Commit 0bef21e854 removed "-o nonempty" since mounting over
non-empty directories is always allowed. But this broke tools which
specify "-o nonempty". Since the expected behaviour is the same
anyway, ignoring the "nonempty" option seems safe, and allows programs
specifying "-o nonempty" to continue working with fusermount3.
This would fix https://bugs.debian.org/939767
Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org>
It is perfectly legal to execute a program with argc == 0 and therefore
no argv.
fusermount needs to check for this case, otherwise it will pass a NULL
poiunter to strdup() and cause undefined behavior.
Especially since fusermount is setuid root, we need to extra be careful.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
In mount.fuse.c, there are several memory leak problems in
main func. For example, setuid_name is allocated by calling
xstrdup func, however it is not freed before calling execl func.
Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Haotian Li <lihaotian9@huawei.com>
In mount.fuse.c, pwd is set by calling getpwnam func.
If the matching entry is not found or an error occurs in
getpwnam func, pwd will be NULL. So we need to check
whether pwd is NULL before accessing it.
Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Haotian Li <lihaotian9@huawei.com>
IN a bunch of comments we say 'under the terms of the GNU GPL', make
it clear this is GPLv2 (as LICENSE says).
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Define FUSE_USE_VERSION < 35 to get old ioctl prototype
with int commands; define FUSE_USE_VERSION >= 35 to get
new ioctl prototype with unsigned int commands.
Fixes#463.
cd to mountpoint's parent directory using unprivileged rather than
privileged access. This is to ensure that unmount works on mountpoints
where root may not have privileged access.
Fixes: #376
If a fuse filesystem was mounted in auto_unmount mode on top of an
already mounted filesystem, we would end up doing a double-unmount
when the fuse filesystem was unmounted properly.
Make the auto_unmount code less eager: unmount only if the mounted
filesystem has proper type and is returning 'Transport endpoint not
connected'.
The unprivileged option allows to run the FUSE file system process
without privileges by dropping capabilities and preventing them from
being re-acquired via setuid / fscaps etc. To accomplish this,
mount.fuse sets up the `/dev/fuse` file descriptor and mount itself
and passes the file descriptor via the `/dev/fd/%u` mountpoint syntax
to the FUSE file system.
Before:
$ _FUSE_COMMFD=1 priv_strace -s8000 -e trace=mount util/fusermount3 /proc/self/fd
mount("/dev/fuse", ".", "fuse", MS_NOSUID|MS_NODEV, "fd=3,rootmode=40000,user_id=379777,group_id=5001") = 0
sending file descriptor: Socket operation on non-socket
+++ exited with 1 +++
After:
$ _FUSE_COMMFD=1 priv_strace -s8000 -e trace=mount util/fusermount3 /proc/self/fd
util/fusermount3: mounting over filesystem type 0x009fa0 is forbidden
+++ exited with 1 +++
This patch could potentially have security
impact on some systems that are configured with allow_other;
see https://launchpad.net/bugs/1530566 for an example of how a similar
issue in the ecryptfs mount helper was exploitable. However, the FUSE
mount helper performs slightly different security checks, so that exact
attack doesn't work with fusermount; I don't know of any specific attack
you could perform using this, apart from faking the SELinux context of your
process when someone's looking at a process listing. Potential targets for
overwrite are (looking on a system with a 4.9 kernel):
writable only for the current process:
/proc/self/{fd,map_files}
(Yes, "ls -l" claims that you don't have write access, but that's not true;
"find -writable" will show you what access you really have.)
writable also for other owned processes:
/proc/$pid/{sched,autogroup,comm,mem,clear_refs,attr/*,oom_adj,
oom_score_adj,loginuid,coredump_filter,uid_map,gid_map,projid_map,
setgroups,timerslack_ns}
Blacklists are notoriously fragile; especially if the kernel wishes to add
some security-critical mount option at a later date, all existing systems
with older versions of fusermount installed will suddenly have a security
problem.
Additionally, if the kernel's option parsing became a tiny bit laxer, the
blacklist could probably be bypassed.
Whitelist known-harmless flags instead, even if it's slightly more
inconvenient.
If an attacker wishes to use the default configuration instead of the
system's actual configuration, they can attempt to trigger a failure in
read_conf(). This only permits increasing mount_max if it is lower than the
default, so it's not particularly interesting. Still, this should probably
be prevented robustly; bail out if funny stuff happens when we're trying to
read the config.
Note that the classic attack trick of opening so many files that the
system-wide limit is reached won't work here - because fusermount only
drops the fsuid, not the euid, the process is running with euid=0 and
CAP_SYS_ADMIN, so it bypasses the number-of-globally-open-files check in
get_empty_filp() (unless you're inside a user namespace).
The old code permits the following behavior:
$ _FUSE_COMMFD=10000 priv_strace -etrace=mount -s200 fusermount -o 'foobar=\,allow_other' mount
mount("/dev/fuse", ".", "fuse", MS_NOSUID|MS_NODEV, "foobar=\\,allow_other,fd=3,rootmode=40000,user_id=1000,group_id=1000") = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
However, backslashes do not have any special meaning for the kernel here.
As it happens, you can't abuse this because there is no FUSE mount option
that takes a string value that can contain backslashes; but this is very
brittle. Don't interpret "escape characters" in places where they don't
work.
Currently, in the kernel, copy_mount_options() copies in one page of
userspace memory (or less if some of that memory area is not mapped).
do_mount() then writes a null byte to the last byte of the copied page.
This means that mount option strings longer than PAGE_SIZE-1 bytes get
truncated silently.
Therefore, this can happen:
user@d9-ut:~$ _FUSE_COMMFD=10000 fusermount -o "$(perl -e 'print ","x4000')" mount
sending file descriptor: Bad file descriptor
user@d9-ut:~$ grep /mount /proc/mounts
/dev/fuse /home/user/mount fuse rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=1000,group_id=1000 0 0
user@d9-ut:~$ fusermount -u mount
user@d9-ut:~$ _FUSE_COMMFD=10000 fusermount -o "$(perl -e 'print ","x4050')" mount
sending file descriptor: Bad file descriptor
user@d9-ut:~$ grep /mount /proc/mounts
/dev/fuse /home/user/mount fuse rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=1000,group_id=100 0 0
user@d9-ut:~$ fusermount -u mount
user@d9-ut:~$ _FUSE_COMMFD=10000 fusermount -o "$(perl -e 'print ","x4051')" mount
sending file descriptor: Bad file descriptor
user@d9-ut:~$ grep /mount /proc/mounts
/dev/fuse /home/user/mount fuse rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=1000,group_id=10 0 0
user@d9-ut:~$ fusermount -u mount
user@d9-ut:~$ _FUSE_COMMFD=10000 fusermount -o "$(perl -e 'print ","x4052')" mount
sending file descriptor: Bad file descriptor
user@d9-ut:~$ grep /mount /proc/mounts
/dev/fuse /home/user/mount fuse rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=1000,group_id=1 0 0
user@d9-ut:~$ fusermount -u mount
I'm not aware of any context in which this is actually exploitable - you'd
still need the UIDs to fit, and you can't do it if the three GIDs of the
process don't match (in the case of a typical setgid binary), but it does
look like something that should be fixed.
I also plan to try to get this fixed on the kernel side.
Silence below warnings which appear if IGNORE_MTAB is defined.
[59/64] Compiling C object 'util/fusermount3@exe/fusermount.c.o'.
../util/fusermount.c:493:12: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
static int count_fuse_fs()
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
../util/fusermount.c: In function 'unmount_fuse':
../util/fusermount.c:508:46: warning: unused parameter 'quiet' [-Wunused-parameter]
static int unmount_fuse(const char *mnt, int quiet, int lazy)
^~~~~
