The function fuse_session_process_buf_int() would do much things
for FUSE_INTERRUPT requests, even there are no FUSE_INTERRUPT requests:
1. check every non-FUSE_INTERRUPT request and add these requests to the
linked list(se->list) under a big lock(se->lock).
2. the function fuse_free_req() frees every request and remove them from
the linked list(se->list) under a bing lock(se->lock).
These operations are not meaningful when there are no FUSE_INTERRUPT requests,
and have a great impact on the performance of fuse filesystem because the big
lock for each request.
In some cases, FUSE_INTERRUPT requests are infrequent, even none at all.
Besides, the user-defined filesystem may do nothing for FUSE_INTERRUPT requests.
And the kernel side has the option "no_interrupt" in struct fuse_conn. This kernel option
can be enabled by return ENOSYS in libfuse for the reply of FUSE_INTERRUPT request.
But I don't find the code to enable the "no_interrupt" kernel option in libfuse.
So add the no_interrupt support, and when this operaion is enabled:
1. remove the useless locking operaions and list operations.
2. return ENOSYS for the reply of FUSE_INTERRUPT request to inform the kernel to disable
FUSE_INTERRUPT request.
IN a bunch of comments we say 'under the terms of the GNU GPL', make
it clear this is GPLv2 (as LICENSE says).
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
An earlier version of the fioclient.c example was intended to be
used together with cusexmp.c. The former has since evolved into
ioctl_client.c and no longer has the function necessary to test
CUSE. Therefore, we've added a new cuse_client.c that is clearly
associated with the cuse.c example file system.
