2007-10-31 03:41:13 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Simple text-based progress display module for GIT
|
|
|
|
*
|
2009-09-14 14:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2007 by Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
|
2007-10-31 03:41:13 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
|
|
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
|
|
|
|
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-19 02:27:45 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "git-compat-util.h"
|
2014-02-21 20:50:18 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "gettext.h"
|
2007-04-19 02:27:45 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "progress.h"
|
2013-04-11 03:03:23 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "strbuf.h"
|
2014-07-12 08:08:11 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "trace.h"
|
2007-04-19 02:27:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-10-31 02:57:34 +08:00
|
|
|
#define TP_IDX_MAX 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct throughput {
|
2007-11-07 05:30:28 +08:00
|
|
|
off_t curr_total;
|
2007-11-05 11:15:41 +08:00
|
|
|
off_t prev_total;
|
2014-07-12 08:08:11 +08:00
|
|
|
uint64_t prev_ns;
|
2007-11-05 11:15:41 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int avg_bytes;
|
2007-10-31 02:57:34 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int avg_misecs;
|
2007-11-07 05:30:28 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int last_bytes[TP_IDX_MAX];
|
2007-10-31 02:57:34 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int last_misecs[TP_IDX_MAX];
|
|
|
|
unsigned int idx;
|
2015-09-25 05:05:57 +08:00
|
|
|
struct strbuf display;
|
2007-10-31 02:57:34 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-31 02:57:32 +08:00
|
|
|
struct progress {
|
|
|
|
const char *title;
|
2017-11-14 04:15:58 +08:00
|
|
|
uint64_t last_value;
|
|
|
|
uint64_t total;
|
2007-10-31 02:57:32 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned last_percent;
|
|
|
|
unsigned delay;
|
2007-10-31 02:57:34 +08:00
|
|
|
struct throughput *throughput;
|
2017-07-09 00:43:42 +08:00
|
|
|
uint64_t start_ns;
|
2019-04-05 08:45:37 +08:00
|
|
|
struct strbuf counters_sb;
|
2007-10-31 02:57:32 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-19 02:27:45 +08:00
|
|
|
static volatile sig_atomic_t progress_update;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void progress_interval(int signum)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
progress_update = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void set_progress_signal(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct sigaction sa;
|
|
|
|
struct itimerval v;
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-21 03:05:27 +08:00
|
|
|
progress_update = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-19 02:27:45 +08:00
|
|
|
memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(sa));
|
|
|
|
sa.sa_handler = progress_interval;
|
|
|
|
sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
|
|
|
|
sa.sa_flags = SA_RESTART;
|
|
|
|
sigaction(SIGALRM, &sa, NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v.it_interval.tv_sec = 1;
|
|
|
|
v.it_interval.tv_usec = 0;
|
|
|
|
v.it_value = v.it_interval;
|
|
|
|
setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, &v, NULL);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void clear_progress_signal(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct itimerval v = {{0,},};
|
|
|
|
setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, &v, NULL);
|
|
|
|
signal(SIGALRM, SIG_IGN);
|
|
|
|
progress_update = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-13 21:30:51 +08:00
|
|
|
static int is_foreground_fd(int fd)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2015-05-19 13:24:57 +08:00
|
|
|
int tpgrp = tcgetpgrp(fd);
|
|
|
|
return tpgrp < 0 || tpgrp == getpgid(0);
|
2015-04-13 21:30:51 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
progress: make display_progress() return void
Ever since the progress infrastructure was introduced in 96a02f8f6d
(common progress display support, 2007-04-18), display_progress() has
returned an int, telling callers whether it updated the progress bar
or not. However, this is:
- useless, because over the last dozen years there has never been a
single caller that cared about that return value.
- not quite true, because it doesn't print a progress bar when
running in the background, yet it returns 1; see 85cb8906f0
(progress: no progress in background, 2015-04-13).
The related display_throughput() function returned void already upon
its introduction in cf84d51c43 (add throughput to progress display,
2007-10-30).
Let's make display_progress() return void, too. While doing so
several return statements in display() become unnecessary, remove
them.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-05 08:45:36 +08:00
|
|
|
static void display(struct progress *progress, uint64_t n, const char *done)
|
2007-04-19 02:27:45 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-04-05 08:45:37 +08:00
|
|
|
const char *tp;
|
|
|
|
struct strbuf *counters_sb = &progress->counters_sb;
|
|
|
|
int show_update = 0;
|
progress: clear previous progress update dynamically
When the progress bar includes throughput, its length can shorten as
the unit of display changes from KiB to MiB. To cover up remnants of
the previous progress bar when such a change of units happens we
always print three spaces at the end of the progress bar.
Alas, covering only three characters is not quite enough: when both
the total and the throughput happen to change units from KiB to MiB in
the same update, then the progress bar's length is shortened by four
characters (or maybe even more!):
Receiving objects: 25% (2901/11603), 772.01 KiB | 733.00 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 27% (3133/11603), 1.43 MiB | 1.16 MiB/s s
and a stray 's' is left behind.
So instead of hard-coding the three characters to cover, let's compare
the length of the current progress bar with the previous one, and
cover up as many characters as needed.
Sure, it would be much simpler to just print more spaces at the end of
the progress bar, but this approach is more future-proof, and it won't
print extra spaces when none are needed, notably when the progress bar
doesn't show throughput and thus never shrinks.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-13 03:45:14 +08:00
|
|
|
int last_count_len = counters_sb->len;
|
2007-10-17 09:55:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-05 06:07:00 +08:00
|
|
|
if (progress->delay && (!progress_update || --progress->delay))
|
progress: make display_progress() return void
Ever since the progress infrastructure was introduced in 96a02f8f6d
(common progress display support, 2007-04-18), display_progress() has
returned an int, telling callers whether it updated the progress bar
or not. However, this is:
- useless, because over the last dozen years there has never been a
single caller that cared about that return value.
- not quite true, because it doesn't print a progress bar when
running in the background, yet it returns 1; see 85cb8906f0
(progress: no progress in background, 2015-04-13).
The related display_throughput() function returned void already upon
its introduction in cf84d51c43 (add throughput to progress display,
2007-10-30).
Let's make display_progress() return void, too. While doing so
several return statements in display() become unnecessary, remove
them.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-05 08:45:36 +08:00
|
|
|
return;
|
2007-10-17 09:55:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
progress->last_value = n;
|
2015-09-25 05:05:57 +08:00
|
|
|
tp = (progress->throughput) ? progress->throughput->display.buf : "";
|
2007-04-19 02:27:45 +08:00
|
|
|
if (progress->total) {
|
|
|
|
unsigned percent = n * 100 / progress->total;
|
|
|
|
if (percent != progress->last_percent || progress_update) {
|
|
|
|
progress->last_percent = percent;
|
2019-04-05 08:45:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strbuf_reset(counters_sb);
|
|
|
|
strbuf_addf(counters_sb,
|
|
|
|
"%3u%% (%"PRIuMAX"/%"PRIuMAX")%s", percent,
|
|
|
|
(uintmax_t)n, (uintmax_t)progress->total,
|
|
|
|
tp);
|
|
|
|
show_update = 1;
|
2007-04-19 02:27:45 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else if (progress_update) {
|
2019-04-05 08:45:37 +08:00
|
|
|
strbuf_reset(counters_sb);
|
|
|
|
strbuf_addf(counters_sb, "%"PRIuMAX"%s", (uintmax_t)n, tp);
|
|
|
|
show_update = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (show_update) {
|
2015-04-13 21:30:51 +08:00
|
|
|
if (is_foreground_fd(fileno(stderr)) || done) {
|
progress: clear previous progress update dynamically
When the progress bar includes throughput, its length can shorten as
the unit of display changes from KiB to MiB. To cover up remnants of
the previous progress bar when such a change of units happens we
always print three spaces at the end of the progress bar.
Alas, covering only three characters is not quite enough: when both
the total and the throughput happen to change units from KiB to MiB in
the same update, then the progress bar's length is shortened by four
characters (or maybe even more!):
Receiving objects: 25% (2901/11603), 772.01 KiB | 733.00 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 27% (3133/11603), 1.43 MiB | 1.16 MiB/s s
and a stray 's' is left behind.
So instead of hard-coding the three characters to cover, let's compare
the length of the current progress bar with the previous one, and
cover up as many characters as needed.
Sure, it would be much simpler to just print more spaces at the end of
the progress bar, but this approach is more future-proof, and it won't
print extra spaces when none are needed, notably when the progress bar
doesn't show throughput and thus never shrinks.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-13 03:45:14 +08:00
|
|
|
const char *eol = done ? done : "\r";
|
|
|
|
size_t clear_len = counters_sb->len < last_count_len ?
|
|
|
|
last_count_len - counters_sb->len + 1 :
|
|
|
|
0;
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s%*s", progress->title,
|
|
|
|
counters_sb->buf, (int) clear_len, eol);
|
2015-04-13 21:30:51 +08:00
|
|
|
fflush(stderr);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2007-04-19 02:27:45 +08:00
|
|
|
progress_update = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-14 04:15:58 +08:00
|
|
|
static void throughput_string(struct strbuf *buf, uint64_t total,
|
2007-11-07 05:30:28 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned int rate)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2015-09-25 05:05:57 +08:00
|
|
|
strbuf_reset(buf);
|
2013-04-11 03:03:23 +08:00
|
|
|
strbuf_addstr(buf, ", ");
|
|
|
|
strbuf_humanise_bytes(buf, total);
|
|
|
|
strbuf_addstr(buf, " | ");
|
|
|
|
strbuf_humanise_bytes(buf, rate * 1024);
|
|
|
|
strbuf_addstr(buf, "/s");
|
2007-11-07 05:30:28 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-14 04:15:58 +08:00
|
|
|
void display_throughput(struct progress *progress, uint64_t total)
|
2007-10-31 02:57:34 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct throughput *tp;
|
2014-07-12 08:08:11 +08:00
|
|
|
uint64_t now_ns;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int misecs, count, rate;
|
2007-10-31 02:57:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!progress)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
tp = progress->throughput;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-12 08:08:11 +08:00
|
|
|
now_ns = getnanotime();
|
2007-10-31 02:57:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!tp) {
|
|
|
|
progress->throughput = tp = calloc(1, sizeof(*tp));
|
2007-11-05 11:15:41 +08:00
|
|
|
if (tp) {
|
2007-11-07 05:30:28 +08:00
|
|
|
tp->prev_total = tp->curr_total = total;
|
2014-07-12 08:08:11 +08:00
|
|
|
tp->prev_ns = now_ns;
|
2015-09-25 05:05:57 +08:00
|
|
|
strbuf_init(&tp->display, 0);
|
2007-11-05 11:15:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2007-10-31 02:57:34 +08:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2007-11-07 05:30:28 +08:00
|
|
|
tp->curr_total = total;
|
2007-10-31 02:57:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-07-12 08:08:11 +08:00
|
|
|
/* only update throughput every 0.5 s */
|
|
|
|
if (now_ns - tp->prev_ns <= 500000000)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-31 02:57:34 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2014-07-12 08:08:11 +08:00
|
|
|
* We have x = bytes and y = nanosecs. We want z = KiB/s:
|
2007-10-31 02:57:34 +08:00
|
|
|
*
|
2014-07-12 08:08:11 +08:00
|
|
|
* z = (x / 1024) / (y / 1000000000)
|
|
|
|
* z = x / y * 1000000000 / 1024
|
|
|
|
* z = x / (y * 1024 / 1000000000)
|
2007-10-31 02:57:34 +08:00
|
|
|
* z = x / y'
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* To simplify things we'll keep track of misecs, or 1024th of a sec
|
|
|
|
* obtained with:
|
|
|
|
*
|
2014-07-12 08:08:11 +08:00
|
|
|
* y' = y * 1024 / 1000000000
|
|
|
|
* y' = y * (2^10 / 2^42) * (2^42 / 1000000000)
|
|
|
|
* y' = y / 2^32 * 4398
|
|
|
|
* y' = (y * 4398) >> 32
|
2007-10-31 02:57:34 +08:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2014-07-12 08:08:11 +08:00
|
|
|
misecs = ((now_ns - tp->prev_ns) * 4398) >> 32;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
count = total - tp->prev_total;
|
|
|
|
tp->prev_total = total;
|
|
|
|
tp->prev_ns = now_ns;
|
|
|
|
tp->avg_bytes += count;
|
|
|
|
tp->avg_misecs += misecs;
|
|
|
|
rate = tp->avg_bytes / tp->avg_misecs;
|
|
|
|
tp->avg_bytes -= tp->last_bytes[tp->idx];
|
|
|
|
tp->avg_misecs -= tp->last_misecs[tp->idx];
|
|
|
|
tp->last_bytes[tp->idx] = count;
|
|
|
|
tp->last_misecs[tp->idx] = misecs;
|
|
|
|
tp->idx = (tp->idx + 1) % TP_IDX_MAX;
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-25 05:05:57 +08:00
|
|
|
throughput_string(&tp->display, total, rate);
|
2014-07-12 08:08:11 +08:00
|
|
|
if (progress->last_value != -1 && progress_update)
|
|
|
|
display(progress, progress->last_value, NULL);
|
2007-10-31 02:57:34 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
progress: make display_progress() return void
Ever since the progress infrastructure was introduced in 96a02f8f6d
(common progress display support, 2007-04-18), display_progress() has
returned an int, telling callers whether it updated the progress bar
or not. However, this is:
- useless, because over the last dozen years there has never been a
single caller that cared about that return value.
- not quite true, because it doesn't print a progress bar when
running in the background, yet it returns 1; see 85cb8906f0
(progress: no progress in background, 2015-04-13).
The related display_throughput() function returned void already upon
its introduction in cf84d51c43 (add throughput to progress display,
2007-10-30).
Let's make display_progress() return void, too. While doing so
several return statements in display() become unnecessary, remove
them.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-05 08:45:36 +08:00
|
|
|
void display_progress(struct progress *progress, uint64_t n)
|
2007-04-19 02:27:45 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
progress: make display_progress() return void
Ever since the progress infrastructure was introduced in 96a02f8f6d
(common progress display support, 2007-04-18), display_progress() has
returned an int, telling callers whether it updated the progress bar
or not. However, this is:
- useless, because over the last dozen years there has never been a
single caller that cared about that return value.
- not quite true, because it doesn't print a progress bar when
running in the background, yet it returns 1; see 85cb8906f0
(progress: no progress in background, 2015-04-13).
The related display_throughput() function returned void already upon
its introduction in cf84d51c43 (add throughput to progress display,
2007-10-30).
Let's make display_progress() return void, too. While doing so
several return statements in display() become unnecessary, remove
them.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-05 08:45:36 +08:00
|
|
|
if (progress)
|
|
|
|
display(progress, n, NULL);
|
2007-04-19 02:27:45 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-14 04:15:58 +08:00
|
|
|
static struct progress *start_progress_delay(const char *title, uint64_t total,
|
2017-12-05 06:07:00 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned delay)
|
2007-04-21 03:05:27 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2007-10-31 02:57:32 +08:00
|
|
|
struct progress *progress = malloc(sizeof(*progress));
|
|
|
|
if (!progress) {
|
|
|
|
/* unlikely, but here's a good fallback */
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "%s...\n", title);
|
2007-11-20 03:48:58 +08:00
|
|
|
fflush(stderr);
|
2007-10-31 02:57:32 +08:00
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2007-10-17 09:55:45 +08:00
|
|
|
progress->title = title;
|
2007-04-21 03:05:27 +08:00
|
|
|
progress->total = total;
|
2007-10-17 09:55:45 +08:00
|
|
|
progress->last_value = -1;
|
2007-04-21 03:05:27 +08:00
|
|
|
progress->last_percent = -1;
|
|
|
|
progress->delay = delay;
|
2007-10-31 02:57:34 +08:00
|
|
|
progress->throughput = NULL;
|
2017-07-09 00:43:42 +08:00
|
|
|
progress->start_ns = getnanotime();
|
2019-04-05 08:45:37 +08:00
|
|
|
strbuf_init(&progress->counters_sb, 0);
|
2007-04-21 03:05:27 +08:00
|
|
|
set_progress_signal();
|
2007-10-31 02:57:32 +08:00
|
|
|
return progress;
|
2007-04-21 03:05:27 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-14 04:15:58 +08:00
|
|
|
struct progress *start_delayed_progress(const char *title, uint64_t total)
|
progress: simplify "delayed" progress API
We used to expose the full power of the delayed progress API to the
callers, so that they can specify, not just the message to show and
expected total amount of work that is used to compute the percentage
of work performed so far, the percent-threshold parameter P and the
delay-seconds parameter N. The progress meter starts to show at N
seconds into the operation only if we have not yet completed P per-cent
of the total work.
Most callers used either (0%, 2s) or (50%, 1s) as (P, N), but there
are oddballs that chose more random-looking values like 95%.
For a smoother workload, (50%, 1s) would allow us to start showing
the progress meter earlier than (0%, 2s), while keeping the chance
of not showing progress meter for long running operation the same as
the latter. For a task that would take 2s or more to complete, it
is likely that less than half of it would complete within the first
second, if the workload is smooth. But for a spiky workload whose
earlier part is easier, such a setting is likely to fail to show the
progress meter entirely and (0%, 2s) is more appropriate.
But that is merely a theory. Realistically, it is of dubious value
to ask each codepath to carefully consider smoothness of their
workload and specify their own setting by passing two extra
parameters. Let's simplify the API by dropping both parameters and
have everybody use (0%, 2s).
Oh, by the way, the percent-threshold parameter and the structure
member were consistently misspelled, which also is now fixed ;-)
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-08-20 01:39:41 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2017-12-05 06:07:00 +08:00
|
|
|
return start_progress_delay(title, total, 2);
|
progress: simplify "delayed" progress API
We used to expose the full power of the delayed progress API to the
callers, so that they can specify, not just the message to show and
expected total amount of work that is used to compute the percentage
of work performed so far, the percent-threshold parameter P and the
delay-seconds parameter N. The progress meter starts to show at N
seconds into the operation only if we have not yet completed P per-cent
of the total work.
Most callers used either (0%, 2s) or (50%, 1s) as (P, N), but there
are oddballs that chose more random-looking values like 95%.
For a smoother workload, (50%, 1s) would allow us to start showing
the progress meter earlier than (0%, 2s), while keeping the chance
of not showing progress meter for long running operation the same as
the latter. For a task that would take 2s or more to complete, it
is likely that less than half of it would complete within the first
second, if the workload is smooth. But for a spiky workload whose
earlier part is easier, such a setting is likely to fail to show the
progress meter entirely and (0%, 2s) is more appropriate.
But that is merely a theory. Realistically, it is of dubious value
to ask each codepath to carefully consider smoothness of their
workload and specify their own setting by passing two extra
parameters. Let's simplify the API by dropping both parameters and
have everybody use (0%, 2s).
Oh, by the way, the percent-threshold parameter and the structure
member were consistently misspelled, which also is now fixed ;-)
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-08-20 01:39:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-14 04:15:58 +08:00
|
|
|
struct progress *start_progress(const char *title, uint64_t total)
|
2007-10-17 09:55:45 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2017-12-05 06:07:00 +08:00
|
|
|
return start_progress_delay(title, total, 0);
|
2007-10-17 09:55:45 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-10-31 02:57:32 +08:00
|
|
|
void stop_progress(struct progress **p_progress)
|
2007-11-09 04:45:41 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2014-02-21 20:50:18 +08:00
|
|
|
stop_progress_msg(p_progress, _("done"));
|
2007-11-09 04:45:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void stop_progress_msg(struct progress **p_progress, const char *msg)
|
2007-04-19 02:27:45 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2007-10-31 02:57:32 +08:00
|
|
|
struct progress *progress = *p_progress;
|
|
|
|
if (!progress)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
*p_progress = NULL;
|
2007-10-17 09:55:45 +08:00
|
|
|
if (progress->last_value != -1) {
|
|
|
|
/* Force the last update */
|
2017-02-17 01:07:13 +08:00
|
|
|
char *buf;
|
2007-11-07 05:30:28 +08:00
|
|
|
struct throughput *tp = progress->throughput;
|
2008-06-08 23:26:15 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-11-07 05:30:28 +08:00
|
|
|
if (tp) {
|
2017-07-09 00:43:42 +08:00
|
|
|
uint64_t now_ns = getnanotime();
|
|
|
|
unsigned int misecs, rate;
|
|
|
|
misecs = ((now_ns - progress->start_ns) * 4398) >> 32;
|
|
|
|
rate = tp->curr_total / (misecs ? misecs : 1);
|
2015-09-25 05:05:57 +08:00
|
|
|
throughput_string(&tp->display, tp->curr_total, rate);
|
2007-11-07 05:30:28 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2007-10-17 09:55:45 +08:00
|
|
|
progress_update = 1;
|
2017-02-17 01:07:13 +08:00
|
|
|
buf = xstrfmt(", %s.\n", msg);
|
|
|
|
display(progress, progress->last_value, buf);
|
|
|
|
free(buf);
|
2007-10-17 09:55:45 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2007-04-19 02:27:45 +08:00
|
|
|
clear_progress_signal();
|
2019-04-05 08:45:37 +08:00
|
|
|
strbuf_release(&progress->counters_sb);
|
2015-09-25 05:05:57 +08:00
|
|
|
if (progress->throughput)
|
|
|
|
strbuf_release(&progress->throughput->display);
|
2007-10-31 02:57:34 +08:00
|
|
|
free(progress->throughput);
|
2007-10-31 02:57:32 +08:00
|
|
|
free(progress);
|
2007-04-19 02:27:45 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|