mirror of
https://github.com/git/git.git
synced 2024-11-23 09:56:28 +08:00
merge-ort: fix two leaks when handling directory rename modifications
There are two leaks in `apply_directory_rename_modifications()`: - We do not release the `dirs_to_insert` string list. - We do not release some `conflict_info` we put into the `opt->priv->paths` string map. The former is trivial to fix. The latter is a bit less straight forward: the `util` pointer of the string map may sometimes point to data that has been allocated via `CALLOC()`, while at other times it may point to data that has been allocated via a `mem_pool`. It very much seems like an oversight that we didn't also allocate the conflict info in this code path via the memory pool, though. So let's fix that, which will also plug the memory leak for us. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2a01470891
commit
ed78f048ae
@ -2710,7 +2710,7 @@ static void apply_directory_rename_modifications(struct merge_options *opt,
|
||||
struct conflict_info *dir_ci;
|
||||
char *cur_dir = dirs_to_insert.items[i].string;
|
||||
|
||||
CALLOC_ARRAY(dir_ci, 1);
|
||||
dir_ci = mem_pool_calloc(&opt->priv->pool, 1, sizeof(*dir_ci));
|
||||
|
||||
dir_ci->merged.directory_name = parent_name;
|
||||
len = strlen(parent_name);
|
||||
@ -2838,6 +2838,8 @@ static void apply_directory_rename_modifications(struct merge_options *opt,
|
||||
* Finally, record the new location.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
pair->two->path = new_path;
|
||||
|
||||
string_list_clear(&dirs_to_insert, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*** Function Grouping: functions related to regular rename detection ***/
|
||||
|
@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ test_description="recursive merge with directory renames"
|
||||
# underscore notation is to differentiate different
|
||||
# files that might be renamed into each other's paths.)
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
|
||||
. ./test-lib.sh
|
||||
. "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-merge.sh
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user