Relevant BUGIDs: 476961

Purpose of commit: comments

Commit summary:
---------------
Added some clarification comments to help explain why I'm rejecting
bug 476961.
This commit is contained in:
Andrew G. Morgan 2001-11-12 06:57:38 +00:00
parent 0c1e9795ad
commit 6616ed2d98
3 changed files with 5 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -50,8 +50,8 @@ bug report - outstanding bugs are listed here:
patches!
* pam_pwdb: Solar Designer pointed out that there was a problem with
the compatibility support for md5 password hashing. (Bug 460717 -
agmorgan)
the compatibility support for md5 password hashing. (Bug 460717,
476961 - agmorgan)
* pam_issue: Nalin found segfaulting problems if the PAM_USER_PROMPT
is unset, found some similar problems with assumptions about
realloc. (Bug 476983 - agmorgan)

View File

@ -236,6 +236,8 @@ static int _unix_chauthtok(pam_handle_t *pamh, unsigned int ctrl)
/*
* By reaching here we have approved the passwords and must now
* rebuild the password database file.
*
* This includes the fact that the password is _not_ NULL.
*/
/*

View File

@ -513,6 +513,7 @@ static int _unix_verify_password(pam_handle_t *pamh, const char *name,
} else {
/* there is no way that p can be NULL (one can be "") */
pp = _pam_md(p, salt);
/* the moment of truth -- do we agree with the password? */