While all of the strings passed to warning() are, in fact, literals, the
compiler doesn't recognize them as such because it doesn't see through
the loop used to iterate over them:
builtin-receive-pack.c: In function 'warn_unconfigured_deny':
builtin-receive-pack.c:247: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments
builtin-receive-pack.c: In function 'warn_unconfigured_deny_delete_current':
builtin-receive-pack.c:273: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments
Calm the compiler by adding easily recognizable format string literals.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* ms/mailmap:
Move mailmap documentation into separate file
Change current mailmap usage to do matching on both name and email of author/committer.
Add map_user() and clear_mailmap() to mailmap
Add find_insert_index, insert_at_index and clear_func functions to string_list
Add mailmap.file as configurational option for mailmap location
After 753bc91 ("Remove the requirement opaquelocktoken uri scheme"),
lock tokens are in the URI forms in which they are received from the
server, eg. 'opaquelocktoken:', 'urn:uuid:'.
However, "start_put" (and consequently "start_move"), which attempts to
create a unique temporary file using the UUID of the lock token,
inadvertently uses the lock token in its URI form. These file
operations on the server may not be successful (specifically, in
Windows), due to the colon ':' character from the URI form of the lock
token in the file path.
This patch uses a hash of the lock token instead, guaranteeing only
"safe" characters (a-f, 0-9) are used in the file path.
The token's hash is generated when the lock token is received from the
server in handle_new_lock_ctx, minimizing the number of times of
hashing.
Signed-off-by: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Extend t1500 with tests of 'git rev-parse --git-dir' when invoked from
other directories of the repository or the work tree.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 72183cb2 (Fix gitdir detection when in subdir of
gitdir, 2009-01-16) added a test to 't1501-worktree' to check the
behaviour of 'git rev-parse --git-dir' in a special case. However,
t1501 is about testing separate work tree setups, and not about basic
'rev-parse' functionality, which is tested in t1500-rev-parse.
Therefore, this patch moves that test to t1500.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a section about how to shrink a repository's size after running
git-filter-branch to remove large blobs from history.
This comes up every week or so on IRC, and the commands required to
handle every case are not very newbie-friendly, so hopefully writing
them down somewhere leads to fewer questions.
It may seem contradictory to document fallbacks for older Gits in
newer docs, but we want to point people at this as a FAQ answer, and
they will frequently not have the newest version installed.
Thanks to Björn Steinbrink and Junio C Hamano for comments and
corrections.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With this patch, "git gc --no-prune" will not prune any loose (and
dangling) object, and "git gc --prune=5.minutes.ago" will prune
all loose objects older than 5 minutes.
This patch benefitted from suggestions by Thomas Rast and Jan Krï¿œger.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
1.6.2 will have @{-1} syntax advertised as "usable anywhere you can use
a branch name". However, "git merge @{-1}" did not work.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This teaches the new "@{-1} syntax to refer to the previous branch to "git
branch". After looking at somebody's faulty patch series on a topic
branch too long, if you decide it is not worth merging, you can just say:
$ git checkout master
$ git branch -D @{-1}
to get rid of it without having to type the name of the topic you now hate
so much for wasting a lot of your time.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit afe5d3d5 introduced a safety valve to symbolic-ref to
disallow installing an invalid HEAD. It was accompanied by
b229d18a, which changed validate_headref to require that
HEAD contain a pointer to refs/heads/ instead of just refs/.
Therefore, the safety valve also checked for refs/heads/.
As it turns out, topgit is using refs/top-bases/ in HEAD,
leading us to re-loosen (at least temporarily) the
validate_headref check made in b229d18a. This patch does the
corresponding loosening for the symbolic-ref safety valve,
so that the two are in agreement once more.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'git log --abbrev-commit' added an ellipsis to all commit names that
were abbreviated. This was particularly annoying if you wanted to
cut&paste the sha1 from the terminal, since selecting by word would
pick up '...' too.
So use find_unique_abbrev() instead of diff_unique_abbrev() in all
log-related commit sha1 printing routines, and also change the
formatting of the 'Merge: parent1 parent2' line output via
pretty_print_commit().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After "cloning from an empty repository", we have a configuration to
describe the remote's URL and the default ref mappings, but we lack the
branch configuration for the default branch we create on our end,
"master".
It is likely that the empty repository we cloned from will point the
default "master" branch with its HEAD, so prepare the local configuration
to match.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When there is more than one file that are changed, running git diff with
GIT_EXTERNAL_DIFF incorrectly diagnoses an programming error and dies.
The check introduced in 479b0ae (diff: refactor tempfile cleanup handling,
2009-01-22) to detect a temporary file slot that forgot to remove its
temporary file was inconsistent with the way the codepath to remove the
temporary to mark the slot that it is done with it.
This patch fixes this problem and adds a test case for it.
Signed-off-by: Nazri Ramliy <ayiehere@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
Prepare for 1.6.1.4.
Make repack less likely to corrupt repository
fast-export: ensure we traverse commits in topological order
Clear the delta base cache if a pack is rebuilt
Conflicts:
RelNotes
* maint-1.6.0:
Make repack less likely to corrupt repository
fast-export: ensure we traverse commits in topological order
Clear the delta base cache if a pack is rebuilt
Some platforms refuse to rename a file that is open. When repacking an
already packed repository without adding any new object, the resulting
pack will contain the same set of objects as an existing pack, and on such
platforms, a newly created packfile cannot replace the existing one.
The logic detected this issue but did not try hard enough to recover from
it. Especially because the files that needs renaming come in pairs, there
potentially are different failure modes that one can be renamed but the
others cannot. Asking manual recovery to end users were error prone.
This patch tries to make it more robust by first making sure all the
existing files that need to be renamed have been renamed before
continuing, and attempts to roll back if some failed to rename.
This is based on an initial patch by Robin Rosenberg.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
fast-export will only list as parents those commits which have already
been traversed (making it appear as if merges have been squashed if not
all parents have been traversed). To avoid this silent squashing of
merge commits, we request commits in topological order.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
9273b56 (filter-branch: Fix fatal error on bare repositories, 2009-02-03)
fixed a missing check of return status from an underlying command in
git-filter-branch, but there still are places that do not check errors.
For example, the command does not pay attention to the exit status of the
command given by --commit-filter. It should abort in such a case.
This attempts to fix all the remaining places that fails to checks errors.
In two places, I've had to break apart pipelines in order to check the
error code for the first stage of the pipeline, as discussed here:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/git/2009/1/28/4835614
Feedback on this patch was provided by Johannes Sixt, Johannes Schindelin
and Junio C Hamano. Thomas Rast helped with pipeline error handling.
Signed-off-by: Eric Kidd <git@randomhacks.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the show_new_revisions function, the original code:
git rev-parse --not --branches | grep -v $(git rev-parse $refname) |
isn't quite right since one can create a new branch and push it
without any new commits. In that case, two refs will have the same
sha1 but both would get filtered by the 'grep'. In the end, we'll
show ALL the history which is not what we want. Instead, we should
list the branches by name and remove the branch being updated and THEN
pass that list through rev-parse.
Revised as suggested by Jakub Narebski and Junio C Hamano to use
git-for-each-ref instead of git-branch. (Thanks!)
Signed-off-by: Pat Notz <pknotz@sandia.gov>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is some risk that re-opening a regenerated pack file with
different offsets could leave stale entries within the delta base
cache that could be matched up against other objects using the same
"struct packed_git*" and pack offset.
Throwing away the entire delta base cache in this case is safer,
as we don't have to worry about a recycled "struct packed_git*"
matching to the wrong base object, resulting in delta apply
errors while unpacking an object.
Suggested-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* git://git.bogomips.org/git-svn:
test case for regression caused by git-svn empty symlink fix
git-svn: fix broken symlink workaround when switching branches
git-svn: Print revision while searching for earliest use of path
git-svn: abstract out a block into new method other_gs()
git-svn: allow disabling expensive broken symlink checks
057e713 (Warn use of "origin" when remotes/origin/HEAD is dangling,
2009-02-08) tried to warn dangling refs/remotes/origin/HEAD only when
"origin" was used to refer to it. There was one corner case a symref is
expected to be dangling and this warning is unwarranted: HEAD in an empty
repository.
This squelches the warning for this special case.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit dbc6c74d08 "git-svn: handle empty
files marked as symlinks in SVN" caused a regression in an unusual case
where a branch has been created in SVN, later deleted and then created
again from another branch point and the original branch point had empty
files not in the new branch. In some cases git svn fetch will then fail
while trying to fetch the empty file from the wrong SVN revision.
This adds a test case that reproduces the issue.
[ew: added additional test to ensure file was created correctly
made test file executable ]
Signed-off-by: Anton Gyllenberg <anton@iki.fi>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Thanks to Anton Gyllenberg <anton@iki.fi> for the bug report
(and testcase in the following commit):
> Commit dbc6c74d08 "git-svn:
> handle empty files marked as symlinks in SVN" caused a
> regression in an unusual case where a branch has been created
> in SVN, later deleted and then created again from another
> branch point and the original branch point had empty files not
> in the new branch. In some cases git svn fetch will then fail
> while trying to fetch the empty file from the wrong SVN
> revision.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
When initializing a git-svn repository from a Subversion repoository,
it is common to be interested in a path which did not exist in the
initial commit to Subversion. In a large repository, the initial fetch
may take some looking for the earliest existence of the path time while
the user receives no additional feedback. Print the highest revision
number scanned thus far to let the user know something is still
happening.
Signed-off-by: Deskin Miller <deskinm@umich.edu>
We will be adding a more places that need to find git revisions
corresponding to new parents, so abstract out this section into a new
method.
Signed-off-by: Yuval Kogman <nothingmuch@woobling.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
[ew: minor formatting changes]
Since dbc6c74d08, git-svn has had
an expensive check for broken symlinks that exist in some
repositories. This leads to a heavy performance hit on
repositories with many empty blobs that are not supposed to be
symlinks.
The workaround is enabled by default; and may be disabled via:
git config svn.brokenSymlinkWorkaround false
Reported by Markus Heidelberg.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
cc0e6c5 (Handle return code of parse_commit in revision machinery,
2007-05-04) attempted to tighten error checking in the revision machinery,
but it wasn't enough. When get_revision_1() was asked for the next commit
to return, it tries to read and simplify the parents of the commit to be
returned, but an error while doing so was silently ignored and reported as
a truncated history to the caller instead.
This resulted in an early end of "git log" output or a pack that lacks
older commits from "git pack-objects", without any error indication in the
exit status from these commands, even though the underlying parse_commit()
issues an error message to the end user.
Note that the codepath in add_parents_list() that paints parents of an
UNINTERESTING commit UNINTERESTING silently ignores the error when
parse_commit() fails; this is deliberate and in line with aeeae1b
(revision traversal: allow UNINTERESTING objects to be missing,
2009-01-27).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is a companion patch to the recent 3d95d92 (receive-pack: explain
what to do when push updates the current branch, 2009-01-31).
Deleting the current branch from a remote will result in the next clone
from it not check out anything, among other things. It also is one of the
cause that makes remotes/origin/HEAD a dangling symbolic ref. This patch
still allows the traditional behaviour but with a big warning, and promises
that the default will change to 'refuse' in a future release.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
