git/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
Junio C Hamano 982b64e4cc t4014: fix test commit labels.
The commit tag and commit comments used in the test claimed that
the #1 commit was merged upstream where the test actually let the
upstream merge #2 commit.  Fix them.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-06-28 22:48:34 -07:00

70 lines
1.5 KiB
Bash
Executable File

#!/bin/sh
#
# Copyright (c) 2006 Junio C Hamano
#
test_description='Format-patch skipping already incorporated patches'
. ./test-lib.sh
test_expect_success setup '
for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10; do echo "$i"; done >file &&
git add file &&
git commit -m Initial &&
git checkout -b side &&
for i in 1 2 5 6 A B C 7 8 9 10; do echo "$i"; done >file &&
git update-index file &&
git commit -m "Side change #1" &&
for i in D E F; do echo "$i"; done >>file &&
git update-index file &&
git commit -m "Side change #2" &&
git tag C2 &&
for i in 5 6 1 2 3 A 4 B C 7 8 9 10 D E F; do echo "$i"; done >file &&
git update-index file &&
git commit -m "Side change #3" &&
git checkout master &&
git diff-tree -p C2 | git apply --index &&
git commit -m "Master accepts moral equivalent of #2"
'
test_expect_success "format-patch --ignore-if-in-upstream" '
git format-patch --stdout master..side >patch0 &&
cnt=`grep "^From " patch0 | wc -l` &&
test $cnt = 3
'
test_expect_success "format-patch --ignore-if-in-upstream" '
git format-patch --stdout \
--ignore-if-in-upstream master..side >patch1 &&
cnt=`grep "^From " patch1 | wc -l` &&
test $cnt = 2
'
test_expect_success "format-patch result applies" '
git checkout -b rebuild-0 master &&
git am -3 patch0 &&
cnt=`git rev-list master.. | wc -l` &&
test $cnt = 2
'
test_expect_success "format-patch --ignore-if-in-upstream result applies" '
git checkout -b rebuild-1 master &&
git am -3 patch1 &&
cnt=`git rev-list master.. | wc -l` &&
test $cnt = 2
'
test_done