run-command: do not pass child process data into callbacks

The expected way to pass data into the callback is to pass them via
the customizable callback pointer. The error reporting in
default_{start_failure, task_finished} is not user friendly enough, that
we want to encourage using the child data for such purposes.

Furthermore the struct child data is cleaned by the run-command API,
before we access them in the callbacks, leading to use-after-free
situations.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Stefan Beller 2016-02-29 13:57:06 -08:00 committed by Junio C Hamano
parent 62104ba14a
commit 2a73b3dad0
4 changed files with 9 additions and 32 deletions

View File

@ -902,35 +902,18 @@ struct parallel_processes {
struct strbuf buffered_output; /* of finished children */
};
static int default_start_failure(struct child_process *cp,
struct strbuf *err,
static int default_start_failure(struct strbuf *err,
void *pp_cb,
void *pp_task_cb)
{
int i;
strbuf_addstr(err, "Starting a child failed:");
for (i = 0; cp->argv[i]; i++)
strbuf_addf(err, " %s", cp->argv[i]);
return 0;
}
static int default_task_finished(int result,
struct child_process *cp,
struct strbuf *err,
void *pp_cb,
void *pp_task_cb)
{
int i;
if (!result)
return 0;
strbuf_addf(err, "A child failed with return code %d:", result);
for (i = 0; cp->argv[i]; i++)
strbuf_addf(err, " %s", cp->argv[i]);
return 0;
}
@ -1048,8 +1031,7 @@ static int pp_start_one(struct parallel_processes *pp)
pp->children[i].process.no_stdin = 1;
if (start_command(&pp->children[i].process)) {
code = pp->start_failure(&pp->children[i].process,
&pp->children[i].err,
code = pp->start_failure(&pp->children[i].err,
pp->data,
&pp->children[i].data);
strbuf_addbuf(&pp->buffered_output, &pp->children[i].err);
@ -1117,7 +1099,7 @@ static int pp_collect_finished(struct parallel_processes *pp)
code = finish_command(&pp->children[i].process);
code = pp->task_finished(code, &pp->children[i].process,
code = pp->task_finished(code,
&pp->children[i].err, pp->data,
&pp->children[i].data);

View File

@ -158,8 +158,7 @@ typedef int (*get_next_task_fn)(struct child_process *cp,
* To send a signal to other child processes for abortion, return
* the negative signal number.
*/
typedef int (*start_failure_fn)(struct child_process *cp,
struct strbuf *err,
typedef int (*start_failure_fn)(struct strbuf *err,
void *pp_cb,
void *pp_task_cb);
@ -178,7 +177,6 @@ typedef int (*start_failure_fn)(struct child_process *cp,
* the negative signal number.
*/
typedef int (*task_finished_fn)(int result,
struct child_process *cp,
struct strbuf *err,
void *pp_cb,
void *pp_task_cb);
@ -192,9 +190,8 @@ typedef int (*task_finished_fn)(int result,
* (both stdout and stderr) is routed to stderr in a manner that output
* from different tasks does not interleave.
*
* If start_failure_fn or task_finished_fn are NULL, default handlers
* will be used. The default handlers will print an error message on
* error without issuing an emergency stop.
* start_failure_fn and task_finished_fn can be NULL to omit any
* special handling.
*/
int run_processes_parallel(int n,
get_next_task_fn,

View File

@ -705,8 +705,7 @@ static int get_next_submodule(struct child_process *cp,
return 0;
}
static int fetch_start_failure(struct child_process *cp,
struct strbuf *err,
static int fetch_start_failure(struct strbuf *err,
void *cb, void *task_cb)
{
struct submodule_parallel_fetch *spf = cb;
@ -716,8 +715,8 @@ static int fetch_start_failure(struct child_process *cp,
return 0;
}
static int fetch_finish(int retvalue, struct child_process *cp,
struct strbuf *err, void *cb, void *task_cb)
static int fetch_finish(int retvalue, struct strbuf *err,
void *cb, void *task_cb)
{
struct submodule_parallel_fetch *spf = cb;

View File

@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ static int no_job(struct child_process *cp,
}
static int task_finished(int result,
struct child_process *cp,
struct strbuf *err,
void *pp_cb,
void *pp_task_cb)