Add jobs that exercise Git on Windows. Unfortunately, building and
especially testing Git on Windows is inherently slower compared to other
Unix-like systems, mostly because spawning processes is way slower. We
thus use the same layout as we use in GitHub Actions, where we have one
build job, and then pass on the resulting build artifacts to ten test
jobs that split up the work across each other.
Unfortunately, the GitLab runners for Windows machines are embarassingly
slow by themselves. So while this strategy leads to around 20 minutes of
build time in GitHub Actions, the same pipeline takes around an hour in
GitLab CI. Still, having late coverage is certainly better than having
none at all.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We're about to add a couple of jobs for Windows. As the Windows runners
are quite slow, we will split those up across two stages: one stage to
build the artifacts, and one stage that runs test slices in parallel.
Introduce stages and "needs" dependencies for the preexisting jobs as a
preparatory step. The stages will lead to a more natural representation
of jobs in the UI, whereas the "needs" dependency ensures that jobs do
not have to wait for all jobs in the preceding stage to finish.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With the recent effort to make the test suite free of memory leaks we
now run a lot more of test suites with the leak-sanitizer enabled. While
we were originally only executing around 23000 tests, we're now at 30000
tests. Naturally, this has a significant impact on the runtime of such a
test run.
Naturally, this impact can also be felt for our leak-checking CI jobs.
While macOS used to be the slowest-executing job on GitLab CI with ~15
minutes of runtime, nowadays it is our leak checks which take around 45
to 55 minutes.
Our Linux runners for GitLab CI are untagged, which means that they
default to the "small" machine type with two CPU cores [1]. Upgrade
these to the "medium" runner, which provide four CPU cores and which
should thus provide a noticeable speedup.
In theory, we could upgrade to an ever larger machine than that. The
official mirror [2] has an Ultimate license, so we could get up to 128
cores. But anybody running a fork of the Git project without such a
license wouldn't be able to use those beefier machines and thus their
pipelines would fail.
[1]: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/runners/hosted_runners/linux.html
[2]: https://gitlab.com/git-scm/git/
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
CI updates
* jk/ci-linux32-update:
ci: add Ubuntu 16.04 job to GitLab CI
ci: use regular action versions for linux32 job
ci: use more recent linux32 image
ci: unify ubuntu and ubuntu32 dependencies
ci: drop run-docker scripts
In the preceding commits we had to convert the linux32 job to be based
on Ubuntu 20.04 instead of Ubuntu 16.04 due to a limitation in GitHub
Workflows. This was the only job left that still tested against this old
but supported Ubuntu version, and we have no other jobs that test with a
comparatively old Linux distribution.
Add a new job to GitLab CI that tests with Ubuntu 16.04 to cover the
resulting test gap. GitLab doesn't modify Docker images in the same way
GitHub does and thus doesn't fall prey to the same issue. There are two
compatibility issues uncovered by this:
- Ubuntu 16.04 does not support HTTP/2 in Apache. We thus cannot set
`GIT_TEST_HTTPD=true`, which would otherwise cause us to fail when
Apache fails to start.
- Ubuntu 16.04 cannot use recent JGit versions as they depend on a
more recent Java runtime than we have available. We thus disable
installing any kind of optional dependencies that do not come from
the package manager.
These two restrictions are fine though, as we only really care about
whether Git compiles and runs on such old distributions in the first
place.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'check-whitespace' CI script exits gracefully if no base commit is
provided or if an invalid revision is provided. This is not good because
if a particular CI provides an incorrect base_commit, it would fail
successfully.
This is exactly the case with the GitLab CI. The CI is using the
"$CI_MERGE_REQUEST_TARGET_BRANCH_SHA" variable to get the base commit
SHA, but variable is only defined for _merged_ pipelines. So it is empty
for regular pipelines [1]. This should've failed the check-whitespace
job.
Let's fallback to 'CI_MERGE_REQUEST_DIFF_BASE_SHA' if
"CI_MERGE_REQUEST_TARGET_BRANCH_SHA" isn't available in GitLab CI,
similar to the previous commit. Let's also add a check for incorrect
base_commit in the 'check-whitespace.sh' script. While here, fix a small
typo too.
[1]: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/variables/predefined_variables.html#predefined-variables-for-merge-request-pipelines
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We don't run style checks on our CI, even though we have a
'.clang-format' setup in the repository. Let's add one, the job will
validate only against the new commits added and will only run on merge
requests. Since we're introducing it for the first time, let's allow
this job to fail, so we can validate if this is useful and eventually
enforce it.
For GitHub, we allow the job to pass by adding 'continue-on-error: true'
to the workflow. This means the job would show as passed, even if the
style check failed. To know the status of the job, users have to
manually check the logs.
For GitLab, we allow the job to pass by adding 'allow_failure: true', to
the job. Unlike GitHub, here the job will show as failed with a yellow
warning symbol, but the pipeline would still show as passed.
Also for GitLab, we use the 'CI_MERGE_REQUEST_TARGET_BRANCH_SHA'
variable by default to obtain the base SHA of the merged pipeline (which
is only available for merged pipelines [1]). Otherwise we use the
'CI_MERGE_REQUEST_DIFF_BASE_SHA' variable.
[1]: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/variables/predefined_variables.html#predefined-variables-for-merge-request-pipelines
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add another job to execute `make check-docs`, which lints our
documentation and makes sure that expected manpages exist. This job
mirrors the same job that we already have for GitHub Actions.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "whitespace check" task that was enabled for GitHub Actions CI
has been ported to GitLab CI.
* jt/port-ci-whitespace-check-to-gitlab:
gitlab-ci: add whitespace error check
ci: make the whitespace report optional
ci: separate whitespace check script
github-ci: fix link to whitespace error
ci: pre-collapse GitLab CI sections
There was a semantic merge conflict between 9cdeb34b96 (ci: merge
scripts which install dependencies, 2024-04-12), which has merged
"ci/install-docker-dependencies.sh" into "ci/install-dependencies.sh"
and c7b228e000 (gitlab-ci: add smoke test for fuzzers, 2024-04-29),
which has added a new fuzz smoke test job that makes use of the
now-removed script.
Adapt the job to instead use the new script to install dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Our GitLab CI setup has a test gap where the fuzzers aren't exercised at
all. Add a smoke test, similar to the one we have in GitHub Workflows.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
GitLab CI does not have a job to check for whitespace errors introduced
by a set of changes. Reuse the existing generic `whitespace-check.sh` to
create the job for GitLab pipelines.
Note that the `$CI_MERGE_REQUEST_TARGET_BRANCH_SHA` variable is only
available in GitLab merge request pipelines and therefore the CI job is
configured to only run as part of those pipelines.
Signed-off-by: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have two different scripts which install dependencies, one for
dockerized jobs and one for non-dockerized ones. Naturally, these
scripts have quite some duplication. Furthermore, either of these
scripts is missing some test dependencies that the respective other
script has, thus reducing test coverage.
Merge those two scripts such that there is a single source of truth for
test dependencies, only.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Part of "install-dependencies.sh" is to install some binaries required
for tests into a custom directory that gets added to the PATH. This
directory is located at "$HOME/path" and thus depends on the current
user that the script executes as.
This creates problems for GitLab CI, which installs dependencies as the
root user, but runs tests as a separate, unprivileged user. As their
respective home directories are different, we will end up using two
different custom path directories. Consequently, the unprivileged user
will not be able to find the binaries that were set up as root user.
Fix this issue by allowing CI to override the custom path, which allows
GitLab to set up a constant value that isn't derived from "$HOME".
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add CI jobs for both GitHub Workflows and GitLab CI to run Git with the
new reftable backend.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a job to GitLab CI which runs tests on macOS, which matches the
equivalent "osx-clang" job that we have for GitHub Workflows. One
significant difference though is that this new job runs on Apple M1
machines and thus uses the "arm64" architecture. As GCC does not yet
support this comparatively new architecture we cannot easily include an
equivalent for the "osx-gcc" job that exists in GitHub Workflows.
Note that one test marked as `test_must_fail` is surprisingly passing:
t7815-grep-binary.sh (Wstat: 0 Tests: 22 Failed: 0)
TODO passed: 12
This seems to boil down to an unexpected difference in how regcomp(3P)
works when matching NUL bytes. Cross-checking with the respective GitHub
job shows that this is not an issue unique to the GitLab CI job as it
passes in the same way there.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Our GitHub Workflows definitions have a static analysis job that
runs the following tasks:
- Coccinelle to check for suggested refactorings.
- `make hdr-check` to check for missing includes or forward
declarations in our header files.
- `make check-pot` to check our translations for issues.
- `./ci/check-directional-formatting.bash` to check whether our
sources contain any Unicode directional formatting code points.
Add an equivalent job to our GitLab CI definitions.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We already support Azure Pipelines and GitHub Workflows in the Git
project, but until now we do not have support for GitLab CI. While it is
arguably not in the interest of the Git project to maintain a ton of
different CI platforms, GitLab has recently ramped up its efforts and
tries to contribute to the Git project more regularly.
Part of a problem we hit at GitLab rather frequently is that our own,
custom CI setup we have is so different to the setup that the Git
project has. More esoteric jobs like "linux-TEST-vars" that also set a
couple of environment variables do not exist in GitLab's custom CI
setup, and maintaining them to keep up with what Git does feels like
wasted time. The result is that we regularly send patch series upstream
that fail to compile or pass tests in GitHub Workflows. We would thus
like to integrate the GitLab CI configuration into the Git project to
help us send better patch series upstream and thus reduce overhead for
the maintainer. Results of these pipeline runs will be made available
(at least) in GitLab's mirror of the Git project at [1].
This commit introduces the integration into our regular CI scripts so
that most of the setup continues to be shared across all of the CI
solutions. Note that as the builds on GitLab CI run as unprivileged
user, we need to pull in both sudo and shadow packages to our Alpine
based job to set this up.
[1]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/git
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
