Make "git add -p" to not skip files that are in index even if they are
excluded (by .gitignore etc.). This fixes the contradictory behavior
that "git status" and "git commit -a" listed such files as modified, but
"git add -p FILENAME" ignored them.
Signed-off-by: Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tr/reset-checkout-patch:
stash: simplify defaulting to "save" and reject unknown options
Make test case number unique
tests: disable interactive hunk selection tests if perl is not available
DWIM 'git stash save -p' for 'git stash -p'
Implement 'git stash save --patch'
Implement 'git checkout --patch'
Implement 'git reset --patch'
builtin-add: refactor the meat of interactive_add()
Add a small patch-mode testing library
git-apply--interactive: Refactor patch mode code
Make 'git stash -k' a short form for 'git stash save --keep-index'
This adds a hunk-based mode to git-stash. You can select hunks from
the difference between HEAD and worktree, and git-stash will build a
stash that reflects these changes. The index state of the stash is
the same as your current index, and we also let --patch imply
--keep-index.
Note that because the selected hunks are rolled back from the worktree
but not the index, the resulting state may appear somewhat confusing
if you had also staged these changes. This is not entirely
satisfactory, but due to the way stashes are applied, other solutions
would require a change to the stash format.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This introduces a --patch mode for git-checkout. In the index usage
git checkout --patch -- [files...]
it lets the user discard edits from the <files> at the granularity of
hunks (by selecting hunks from 'git diff' and then reverse applying
them to the worktree).
We also accept a revision argument. In the case
git checkout --patch HEAD -- [files...]
we offer hunks from the difference between HEAD and the worktree, and
reverse applies them to both index and worktree, allowing you to
discard staged changes completely. In the non-HEAD usage
git checkout --patch <revision> -- [files...]
it offers hunks from the difference between the worktree and
<revision>. The chosen hunks are then applied to both index and
worktree.
The application to worktree and index is done "atomically" in the
sense that we first check if the patch applies to the index (it should
always apply to the worktree). If it does not, we give the user a
choice to either abort or apply to the worktree anyway.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This introduces a --patch mode for git-reset. The basic case is
git reset --patch -- [files...]
which acts as the opposite of 'git add --patch -- [files...]': it
offers hunks for *un*staging. Advanced usage is
git reset --patch <revision> -- [files...]
which offers hunks from the diff between the index and <revision> for
forward application to the index. (That is, the basic case is just
<revision> = HEAD.)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 0392513 (add-interactive: refactor mode hunk handling, 2009-04-16),
we merged the interaction loops for mode changes and hunk staging.
This was fine at the time, because 0beee4c (git-add--interactive:
remove hunk coalescing, 2008-07-02) removed hunk coalescing.
However, in 7a26e65 (Revert "git-add--interactive: remove hunk
coalescing", 2009-05-16), we resurrected it. Since then, the code
would attempt in vain to merge mode changes with diff hunks,
corrupting both in the process.
We add a check to the coalescing loop to ensure it only looks at diff
hunks, thus skipping mode changes.
Noticed-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This makes some aspects of the 'git add -p' loop configurable (within
the code), so that we can later reuse git-add--interactive for other
similar tools.
Most fields are fairly straightforward, but APPLY gets a subroutine
(instead of just a string a la 'apply --cached') so that we can handle
'checkout -p', which will need to atomically apply the patch twice
(index and worktree).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Remove a debugging print that snuck in at 7a26e65 (Revert
"git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing", 2009-05-16).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This reverts commit 0beee4c6de but with a
bit of twist, as we have added "edit hunk manually" hack and we cannot
rely on the original line numbers of the hunks that were manually edited.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit cbd3a01 added a new "q" subcommand to the "git add -p"
command loop, but forgot to add it to the prompt.
Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The original implementation considered the mode separately
from the rest of the hunks, asking about it outside the main
hunk-selection loop. This patch instead places a mode change
as the first hunk in the loop. This has two advantages:
1. less duplicated code (since we use the main selection
loop). This also cleans up an inconsistency, which is
that the main selection loop separates options with a
comma, whereas the mode prompt used slashes.
2. users can now skip the mode change and come back to it,
search for it (via "/mode"), etc, as they can with other
hunks.
To facilitate this, each hunk is now marked with a "type".
Mode hunks are not considered for splitting (which would
make no sense, and also confuses the split_hunk function),
nor are they editable. In theory, one could edit the mode
lines and change to a new mode. In practice, there are only
two modes that git cares about (0644 and 0755), so either
you want to move from one to the other or not (and you can
do that by staging or not staging).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There's already 'd' to stop staging hunks in a file, but no explicit
command to stop the interactive staging (for the current files and the
remaining ones). Of course you can do 'd' and then ^C, but it would be
more intuitive to allow 'quit' action.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The original implementation considered the mode separately
from the rest of the hunks, asking about it outside the main
hunk-selection loop. This patch instead places a mode change
as the first hunk in the loop. This has two advantages:
1. less duplicated code (since we use the main selection
loop). This also cleans up an inconsistency, which is
that the main selection loop separates options with a
comma, whereas the mode prompt used slashes.
2. users can now skip the mode change and come back to it,
search for it (via "/mode"), etc, as they can with other
hunks.
To facilitate this, each hunk is now marked with a "type".
Mode hunks are not considered for splitting (which would
make no sense, and also confuses the split_hunk function),
nor are they editable. In theory, one could edit the mode
lines and change to a new mode. In practice, there are only
two modes that git cares about (0644 and 0755), so either
you want to move from one to the other or not (and you can
do that by staging or not staging).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There's already 'd' to stop staging hunks in a file, but no explicit
command to stop the interactive staging (for the current files and the
remaining ones). Of course you can do 'd' and then ^C, but it would be
more intuitive to allow 'quit' action.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The underlying plumbing commands are not run with -z option, so the paths
returned from them need to be unquoted as needed.
Remove the now stale BUGS section from git-add documentaiton as suggested
by Teemu Likonen.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Similar to the behaviour for editing a commit message, let terminating
the editor with a failure abort the current hunk edit and revisit the
option selection for the hunk.
Signed-off-by: Deskin Miller <deskinm@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After invoking git add -p I always got the warnings:
Use of uninitialized value $_[3] in exec at Git.pm line 1282.
Use of uninitialized value $args[2] in join or string at Git.pm line 1264.
A bisect showed that these warnings occur in a301973 "add -p: print errors
in separate color" the first time.
They can be reproduced by setting color.ui (or color.interactive) to "auto"
and unsetting color.interactive.help and color.interactive.error.
I am using Perl 5.10.0.
The reason of the warning is that color.interactive.error defaults to
color.interactive.help which defaults to nothing in the specific codepath.
It defaults to 'red bold' some lines above which could lead to the wrong
assumption that it always defaults to 'red bold' now.
This patch lets it default to 'red bold', blowing the warnings away.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Acked-By: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
eval{use...} is no good because the 'use' is evaluated at compile
time, so manually 'require' it. We need to forward declare the
functions we use, otherwise Perl raises a compilation error.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Print interaction error messages in color.interactive.error, which
defaults to the value of color.interactive.help.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use Term::ReadKey, if available and enabled with interactive.singlekey,
to let the user answer add -p's prompts by pressing a single key. We're
not doing the same in the main 'add -i' interface because file selection
etc. may expect several characters.
Two commands take an argument: 'g' can easily cope since it'll just
offer a choice of chunks. '/' now (unconditionally, even without
readkey) offers a chance to enter a regex if none was given.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the user hit Ctrl-D (EOF) while the script was in 'go to hunk?'
mode, it threw an undefined variable error. Explicitly test for EOF
and have it re-enter the goto prompt loop.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
57886bc (git-add -i/-p: Change prompt separater from slash to comma,
2008-11-27) changed the prompt separator to ',', but forgot to adapt
the 'g' (goto) command.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of printing the help menu, this will print "No next hunk" and then
process the given hunk again.
Signed-off-by: William Pursell <bill.pursell@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This command allows the user to skip hunks that don't match the specified
regex.
Signed-off-by: William Pursell <bill.pursell@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Otherwise the find command '/' soon to be introduced will be hard to see.
Signed-off-by: William Pursell <bill.pursell@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a minor change is made while the working directory is in a bit of a
mess, it is somewhat difficult to wade through all of the hunks using git
add --patch. This allows one to jump to the hunk that needs to be staged
without having to respond 'n' to each preceding hunk.
Signed-off-by: William Pursell <bill.pursell@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit implements a rather simple-minded mechanism to display a
one-line summary of the hunks in an array ref. The display consists of
the line numbers and the first changed line, truncated to 80 characters.
20 lines are displayed at a time, and the index of the first undisplayed
line is returned, allowing the caller to display more if desired. (The 20
and 80 should be made configurable.)
Signed-off-by: William Pursell <bill.pursell@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Current 'git add -p' will say "No changes." if there are no changes to
text files, which can be confusing if there _are_ changes to binary
files. Add some code to distinguish the two cases, and give a
different message in the latter one.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* sp/win:
We need to check for msys as well as Windows in add--interactive.
Convert CR/LF to LF in tag signatures
Fixed text file auto-detection: treat EOF character 032 at the end of file as printable
git-add -i ranges expect number-number. But for the supremely lazy, typing in
that second number when selecting "from patch 7 to the end" is wasted effort.
So treat an empty second number in a range as "until the last item".
Signed-off-by: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Adds a new option 'e' to the 'add -p' command loop that lets you edit
the current hunk in your favourite editor.
If the resulting patch applies cleanly, the edited hunk will
immediately be marked for staging. If it does not apply cleanly, you
will be given an opportunity to edit again. If all lines of the hunk
are removed, then the edit is aborted and the hunk is left unchanged.
Applying the changed hunk(s) relies on Johannes Schindelin's new
--recount option for git-apply.
Note that the "real patch" test intentionally uses
(echo e; echo n; echo d) | git add -p
even though the 'n' and 'd' are superfluous at first sight. They
serve to get out of the interaction loop if git add -p wrongly
concludes the patch does not apply.
Many thanks to Jeff King <peff@peff.net> for lots of help and
suggestions.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Current git-apply has no trouble at all applying chunks that have
overlapping context, as produced by the splitting feature. So we can
drop the manual coalescing.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We recounted the postimage offsets to compensate for hunks that were
not selected. Now apply --recount can do the job for us.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When using the 'p'atch command, instead of just throwing out any mode
change, present it to the user in the same way that we show hunks.
This way, the mode change can be staged independently from the changes
to the contents.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a path is examined in the patch subcommand, any mode changes in
the file are given to use in the diff header by git-diff. If no hunks
are staged, then we throw out that header and do not touch the
path. But if _any_ hunks are staged, we use the header, and the mode
is changed together with the contents.
Since the 'p'atch command should just be dealing with hunks that are
shown to the user, it makes sense to just ignore mode changes
entirely. We do squirrel away the mode, though, since the next patch
will allow users to select the mode update separately.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There were several points where we looked at the HEAD
commit; for initial commits, this is meaningless. So instead
we:
- show staged status data as a diff against the empty tree
instead of HEAD
- show file diffs as creation events
- use "git rm --cached" to revert instead of going back to
the HEAD commit
We magically reference the empty tree to implement this.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Users with color.diff set to true/auto will not see color in
"git add -i" unless they also set color.interactive.
This changes the semantics of color.interactive to control only the
coloring of the interaction aspect of the command and let color.diff
to control the color of hunk picker, which would arguably be more
convenient.
Old $use_color variable is now renamed to $menu_use_color to make it
clear that it is about coloring the interaction.
The "colored" subroutine now checks if the passed color is defined,
instead of checking $use_color variable, to decide if the lines should
be colored. The various variables that define colors for different
parts of the output are set or unset depending on the setting of
color.interactive and color.diff configuration variables.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When color support was added, we colored the diffs ourselves.
However, 4af756f3 changed this to simply run "git diff-files"
twice, keeping the colored output separately.
This makes the internal diff color variables obsolete with
one exception: when splitting hunks, we have to manually
recreate the fragment for each part of the split. Thus we
keep $fraginfo_color around to do that correctly.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Rather than replicating the colorization logic of "git diff-files" we
rely on "git diff-files" itself. This guarantees consistent colorization
in and outside "git add -i".
Seeing as speed is not a concern here (the bottleneck is how fast the
user can read, not how fast "git diff-files" runs) we do this by
actually running it twice, once without color and once with.
In this way as the whitespace colorization provided by "git diff-files"
evolves (per-path attributes, new classes of whitespace error), "git
add -i" will automatically benefit from it and stay in synch.
Also, by working with two sets of diff output (an uncolorized one for
internal processing and a colorized one for display only) we minimize
the risk of regressions because the changes required to implement this
are minimally invasive.
Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is mostly lifted from earlier series by Dan Zwell, but updated to
use "git config --get-color" and "git config --get-colorbool" to make it
simpler and more consistent with commands written in C.
A new configuration color.interactive variable is like color.diff and
color.status, and controls if "git-add -i" uses color.
A set of configuration variables, color.interactive.<slot>, are used to
define what color is used for the prompt, header, and help text.
For perl scripts, Git.pm provides $repo->get_color() method, which takes
the slot name and the default color, and returns the terminal escape
sequence to color the output text. $repo->get_colorbool() method can be
used to check if color is set to be used for a given operation.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These changes make the automatic prefix highlighting work with the "Add
untracked" subcommand in git-add--interactive by explicitly handling
arrays, hashes and strings internally (previously only arrays and hashes
were handled).
In addition, prefixes which have special meaning for list_and_choose
(things like "*" for "all" and "-" for "deselect) are explicitly
excluded (highlighting these prefixes would be misleading).
Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The user interface provided by the command loop in git-add--interactive
gives the impression that subcommands can only be launched by entering
an integer identifier from 1 through 8.
A "hidden" feature is that any string can be entered, and a regex search
anchored at the beginning of the string is used to find the uniquely
matching option.
This patch makes this feature a little more obvious by highlighting the
first character of each subcommand (for example "patch" is displayed as
"[p]atch").
A new function is added to detect the shortest unique prefix and this
is used to decide what to highlight. Highlighting is also applied when
choosing files.
In the case where the common prefix may be unreasonably large
highlighting is omitted; in this patch the soft limit (above which the
highlighting will be omitted for a particular item) is 0 (in other words,
there is no soft limit) and the hard limit (above which highlighting will
be omitted for all items) is 3, but this can be tweaked.
The actual highlighting is done by the highlight_prefix function, which
will enable us to implement ANSI color code-based highlighting (most
likely using underline or boldface) in the future.
Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the "--patch" option is supplied, the patch_update_cmd() function is
called bypassing the main_loop() and exits.
Seeing as builtin-add is the only caller of git-add--interactive we can
impose a strict requirement on the format of the arguments to avoid
possible ambiguity: an "--" argument must be used whenever any pathspecs
are passed, both with the "--patch" option and without it.
Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
This allows more than one files from the list to be chosen from
the patch subcommand instead of going through the file one by
one.
This also updates the "list-and-choose" UI for usability. When
the prompt ends with ">>", if you type '*' to choose all
choices, the prompt immediately returns the choice without
requiring an extra empty line to confirm the selection.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Implement Junio's suggestion that git-add--interactive should reproduce the
path-limiting semantics of non-interactive git-add.
In otherwords, if "git add -i" (unrestricted) shows paths from a set A,
"git add -i paths..." should show paths from a subset of the set A and that
subset should be defined with the existing ls-files pathspec semantics.
Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Split patch_update_cmd into two functions, one to prompt the user for
a path to patch and another to do the actual work given that file path.
This lays the groundwork for a future commit which will teach
git-add--interactive to accept a path parameter and jump directly to
the patch subcommand for that path, bypassing the interactive prompt.
Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This provides a way for scripts to get at the new standard exclude
function.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The unified diff format allows one-line ranges to be abbreviated
by omiting the size. The hunk header "@@ -10,1 +10,1 @@" can be
expressed as "@@ -10 +10 @@", but this wasn't properly parsed in
all cases.
Such abbreviated hunk headers are generated when a one-line change
(add, remove or modify) appears without context; for example
because the file is a one-liner itself or because GIT_DIFF_OPTS
was set to '-u0'. If the user then runs 'git add -i' and enters
the 'patch' command for that file, perl complains about undefined
variables.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Luc Herren <jlh@gmx.ch>
Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
1) Previously, any menu would cause a perl error when entered '0',
which is never a valid option.
2) Entering a bogus choice (like 998 or 4-2) surprisingly caused
the same behavior as if the user had just hit 'enter', which
means to carry out the selected action on the selected items.
Entering such bogus input is now a no-op and the sub-menu
doesn't exit.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Luc Herren <jlh@gmx.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Hitting Ctrl-D (EOF) is a common way to exit shell-like tools.
When in a sub-menu it will still behave as if an empty line had
been entered, carrying out the action on the selected items and
returning to the previous menu.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Luc Herren <jlh@gmx.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It wont work for arguments with special characters (like ", : or *).
It is generally not possible on Windows, so I didn't even try.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Earlier, when a path that was removed from the working tree was
chosen for update subcommand, you got an error like this:
error: git-resolve.sh: does not exist and --remove not passed
fatal: Unable to process file git-resolve.sh
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This adds hunk splitting and recounting the patch lines. The
'patch' subcommand now allows you to split a large hunk at
context lines in the middle.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
A script to be driven when the user says "git add --interactive"
is introduced.
When it is run, first it runs its internal 'status' command to
show the current status, and then goes into its internactive
command loop.
The command loop shows the list of subcommands available, and
gives a prompt "What now> ". In general, when the prompt ends
with a single '>', you can pick only one of the choices given
and type return, like this:
*** Commands ***
1: status 2: update 3: revert 4: add untracked
5: patch 6: diff 7: quit 8: help
What now> 1
You also could say "s" or "sta" or "status" above as long as the
choice is unique.
The main command loop has 6 subcommands (plus help and quit).
* 'status' shows the change between HEAD and index (i.e. what
will be committed if you say "git commit"), and between index
and working tree files (i.e. what you could stage further
before "git commit" using "git-add") for each path. A sample
output looks like this:
staged unstaged path
1: binary nothing foo.png
2: +403/-35 +1/-1 git-add--interactive.perl
It shows that foo.png has differences from HEAD (but that is
binary so line count cannot be shown) and there is no
difference between indexed copy and the working tree
version (if the working tree version were also different,
'binary' would have been shown in place of 'nothing'). The
other file, git-add--interactive.perl, has 403 lines added
and 35 lines deleted if you commit what is in the index, but
working tree file has further modifications (one addition and
one deletion).
* 'update' shows the status information and gives prompt
"Update>>". When the prompt ends with double '>>', you can
make more than one selection, concatenated with whitespace or
comma. Also you can say ranges. E.g. "2-5 7,9" to choose
2,3,4,5,7,9 from the list. You can say '*' to choose
everything.
What you chose are then highlighted with '*', like this:
staged unstaged path
1: binary nothing foo.png
* 2: +403/-35 +1/-1 git-add--interactive.perl
To remove selection, prefix the input with - like this:
Update>> -2
After making the selection, answer with an empty line to
stage the contents of working tree files for selected paths
in the index.
* 'revert' has a very similar UI to 'update', and the staged
information for selected paths are reverted to that of the
HEAD version. Reverting new paths makes them untracked.
* 'add untracked' has a very similar UI to 'update' and
'revert', and lets you add untracked paths to the index.
* 'patch' lets you choose one path out of 'status' like
selection. After choosing the path, it presents diff between
the index and the working tree file and asks you if you want
to stage the change of each hunk. You can say:
y - add the change from that hunk to index
n - do not add the change from that hunk to index
a - add the change from that hunk and all the rest to index
d - do not the change from that hunk nor any of the rest to index
j - do not decide on this hunk now, and view the next
undecided hunk
J - do not decide on this hunk now, and view the next hunk
k - do not decide on this hunk now, and view the previous
undecided hunk
K - do not decide on this hunk now, and view the previous hunk
After deciding the fate for all hunks, if there is any hunk
that was chosen, the index is updated with the selected hunks.
* 'diff' lets you review what will be committed (i.e. between
HEAD and index).
This is still rough, but does everything except a few things I
think are needed.
* 'patch' should be able to allow splitting a hunk into
multiple hunks.
* 'patch' does not adjust the line offsets @@ -k,l +m,n @@
in the hunk header. This does not have major problem in
practice, but it _should_ do the adjustment.
* It does not have any explicit support for a merge in
progress; it may not work at all.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
