mirror of
https://github.com/git/git.git
synced 2024-11-30 21:44:02 +08:00
2df85669d1
Turns out that putting 'link:' before the 'http' is actually superfluous in AsciiDoc, as there's already a predefined macro to handle it. "http, https, [etc] URLs are rendered using predefined inline macros." http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/userguide.html#_urls "Hypertext links to files on the local file system are specified using the link inline macro." http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/userguide.html#_linking_to_local_documents Despite being superfluous, the reference implementation of AsciiDoc tolerates the extra 'link:' and silently removes it, giving a functioning link in the generated HTML. However, AsciiDoctor (the Ruby implementation of AsciiDoc used to render the http://git-scm.com/ site) does /not/ have this behaviour, and so generates broken links, as can be seen here: http://git-scm.com/docs/git-cvsimport (links to cvs2git & parsecvs) http://git-scm.com/docs/git-filter-branch (link to The BFG) It's worth noting that after this change, the html generated by 'make html' in the git project is identical, and all links still work. Signed-off-by: Roberto Tyley <roberto.tyley@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
203 lines
7.4 KiB
Plaintext
203 lines
7.4 KiB
Plaintext
gitcvs-migration(7)
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
NAME
|
|
----
|
|
gitcvs-migration - Git for CVS users
|
|
|
|
SYNOPSIS
|
|
--------
|
|
[verse]
|
|
'git cvsimport' *
|
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
Git differs from CVS in that every working tree contains a repository with
|
|
a full copy of the project history, and no repository is inherently more
|
|
important than any other. However, you can emulate the CVS model by
|
|
designating a single shared repository which people can synchronize with;
|
|
this document explains how to do that.
|
|
|
|
Some basic familiarity with Git is required. Having gone through
|
|
linkgit:gittutorial[7] and
|
|
linkgit:gitglossary[7] should be sufficient.
|
|
|
|
Developing against a shared repository
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Suppose a shared repository is set up in /pub/repo.git on the host
|
|
foo.com. Then as an individual committer you can clone the shared
|
|
repository over ssh with:
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
$ git clone foo.com:/pub/repo.git/ my-project
|
|
$ cd my-project
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
and hack away. The equivalent of 'cvs update' is
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
$ git pull origin
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
which merges in any work that others might have done since the clone
|
|
operation. If there are uncommitted changes in your working tree, commit
|
|
them first before running git pull.
|
|
|
|
[NOTE]
|
|
================================
|
|
The 'pull' command knows where to get updates from because of certain
|
|
configuration variables that were set by the first 'git clone'
|
|
command; see `git config -l` and the linkgit:git-config[1] man
|
|
page for details.
|
|
================================
|
|
|
|
You can update the shared repository with your changes by first committing
|
|
your changes, and then using the 'git push' command:
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
$ git push origin master
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
to "push" those commits to the shared repository. If someone else has
|
|
updated the repository more recently, 'git push', like 'cvs commit', will
|
|
complain, in which case you must pull any changes before attempting the
|
|
push again.
|
|
|
|
In the 'git push' command above we specify the name of the remote branch
|
|
to update (`master`). If we leave that out, 'git push' tries to update
|
|
any branches in the remote repository that have the same name as a branch
|
|
in the local repository. So the last 'push' can be done with either of:
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
$ git push origin
|
|
$ git push foo.com:/pub/project.git/
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
as long as the shared repository does not have any branches
|
|
other than `master`.
|
|
|
|
Setting Up a Shared Repository
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
We assume you have already created a Git repository for your project,
|
|
possibly created from scratch or from a tarball (see
|
|
linkgit:gittutorial[7]), or imported from an already existing CVS
|
|
repository (see the next section).
|
|
|
|
Assume your existing repo is at /home/alice/myproject. Create a new "bare"
|
|
repository (a repository without a working tree) and fetch your project into
|
|
it:
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
$ mkdir /pub/my-repo.git
|
|
$ cd /pub/my-repo.git
|
|
$ git --bare init --shared
|
|
$ git --bare fetch /home/alice/myproject master:master
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Next, give every team member read/write access to this repository. One
|
|
easy way to do this is to give all the team members ssh access to the
|
|
machine where the repository is hosted. If you don't want to give them a
|
|
full shell on the machine, there is a restricted shell which only allows
|
|
users to do Git pushes and pulls; see linkgit:git-shell[1].
|
|
|
|
Put all the committers in the same group, and make the repository
|
|
writable by that group:
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
$ chgrp -R $group /pub/my-repo.git
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Make sure committers have a umask of at most 027, so that the directories
|
|
they create are writable and searchable by other group members.
|
|
|
|
Importing a CVS archive
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
First, install version 2.1 or higher of cvsps from
|
|
http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/[http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/] and make
|
|
sure it is in your path. Then cd to a checked out CVS working directory
|
|
of the project you are interested in and run linkgit:git-cvsimport[1]:
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------
|
|
$ git cvsimport -C <destination> <module>
|
|
-------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
This puts a Git archive of the named CVS module in the directory
|
|
<destination>, which will be created if necessary.
|
|
|
|
The import checks out from CVS every revision of every file. Reportedly
|
|
cvsimport can average some twenty revisions per second, so for a
|
|
medium-sized project this should not take more than a couple of minutes.
|
|
Larger projects or remote repositories may take longer.
|
|
|
|
The main trunk is stored in the Git branch named `origin`, and additional
|
|
CVS branches are stored in Git branches with the same names. The most
|
|
recent version of the main trunk is also left checked out on the `master`
|
|
branch, so you can start adding your own changes right away.
|
|
|
|
The import is incremental, so if you call it again next month it will
|
|
fetch any CVS updates that have been made in the meantime. For this to
|
|
work, you must not modify the imported branches; instead, create new
|
|
branches for your own changes, and merge in the imported branches as
|
|
necessary.
|
|
|
|
If you want a shared repository, you will need to make a bare clone
|
|
of the imported directory, as described above. Then treat the imported
|
|
directory as another development clone for purposes of merging
|
|
incremental imports.
|
|
|
|
Advanced Shared Repository Management
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Git allows you to specify scripts called "hooks" to be run at certain
|
|
points. You can use these, for example, to send all commits to the shared
|
|
repository to a mailing list. See linkgit:githooks[5].
|
|
|
|
You can enforce finer grained permissions using update hooks. See
|
|
link:howto/update-hook-example.html[Controlling access to branches using
|
|
update hooks].
|
|
|
|
Providing CVS Access to a Git Repository
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
It is also possible to provide true CVS access to a Git repository, so
|
|
that developers can still use CVS; see linkgit:git-cvsserver[1] for
|
|
details.
|
|
|
|
Alternative Development Models
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
CVS users are accustomed to giving a group of developers commit access to
|
|
a common repository. As we've seen, this is also possible with Git.
|
|
However, the distributed nature of Git allows other development models,
|
|
and you may want to first consider whether one of them might be a better
|
|
fit for your project.
|
|
|
|
For example, you can choose a single person to maintain the project's
|
|
primary public repository. Other developers then clone this repository
|
|
and each work in their own clone. When they have a series of changes that
|
|
they're happy with, they ask the maintainer to pull from the branch
|
|
containing the changes. The maintainer reviews their changes and pulls
|
|
them into the primary repository, which other developers pull from as
|
|
necessary to stay coordinated. The Linux kernel and other projects use
|
|
variants of this model.
|
|
|
|
With a small group, developers may just pull changes from each other's
|
|
repositories without the need for a central maintainer.
|
|
|
|
SEE ALSO
|
|
--------
|
|
linkgit:gittutorial[7],
|
|
linkgit:gittutorial-2[7],
|
|
linkgit:gitcore-tutorial[7],
|
|
linkgit:gitglossary[7],
|
|
link:everyday.html[Everyday Git],
|
|
link:user-manual.html[The Git User's Manual]
|
|
|
|
GIT
|
|
---
|
|
Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite.
|