mirror of
https://github.com/git/git.git
synced 2024-11-24 10:26:17 +08:00
name-rev: drop unused parameters from is_better_name()
When this function was extracted in 0041bf6544
(name-rev: refactor logic
to see if a new candidate is a better name, 2017-03-29), it ended up
getting more arguments than it needs.
It's possible we may later use these values to evaluate the name, but
since it's a static function with a single caller, it will be easy to
add them back then.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
be27fb7b28
commit
c016579895
@ -40,9 +40,7 @@ static void set_commit_rev_name(struct commit *commit, struct rev_name *name)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int is_better_name(struct rev_name *name,
|
||||
const char *tip_name,
|
||||
timestamp_t taggerdate,
|
||||
int generation,
|
||||
int distance,
|
||||
int from_tag)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -103,8 +101,7 @@ static void name_rev(struct commit *commit,
|
||||
name = xmalloc(sizeof(rev_name));
|
||||
set_commit_rev_name(commit, name);
|
||||
goto copy_data;
|
||||
} else if (is_better_name(name, tip_name, taggerdate,
|
||||
generation, distance, from_tag)) {
|
||||
} else if (is_better_name(name, taggerdate, distance, from_tag)) {
|
||||
copy_data:
|
||||
name->tip_name = tip_name;
|
||||
name->taggerdate = taggerdate;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user