git/t/chainlint/chain-break-return-exit.test
Eric Sunshine 832c68b3c2 chainlint.pl: don't flag broken &&-chain if failure indicated explicitly
There are quite a few tests which print an error messages and then
explicitly signal failure with `false`, `return 1`, or `exit 1` as the
final command in an `if` branch. In these cases, the tests don't bother
maintaining the &&-chain between `echo` and the explicit "test failed"
indicator. Since such constructs are manually signaling failure, their
&&-chain breakage is legitimate and safe -- both for the command
immediately preceding `false`, `return`, or `exit`, as well as for all
preceding commands in the `if` branch. Therefore, stop flagging &&-chain
breakage in these sorts of cases.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-09-01 10:07:41 -07:00

24 lines
651 B
Plaintext

case "$(git ls-files)" in
one) echo pass one ;;
# LINT: broken &&-chain okay if explicit "return 1" signals failuire
*) echo bad one; return 1 ;;
esac &&
(
case "$(git ls-files)" in
two) echo pass two ;;
# LINT: broken &&-chain okay if explicit "exit 1" signals failuire
*) echo bad two; exit 1 ;;
esac
) &&
case "$(git ls-files)" in
dir/two"$LF"one) echo pass both ;;
# LINT: broken &&-chain okay if explicit "return 1" signals failuire
*) echo bad; return 1 ;;
esac &&
for i in 1 2 3 4 ; do
# LINT: broken &&-chain okay if explicit "return $?" signals failure
git checkout main -b $i || return $?
test_commit $i $i $i tag$i || return $?
done