This function is a single-liner and is only called from one
place. Just inline it, which makes the code more obvious.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we encounter an unknown http error (e.g., a 403), we
hand the error code to http_error, which then prints it with
error(). After that we die with the redundant message "HTTP
request failed".
Instead, let's just drop http_error entirely, which does
nothing but pass arguments to error(), and instead die
directly with a useful message.
So before:
$ git clone https://example.com/repo.git
Cloning into 'repo'...
error: unable to access 'https://example.com/repo.git': The requested URL returned error: 403 Forbidden
fatal: HTTP request failed
and after:
$ git clone https://example.com/repo.git
Cloning into 'repo'...
fatal: unable to access 'https://example.com/repo.git': The requested URL returned error: 403 Forbidden
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we report an http error code, we say something like:
error: The requested URL reported failure: 403 Forbidden while accessing http://example.com/repo.git
Everything between "error:" and "while" is written by curl,
and the resulting sentence is hard to read (especially
because there is no punctuation between curl's sentence and
the remainder of ours). Instead, let's re-order this to give
better flow:
error: unable to access 'http://example.com/repo.git: The requested URL reported failure: 403 Forbidden
This is still annoyingly long, but at least reads more
clearly left to right.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This helper function should really be a one-liner that
prints an error message, but it has ended up unnecessarily
complicated:
1. We call error() directly when we fail to start the curl
request, so we must later avoid printing a duplicate
error in http_error().
It would be much simpler in this case to just stuff the
error message into our usual curl_errorstr buffer
rather than printing it ourselves. This means that
http_error does not even have to care about curl's exit
value (the interesting part is in the errorstr buffer
already).
2. We return the "ret" value passed in to us, but none of
the callers actually cares about our return value. We
can just drop this entirely.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we report http errors in fetching the initial ref
advertisement, we show the full URL we attempted to use,
including "info/refs?service=git-upload-pack". While this
may be useful for debugging a broken server, it is
unnecessarily verbose and confusing for most cases, in which
the client user is not even the same person as the owner of
the repository.
Let's just show the repository URL; debugging can happen
with GIT_CURL_VERBOSE, which shows way more useful
information, anyway.
At the same time, let's also make sure to mention the
repository URL when we report failed authentication
(previously we said only "Authentication failed"). Knowing
the URL can help the user realize why authentication failed
(e.g., they meant to push to remote A, not remote B).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we get an http 404 trying to get the initial list of
refs from the server, we try to be helpful and remind the
user that update-server-info may need to be run. This looks
like:
$ git clone https://github.com/non/existent
Cloning into 'existent'...
fatal: https://github.com/non/existent/info/refs?service=git-upload-pack not found: did you run git update-server-info on the server?
Suggesting update-server-info may be a good suggestion for
users who are in control of the server repo and who are
planning to set up dumb http. But for users of smart http,
and especially users who are not in control of the server
repo, the advice is useless and confusing.
Since most people are expected to use smart http these days,
it does not make sense to keep the update-server-info hint.
We not only drop the mention of update-server-info, but also
show only the main repo URL, not the full "info/refs" and
service parameter. These elements may be useful for
debugging a broken server configuration, but in the majority
of cases, users are not fetching from their own
repositories, but rather from other people's repositories;
they have neither the power nor interest to fix a broken
configuration, and the extra components just make the
message more confusing. Users who do want to debug can and
should use GIT_CURL_VERBOSE to get more complete information
on the actual URLs visited.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we get an http 404 trying to get the initial list of
refs from the server, we try to be helpful and remind the
user that update-server-info may need to be run. This looks
like:
$ git clone https://github.com/non/existent
Cloning into 'existent'...
fatal: https://github.com/non/existent/info/refs?service=git-upload-pack not found: did you run git update-server-info on the server?
Suggesting update-server-info may be a good suggestion for
users who are in control of the server repo and who are
planning to set up dumb http. But for users of smart http,
and especially users who are not in control of the server
repo, the advice is useless and confusing.
The previous patch taught remote-curl to show custom advice
from the server when it is available. When we have shown
messages from the server, we can also drop our custom
advice; what the server has to say is likely to be more
accurate and helpful.
We not only drop the mention of update-server-info, but also
show only the main repo URL, not the full "info/refs" and
service parameter. These elements may be useful for
debugging a broken server configuration, but again, anything
the server has provided is likely to be more useful (and one
can still use GIT_CURL_VERBOSE to get much more complete
debugging information).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If an http request to a remote git server fails, we show
only the http response code, or sometimes a custom message
for particular codes. This gives the server no opportunity
to offer a more detailed explanation of the reason for the
failure, or to give extra advice.
This patch teaches remote-curl to record and display the
body content of a failed http response. We only display such
responses when the content-type is advertised as text/plain,
as it is the most likely to look presentable on the user's
terminal (and it is hoped to be a good indication that the
message is intended for git clients, and not for a web
browser).
Each line of the new output is prepended with "remote:".
Example output may look like this (assuming the server is
configured to display such a helpful message):
$ GIT_SMART_HTTP=0 git clone https://example.com/some/repo.git
Cloning into 'repo'...
remote: Sorry, fetching via dumb http is forbidden.
remote: Please upgrade your git client to v1.6.6 or greater
remote: and make sure that smart-http is enabled.
error: The requested URL returned error: 403 while accessing http://localhost:5001/some/repo.git/info/refs
fatal: HTTP request failed
For the sake of simplicity, we only record and display these
errors during the initial fetch of the ref list, as that is
the initial contact with the server and where the most
common, interesting errors happen (and there is already
precedent, as that is the only place we currently massage
http error codes into more helpful messages).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We currently set curl's FAILONERROR option, which means that
any http failures are reported as curl errors, and the
http body content from the server is thrown away.
This patch introduces a new option to http_get_strbuf which
specifies that the body content from a failed http response
should be placed in the destination strbuf, where it can be
accessed by the caller.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach "merge/pull" to optionally verify and reject commits that are
not signed properly.
* sg/gpg-sig:
pretty printing: extend %G? to include 'N' and 'U'
merge/pull Check for untrusted good GPG signatures
merge/pull: verify GPG signatures of commits being merged
commit.c/GPG signature verification: Also look at the first GPG status line
Move commit GPG signature verification to commit.c
Update "git send-email" for issues noticed by PerlCritic.
* rr/send-email-perl-critique:
send-email: use the three-arg form of open in recipients_cmd
send-email: drop misleading function prototype
send-email: use "return;" not "return undef;" on error codepaths
"git merge $(git rev-parse v1.8.2)" behaved quite differently from
"git merge v1.8.2" as if v1.8.2 were written as v1.8.2^0 and did
not pay much attention to the annotated tag payload.
This makes the code notice the type of the tag object, in addition
to the dwim_ref() based classification the current code uses
(i.e. the name appears in refs/tags/) to decide when to special
case merging of tags.
* jc/merge-tag-object:
t6200: test message for merging of an annotated tag
t6200: use test_config/test_unconfig
merge: a random object may not necssarily be a commit
Sometimes the chown() function is called even when not needed (This
can be provoked by running t1301, and adding some debug code).
Save a chmod from 400 to 400, or from 600 to 600 on these files:
.git/info/refs+
.git/objects/info/packs+
Save chmod on directories from 2770 to 2770:
.git/refs
.git/refs/heads
.git/refs/tags
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
All calls to set_shared_perm() use mode == 0, so simplify the
function.
Because all callers use the macro adjust_shared_perm(path) from
cache.h to call this function, convert it to a proper function,
losing set_shared_perm().
Since path.c has much more functions than just mkpath() these days,
drop the stale comment about it.
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When running "git log -p --submodule=log", the submodule log is not
indented by the graph output, although all other lines are. Fix this by
prepending the current line prefix to each line of the submodule log.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The argument to --diff-algorithm is mandatory, so there is no reason to
require the argument to be stuck to the option with '='. Change this
for consistency with other Git commands.
Note that this does not change the handling of diff-algorithm in
merge-recursive.c since the primary interface to that is via the -X
option to 'git merge' where the unstuck form does not make sense.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 07924d4 (diff: Introduce --diff-algorithm command line option
2013-01-16) added diff-algorithm as a parameter to the recursive merge
strategy but did not document it. Do so.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we introduced the concept of "detached HEAD", we made sure that
commands that operate on the history of the current branch "just
work" in that state. They update the HEAD to point at the new
history without affecting any branch when the HEAD is detached, just
like they update the tip of the "current branch" to point at the new
history when HEAD points at a specific branch.
As this is done as the natural extension for these commands, we did
not, we still do not, and we do not want to repeat "A detached HEAD
is updated without affecting any branch" when describing what each
and every one of these commands that operates "on the current branch"
does.
Add a blanket description to the glossary to cover them instead.
The general principle is that operations to update the branch work
on and affect the HEAD, while operations to update the information
about a branch do not.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The logic flow of has_changes() used for "log -S" and diff_grep()
used for "log -G" are essentially the same. See if we have both
sides that could be different in any interesting way, slurp the
contents in core, possibly after applying textconv, inspect the
contents, clean-up and report the result. The only difference
between the two is how "inspect" step works.
Unify this codeflow in a helper, pickaxe_match(), which takes a
callback function that implements the specific "inspect" step.
After removing the common scaffolding code from the existing
has_changes() and diff_grep(), they each becomes such a callback
function suitable for passing to pickaxe_match().
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The diff_grep() and has_changes() functions had early return
codepaths for unmerged filepairs, which simply returned 0. When we
taught textconv filter to them, one was ignored and continued to
return early without freeing the result filtered by textconv, and
the other had a failed attempt to fix, which allowed the planned
return value 0 to be overwritten by a bogus call to contains().
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These two functions are called in the same codeflow to implement
"log -S<block>" and "log -G<pattern>", respectively, but the latter
lacked two obvious optimizations the former implemented, namely:
- When a pickaxe limit is not given at all, they should return
without wasting any cycle;
- When both sides of the filepair are the same, and the same
textconv conversion apply to them, return early, as there will be
no interesting differences between the two anyway.
Also release the filespec data once the processing is done (this is
not about leaking memory--it is about releasing data we finished
looking at as early as possible).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The explanation for 'git commit --amend' talks about preparing a tree
object, which shouldn't be how user-facing documentation talks about
commit.
Reword it to say it works as usual, but replaces the current commit.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If we have a symlink "d" that points to a directory, we
should not be able to remove "d/f". In the normal case,
where "d/f" does not exist in the index, we already disallow
this, as we only remove things that git knows about in the
index. So for something like:
ln -s /outside/repo foo
git add foo
git rm foo/bar
we will properly produce an error (as there is no index
entry for foo/bar). However, if there is an index entry for
the path (e.g., because the movement is due to working tree
changes that have not yet been reflected in the index), we
will happily delete it, even though the path we delete from the
filesystem is not the same as the path in the index.
This patch documents that failure with a test.
While this is a bug, it should not be possible to cause
serious data loss with it. For any path that does not have
an index entry, we will complain and bail. For a path which
does have an index entry, we will do the usual up-to-date
content check. So even if the deleted path in the filesystem
is not the same as the one we are removing from the index,
we do know that they at least have the same content, and
that the content is included in HEAD.
That means the worst case is not the accidental loss of
content, but rather confusion by the user when a copy of a
file another part of the tree is removed. Which makes this
bug a minor and hard-to-trigger annoyance rather than a
data-loss bug (and hence the fix can be saved for a rainy
day when somebody feels like working on it).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
fill_one is _almost_ identical to just calling fill_textconv; the
exception is that for the !DIFF_FILE_VALID case, fill_textconv gives us
an empty buffer rather than a NULL one. Since we currently use the NULL
pointer as a signal that the file is not present on one side of the
diff, we must now switch to using DIFF_FILE_VALID to make the same
check.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Simon Ruderich <simon@ruderich.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The fill_one() function is responsible for finding and filling the
textconv filter as necessary, and is called by diff_grep() function
that implements "git log -G<pattern>".
The has_changes() function that implements "git log -S<block>" calls
get_textconv() for two sides being compared, before it checks to see
if it was asked to perform the pickaxe limiting. Move the code
around to avoid this wastage.
After has_changes() calls get_textconv() to obtain textconv for both
sides, fill_one() is called to use them.
By adding get_textconv() to diff_grep() and relieving fill_one() of
responsibility to find the textconv filter, we can avoid calling
get_textconv() twice in has_changes().
With this change it's also no longer necessary for fill_one() to
modify the textconv argument, therefore pass a pointer instead of a
pointer to a pointer.
Signed-off-by: Simon Ruderich <simon@ruderich.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Much like the previous patch, this triggered an unrelated bug.
Closing STDERR is not worth it anyway, as we risk writing die() and
such to random files that happen to be subsequently opened on FD 2.
Don't do it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
On my system, t9100.1 triggers the following warning:
==352== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==352== at 0x57119C0: __write_nocancel (in /lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==352== by 0x56AC1D2: _IO_file_write@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (in /lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==352== by 0x56AC0B1: new_do_write (in /lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==352== by 0x56AD3B4: _IO_do_write@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (in /lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==352== by 0x56AD6FE: _IO_file_overflow@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (in /lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==352== by 0x56AE3D8: _IO_default_xsputn (in /lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==352== by 0x56ACAA2: _IO_file_xsputn@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (in /lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==352== by 0x5682133: buffered_vfprintf (in /lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==352== by 0x567CE9D: vfprintf (in /lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==352== by 0x5687096: fprintf (in /lib64/libc-2.17.so)
==352== by 0x4E7AC5: vreportf (usage.c:15)
==352== by 0x4E7B14: die_builtin (usage.c:38)
The actual complaint appears to be a bug in the underlying
implementation. What's interesting here is that it is apparently
_triggered_ by closing stderr, which results in (from strace)
write(2, "fatal: Needed a single revision\n", 32) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
write(2, "\0", 1) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
Closing stderr is a bad idea anyway: there is a very real chance that
we print fatal error messages to some other file that just happens to
be opened on the now-free FD 2. So let's not do that.
As pointed out by Eric Wong (thanks), the initial close needs to go:
die() would again write nowhere if we close STDERR beforehand.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Eric Wong noticed that the address at suse.cz no longer works.
We may want to update in-code addresses as well, but let's do
this first in 'maint'.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"submodule summary --summary-limit" option did not support
"--option=value" form.
* rs/submodule-summary-limit:
submodule summary: support --summary-limit=<n>
* jk/peel-ref:
upload-pack: load non-tip "want" objects from disk
upload-pack: make sure "want" objects are parsed
upload-pack: drop lookup-before-parse optimization
The previous commit taught "rm" that it is safe to consider
"d/f" removed when "d" has become a non-directory. This
patch adds a test for the opposite: a file "d" that becomes
a directory.
In this case, "git rm" does need to complain, because we
should not be removing arbitrary content under "d". Git
already behaves correctly, but let's make sure that remains
the case by protecting the behavior with a test.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If we used to have an index entry "d/f", but "d" has been
replaced by a non-directory entry, the user may still want
to run "git rm" to delete the stale index entry. They could
use "git rm --cached" to just touch the index, but "git rm"
should also work: we explicitly try to handle the case that
the file has already been removed from the working tree.
However, because unlinking "d/f" in this case will not yield
ENOENT, but rather ENOTDIR, we do not notice that the file
is already gone. Instead, we report it as an error.
The simple solution is to treat ENOTDIR in this case exactly
like ENOENT; all we want to know is whether the file is
already gone, and if a leading path is no longer a
directory, then by definition the sub-path is gone.
Reported-by: jpinheiro <7jpinheiro@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The loop that fills in the buffers that are later passed to the merge
driver exits early when not all stages of a path are present in the index.
But since the buffer pointers are not initialized in advance, the
subsequent accesses are undefined.
Initialize buffer pointers in advance to avoid undefined behavior later.
That is not sufficient, though, to get correct operation of handle_cache().
The function replays a conflicted merge to extract the part inside the
conflict markers. As written, the loop exits early when a stage is missing.
Consequently, the buffers for later stages that would be present in the
index are not filled in and the merge is replayed with incomplete data.
Fix it by investigating all stages of the given path.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There was some lingering code that shouldn't have been there in the
first place.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The fastimport plugin was only required in the early stage of
development.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We don't need to check for duplicate test numbers, we don't have them,
and either way test-lint-duplicates doesn't work in this situation.
Also, while we are on it, enable test-lint-shell-syntax to check for sh
errors.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It's not portable, as reported by test-lint.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This keeps texinfo 5.x happy. See https://bugs.gentoo.org/464210.
Signed-off-by: Martin von Gagern <Martin.vGagern@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the source file is empty, the calculation of the merge score
results in a division by zero. In the situation:
== preimage == == postimage ==
F (empty file) F (a large file)
E (a new empty file)
it does not make sense to consider F->E as a rename, so it is better not
to break the pre- and post-image of F.
Bail out early in this case to avoid hitting the divide-by-zero. This
causes the merge score to be left at zero.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
