mirror of
https://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git
synced 2024-11-24 10:22:41 +08:00
30aa57851a
2006-09-12 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> [BZ #2526] * README.libm: Fix a thinko in sqrt algorithm description. [BZ #3143] * manual/string.texi (argz_delete): Fix prototype. Patch by <alpt@freaknet.org>. 2006-08-26 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> [BZ #3138] * io/test-lfs.c (do_prepare): Give name_len type size_t. * io/tst-fcntl.c (do_prepare): Likewise. * posix/tst-exec.c (do_prepare): Likewise. * posix/tst-preadwrite.c (do_prepare): Likewise. * posix/tst-spawn.c (do_prepare): Likewise. * posix/tst-truncate.c (do_prepare): Likewise. * rt/tst-aio.c (do_prepare): Likewise. * rt/tst-aio64.c (do_prepare): Likewise. * stdlib/test-canon2.c (do_prepare): Give test_dir_len type size_t.
857 lines
31 KiB
Plaintext
857 lines
31 KiB
Plaintext
The following functions for the `long double' versions of the libm
|
|
function have to be written:
|
|
|
|
e_acosl.c
|
|
e_asinl.c
|
|
e_atan2l.c
|
|
e_expl.c
|
|
e_fmodl.c
|
|
e_hypotl.c
|
|
e_j0l.c
|
|
e_j1l.c
|
|
e_jnl.c
|
|
e_lgammal_r.c
|
|
e_logl.c
|
|
e_log10l.c
|
|
e_powl.c
|
|
e_rem_pio2l.c
|
|
e_sinhl.c
|
|
e_sqrtl.c
|
|
|
|
k_cosl.c
|
|
k_rem_pio2l.c
|
|
k_sinl.c
|
|
k_tanl.c
|
|
|
|
s_atanl.c
|
|
s_erfl.c
|
|
s_expm1l.c
|
|
s_log1pl.c
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
Methods
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
arcsin
|
|
~~~~~~
|
|
* Since asin(x) = x + x^3/6 + x^5*3/40 + x^7*15/336 + ...
|
|
* we approximate asin(x) on [0,0.5] by
|
|
* asin(x) = x + x*x^2*R(x^2)
|
|
* where
|
|
* R(x^2) is a rational approximation of (asin(x)-x)/x^3
|
|
* and its remez error is bounded by
|
|
* |(asin(x)-x)/x^3 - R(x^2)| < 2^(-58.75)
|
|
*
|
|
* For x in [0.5,1]
|
|
* asin(x) = pi/2-2*asin(sqrt((1-x)/2))
|
|
* Let y = (1-x), z = y/2, s := sqrt(z), and pio2_hi+pio2_lo=pi/2;
|
|
* then for x>0.98
|
|
* asin(x) = pi/2 - 2*(s+s*z*R(z))
|
|
* = pio2_hi - (2*(s+s*z*R(z)) - pio2_lo)
|
|
* For x<=0.98, let pio4_hi = pio2_hi/2, then
|
|
* f = hi part of s;
|
|
* c = sqrt(z) - f = (z-f*f)/(s+f) ...f+c=sqrt(z)
|
|
* and
|
|
* asin(x) = pi/2 - 2*(s+s*z*R(z))
|
|
* = pio4_hi+(pio4-2s)-(2s*z*R(z)-pio2_lo)
|
|
* = pio4_hi+(pio4-2f)-(2s*z*R(z)-(pio2_lo+2c))
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
arccos
|
|
~~~~~~
|
|
* Method :
|
|
* acos(x) = pi/2 - asin(x)
|
|
* acos(-x) = pi/2 + asin(x)
|
|
* For |x|<=0.5
|
|
* acos(x) = pi/2 - (x + x*x^2*R(x^2)) (see asin.c)
|
|
* For x>0.5
|
|
* acos(x) = pi/2 - (pi/2 - 2asin(sqrt((1-x)/2)))
|
|
* = 2asin(sqrt((1-x)/2))
|
|
* = 2s + 2s*z*R(z) ...z=(1-x)/2, s=sqrt(z)
|
|
* = 2f + (2c + 2s*z*R(z))
|
|
* where f=hi part of s, and c = (z-f*f)/(s+f) is the correction term
|
|
* for f so that f+c ~ sqrt(z).
|
|
* For x<-0.5
|
|
* acos(x) = pi - 2asin(sqrt((1-|x|)/2))
|
|
* = pi - 0.5*(s+s*z*R(z)), where z=(1-|x|)/2,s=sqrt(z)
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
atan2
|
|
~~~~~
|
|
* Method :
|
|
* 1. Reduce y to positive by atan2(y,x)=-atan2(-y,x).
|
|
* 2. Reduce x to positive by (if x and y are unexceptional):
|
|
* ARG (x+iy) = arctan(y/x) ... if x > 0,
|
|
* ARG (x+iy) = pi - arctan[y/(-x)] ... if x < 0,
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
atan
|
|
~~~~
|
|
* Method
|
|
* 1. Reduce x to positive by atan(x) = -atan(-x).
|
|
* 2. According to the integer k=4t+0.25 chopped, t=x, the argument
|
|
* is further reduced to one of the following intervals and the
|
|
* arctangent of t is evaluated by the corresponding formula:
|
|
*
|
|
* [0,7/16] atan(x) = t-t^3*(a1+t^2*(a2+...(a10+t^2*a11)...)
|
|
* [7/16,11/16] atan(x) = atan(1/2) + atan( (t-0.5)/(1+t/2) )
|
|
* [11/16.19/16] atan(x) = atan( 1 ) + atan( (t-1)/(1+t) )
|
|
* [19/16,39/16] atan(x) = atan(3/2) + atan( (t-1.5)/(1+1.5t) )
|
|
* [39/16,INF] atan(x) = atan(INF) + atan( -1/t )
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
exp
|
|
~~~
|
|
* Method
|
|
* 1. Argument reduction:
|
|
* Reduce x to an r so that |r| <= 0.5*ln2 ~ 0.34658.
|
|
* Given x, find r and integer k such that
|
|
*
|
|
* x = k*ln2 + r, |r| <= 0.5*ln2.
|
|
*
|
|
* Here r will be represented as r = hi-lo for better
|
|
* accuracy.
|
|
*
|
|
* 2. Approximation of exp(r) by a special rational function on
|
|
* the interval [0,0.34658]:
|
|
* Write
|
|
* R(r**2) = r*(exp(r)+1)/(exp(r)-1) = 2 + r*r/6 - r**4/360 + ...
|
|
* We use a special Reme algorithm on [0,0.34658] to generate
|
|
* a polynomial of degree 5 to approximate R. The maximum error
|
|
* of this polynomial approximation is bounded by 2**-59. In
|
|
* other words,
|
|
* R(z) ~ 2.0 + P1*z + P2*z**2 + P3*z**3 + P4*z**4 + P5*z**5
|
|
* (where z=r*r, and the values of P1 to P5 are listed below)
|
|
* and
|
|
* | 5 | -59
|
|
* | 2.0+P1*z+...+P5*z - R(z) | <= 2
|
|
* | |
|
|
* The computation of exp(r) thus becomes
|
|
* 2*r
|
|
* exp(r) = 1 + -------
|
|
* R - r
|
|
* r*R1(r)
|
|
* = 1 + r + ----------- (for better accuracy)
|
|
* 2 - R1(r)
|
|
* where
|
|
* 2 4 10
|
|
* R1(r) = r - (P1*r + P2*r + ... + P5*r ).
|
|
*
|
|
* 3. Scale back to obtain exp(x):
|
|
* From step 1, we have
|
|
* exp(x) = 2^k * exp(r)
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
hypot
|
|
~~~~~
|
|
* If (assume round-to-nearest) z=x*x+y*y
|
|
* has error less than sqrt(2)/2 ulp, than
|
|
* sqrt(z) has error less than 1 ulp (exercise).
|
|
*
|
|
* So, compute sqrt(x*x+y*y) with some care as
|
|
* follows to get the error below 1 ulp:
|
|
*
|
|
* Assume x>y>0;
|
|
* (if possible, set rounding to round-to-nearest)
|
|
* 1. if x > 2y use
|
|
* x1*x1+(y*y+(x2*(x+x1))) for x*x+y*y
|
|
* where x1 = x with lower 32 bits cleared, x2 = x-x1; else
|
|
* 2. if x <= 2y use
|
|
* t1*y1+((x-y)*(x-y)+(t1*y2+t2*y))
|
|
* where t1 = 2x with lower 32 bits cleared, t2 = 2x-t1,
|
|
* y1= y with lower 32 bits chopped, y2 = y-y1.
|
|
*
|
|
* NOTE: scaling may be necessary if some argument is too
|
|
* large or too tiny
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
j0/y0
|
|
~~~~~
|
|
* Method -- j0(x):
|
|
* 1. For tiny x, we use j0(x) = 1 - x^2/4 + x^4/64 - ...
|
|
* 2. Reduce x to |x| since j0(x)=j0(-x), and
|
|
* for x in (0,2)
|
|
* j0(x) = 1-z/4+ z^2*R0/S0, where z = x*x;
|
|
* (precision: |j0-1+z/4-z^2R0/S0 |<2**-63.67 )
|
|
* for x in (2,inf)
|
|
* j0(x) = sqrt(2/(pi*x))*(p0(x)*cos(x0)-q0(x)*sin(x0))
|
|
* where x0 = x-pi/4. It is better to compute sin(x0),cos(x0)
|
|
* as follow:
|
|
* cos(x0) = cos(x)cos(pi/4)+sin(x)sin(pi/4)
|
|
* = 1/sqrt(2) * (cos(x) + sin(x))
|
|
* sin(x0) = sin(x)cos(pi/4)-cos(x)sin(pi/4)
|
|
* = 1/sqrt(2) * (sin(x) - cos(x))
|
|
* (To avoid cancellation, use
|
|
* sin(x) +- cos(x) = -cos(2x)/(sin(x) -+ cos(x))
|
|
* to compute the worse one.)
|
|
*
|
|
* Method -- y0(x):
|
|
* 1. For x<2.
|
|
* Since
|
|
* y0(x) = 2/pi*(j0(x)*(ln(x/2)+Euler) + x^2/4 - ...)
|
|
* therefore y0(x)-2/pi*j0(x)*ln(x) is an even function.
|
|
* We use the following function to approximate y0,
|
|
* y0(x) = U(z)/V(z) + (2/pi)*(j0(x)*ln(x)), z= x^2
|
|
* where
|
|
* U(z) = u00 + u01*z + ... + u06*z^6
|
|
* V(z) = 1 + v01*z + ... + v04*z^4
|
|
* with absolute approximation error bounded by 2**-72.
|
|
* Note: For tiny x, U/V = u0 and j0(x)~1, hence
|
|
* y0(tiny) = u0 + (2/pi)*ln(tiny), (choose tiny<2**-27)
|
|
* 2. For x>=2.
|
|
* y0(x) = sqrt(2/(pi*x))*(p0(x)*cos(x0)+q0(x)*sin(x0))
|
|
* where x0 = x-pi/4. It is better to compute sin(x0),cos(x0)
|
|
* by the method mentioned above.
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
j1/y1
|
|
~~~~~
|
|
* Method -- j1(x):
|
|
* 1. For tiny x, we use j1(x) = x/2 - x^3/16 + x^5/384 - ...
|
|
* 2. Reduce x to |x| since j1(x)=-j1(-x), and
|
|
* for x in (0,2)
|
|
* j1(x) = x/2 + x*z*R0/S0, where z = x*x;
|
|
* (precision: |j1/x - 1/2 - R0/S0 |<2**-61.51 )
|
|
* for x in (2,inf)
|
|
* j1(x) = sqrt(2/(pi*x))*(p1(x)*cos(x1)-q1(x)*sin(x1))
|
|
* y1(x) = sqrt(2/(pi*x))*(p1(x)*sin(x1)+q1(x)*cos(x1))
|
|
* where x1 = x-3*pi/4. It is better to compute sin(x1),cos(x1)
|
|
* as follow:
|
|
* cos(x1) = cos(x)cos(3pi/4)+sin(x)sin(3pi/4)
|
|
* = 1/sqrt(2) * (sin(x) - cos(x))
|
|
* sin(x1) = sin(x)cos(3pi/4)-cos(x)sin(3pi/4)
|
|
* = -1/sqrt(2) * (sin(x) + cos(x))
|
|
* (To avoid cancellation, use
|
|
* sin(x) +- cos(x) = -cos(2x)/(sin(x) -+ cos(x))
|
|
* to compute the worse one.)
|
|
*
|
|
* Method -- y1(x):
|
|
* 1. screen out x<=0 cases: y1(0)=-inf, y1(x<0)=NaN
|
|
* 2. For x<2.
|
|
* Since
|
|
* y1(x) = 2/pi*(j1(x)*(ln(x/2)+Euler)-1/x-x/2+5/64*x^3-...)
|
|
* therefore y1(x)-2/pi*j1(x)*ln(x)-1/x is an odd function.
|
|
* We use the following function to approximate y1,
|
|
* y1(x) = x*U(z)/V(z) + (2/pi)*(j1(x)*ln(x)-1/x), z= x^2
|
|
* where for x in [0,2] (abs err less than 2**-65.89)
|
|
* U(z) = U0[0] + U0[1]*z + ... + U0[4]*z^4
|
|
* V(z) = 1 + v0[0]*z + ... + v0[4]*z^5
|
|
* Note: For tiny x, 1/x dominate y1 and hence
|
|
* y1(tiny) = -2/pi/tiny, (choose tiny<2**-54)
|
|
* 3. For x>=2.
|
|
* y1(x) = sqrt(2/(pi*x))*(p1(x)*sin(x1)+q1(x)*cos(x1))
|
|
* where x1 = x-3*pi/4. It is better to compute sin(x1),cos(x1)
|
|
* by method mentioned above.
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
jn/yn
|
|
~~~~~
|
|
* Note 2. About jn(n,x), yn(n,x)
|
|
* For n=0, j0(x) is called,
|
|
* for n=1, j1(x) is called,
|
|
* for n<x, forward recursion us used starting
|
|
* from values of j0(x) and j1(x).
|
|
* for n>x, a continued fraction approximation to
|
|
* j(n,x)/j(n-1,x) is evaluated and then backward
|
|
* recursion is used starting from a supposed value
|
|
* for j(n,x). The resulting value of j(0,x) is
|
|
* compared with the actual value to correct the
|
|
* supposed value of j(n,x).
|
|
*
|
|
* yn(n,x) is similar in all respects, except
|
|
* that forward recursion is used for all
|
|
* values of n>1.
|
|
|
|
jn:
|
|
/* (x >> n**2)
|
|
* Jn(x) = cos(x-(2n+1)*pi/4)*sqrt(2/x*pi)
|
|
* Yn(x) = sin(x-(2n+1)*pi/4)*sqrt(2/x*pi)
|
|
* Let s=sin(x), c=cos(x),
|
|
* xn=x-(2n+1)*pi/4, sqt2 = sqrt(2),then
|
|
*
|
|
* n sin(xn)*sqt2 cos(xn)*sqt2
|
|
* ----------------------------------
|
|
* 0 s-c c+s
|
|
* 1 -s-c -c+s
|
|
* 2 -s+c -c-s
|
|
* 3 s+c c-s
|
|
...
|
|
/* x is tiny, return the first Taylor expansion of J(n,x)
|
|
* J(n,x) = 1/n!*(x/2)^n - ...
|
|
...
|
|
/* use backward recurrence */
|
|
/* x x^2 x^2
|
|
* J(n,x)/J(n-1,x) = ---- ------ ------ .....
|
|
* 2n - 2(n+1) - 2(n+2)
|
|
*
|
|
* 1 1 1
|
|
* (for large x) = ---- ------ ------ .....
|
|
* 2n 2(n+1) 2(n+2)
|
|
* -- - ------ - ------ -
|
|
* x x x
|
|
*
|
|
* Let w = 2n/x and h=2/x, then the above quotient
|
|
* is equal to the continued fraction:
|
|
* 1
|
|
* = -----------------------
|
|
* 1
|
|
* w - -----------------
|
|
* 1
|
|
* w+h - ---------
|
|
* w+2h - ...
|
|
*
|
|
* To determine how many terms needed, let
|
|
* Q(0) = w, Q(1) = w(w+h) - 1,
|
|
* Q(k) = (w+k*h)*Q(k-1) - Q(k-2),
|
|
* When Q(k) > 1e4 good for single
|
|
* When Q(k) > 1e9 good for double
|
|
* When Q(k) > 1e17 good for quadruple
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
/* estimate log((2/x)^n*n!) = n*log(2/x)+n*ln(n)
|
|
* Hence, if n*(log(2n/x)) > ...
|
|
* single 8.8722839355e+01
|
|
* double 7.09782712893383973096e+02
|
|
* long double 1.1356523406294143949491931077970765006170e+04
|
|
* then recurrent value may overflow and the result is
|
|
* likely underflow to zero
|
|
|
|
yn:
|
|
/* (x >> n**2)
|
|
* Jn(x) = cos(x-(2n+1)*pi/4)*sqrt(2/x*pi)
|
|
* Yn(x) = sin(x-(2n+1)*pi/4)*sqrt(2/x*pi)
|
|
* Let s=sin(x), c=cos(x),
|
|
* xn=x-(2n+1)*pi/4, sqt2 = sqrt(2),then
|
|
*
|
|
* n sin(xn)*sqt2 cos(xn)*sqt2
|
|
* ----------------------------------
|
|
* 0 s-c c+s
|
|
* 1 -s-c -c+s
|
|
* 2 -s+c -c-s
|
|
* 3 s+c c-s
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
lgamma
|
|
~~~~~~
|
|
* Method:
|
|
* 1. Argument Reduction for 0 < x <= 8
|
|
* Since gamma(1+s)=s*gamma(s), for x in [0,8], we may
|
|
* reduce x to a number in [1.5,2.5] by
|
|
* lgamma(1+s) = log(s) + lgamma(s)
|
|
* for example,
|
|
* lgamma(7.3) = log(6.3) + lgamma(6.3)
|
|
* = log(6.3*5.3) + lgamma(5.3)
|
|
* = log(6.3*5.3*4.3*3.3*2.3) + lgamma(2.3)
|
|
* 2. Polynomial approximation of lgamma around its
|
|
* minimun ymin=1.461632144968362245 to maintain monotonicity.
|
|
* On [ymin-0.23, ymin+0.27] (i.e., [1.23164,1.73163]), use
|
|
* Let z = x-ymin;
|
|
* lgamma(x) = -1.214862905358496078218 + z^2*poly(z)
|
|
* where
|
|
* poly(z) is a 14 degree polynomial.
|
|
* 2. Rational approximation in the primary interval [2,3]
|
|
* We use the following approximation:
|
|
* s = x-2.0;
|
|
* lgamma(x) = 0.5*s + s*P(s)/Q(s)
|
|
* with accuracy
|
|
* |P/Q - (lgamma(x)-0.5s)| < 2**-61.71
|
|
* Our algorithms are based on the following observation
|
|
*
|
|
* zeta(2)-1 2 zeta(3)-1 3
|
|
* lgamma(2+s) = s*(1-Euler) + --------- * s - --------- * s + ...
|
|
* 2 3
|
|
*
|
|
* where Euler = 0.5771... is the Euler constant, which is very
|
|
* close to 0.5.
|
|
*
|
|
* 3. For x>=8, we have
|
|
* lgamma(x)~(x-0.5)log(x)-x+0.5*log(2pi)+1/(12x)-1/(360x**3)+....
|
|
* (better formula:
|
|
* lgamma(x)~(x-0.5)*(log(x)-1)-.5*(log(2pi)-1) + ...)
|
|
* Let z = 1/x, then we approximation
|
|
* f(z) = lgamma(x) - (x-0.5)(log(x)-1)
|
|
* by
|
|
* 3 5 11
|
|
* w = w0 + w1*z + w2*z + w3*z + ... + w6*z
|
|
* where
|
|
* |w - f(z)| < 2**-58.74
|
|
*
|
|
* 4. For negative x, since (G is gamma function)
|
|
* -x*G(-x)*G(x) = pi/sin(pi*x),
|
|
* we have
|
|
* G(x) = pi/(sin(pi*x)*(-x)*G(-x))
|
|
* since G(-x) is positive, sign(G(x)) = sign(sin(pi*x)) for x<0
|
|
* Hence, for x<0, signgam = sign(sin(pi*x)) and
|
|
* lgamma(x) = log(|Gamma(x)|)
|
|
* = log(pi/(|x*sin(pi*x)|)) - lgamma(-x);
|
|
* Note: one should avoid compute pi*(-x) directly in the
|
|
* computation of sin(pi*(-x)).
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
log
|
|
~~~
|
|
* Method :
|
|
* 1. Argument Reduction: find k and f such that
|
|
* x = 2^k * (1+f),
|
|
* where sqrt(2)/2 < 1+f < sqrt(2) .
|
|
*
|
|
* 2. Approximation of log(1+f).
|
|
* Let s = f/(2+f) ; based on log(1+f) = log(1+s) - log(1-s)
|
|
* = 2s + 2/3 s**3 + 2/5 s**5 + .....,
|
|
* = 2s + s*R
|
|
* We use a special Reme algorithm on [0,0.1716] to generate
|
|
* a polynomial of degree 14 to approximate R The maximum error
|
|
* of this polynomial approximation is bounded by 2**-58.45. In
|
|
* other words,
|
|
* 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
|
|
* R(z) ~ Lg1*s +Lg2*s +Lg3*s +Lg4*s +Lg5*s +Lg6*s +Lg7*s
|
|
* (the values of Lg1 to Lg7 are listed in the program)
|
|
* and
|
|
* | 2 14 | -58.45
|
|
* | Lg1*s +...+Lg7*s - R(z) | <= 2
|
|
* | |
|
|
* Note that 2s = f - s*f = f - hfsq + s*hfsq, where hfsq = f*f/2.
|
|
* In order to guarantee error in log below 1ulp, we compute log
|
|
* by
|
|
* log(1+f) = f - s*(f - R) (if f is not too large)
|
|
* log(1+f) = f - (hfsq - s*(hfsq+R)). (better accuracy)
|
|
*
|
|
* 3. Finally, log(x) = k*ln2 + log(1+f).
|
|
* = k*ln2_hi+(f-(hfsq-(s*(hfsq+R)+k*ln2_lo)))
|
|
* Here ln2 is split into two floating point number:
|
|
* ln2_hi + ln2_lo,
|
|
* where n*ln2_hi is always exact for |n| < 2000.
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
log10
|
|
~~~~~
|
|
* Method :
|
|
* Let log10_2hi = leading 40 bits of log10(2) and
|
|
* log10_2lo = log10(2) - log10_2hi,
|
|
* ivln10 = 1/log(10) rounded.
|
|
* Then
|
|
* n = ilogb(x),
|
|
* if(n<0) n = n+1;
|
|
* x = scalbn(x,-n);
|
|
* log10(x) := n*log10_2hi + (n*log10_2lo + ivln10*log(x))
|
|
*
|
|
* Note 1:
|
|
* To guarantee log10(10**n)=n, where 10**n is normal, the rounding
|
|
* mode must set to Round-to-Nearest.
|
|
* Note 2:
|
|
* [1/log(10)] rounded to 53 bits has error .198 ulps;
|
|
* log10 is monotonic at all binary break points.
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
pow
|
|
~~~
|
|
* Method: Let x = 2 * (1+f)
|
|
* 1. Compute and return log2(x) in two pieces:
|
|
* log2(x) = w1 + w2,
|
|
* where w1 has 53-24 = 29 bit trailing zeros.
|
|
* 2. Perform y*log2(x) = n+y' by simulating muti-precision
|
|
* arithmetic, where |y'|<=0.5.
|
|
* 3. Return x**y = 2**n*exp(y'*log2)
|
|
*
|
|
* Special cases:
|
|
* 1. (anything) ** 0 is 1
|
|
* 2. (anything) ** 1 is itself
|
|
* 3. (anything) ** NAN is NAN
|
|
* 4. NAN ** (anything except 0) is NAN
|
|
* 5. +-(|x| > 1) ** +INF is +INF
|
|
* 6. +-(|x| > 1) ** -INF is +0
|
|
* 7. +-(|x| < 1) ** +INF is +0
|
|
* 8. +-(|x| < 1) ** -INF is +INF
|
|
* 9. +-1 ** +-INF is NAN
|
|
* 10. +0 ** (+anything except 0, NAN) is +0
|
|
* 11. -0 ** (+anything except 0, NAN, odd integer) is +0
|
|
* 12. +0 ** (-anything except 0, NAN) is +INF
|
|
* 13. -0 ** (-anything except 0, NAN, odd integer) is +INF
|
|
* 14. -0 ** (odd integer) = -( +0 ** (odd integer) )
|
|
* 15. +INF ** (+anything except 0,NAN) is +INF
|
|
* 16. +INF ** (-anything except 0,NAN) is +0
|
|
* 17. -INF ** (anything) = -0 ** (-anything)
|
|
* 18. (-anything) ** (integer) is (-1)**(integer)*(+anything**integer)
|
|
* 19. (-anything except 0 and inf) ** (non-integer) is NAN
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
rem_pio2 return the remainder of x rem pi/2 in y[0]+y[1]
|
|
~~~~~~~~
|
|
This is one of the basic functions which is written with highest accuracy
|
|
in mind.
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
sinh
|
|
~~~~
|
|
* Method :
|
|
* mathematically sinh(x) if defined to be (exp(x)-exp(-x))/2
|
|
* 1. Replace x by |x| (sinh(-x) = -sinh(x)).
|
|
* 2.
|
|
* E + E/(E+1)
|
|
* 0 <= x <= 22 : sinh(x) := --------------, E=expm1(x)
|
|
* 2
|
|
*
|
|
* 22 <= x <= lnovft : sinh(x) := exp(x)/2
|
|
* lnovft <= x <= ln2ovft: sinh(x) := exp(x/2)/2 * exp(x/2)
|
|
* ln2ovft < x : sinh(x) := x*shuge (overflow)
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
sqrt
|
|
~~~~
|
|
* Method:
|
|
* Bit by bit method using integer arithmetic. (Slow, but portable)
|
|
* 1. Normalization
|
|
* Scale x to y in [1,4) with even powers of 2:
|
|
* find an integer k such that 1 <= (y=x*2^(-2k)) < 4, then
|
|
* sqrt(x) = 2^k * sqrt(y)
|
|
* 2. Bit by bit computation
|
|
* Let q = sqrt(y) truncated to i bit after binary point (q = 1),
|
|
* i 0
|
|
* i+1 2
|
|
* s = 2*q , and y = 2 * ( y - q ). (1)
|
|
* i i i i
|
|
*
|
|
* To compute q from q , one checks whether
|
|
* i+1 i
|
|
*
|
|
* -(i+1) 2
|
|
* (q + 2 ) <= y. (2)
|
|
* i
|
|
* -(i+1)
|
|
* If (2) is false, then q = q ; otherwise q = q + 2 .
|
|
* i+1 i i+1 i
|
|
*
|
|
* With some algebric manipulation, it is not difficult to see
|
|
* that (2) is equivalent to
|
|
* -(i+1)
|
|
* s + 2 <= y (3)
|
|
* i i
|
|
*
|
|
* The advantage of (3) is that s and y can be computed by
|
|
* i i
|
|
* the following recurrence formula:
|
|
* if (3) is false
|
|
*
|
|
* s = s , y = y ; (4)
|
|
* i+1 i i+1 i
|
|
*
|
|
* otherwise,
|
|
* -i -(i+1)
|
|
* s = s + 2 , y = y - s - 2 (5)
|
|
* i+1 i i+1 i i
|
|
*
|
|
* One may easily use induction to prove (4) and (5).
|
|
* Note. Since the left hand side of (3) contain only i+2 bits,
|
|
* it does not necessary to do a full (53-bit) comparison
|
|
* in (3).
|
|
* 3. Final rounding
|
|
* After generating the 53 bits result, we compute one more bit.
|
|
* Together with the remainder, we can decide whether the
|
|
* result is exact, bigger than 1/2ulp, or less than 1/2ulp
|
|
* (it will never equal to 1/2ulp).
|
|
* The rounding mode can be detected by checking whether
|
|
* huge + tiny is equal to huge, and whether huge - tiny is
|
|
* equal to huge for some floating point number "huge" and "tiny".
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
cos
|
|
~~~
|
|
* kernel cos function on [-pi/4, pi/4], pi/4 ~ 0.785398164
|
|
* Input x is assumed to be bounded by ~pi/4 in magnitude.
|
|
* Input y is the tail of x.
|
|
*
|
|
* Algorithm
|
|
* 1. Since cos(-x) = cos(x), we need only to consider positive x.
|
|
* 2. if x < 2^-27 (hx<0x3e400000 0), return 1 with inexact if x!=0.
|
|
* 3. cos(x) is approximated by a polynomial of degree 14 on
|
|
* [0,pi/4]
|
|
* 4 14
|
|
* cos(x) ~ 1 - x*x/2 + C1*x + ... + C6*x
|
|
* where the remez error is
|
|
*
|
|
* | 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 | -58
|
|
* |cos(x)-(1-.5*x +C1*x +C2*x +C3*x +C4*x +C5*x +C6*x )| <= 2
|
|
* | |
|
|
*
|
|
* 4 6 8 10 12 14
|
|
* 4. let r = C1*x +C2*x +C3*x +C4*x +C5*x +C6*x , then
|
|
* cos(x) = 1 - x*x/2 + r
|
|
* since cos(x+y) ~ cos(x) - sin(x)*y
|
|
* ~ cos(x) - x*y,
|
|
* a correction term is necessary in cos(x) and hence
|
|
* cos(x+y) = 1 - (x*x/2 - (r - x*y))
|
|
* For better accuracy when x > 0.3, let qx = |x|/4 with
|
|
* the last 32 bits mask off, and if x > 0.78125, let qx = 0.28125.
|
|
* Then
|
|
* cos(x+y) = (1-qx) - ((x*x/2-qx) - (r-x*y)).
|
|
* Note that 1-qx and (x*x/2-qx) is EXACT here, and the
|
|
* magnitude of the latter is at least a quarter of x*x/2,
|
|
* thus, reducing the rounding error in the subtraction.
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
sin
|
|
~~~
|
|
* kernel sin function on [-pi/4, pi/4], pi/4 ~ 0.7854
|
|
* Input x is assumed to be bounded by ~pi/4 in magnitude.
|
|
* Input y is the tail of x.
|
|
* Input iy indicates whether y is 0. (if iy=0, y assume to be 0).
|
|
*
|
|
* Algorithm
|
|
* 1. Since sin(-x) = -sin(x), we need only to consider positive x.
|
|
* 2. if x < 2^-27 (hx<0x3e400000 0), return x with inexact if x!=0.
|
|
* 3. sin(x) is approximated by a polynomial of degree 13 on
|
|
* [0,pi/4]
|
|
* 3 13
|
|
* sin(x) ~ x + S1*x + ... + S6*x
|
|
* where
|
|
*
|
|
* |sin(x) 2 4 6 8 10 12 | -58
|
|
* |----- - (1+S1*x +S2*x +S3*x +S4*x +S5*x +S6*x )| <= 2
|
|
* | x |
|
|
*
|
|
* 4. sin(x+y) = sin(x) + sin'(x')*y
|
|
* ~ sin(x) + (1-x*x/2)*y
|
|
* For better accuracy, let
|
|
* 3 2 2 2 2
|
|
* r = x *(S2+x *(S3+x *(S4+x *(S5+x *S6))))
|
|
* then 3 2
|
|
* sin(x) = x + (S1*x + (x *(r-y/2)+y))
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
tan
|
|
~~~
|
|
* kernel tan function on [-pi/4, pi/4], pi/4 ~ 0.7854
|
|
* Input x is assumed to be bounded by ~pi/4 in magnitude.
|
|
* Input y is the tail of x.
|
|
* Input k indicates whether tan (if k=1) or
|
|
* -1/tan (if k= -1) is returned.
|
|
*
|
|
* Algorithm
|
|
* 1. Since tan(-x) = -tan(x), we need only to consider positive x.
|
|
* 2. if x < 2^-28 (hx<0x3e300000 0), return x with inexact if x!=0.
|
|
* 3. tan(x) is approximated by a odd polynomial of degree 27 on
|
|
* [0,0.67434]
|
|
* 3 27
|
|
* tan(x) ~ x + T1*x + ... + T13*x
|
|
* where
|
|
*
|
|
* |tan(x) 2 4 26 | -59.2
|
|
* |----- - (1+T1*x +T2*x +.... +T13*x )| <= 2
|
|
* | x |
|
|
*
|
|
* Note: tan(x+y) = tan(x) + tan'(x)*y
|
|
* ~ tan(x) + (1+x*x)*y
|
|
* Therefore, for better accuracy in computing tan(x+y), let
|
|
* 3 2 2 2 2
|
|
* r = x *(T2+x *(T3+x *(...+x *(T12+x *T13))))
|
|
* then
|
|
* 3 2
|
|
* tan(x+y) = x + (T1*x + (x *(r+y)+y))
|
|
*
|
|
* 4. For x in [0.67434,pi/4], let y = pi/4 - x, then
|
|
* tan(x) = tan(pi/4-y) = (1-tan(y))/(1+tan(y))
|
|
* = 1 - 2*(tan(y) - (tan(y)^2)/(1+tan(y)))
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
atan
|
|
~~~~
|
|
* Method
|
|
* 1. Reduce x to positive by atan(x) = -atan(-x).
|
|
* 2. According to the integer k=4t+0.25 chopped, t=x, the argument
|
|
* is further reduced to one of the following intervals and the
|
|
* arctangent of t is evaluated by the corresponding formula:
|
|
*
|
|
* [0,7/16] atan(x) = t-t^3*(a1+t^2*(a2+...(a10+t^2*a11)...)
|
|
* [7/16,11/16] atan(x) = atan(1/2) + atan( (t-0.5)/(1+t/2) )
|
|
* [11/16.19/16] atan(x) = atan( 1 ) + atan( (t-1)/(1+t) )
|
|
* [19/16,39/16] atan(x) = atan(3/2) + atan( (t-1.5)/(1+1.5t) )
|
|
* [39/16,INF] atan(x) = atan(INF) + atan( -1/t )
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
erf
|
|
~~~
|
|
* x
|
|
* 2 |\
|
|
* erf(x) = --------- | exp(-t*t)dt
|
|
* sqrt(pi) \|
|
|
* 0
|
|
*
|
|
* erfc(x) = 1-erf(x)
|
|
* Note that
|
|
* erf(-x) = -erf(x)
|
|
* erfc(-x) = 2 - erfc(x)
|
|
*
|
|
* Method:
|
|
* 1. For |x| in [0, 0.84375]
|
|
* erf(x) = x + x*R(x^2)
|
|
* erfc(x) = 1 - erf(x) if x in [-.84375,0.25]
|
|
* = 0.5 + ((0.5-x)-x*R) if x in [0.25,0.84375]
|
|
* where R = P/Q where P is an odd poly of degree 8 and
|
|
* Q is an odd poly of degree 10.
|
|
* -57.90
|
|
* | R - (erf(x)-x)/x | <= 2
|
|
*
|
|
*
|
|
* Remark. The formula is derived by noting
|
|
* erf(x) = (2/sqrt(pi))*(x - x^3/3 + x^5/10 - x^7/42 + ....)
|
|
* and that
|
|
* 2/sqrt(pi) = 1.128379167095512573896158903121545171688
|
|
* is close to one. The interval is chosen because the fix
|
|
* point of erf(x) is near 0.6174 (i.e., erf(x)=x when x is
|
|
* near 0.6174), and by some experiment, 0.84375 is chosen to
|
|
* guarantee the error is less than one ulp for erf.
|
|
*
|
|
* 2. For |x| in [0.84375,1.25], let s = |x| - 1, and
|
|
* c = 0.84506291151 rounded to single (24 bits)
|
|
* erf(x) = sign(x) * (c + P1(s)/Q1(s))
|
|
* erfc(x) = (1-c) - P1(s)/Q1(s) if x > 0
|
|
* 1+(c+P1(s)/Q1(s)) if x < 0
|
|
* |P1/Q1 - (erf(|x|)-c)| <= 2**-59.06
|
|
* Remark: here we use the taylor series expansion at x=1.
|
|
* erf(1+s) = erf(1) + s*Poly(s)
|
|
* = 0.845.. + P1(s)/Q1(s)
|
|
* That is, we use rational approximation to approximate
|
|
* erf(1+s) - (c = (single)0.84506291151)
|
|
* Note that |P1/Q1|< 0.078 for x in [0.84375,1.25]
|
|
* where
|
|
* P1(s) = degree 6 poly in s
|
|
* Q1(s) = degree 6 poly in s
|
|
*
|
|
* 3. For x in [1.25,1/0.35(~2.857143)],
|
|
* erfc(x) = (1/x)*exp(-x*x-0.5625+R1/S1)
|
|
* erf(x) = 1 - erfc(x)
|
|
* where
|
|
* R1(z) = degree 7 poly in z, (z=1/x^2)
|
|
* S1(z) = degree 8 poly in z
|
|
*
|
|
* 4. For x in [1/0.35,28]
|
|
* erfc(x) = (1/x)*exp(-x*x-0.5625+R2/S2) if x > 0
|
|
* = 2.0 - (1/x)*exp(-x*x-0.5625+R2/S2) if -6<x<0
|
|
* = 2.0 - tiny (if x <= -6)
|
|
* erf(x) = sign(x)*(1.0 - erfc(x)) if x < 6, else
|
|
* erf(x) = sign(x)*(1.0 - tiny)
|
|
* where
|
|
* R2(z) = degree 6 poly in z, (z=1/x^2)
|
|
* S2(z) = degree 7 poly in z
|
|
*
|
|
* Note1:
|
|
* To compute exp(-x*x-0.5625+R/S), let s be a single
|
|
* precision number and s := x; then
|
|
* -x*x = -s*s + (s-x)*(s+x)
|
|
* exp(-x*x-0.5626+R/S) =
|
|
* exp(-s*s-0.5625)*exp((s-x)*(s+x)+R/S);
|
|
* Note2:
|
|
* Here 4 and 5 make use of the asymptotic series
|
|
* exp(-x*x)
|
|
* erfc(x) ~ ---------- * ( 1 + Poly(1/x^2) )
|
|
* x*sqrt(pi)
|
|
* We use rational approximation to approximate
|
|
* g(s)=f(1/x^2) = log(erfc(x)*x) - x*x + 0.5625
|
|
* Here is the error bound for R1/S1 and R2/S2
|
|
* |R1/S1 - f(x)| < 2**(-62.57)
|
|
* |R2/S2 - f(x)| < 2**(-61.52)
|
|
*
|
|
* 5. For inf > x >= 28
|
|
* erf(x) = sign(x) *(1 - tiny) (raise inexact)
|
|
* erfc(x) = tiny*tiny (raise underflow) if x > 0
|
|
* = 2 - tiny if x<0
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
expm1 Returns exp(x)-1, the exponential of x minus 1
|
|
~~~~~
|
|
* Method
|
|
* 1. Argument reduction:
|
|
* Given x, find r and integer k such that
|
|
*
|
|
* x = k*ln2 + r, |r| <= 0.5*ln2 ~ 0.34658
|
|
*
|
|
* Here a correction term c will be computed to compensate
|
|
* the error in r when rounded to a floating-point number.
|
|
*
|
|
* 2. Approximating expm1(r) by a special rational function on
|
|
* the interval [0,0.34658]:
|
|
* Since
|
|
* r*(exp(r)+1)/(exp(r)-1) = 2+ r^2/6 - r^4/360 + ...
|
|
* we define R1(r*r) by
|
|
* r*(exp(r)+1)/(exp(r)-1) = 2+ r^2/6 * R1(r*r)
|
|
* That is,
|
|
* R1(r**2) = 6/r *((exp(r)+1)/(exp(r)-1) - 2/r)
|
|
* = 6/r * ( 1 + 2.0*(1/(exp(r)-1) - 1/r))
|
|
* = 1 - r^2/60 + r^4/2520 - r^6/100800 + ...
|
|
* We use a special Reme algorithm on [0,0.347] to generate
|
|
* a polynomial of degree 5 in r*r to approximate R1. The
|
|
* maximum error of this polynomial approximation is bounded
|
|
* by 2**-61. In other words,
|
|
* R1(z) ~ 1.0 + Q1*z + Q2*z**2 + Q3*z**3 + Q4*z**4 + Q5*z**5
|
|
* where Q1 = -1.6666666666666567384E-2,
|
|
* Q2 = 3.9682539681370365873E-4,
|
|
* Q3 = -9.9206344733435987357E-6,
|
|
* Q4 = 2.5051361420808517002E-7,
|
|
* Q5 = -6.2843505682382617102E-9;
|
|
* (where z=r*r, and the values of Q1 to Q5 are listed below)
|
|
* with error bounded by
|
|
* | 5 | -61
|
|
* | 1.0+Q1*z+...+Q5*z - R1(z) | <= 2
|
|
* | |
|
|
*
|
|
* expm1(r) = exp(r)-1 is then computed by the following
|
|
* specific way which minimize the accumulation rounding error:
|
|
* 2 3
|
|
* r r [ 3 - (R1 + R1*r/2) ]
|
|
* expm1(r) = r + --- + --- * [--------------------]
|
|
* 2 2 [ 6 - r*(3 - R1*r/2) ]
|
|
*
|
|
* To compensate the error in the argument reduction, we use
|
|
* expm1(r+c) = expm1(r) + c + expm1(r)*c
|
|
* ~ expm1(r) + c + r*c
|
|
* Thus c+r*c will be added in as the correction terms for
|
|
* expm1(r+c). Now rearrange the term to avoid optimization
|
|
* screw up:
|
|
* ( 2 2 )
|
|
* ({ ( r [ R1 - (3 - R1*r/2) ] ) } r )
|
|
* expm1(r+c)~r - ({r*(--- * [--------------------]-c)-c} - --- )
|
|
* ({ ( 2 [ 6 - r*(3 - R1*r/2) ] ) } 2 )
|
|
* ( )
|
|
*
|
|
* = r - E
|
|
* 3. Scale back to obtain expm1(x):
|
|
* From step 1, we have
|
|
* expm1(x) = either 2^k*[expm1(r)+1] - 1
|
|
* = or 2^k*[expm1(r) + (1-2^-k)]
|
|
* 4. Implementation notes:
|
|
* (A). To save one multiplication, we scale the coefficient Qi
|
|
* to Qi*2^i, and replace z by (x^2)/2.
|
|
* (B). To achieve maximum accuracy, we compute expm1(x) by
|
|
* (i) if x < -56*ln2, return -1.0, (raise inexact if x!=inf)
|
|
* (ii) if k=0, return r-E
|
|
* (iii) if k=-1, return 0.5*(r-E)-0.5
|
|
* (iv) if k=1 if r < -0.25, return 2*((r+0.5)- E)
|
|
* else return 1.0+2.0*(r-E);
|
|
* (v) if (k<-2||k>56) return 2^k(1-(E-r)) - 1 (or exp(x)-1)
|
|
* (vi) if k <= 20, return 2^k((1-2^-k)-(E-r)), else
|
|
* (vii) return 2^k(1-((E+2^-k)-r))
|
|
*
|
|
* Special cases:
|
|
* expm1(INF) is INF, expm1(NaN) is NaN;
|
|
* expm1(-INF) is -1, and
|
|
* for finite argument, only expm1(0)=0 is exact.
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
log1p
|
|
~~~~~
|
|
* Method :
|
|
* 1. Argument Reduction: find k and f such that
|
|
* 1+x = 2^k * (1+f),
|
|
* where sqrt(2)/2 < 1+f < sqrt(2) .
|
|
*
|
|
* Note. If k=0, then f=x is exact. However, if k!=0, then f
|
|
* may not be representable exactly. In that case, a correction
|
|
* term is need. Let u=1+x rounded. Let c = (1+x)-u, then
|
|
* log(1+x) - log(u) ~ c/u. Thus, we proceed to compute log(u),
|
|
* and add back the correction term c/u.
|
|
* (Note: when x > 2**53, one can simply return log(x))
|
|
*
|
|
* 2. Approximation of log1p(f).
|
|
* Let s = f/(2+f) ; based on log(1+f) = log(1+s) - log(1-s)
|
|
* = 2s + 2/3 s**3 + 2/5 s**5 + .....,
|
|
* = 2s + s*R
|
|
* We use a special Reme algorithm on [0,0.1716] to generate
|
|
* a polynomial of degree 14 to approximate R The maximum error
|
|
* of this polynomial approximation is bounded by 2**-58.45. In
|
|
* other words,
|
|
* 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
|
|
* R(z) ~ Lp1*s +Lp2*s +Lp3*s +Lp4*s +Lp5*s +Lp6*s +Lp7*s
|
|
* (the values of Lp1 to Lp7 are listed in the program)
|
|
* and
|
|
* | 2 14 | -58.45
|
|
* | Lp1*s +...+Lp7*s - R(z) | <= 2
|
|
* | |
|
|
* Note that 2s = f - s*f = f - hfsq + s*hfsq, where hfsq = f*f/2.
|
|
* In order to guarantee error in log below 1ulp, we compute log
|
|
* by
|
|
* log1p(f) = f - (hfsq - s*(hfsq+R)).
|
|
*
|
|
* 3. Finally, log1p(x) = k*ln2 + log1p(f).
|
|
* = k*ln2_hi+(f-(hfsq-(s*(hfsq+R)+k*ln2_lo)))
|
|
* Here ln2 is split into two floating point number:
|
|
* ln2_hi + ln2_lo,
|
|
* where n*ln2_hi is always exact for |n| < 2000.
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|