mirrors/openssl
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/openssl/openssl.git synced 2024-11-29 04:55:11 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

rc4_skey.c: remove dead/redundant code (it's never compiled) and

Browse Source 
misleading/obsolete comment.
This commit is contained in:
Andy Polyakov 2011-06-06 20:02:26 +00:00
parent 7f0d1be3a6
commit 7eabad423c
1 changed files with 0 additions and 34 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

34
crypto/rc4/rc4_skey.c
View File

@ -104,40 +104,6 @@ void RC4_set_key(RC4_KEY *key, int len, const unsigned char *data)
d[(n)]=d[id2]; \
d[id2]=tmp; }
#if defined(OPENSSL_CPUID_OBJ) && !defined(OPENSSL_NO_ASM)
# if defined(__i386) || defined(__i386__) || defined(_M_IX86) || \
defined(__INTEL__) || \
defined(__x86_64) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(_M_AMD64)
if (sizeof(RC4_INT) > 1) {
/*
* Unlike all other x86 [and x86_64] implementations,
* Intel P4 core [including EM64T] was found to perform
* poorly with wider RC4_INT. Performance improvement
* for IA-32 hand-coded assembler turned out to be 2.8x
* if re-coded for RC4_CHAR! It's however inappropriate
* to just switch to RC4_CHAR for x86[_64], as non-P4
* implementations suffer from significant performance
* losses then, e.g. PIII exhibits >2x deterioration,
* and so does Opteron. In order to assure optimal
* all-round performance, let us [try to] detect P4 at
* run-time by checking upon HTT bit in CPU capability
* vector and set up compressed key schedule, which is
* recognized by correspondingly updated assembler
* module...
* <appro@fy.chalmers.se>
*/
if (OPENSSL_ia32cap_P & (1<<28)) {
unsigned char *cp=(unsigned char *)d;
for (i=0;i<256;i++) cp[i]=i;
for (i=0;i<256;i++) SK_LOOP(cp,i);
/* mark schedule as compressed! */
d[256/sizeof(RC4_INT)]=-1;
return;
}
}
# endif
#endif
for (i=0; i < 256; i++) d[i]=i;
for (i=0; i < 256; i+=4)
{