Commit 46eb449c restricted git-filter-branch to non-bare repositories
unnecessarily; git-filter-branch can work on bare repositories just
fine.
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git branch --no-merged $commit" used to compute the merge base between
the tip of each and every branch with the named $commit, but this was
wasteful when you have many branches. Inside append_ref() we literally
ran has_commit() between the tip of the branch and the merge_filter_ref.
Instead, we can let the revision machinery traverse the history as if we
are running:
$ git rev-list --branches --not $commit
by queueing the tips of branches we encounter as positive refs (this
mimicks the "--branches" option in the above command line) and then
appending the merge_filter_ref commit as a negative one, and finally
calling prepare_revision_walk() to limit the list..
After the traversal is done, branch tips that are reachable from $commit
are painted UNINTERESTING; they are already fully contained in $commit
(i.e. --merged). Tips that are not painted UNINTERESTING still have
commits that are not reachable from $commit, thus "--no-merged" will show
them.
With an artificial repository that has "master" and 1000 test-$i branches
where they were created by "git branch test-$i master~$i":
(with patch)
$ /usr/bin/time git-branch --no-merged master >/dev/null
0.12user 0.02system 0:00.15elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+1588minor)pagefaults 0swaps
$ /usr/bin/time git-branch --no-merged test-200 >/dev/null
0.15user 0.03system 0:00.18elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+1711minor)pagefaults 0swaps
(without patch)
$ /usr/bin/time git-branch --no-merged master >/dev/null
0.69user 0.03system 0:00.72elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+2229minor)pagefaults 0swaps
$ /usr/bin/time git-branch --no-merged test-200 >/dev/null
0.58user 0.03system 0:00.61elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+2248minor)pagefaults 0swaps
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We let for_each_ref() to feed all refs to append_ref() but we are only
ever interested in local or remote tracking branches.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A command line "git stash save --keep-index I was doing this" was
misparsed and keep-index codepath did not trigger.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-am output can be confusing, because the subject of the applied
patch can look like the rest of a sentence starting with "Applying".
The added colon should make this clearer.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In a rebase session where more than one commit is to be 'edit'ed, and the
user spends considerable time to 'edit' a commit, it is easy to forget what
one wanted to 'edit' at the individual commits. It would be helpful to see
at which commit the rebase stopped.
Incidentally, if the rebase stopped due to merge conflicts or other errors,
the commit was already reported ("Could not apply $sha1..."), but when
rebase stopped after successfully applying an "edit" commit, it would not
mention it. With this change the commit is reported.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We used to set the TOPOSORT flag of commits during the topological
sorting, but we can just as well use the member "indegree" for it:
indegree is now incremented by 1 in the cases where the commit used
to have the TOPOSORT flag.
This is the same behavior as before, since indegree could not be
non-zero when TOPOSORT was unset.
Incidentally, this fixes the bug in show-branch where the 8th column
was not shown: show-branch sorts the commits in topological order,
assuming that all the commit flags are available for show-branch's
private matters.
But this was not true: TOPOSORT was identical to the flag corresponding
to the 8th ref. So the flags for the 8th column were unset by the
topological sorting.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is a companion patch to 6848d58c(Ignore dirty submodule states
during rebase and stash).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some shells hang when parsing the script if the last statement is not
followed by a newline. So add one.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some shells have problems with one-shot environment variable export
and function calls. The sequence is rearranged to avoid the one-shot
and to allow the test script to be linked together with '&&'.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The test only checked if the best result picking code works if there are
multiple strategies set in the config. Add a similar one that tests if
the same true if the -s option of git merge was used multiple times.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
At least, this is true in 2007.2, according to the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
See for example, status and show commands. Besides,
Documentation/RelNotes-1.6.0.txt mentions that pager.<cmd>
can be used to enable/disable paging behavior per command.
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the documentation, where you cannot get compile errors for using the
wrong member name, there were two mentions of 'path' left.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 3-way merge, "am" will let the index with unmerged path waiting
for us to resolve conflicts and continue. But if we want to --skip
instead, "am" refuses to continue because of the dirty index.
With this patch, "am" will clean the index without touching files
locally modified, before continuing.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Marin <dkr@freesurf.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When running git submodule update -i, the "-i" is shifted before recursing
into cmd_init and then again outside of the loop. This causes some /bin/sh
to complain about shifting when there are no arguments left (and would
discard anything written after -i too).
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The parameter that is eventually passed to read_directory() to scan the
working tree should be properly initialized.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'git merge -s foobar' diagnosed invalid "foobar" strategy and errored out
with a message, but foobar in pull.twohead or pull.octopus was just
silently ignored. This makes invalid strategy both on the command line
and in the configuration file to trigger the same error.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some of our tests assumed a working "patch" command to produce expected
results when checking "git-apply", but some systems have broken "patch".
We can compare our output with expected output that is precomputed
instead to sidestep this issue.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This should have been part of 24a2293 (git-blame.el: show the when, who
and what in the minibuffer., 2008-02-12), that changed from using
--pretty=oneline to --pretty=format:... without terminating newline.
Acked-by: David Kågedal <davidk@lysator.liu.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
p->argc represent the number of arguments that have not been parsed yet,
_including_ the one we are currently parsing. If it is not greater than
one then there is no more argument.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Marin <dkr@freesurf.fr>
Acked-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When using git-rebase, author fields containing a ')' at the last position
had the close-parens character removed; the removal should be done only
when it is of this form:
user@host (User Name)
i.e. the remainder after stripping the e-mail address part is enclosed in
a parentheses pair as a whole, not for addresses like this:
User Name (me) <user@host>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Bruhat (BooK) <book@cpan.org>
Acked-by: Lukas Sandström <lukass@etek.chalmers.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The name path_list was correct for the first usage of that data structure,
but it really is a general-purpose string list.
$ perl -i -pe 's/path-list/string-list/g' $(git grep -l path-list)
$ perl -i -pe 's/path_list/string_list/g' $(git grep -l path_list)
$ git mv path-list.h string-list.h
$ git mv path-list.c string-list.c
$ perl -i -pe 's/has_path/has_string/g' $(git grep -l has_path)
$ perl -i -pe 's/path/string/g' string-list.[ch]
$ git mv Documentation/technical/api-path-list.txt \
Documentation/technical/api-string-list.txt
$ perl -i -pe 's/strdup_paths/strdup_strings/g' $(git grep -l strdup_paths)
... and then fix all users of string-list to access the member "string"
instead of "path".
Documentation/technical/api-string-list.txt needed some rewrapping, too.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With git-am, it sounds awkward to have the patches in ".git/rebase/",
but for technical reasons, we have to keep the same directory name
for git-am and git-rebase. ".git/rebase-apply" seems to be a good
compromise.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git update-index --refresh", "git reset" and "git add --refresh" have
reported paths that have local modifications as "needs update" since the
beginning of git.
Although this is logically correct in that you need to update the index at
that path before you can commit that change, it is now becoming more and
more clear, especially with the continuous push for user friendliness
since 1.5.0 series, that the message is suboptimal. After all, the change
may be something the user might want to get rid of, and "updating" would
be absolutely a wrong thing to do if that is the case.
I prepared two alternatives to solve this. Both aim to reword the message
to more neutral "locally modified".
This patch is a more intrusive variant that changes the message for only
Porcelain commands ("add" and "reset") while keeping the plumbing
"update-index" intact.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A few compat/* layer functions call these functions, but we would really
want to keep them thin, without depending too much on the libgit proper.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This in the short term will break on platforms that use compat implemenations
that call outside compat layer, but that is exactly what we want. To give
incentive to fix things for people who are affected and more importantly have
environment to test their fixes.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now "git merge -m" needs a message, and errors out with the usage
text if none is given.
This way, t7600-merge.sh is fixed.
Signed-off-by: Michele Ballabio <barra_cuda@katamail.com>
Acked-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Without this patch, git-grep gives confusing usage information:
$ git grep --confused
usage: git grep <option>* <rev>* [-e] <pattern> [<path>...]
$ git grep HEAD pattern
fatal: ambiguous argument 'pattern': unknown revision or path no
t in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions
So put <pattern> before the <rev>s, in accordance with actual correct
usage. While we're changing the usage string, we might as well include
the "--" separating revisions and paths, too.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@uchicago.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'recur' co-existed with 'recursive' when rewriting it in C, but it no
longer available. 'stupid' was also recently removed.
"git merge -s confused origin" still includes them in the list of
available merge strategies.
[jc: this is a squash of two micropatches]
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Check that req_update shows refs, even if all refs are packed.
Signed-off-by: Lars Noschinski <lars@public.noschinski.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
5fdeacb (Teach update-index about --ignore-submodules, 2008-05-14) added a
new refresh option flag but did not assign a unique bit for it correctly,
and broke "update-index --ignore-missing".
This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
And here is a small test script that makes sure that:
- both modified and new files are included,
- removed file is noticed, and
- no ignored file is included.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
People sometimes find that "git add -u && git add ." are 13 keystrokes too
many. This reduces it by nine.
The support of this has been very low priority for me personally, because
I almost never do "git add ." in a directory with already tracked files,
and in a new directory, there is no point saying "git add -u".
However, for two types of people (that are very different from me), this
mode of operation may make sense and there is no reason to leave it
unsupported. That is:
(1) If you are extremely well disciplined and keep perfect .gitignore, it
always is safe to say "git add ."; or
(2) If you are extremely undisciplined and do not even know what files
you created, and you do not very much care what goes in your history,
it does not matter if "git add ." included everything.
So there it is, although I suspect I will not use it myself, ever.
It will be too much of a change that is against the expectation of the
existing users to allow "git commit -a" to include untracked files, and
it would be inconsistent if we named this new option "-a", so the short
option is "-A". We _might_ want to later add "git commit -A" but that is
a separate topic.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
