mirror of
https://github.com/git/git.git
synced 2024-11-23 18:05:29 +08:00
4f6d26b167
When creating a pack-file using 'git pack-objects --revs' we provide a list of interesting and uninteresting commits. For example, a push operation would make the local topic branch be interesting and the known remote refs as uninteresting. We want to discover the set of new objects to send to the server as a thin pack. We walk these commits until we discover a frontier of commits such that every commit walk starting at interesting commits ends in a root commit or unintersting commit. We then need to discover which non-commit objects are reachable from uninteresting commits. This commit walk is not changing during this series. The mark_edges_uninteresting() method in list-objects.c iterates on the commit list and does the following: * If the commit is UNINTERSTING, then mark its root tree and every object it can reach as UNINTERESTING. * If the commit is interesting, then mark the root tree of every UNINTERSTING parent (and all objects that tree can reach) as UNINTERSTING. At the very end, we repeat the process on every commit directly given to the revision walk from stdin. This helps ensure we properly cover shallow commits that otherwise were not included in the frontier. The logic to recursively follow trees is in the mark_tree_uninteresting() method in revision.c. The algorithm avoids duplicate work by not recursing into trees that are already marked UNINTERSTING. Add a new 'sparse' option to the mark_edges_uninteresting() method that performs this logic in a slightly different way. As we iterate over the commits, we add all of the root trees to an oidset. Then, call mark_trees_uninteresting_sparse() on that oidset. Note that we include interesting trees in this process. The current implementation of mark_trees_unintersting_sparse() will walk the same trees as the old logic, but this will be replaced in a later change. Add a '--sparse' flag in 'git pack-objects' to call this new logic. Add a new test script t/t5322-pack-objects-sparse.sh that tests this option. The tests currently demonstrate that the resulting object list is the same as the old algorithm. This includes a case where both algorithms pack an object that is not needed by a remote due to limits on the explored set of trees. When the sparse algorithm is changed in a later commit, we will add a test that demonstrates a change of behavior in some cases. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
29 lines
762 B
C
29 lines
762 B
C
#ifndef LIST_OBJECTS_H
|
|
#define LIST_OBJECTS_H
|
|
|
|
struct commit;
|
|
struct object;
|
|
struct rev_info;
|
|
|
|
typedef void (*show_commit_fn)(struct commit *, void *);
|
|
typedef void (*show_object_fn)(struct object *, const char *, void *);
|
|
void traverse_commit_list(struct rev_info *, show_commit_fn, show_object_fn, void *);
|
|
|
|
typedef void (*show_edge_fn)(struct commit *);
|
|
void mark_edges_uninteresting(struct rev_info *revs,
|
|
show_edge_fn show_edge,
|
|
int sparse);
|
|
|
|
struct oidset;
|
|
struct list_objects_filter_options;
|
|
|
|
void traverse_commit_list_filtered(
|
|
struct list_objects_filter_options *filter_options,
|
|
struct rev_info *revs,
|
|
show_commit_fn show_commit,
|
|
show_object_fn show_object,
|
|
void *show_data,
|
|
struct oidset *omitted);
|
|
|
|
#endif /* LIST_OBJECTS_H */
|