num - msg_index;
|
mlen = num - msg_index;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* For good measure, do this check in constant time as well; it could
|
* For good measure, do this check in constant time as well.
|
||||||
* leak something if |tlen| was assuming valid padding.
|
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
good &= constant_time_ge((unsigned int)(tlen), (unsigned int)(mlen));
|
good &= constant_time_ge(tlen, mlen);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* We can't continue in constant-time because we need to copy the result
|
* Even though we can't fake result's length, we can pretend copying
|
||||||
* and we cannot fake its length. This unavoidably leaks timing
|
* |tlen| bytes where |mlen| bytes would be real. Last |tlen| of |num|
|
||||||
* information at the API boundary.
|
* bytes are viewed as circular buffer with start at |tlen|-|mlen'|,
|
||||||
|
* where |mlen'| is "saturated" |mlen| value. Deducing information
|
||||||
|
* about failure or |mlen| would take attacker's ability to observe
|
||||||
|
* memory access pattern with byte granularity *as it occurs*. It
|
||||||
|
* should be noted that failure is indistinguishable from normal
|
||||||
|
* operation if |tlen| is fixed by protocol.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
if (!good) {
|
tlen = constant_time_select_int(constant_time_lt(num, tlen), num, tlen);
|
||||||
mlen = -1;
|
msg_index = constant_time_select_int(good, msg_index, num - tlen);
|
||||||
goto err;
|
mlen = num - msg_index;
|
||||||
|
for (from += msg_index, mask = good, i = 0; i < tlen; i++) {
|
||||||
|
unsigned int equals = constant_time_eq(i, mlen);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
from -= tlen & equals; /* if (i == mlen) rewind */
|
||||||
|
mask &= mask ^ equals; /* if (i == mlen) mask = 0 */
|
||||||
|
to[i] = constant_time_select_8(mask, from[i], to[i]);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
memcpy(to, from + msg_index, mlen);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
err:
|
|
||||||
OPENSSL_clear_free(em, num);
|
OPENSSL_clear_free(em, num);
|
||||||
if (mlen == -1)
|
RSAerr(RSA_F_RSA_PADDING_CHECK_PKCS1_TYPE_2, RSA_R_PKCS_DECODING_ERROR);
|
||||||
RSAerr(RSA_F_RSA_PADDING_CHECK_PKCS1_TYPE_2,
|
err_clear_last_constant_time(1 & good);
|
||||||
RSA_R_PKCS_DECODING_ERROR);
|
|
||||||
return mlen;
|
return constant_time_select_int(good, mlen, -1);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -110,7 +110,12 @@ L<ERR_get_error(3)>.
|
|||||||
The RSA_padding_check_PKCS1_type_2() padding check leaks timing
|
The RSA_padding_check_PKCS1_type_2() padding check leaks timing
|
||||||
information which can potentially be used to mount a Bleichenbacher
|
information which can potentially be used to mount a Bleichenbacher
|
||||||
padding oracle attack. This is an inherent weakness in the PKCS #1
|
padding oracle attack. This is an inherent weakness in the PKCS #1
|
||||||
v1.5 padding design. Prefer PKCS1_OAEP padding.
|
v1.5 padding design. Prefer PKCS1_OAEP padding. Otherwise it can
|
||||||
|
be recommended to pass zero-padded B<f>, so that B<fl> equals to
|
||||||
|
B<rsa_len>, and if fixed by protocol, B<tlen> being set to the
|
||||||
|
expected length. In such case leakage would be minimal, it would
|
||||||
|
take attacker's ability to observe memory access pattern with byte
|
||||||
|
granilarity as it occurs, post-factum timing analysis won't do.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
=head1 SEE ALSO
|
=head1 SEE ALSO
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user