mirror of
https://github.com/openssl/openssl.git
synced 2024-11-29 13:03:55 +08:00
rc4_skey.c: remove dead/redundant code (it's never compiled) and
misleading/obsolete comment.
This commit is contained in:
parent
7f0d1be3a6
commit
7eabad423c
@ -104,40 +104,6 @@ void RC4_set_key(RC4_KEY *key, int len, const unsigned char *data)
|
|||||||
d[(n)]=d[id2]; \
|
d[(n)]=d[id2]; \
|
||||||
d[id2]=tmp; }
|
d[id2]=tmp; }
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#if defined(OPENSSL_CPUID_OBJ) && !defined(OPENSSL_NO_ASM)
|
|
||||||
# if defined(__i386) || defined(__i386__) || defined(_M_IX86) || \
|
|
||||||
defined(__INTEL__) || \
|
|
||||||
defined(__x86_64) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(_M_AMD64)
|
|
||||||
if (sizeof(RC4_INT) > 1) {
|
|
||||||
/*
|
|
||||||
* Unlike all other x86 [and x86_64] implementations,
|
|
||||||
* Intel P4 core [including EM64T] was found to perform
|
|
||||||
* poorly with wider RC4_INT. Performance improvement
|
|
||||||
* for IA-32 hand-coded assembler turned out to be 2.8x
|
|
||||||
* if re-coded for RC4_CHAR! It's however inappropriate
|
|
||||||
* to just switch to RC4_CHAR for x86[_64], as non-P4
|
|
||||||
* implementations suffer from significant performance
|
|
||||||
* losses then, e.g. PIII exhibits >2x deterioration,
|
|
||||||
* and so does Opteron. In order to assure optimal
|
|
||||||
* all-round performance, let us [try to] detect P4 at
|
|
||||||
* run-time by checking upon HTT bit in CPU capability
|
|
||||||
* vector and set up compressed key schedule, which is
|
|
||||||
* recognized by correspondingly updated assembler
|
|
||||||
* module...
|
|
||||||
* <appro@fy.chalmers.se>
|
|
||||||
*/
|
|
||||||
if (OPENSSL_ia32cap_P & (1<<28)) {
|
|
||||||
unsigned char *cp=(unsigned char *)d;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for (i=0;i<256;i++) cp[i]=i;
|
|
||||||
for (i=0;i<256;i++) SK_LOOP(cp,i);
|
|
||||||
/* mark schedule as compressed! */
|
|
||||||
d[256/sizeof(RC4_INT)]=-1;
|
|
||||||
return;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
# endif
|
|
||||||
#endif
|
|
||||||
for (i=0; i < 256; i++) d[i]=i;
|
for (i=0; i < 256; i++) d[i]=i;
|
||||||
for (i=0; i < 256; i+=4)
|
for (i=0; i < 256; i+=4)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user